Rhetorical analysis provides a means through which a political perspective on technological change can be developed at a micro-discursive level. Through the analysis of managers' arguments and counterarguments, this article identifies three rhetorical strategies that negotiate the relationship between the technical and the social: attributing the effects of technology; claiming convergent and divergent interests; and constructing identities for self, groups, and the technology. It argues that a rhetorical approach maintains space for agency on the behalf of employees (through the witcraft of argument) and analytical skepticism concerning the reality of technology properties and effects (through counterargument). In addition, it proposes the concept of the argumentative context as a means of bridging the gap between individual and organizational rhetoric.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
2.
Ball, K., & Wilson, D. (2000). Power, control and computer-based performance monitoring: Repertoires, resistance and subjectivities. Organization Studies, 21, 539-565.
3.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in ISD . MIS Quarterly, 25, 195-228.
4.
Bijker, W.,Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987 ). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London : Sage.
6.
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bloomfield, B., & Danieli, A. (1995). The role of management consultants in the development of information technology. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 23-46.
8.
Brown, A. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation . Journal of Management Studies, 35, 35-58.
9.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 83-103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Dawson, P., & Buchanan, D. (2005). The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change. Human Relations , 58, 845-865.
11.
Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8, 25-49.
12.
Gill, A., & Whedbee, K. (1997). Rhetoric. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse: Structure and process (pp. 157-184). London: Sage.
13.
Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work. Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
14.
Hamilton, P. (2005, July). The enthymeme in naturally occurring talk: Needing to state the un-stated. Paper presented to Critical Management Studies Conference, Cambridge, UK .
15.
Hayes, N., & Walsham, G. (2000). Competing interpretations of computer-supported cooperative work in organizational contexts. Organization , 7, 49-67.
16.
Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755-778.
17.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441-456.
18.
Knights, D., & Murray, F. (1994). Managers divided. Chichester , UK: Wiley.
19.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology (C. Potter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press
22.
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2006). The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27, 7-29.
23.
McLoughlin, I. (1997). Babies, bathwater, guns and roses. In I. McLoughlin & M. Harris (Eds.), Innovation, organizational change and technology (pp. 207-221). London: International Thompson Business Press.
24.
McLoughlin, I. (1999). Creative technological change. London: Routledge.
25.
McLoughlin, I., & Badham, R. (2005). Political process perspectives on organization and technological change. Human Relations, 58, 827-843.
26.
Mueller, F., Sillince, J., Harvey, C., & Howorth, C. (2003). A rounded picture is what we need: Rhetorical strategies, arguments and the negotiation of change in a UK hospital trust . Organization Studies, 25, 75-93.
27.
Mumby, D., & Stohl, C. (1991). Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society, 2, 313-332.
28.
Nelson, J., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
29.
Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology. Organization Science, 3, 398-427.
30.
Perelman, C. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
31.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage .
33.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
34.
Rappert, B. (2003). Technologies, texts and possibilities. Sociology, 37, 565-580.
35.
Shepherd, C. (2006). Constructing enterprise resource planning: A thoroughgoing interpretivist perspective on technological change. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 357-376.
36.
Shotter, J., & Billig, M. (1998). A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In M. Mayerfield Bell & M. Gardiner (Eds.), Bakhtin and the human sciences: No last words (pp. 13-29). London : Sage.
37.
Spicer, A. (2005). The political process of inscribing a new technology . Human Relations, 58, 867-890.
38.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
39.
Symon, G. (2005). Exploring resistance from a rhetorical perspective . Organization Studies, 26, 1641-1663.
40.
Symon, G., & Clegg, C. (2005). Constructing identity and participation during technological change. Human Relations, 58, 1141-1166.
