Albelda, R., Drago, R.W., & Shulman, S. (2001). Unlevel playing fields: Understanding wage inequality and discrimination. Cambridge, MA: Economic Affairs Bureau.
2.
Alchian, A.A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization . American Economic Association, 62, 777-795.
3.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1138.
5.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (1992). Critical management studies . London: Sage.
6.
America's best graduate schools, 2005: Best business schools. (2004). U.S. News & World Report . Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/mba/brief/mbarankbrief.php
7.
Arrington, C.E., & Francis, J. (1989). Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege, and accounting research. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 14, 1-28.
8.
Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2008 ). Retrieved September 3, 2008, from www.ahrc.ac.uk/about/knowledge_evaluation.asp
9.
Ashcraft, K.L. (2006). Falling from a humble perch: Rereading organizational communication studies with an attitude of alliance. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 645-652.
10.
Australia Research Council. (2008, August 8). Australian Government, Australian Research Council. Retrieved August 30, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/default.htm
11.
Balbus, I.D. (1977). Commodity form and legal form: An essay on the "relative autonomy" of the law. Law and Society Review, 11, 571-587.
12.
Barker, J.R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Beatty, J.E. (2004). Grades as money and the role of the market metaphor in management education. Academy of Management Journal of Learning and Education, 3, 187-196.
14.
Bedeian, A.G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Journal of Learning and Education, 3, 198-216.
15.
Bendix, R. (1960). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Bennis, W.G., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved May 3, 2005, from http://www.hbsp.org
17.
Bernstein, R. (1978). The restructuring of social and political theory . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
18.
Boje, D.M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as "Tamara-Land." Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1035.
19.
Bok, D.C. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Bousquet, M., Scott, T., & Parascondola, L. (2004). Tenured bosses and disposable teachers: Writing instruction in the managed university. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. Economic Journal, 112(483), 419-436.
22.
Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
23.
Brewer, D.J., Gates, S.M., & Goldman, C.A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
24.
British Academy: The UKs National Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences. (2008). Chapter six: Metrics and peer review. Retrieved August 30, 2008, from http://www.britac.ac.uk/reports/peer-review/chap-6.cfm
25.
Brophy, A.L. (2005). The relationship between law review citations and law school rankings. Retrieved January 27, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=868541
26.
Brophy, A.L. (2007). Mrs. Lincoln's lawyer's cat: The future of legal scholarship. Connecticut Law Review CONNtemplations, 39, 1-31. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=997845
27.
Caron, P.L., & Gely, R. (2004). What law schools can learn from Billy Beane and the Oakland Athletics. Texas Law Review, 82, 1483-1554.
28.
Christenson, C. (1983). The methodology of positive accounting. Accounting Review, LVIII'(1), 1-22.
29.
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica , 4, 386-405.
30.
Connelly, C.E., & Gallagher, D.G. (2007, summer). Making "The List": Business school ranking and the commodification of business research. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, pp. 103-116.
31.
Deetz, S.A. (1998). Discursive formations, strategized subordination and self-surveillance. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management, and organization theory: From panopticon to technologies of the self (pp. 151-172). London: Sage.
32.
De Rond, M., & Miller, A.N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life ? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321-329.
33.
Dillard, J., & Tinker, T. (1996). Commodifying business education: The implications of accreditation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7, 215-225.
34.
Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Extejt, M., & Smith, J. (1990). The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals. Journal of Management, 16, 539-551.
36.
Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30, 8-24.
37.
Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
38.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
39.
Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Geary, J., Marriott, L., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). Journal rankings in business and management and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK. British Journal of Management, 15, 95-141.
42.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75-91.
43.
Gioia, D.A., & Corley, K.G. (2002). Being good vs. looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 107-120.
44.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., & Balkin, D.B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921-955.
45.
González, F. J. A, Castro, C.B., Bueno, J.C.C., & González, J.L.G. (2001). Dominant approaches in the field of management. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 327-353.
46.
Gordon, D.M., Edwards, R., & Reich, M. (1982). Segmented work, divided workers: The historical transformation of labor in the United States. New York : Cambridge University Press.
47.
Grey, C. (2004). Reinventing business schools: The contribution of critical management education. Academy of Management Journal of Learning and Education, 3,178-186.
48.
Gross, M., & Hogler, R. (2005). What the shadow knows: Exploring the hidden dimensions of the consumer metaphor in management education. Journal of Management Education, 29, 3-16.
49.
Hunt, H.G., & Hogler, R.L. (1990). Agency theory as ideology: A comparative analysis based on critical legal theory and radical accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 437-454.
50.
Jensen, M.C. (1983, April). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, pp. 319-339.
51.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
52.
Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Kirp, D. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Kirsner, D. (2008, July 9). Journals losing their edge. Australian Higher Education. Retrieved August 30, 2008, from http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23990188-25192,00.html
55.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
56.
Lowry, P.B., Humphreys, S.L., Malwitz, J., & Nix, J. (2007). A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 352-378.
57.
MBA ranking tables. (2003). Financial Times. Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://news.ft.com/jobs/mba
58.
Macdonald, K.M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage.
59.
Marglin, S. (2008). The dismal science: How thinking like an economist undermines community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy (S. Moore & E. Aveling, Trans.) Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.
61.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Van Fleet, D. (2005). Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge: Theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 185-201.
62.
Mitchell, N. (1989). The generous corporation: A political analysis of economic power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2000, May). The academic speed-up. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 2.2. Retrieved October 21, 2007 , from http://www.cust.educ.ubc.ca/workplace/issue4/harneymoten.html
64.
Mumby, D.K., & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies . Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
65.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education , 1, 78-95.
66.
Research Assessment Exercise. (2001). Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://www.hero.ac.uk/rae/
67.
Siggelkow, N. (2001). Who reads my paper anyhow? A survey of journal readership and reputation. Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://www.management.wharton.upenn.edu/siggelkow/
68.
Stake, J.E. (2005). The interplay between law school rankings, reputations, and resource allocation: Ways rankings mislead. Retrieved September 25, 2005, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=700862
69.
Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations , 56, 1163-1193.
70.
Trank, C.Q., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 189-205.
71.
Van Fleet, D.D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D.S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management , 26, 839-861.
72.
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
73.
Willmott, H. (1995). Managing the academics: Commodification and control in the development of university education in the U.K. Human Relations, 48, 993-1027.
74.
Willmott, H. (1998, July). Commercialising higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review. Paper presented at the Higher Education Close-Up Conference, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
75.
Wines, W.A. (2004). Anatomy of the AFSCME strike at Miami University: Should higher education engage in corporate-style strikebreaking? Labor Law Journal, 55, 5-24.
76.
Winter, G., & Cheng, J. (2004, November 27). Strings attached: Givers and colleges clash on spending. New York Times, p. A1.
77.
Yates, M.D. (2003). Naming the system: Inequality and work in the global economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
78.
Zell, D. (2001). The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far? Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 324-338.
79.
Zell, D. (2005). Pressure for relevancy at top-tier business schools . Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 271-274.
