Humor and laughter are emotion-involving activities that can be jointly constructed in interaction. This article analyzes instances of joint laughter in leader-member meetings where laughter may or may not be associated with humor. The method applied is conversation analysis in which the focus lies on laughter's role in the microlevel organization of interaction. The results show that the instances of laughter do not occur in accidental locations but are clearly connected to specific activities. First, humor and laughter can be strategically used by team leaders to create collegiality and a good working atmosphere in their teams. Second, laughing together is connected to closing down a topic or a phase in a meeting in a way that displays mutual understanding. Third, shared laughter initiated by team members appears to be a resource that can be used to reduce tension in challenging situations such as the accomplishment of difficult tasks or the treatment of delicate topics. Finally, laughing together can be used to do remedial work in problematic or conflicting situations. Ultimately, joint laughter appears to be a resource that can be used to improve the task performance and, through this, the achievement of the goals of the organization.
Adelswärd, V. (1989). Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12, 107-136.
2.
Adelswärd, V., & Öberg, B.-M. (1998). The function of laughter and joking in negotiation activities. International Journal of Humor Research, 11(4), 411-429.
3.
Ashforth, B., & Humhrey, R.H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 97-125.
4.
Ashkenasy, N.M., Hartel, C.E.J., & Zerbe, W. (2000). Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice. Westport, CT: Quorum.
5.
Bergson, H. (2005). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic . New York: Dover Publications . (Original published in 1911)
6.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk. Organization in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Campbell, K.S., White, C.D., & Johnson, D.E. (2003). Leader-member relations as a function of rapport management. Journal of Business Communication, 40, 170-194.
9.
Charles, M. (2007). Language matters in global communication: Article based on ORA Lecture, October 2006. Journal of Business Communication , 44, 260-282.
10.
Collinson, D.L. (1988). Engineering humour: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop floor relations. Organization Studies, 9(2), 181-199.
Coser, R.L. (1959). Some social functions of laughter. Human Relations, 12, 171-181.
13.
Díaz, F., Antaki, C., & Collins, A. (1996). Using completion to formulate a statement collectively . Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 525-542.
14.
Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M.L. (1996) Institutional dialogue . In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social Interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 92-118). London: Sage.
15.
Duncan, W.J. (1983). The superiority theory of humor at work: Joking relationships as indicators of formal and informal status patterns in small, task-oriented groups. Small Group Behavior, 16, 555-564.
16.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Fineman, S. (Ed.) (2000). Emotion in organizations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
18.
Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding emotions at work. London: Sage.
19.
Fineman, S., & Sturdy, A. (1999). The emotions of control: A qualitative exploration of environmental regulation. Human Relations, 52(5), 631-658.
20.
Glenn, P.J. (1989). Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations . Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 127-149.
21.
Glenn, P.J. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Goodwin, M.H. & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within Situated Activity. In N. Budwig et al. (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33-54). Stamford CT: Ablex.
24.
Greatbatch, D., & Clark, T. (2003). Displaying group cohesiveness: Humour and laughter in the public lectures of management gurus. Human Relations , 56(12), 1515-1544.
25.
Haakana, M. (1999). Laughing matters. A conversation analytic study of laughter in doctor-patient interaction. Unpublished doctorate thesis, Helsinki: The University of Helsinki.
26.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
27.
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace? Discourse studies, 2(2), 159-185.
28.
Holmes, J. (2006). Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 26-50.
29.
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 347-369). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
30.
Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25-34). London: Academic Press.
31.
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 152-205). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
32.
Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society, 10, 293-316.
33.
Kangasharju, H. (1988). Alignment in disagreement: Building alliances in multiperson interaction. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Finnish, Helsinki University.
34.
Kangasharju, H. (2002). Alignment in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1447-1471.
35.
Kangasharju, H. (2007). Interaktion och inflytande. Finländare och svenskar vid mötesbordet [Interaction and influence. Finns and Swedes meet at the negotiating table]. In O. Kangas & H. Kangasharju (Eds.), Ordens makt och maktens ord [The power of words and the words of power] (pp. 341-377). Helsinki: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.
36.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309.
37.
Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2002). Communication and language use in merged corporations: Cases stora enso and nordea (Helsinki School of Economics Working Papers W-330). Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.
38.
Madlock, P.E. (2008). The link between leadership style, communication competence, and employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 45, 61-78.
39.
Meyer, J.C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310-331.
40.
Mulkay, M. (1988). On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
41.
Norrick, N.R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk . Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
42.
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2007). Humour in business: A double-edged sword. A study of humour and style shifting in intercultural business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 4-28.
43.
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (Ed.). (1992). Lectures on conversation (vol. 1-2). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
44.
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004). Managerial elites making rhetorical and linguistic `moves'for a moving (emotional) display. Human Relations, 57(9), 1103-1143.
45.
Schegloff, E.A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Senge, P.M. (2006). The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. (Original published in 1990)
47.
Vaara, E. (2003). Post-acquisition integration as sense making: Glimpses of ambiguity, confusion, hypocrisy, and politicization. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 859-894.
48.
Vinton, K.E. (1989). Humor in the workplace: It's more than telling jokes. Small Group Behavior, 20(2), 151-166.
49.
Vuorela, T. (2005). Approaches to a business negotiation case study: Teamwork, Humour and Teaching (Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, A-261). Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.
