The melt blending behaviour of natural fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites plays a critical role in determining feedstock quality for extrusion-based manufacturing. This study evaluates the influence of screw speed and polyethylene glycol (PEG) loading on the melt flow index (MFI) and mixture blending time (MBT) of polylactic acid composites reinforced with wild almond fibre (WAF) (3-9 wt%) using response surface methodology (RSM). Central composite design (CCD) experiments were conducted to develop quadratic regression models and identify optimal processing conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed strong model significance, indicating high sensitivity of process parameters. The results reveal a transition from plasticizer-dominated viscosity control at low fibre loading to shear-driven dispersion at higher reinforcement levels. Under optimized conditions, MFI values reached approximately 27 g/10 min, while MBT was reduced, indicating improved processability. Numerical optimization showed high desirability, confirming convergence toward balanced processing conditions. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of response surface modelling in capturing process-structure interactions and provide practical guidance for stable composite feedstock preparation for extrusion-based applications.
RanjanNSinghRAhujaI, et al.3D printed scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: mechanical, morphological, thermal, in-vitro and in-vivo investigations. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2021; 32: 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.002
2.
RanjanNSinghRAhujaIPS, et al.Fabrication of PLA-HAp-CS based biocompatible and biodegradable feedstock filament using twin screw extrusion. In: AlMangourB (ed). BT - Additive Manufacturing of Emerging Materials. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91713-9_11
3.
GąsiorowskiRMatykiewiczDJaniszewska-LatteriniD. Polylactide (PLA) composites reinforced with natural fibrous filler recovered from the biomass of sorghum leaves or stems. Materials2025; 18(19): 4634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18194634
4.
CPRSVParrthipanBK, et al., “Additive manufacturing of polymers and composites for sustainable engineering applications,” Front. Chem. Eng2025; 7-, 1722765. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2025.1722765
5.
RanjanNSinghRAhujaI. Investigations on joining of orthopaedic scaffold with rapid tooling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J. Eng. Med2019; 233: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919852811
6.
MaJHeLWuZ, et al.Optimization and modelling of the physical and mechanical properties of grass fiber reinforced with slag-based composites using response surface methodology. Materials2024; 17(15): 3703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153703
7.
RanjanNSinghRAhujaIPS, et al.On 3D printed scaffolds for orthopedic tissue engineering applications. SN Appl Sci2020; 2(2): 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-1936-8
8.
RasyidFSalimMSMd AkilH, et al.Optimization of processing conditions via response surface methodology (RSM) of nonwoven flax fibre reinforced acrodur biocomposites. Procedia Chem2016; 19: 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.040
9.
RanjanNSinghMSinghDKumarR, “Chapter 5 - hydrogels for additive manufacturing in scaffolding applications: a review,” In Woodhead Publishing Reviews: Mechanical Engineering Series, SinghSPrakashCRamakrishnaAM, Eds., Woodhead Publishing, 2023, pp. 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-86011-6.00009-X
10.
RajaPBabuKKaynakE, et al.Impact of design variations and infill density in 3D-Printed PLA components. Polymers2025; 17(24): 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17243336
11.
GuS-YZhangKRenJ, et al.Melt rheology of polylactide/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends. Carbohydr Polym2008; 74(1): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.017
12.
IlyasRAZuhriMYMAisyahHA, et al.Natural fiber-reinforced polylactic acid, polylactic acid blends and their composites for advanced applications. Polymers2022; 14(1): 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010202
13.
HuYGuJZhangY, et al.FDM 3D printed MXene/Recycled carbon fibre reinforced polylactic acid composites: interface optimization, toughening and enhanced electromagnetic shielding performance. Compos Commun2024; 48: 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2024.101953
AkpanEIAdeosunSOLawalGI, et al.Melt characteristics of poly-lactide. In: FergusJWMishraBAndersonD, et al. (eds). (PLA) Natural Fibre-Composites BT - Engineering Solutions for Sustainability: Materials and Resources II. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48138-8_15
16.
NiangBSchiavoneNAskanianH, et al.Morphological, rheological and mechanical properties of pla-typha based biocomposites. Open Journal of Composite Materials2021; 11: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2021.114009
17.
MazzantiVSalzano de LunaMParianteR, et al.Natural fiber-induced degradation in PLA-Hemp biocomposites in the molten state. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf2020; 137: 105990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105990
18.
SinghAAGenoveseMEManciniG, et al.Green processing route for polylactic acid–cellulose fiber biocomposites. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2020; 8(10): 4128–4136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06760
19.
AlothmanOYAwadSSiakengR, et al.Fabrication and characterization of polylactic acid/natural fiber extruded composites. Polym Eng Sci2023; 63(4): 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26278
RajendraKVasudevanHVimalG. In: VasudevanHKotturVKNRainaAA (eds). Optimization of Injection Moulding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology BT - Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 445–454.
24.
ChandramohanPBala SanthoshMSRaghuR. Process parameters optimization through response surface methodology for enhanced strength of additively manufactured thermoplastic polyurethane parts. In: MallaiahMThapliyalSChandra BoseS (eds). BT - Recent Advances in Additive Manufacturing. Volume 1Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025, pp. 351–368.
25.
IliyasuIBelloJBDibalMN, et al.Response surface methodology for the optimization of the effect of fibre parameters on the physical and mechanical properties of deleb palm fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Sci Afr2022; 16: e01269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01269
26.
KimMNamD-GJuW-T, et al.Response surface methodology for optimization of process parameters and antioxidant properties of mulberry (Morus Alba L.) leaves by extrusion. Molecules2020; 25(22): 5231. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225231
27.
ChelladuraiSJSKMRayAP, et al.Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: a review. Mater Today Proc2021; 37: 1301–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.466
28.
RazaYRazaHAhmedA, et al.Integration of response surface methodology (RSM), machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing properties of polymeric nanocomposites-A review. Polym Compos2025; 46(15): 13591–13627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.30011
29.
Gaspar-CunhaACovasJSikoraJ. Optimization of polymer processing: a review (part II-Molding technologies). Materials2022; 15: 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031138
30.
TrinhV-L. Optimizing the plastic injection molding process and reducing warpage through response surface methodology. Mater Manuf Process2025; 40(9): 1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2025.2491422
31.
XuJGuoHHouJ, et al.Multi-objective process parameter optimization for induction heating curing of carbon fiber reinforced polymer wound circular tubes. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 5: 08927057251401124. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251401124
32.
Kumar AdapaSSettiSG. Development of bio-reinforced PLA filaments using short bamboo fibers for enhanced mechanical performance in FDM 3D printing. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 5: 08927057261439635. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057261439635
33.
RanjbarhaZAberoomand-AzarPMokhtari-AliabadJ, et al.High density polyethylene/wood flour composite: optimization of processing temperature, processing time and coupling agent concentration. Polym Polym Compos2021; 29(9_suppl): S106–S116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391120987338
34.
MishraVBharatNKumarV, et al.Multi-objective optimization of 3D printed PLA/Carbon fibre composite using a combined approach of gray relational analysis and ANOVA. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38(11): 4208–4227. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251339246
35.
SrivabutCRatanawilaiTHizirogluS. Response surface optimization and statistical analysis of composites made from calcium carbonate filler-added recycled polypropylene and rubberwood fiber. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35(3): 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705719889988
