This study applied communication boundary management theory to examine employee responses to workplace e-mail monitoring. Specifically, a measure of perceived workplace e-mail privacy (PEP) was developed and fit to a model of antecedents and consequences. To accomplish this, the study used an online survey methodology to gather employee perceptions related to workplace e-mail monitoring. Results indicated that PEP is a two-dimensional construct capturing one’s proficiency at maintaining privacy and concerns about the organization’s ability to infringe on e-mail privacy. In support of the boundary management perspective, the data revealed that perceptions of workplace e-mail monitoring and PEP were related to the perceived quality of one’s workplace relationships, especially with top management.
Adams, H., III, Scheuing, S.M., & Feeley, S.A. ( 2000). E-mail monitoring in the workplace: The good, the bad and the ugly. Defense Counsel Journal, 67, 32-46.
2.
Afifi, T.D. ( 2003). "Feeling caught" in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate communication privacy rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729-755.
3.
Allman, J. ( 1998). Bearing the burden or baring the soul: Physicians’ self-disclosure and boundary management regarding medical mistakes. Health Communication, 10, 175-197.
4.
Altman, I. ( 1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5.
Altman, I. ( 1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behavior, 18, 7-29.
6.
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. ( 1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 107-160.
7.
American Management Association. (2001). 2001 AMA survey: Workplace monitoring and surveillance. Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org
8.
American Management Association. (2005). 2005 Electronic monitoring and surveillance survey. Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org
9.
American Management Association, The E-Policy Institute, & Clearswift. (2003). 2003 E-mail rules, policies and practices survey. Retrieved from http://www.epolicyinstitute.com
Botan, C. ( 1995). Predicting panoptic effects on employees. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, El Paso, TX.
12.
Botan, C. ( 1996). Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects. Communication Monographs , 63, 293-313.
13.
Botan, C., & McCreadie, M. ( 1990, June). Panopticon: Workplace of the information society . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland.
14.
Case, C.J., & Young, K.S. ( 2002). Employee internet management: Current business practices and outcomes. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 355-361.
15.
Chan, M. ( 2003). Corporate espionage and workplace trust/distrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 45-58.
16.
Cialdini, R. ( 1996). The triple tumor structure of organizational behavior . In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct . New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Downs, C.W., & Adrian, A.D. ( 2004). Assessing organizational communication: Strategic communication audits. Glenview, IL: Scott, Forseman .
19.
D’Urso, S.C. ( 2006). Who’s watching us at work? Toward a structural-perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations. Communication Theory, 16, 281-303.
20.
Eastin, M.S., Glynn, C., & Griffiths, R. ( 2006). Communication technology use and the organizations: A psychological inquiry on personal use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
21.
Eddy, E.R., Stone, D.L., & Stone-Romero, E.E. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52, 335-358.
22.
Ellis, K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2001). Trust in top management and immediate supervisor: The relationship to satisfaction, perceived organizational effectiveness, and information receiving. Communication Quarterly , 49, 382-398.
23.
Fenigstein, A. ( 1997). Paranoid thought and schematic processing. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 77-94.
24.
Fenigstein, A., & Vanable, P.A. ( 1992). Paranoia and self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 129-138.
25.
Fusilier, M.R., & Hoyer, W. ( 1980). Variables affecting perceptions of invasion of privacy in a personnel selection situation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 65, 623-626.
26.
Gumpert, G., & Drucker, S.J. ( 1998). The demise of privacy in a private world: From front porches to chat rooms. Communication Theory, 8, 408-425.
27.
Hamilton, M., & Hunter, J. ( 1997). CFA: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Version 1.1) [Computer Software]. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
28.
Irving, R.H., Higgins, C.A., & Safayeni, F.R. (1986). Computerized performance monitoring systems: Use and abuse. Communications of the ACM , 29, 794-801.
29.
Johnson, J.L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 627-647.
30.
Jourard, S.M. ( 1966). Some psychological aspects of privacy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 31, 307-318.
31.
Kidwell, R.E., Jr., & Bennett, N. ( 1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness. Group and Organization Management , 19, 203-218.
32.
Kovach, K., Conner, S., Livneh, T., Scallan, K., & Schwartz, R. ( 2000, July). Electronic communication in the workplace: Something’s got to give. Business Horizons, 43, 59-64.
33.
Kramer, R. ( 1999). Stalking the sinister attribution error: Paranoia inside the lab and out. Research on Negotiation in Organizations , 7, 59-91.
34.
Kramer, R.M. ( 2001). Organizational paranoia: Origins and dynamics. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 1-42.
35.
Ku, L. ( 1996). Social and nonsocial uses of electronic messaging systems in organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 33, 297-325.
36.
Littlejohn, S.W. ( 2002). Theories of human communication. (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
37.
Mack, M.P. ( 1969). A Bentham reader. New York, NY: Pegasus.
Miller, S., & Weckert, J. ( 2000). Privacy, the workplace and the internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 255-265.
40.
Montana, J.C. ( 2004). E-mail, voice mail, and instant messaging: A legal perspective . Information Management Journal, 38, 37-41.
41.
Pedersen, D.M. ( 1982). Personality correlates of privacy. Journal of Psychology, 112, 11-14.
42.
Pedersen, D.M. ( 1997). Psychological functions of privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 147-156.
43.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L. ( 1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
44.
Petronio, S. ( 1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1, 311-335.
45.
Petronio, S. ( 2001). Balancing the secrets of private disclosures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Petronio, S. ( 2007). Translational research endeavors and the practices of communication privacy management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 218-222.
47.
Petronio, S., Ellemers, N., Giles, H., & Gallois, C. ( 1998). (Mis)communicating across boundaries. Communication Research, 25, 571-595.
48.
Petronio, S., & Kovach, S. ( 1997). Managing privacy boundaries: Health providers’ perceptions of resident care in Scottish nursing homes. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 115-131.
49.
Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. ( 2000). Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18, 35-48.
50.
Snyder, J.L., & Cornetto, K.M. (2005, November). Communication channel use and perceived communication privacy in the workplace: The effects of social influence on communication monitoring and surveillance in organizations . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston, MA.
51.
Stanton, J.M. ( 2003). Information technology and privacy: A boundary management perspective. In S. Clarke, E. Coakes, M. Hunter, & A. Wenn (Eds.), Socio-technical and human cognition elements of information systems (pp. 79-103). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
52.
Stanton, J.M., & Julian, A.L. ( 2002). The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 85-101.
53.
Sullivan, C.B. ( 1995). Preferences for electronic mail in organizational tasks . Journal of Business Communication, 32, 49-64.
54.
Tekleab, A.G., & Taylor, M.S. ( 2003). Aren’t there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization-employee agreement on contract obligations and violations. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 24, 585608.
55.
Timmerman, P.D., & Harrison, W. ( 2005). The discretionary use of electronic media: Four considerations for bad news bearers. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 379-389.
56.
Tolchinsky, P.D., McCuddy, M.K., Adams, J., Ganster, D.C., Woodman, R.W., & Fromkin, H.L. ( 1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 308-313.
57.
Van den Hooff, B., Groot, J., & de Jonge, S. ( 2005). Situational influences on the use of communication technologies: A meta-analysis and exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 4-27.
58.
VanLear, C.A. ( 1991). Testing a cyclical model of communicative openness in relationship development: Two longitudinal studies. Communication Monographs, 58, 337-361.
59.
VanLear, C.A., Jr., & Trujillo, N. ( 1986). On becoming acquainted: A longitudinal study of social judgement processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 3, 375-392.
60.
Vorvoreanu, M., & Botan, C. ( 2000, June). Examining electronic surveillance in the workplace: A review of theoretical perspectives and research findings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
61.
Websense. (2006). Websense, Inc. web @ work survey 2006. Retrieved from http://www.securitymanagement.com/archive/library/websense_technofile0906.pdf
62.
Westin, A.F. ( 1967). Privacy and freedom. New York, NY : Atheneum.
63.
Weisband, S.P., & Reinig, B.A. ( 1995). Managing users’ perceptions of e-mail privacy. Communications of the ACM, 38, 40-47.
64.
Wheeless, L.R., & Grotz, J. ( 1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure . Human Communication Research, 3, 250-257.
65.
Whitty, M.T. ( 2001). Should filtering software be utilized in the workplace? Australian employees’ attitudes toward Internet usage and surveillance of the Internet in the workplace. Surveillance and Society , 2, 39-54.
66.
Zweig, D., & Webster, J. ( 2002). Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 605-63.
