This is a rejoinder to McPhee, Myers, and Trethewey’s response to Cooren’s article titled, “The Communicative Achievement of Collective Minding,” published in Management Communication Quarterly in May 2004. It serves to reaffirm some of the theoretical and methodological arguments initially made in the article and illustrate the epistemic value of in-depth studies of organizational interactions. The author argues that conversation analysis is one of the most relevant ways to address what constitutes the specificity of the organizational communication field: concern for organizational interaction and discourse in general. The author also points out that this approach needs to be adapted to account for the sequential dimension that is so characteristic of organizational processes.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk. Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
Cooren, F. (2000). The organizing property of communication. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4.
Cooren, F. (2004a). The communicative achievement of collective minding: Analysis of board meetings excerpts. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 517-551.
5.
Cooren, F. (2004b). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373-393.
6.
Cooren, F. (Ed.). (in press a). Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Cooren, F. (in press b). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Speech timing and spacing: The phenomenon of organizational closure. Organization, 11(6), 793-824.
9.
Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (in press). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), The communicative constitution of organization: Centering organizational communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D., & Talih, N. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 14(2/3), 263-280.
11.
Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (Eds.). (in press). Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Deetz, S., Heath, R., & MacDonald, J. (in press). On talking to not make decisions: A critical analysis of organizational talk. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
14.
Derrida, J. (1992a). Force of Law. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. C. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. New York/London: Routledge.
15.
Derrida, J. (1992b). Given time. I, counterfeit money (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York: Routledge.
17.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Textuality and agency in interaction analysis. Organization, 11(3), 335-353.
19.
Fairhurst, G. T., & Chandler, T. A. (1989). Social structure in leader-member interaction. Communication Monographs, 56, 215-239.
20.
Fairhurst, G. T., & Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis, and speech act schematics. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131-152). London: Sage.
21.
Fairhurst, G. T., & Sarr, R. A. (1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubruim, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
McPhee, R. D., Corman, S. R., & Iverson, J. (in press). We ought to have... gumption....ACRA analysis of an excerpt from the videotape “After Mr. Sam”. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
McPhee, R. D., Myers, K. K., & Trethewey, A. (2006). On collective mind and conversational analysis: Response to Cooren. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 311-326.
26.
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(4), 499-535.
28.
Murphy, A. G. (2003). The dialectical gaze: Exploring the subject-object tension in the performances of women who strip. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(3), 305-335.
29.
Philipsen, G., & Leighter, J. (in press). Sam Steinberg’s use of “tell” in After Mr. Sam. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360-374.
31.
Pomerantz, A., & Denvir, P. (in press). Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper-management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. V. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 64-91). London: Sage.
33.
Putnam, L. L. (in press). Contradictions in the meta-talk about feelings in “After Mr. Sam.” In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Robichaud, D. (2001). Interaction as a text: A semiotic look at an organizing process. American Journal of Semiotics, 17(1), 141-161.
35.
Robichaud, D. (2002). Greimas’ semiotics and the analysis of organizational action. In P. B. Anderson, R. J. Clarke, K. Liu, & R. K. Stamper (Eds.), Coordination and communication using signs: Studies in organizational semiotics (pp. 129-149). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
36.
Robichaud, D. (2003). Narrative institutions we organize by: The case of a municipal administration. In B. Czarniawska & P. Gagliardi (Eds.), Narratives we organize by: Narrative approaches in organizational studies (pp. 37-53). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
37.
Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. R. (2004). The meta-conversation: The recursive property of language as the key to organizing. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 617-634.
38.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
39.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Sanders, R. E. (in press). The effect of interactional competence on group problem-solving. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. L. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
Stohl, C. (in press). Bringing the outside in: A contextual analysis. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Taylor, J. R., & Cooren, F. (in press). Making worldview sense: And paying homage, retrospectively, to Algirdas Greimas. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Tracy, K. (in press). Feeling-limned talk: Conduct ideals in the Steinberg succession meeting. In F. Cooren (Ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
46.
Tracy, S. (2000). Becoming a character for commerce. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(1), 90-128.
47.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
