The current study investigated the quasi-static crushing behavior and multi-criteria decision ranking of multi-cell tubular structures inspired by the fractal veins of royal lily leaves using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique. Inspired by the hierarchical vein patterns of Victoria amazonica, a variety of tubular configurations were fabricated by altering the number of branches and fractal order. Axial compression of the fabricated tubular samples was applied to evaluate significant crashworthiness metrics like average crushing force (ACF), initial peak crushing force (IPCF), total energy absorption (TEA), and specific energy absorption (SEA). The results revealed that increasing the number of branches and fractal order significantly increased TEA and stimulated more progressive crushing along with improved deformation stability. To identify the optimal design, a hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)–Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework was applied. When compared to single-tubular structures, the bi-tubular structures exhibited 15–25% higher energy absorption, mostly at higher branching levels where multi-cell interactions became dominant. Higher-order, high-branch bi-tubular structures were consistently ranked closest to the ideal solution due to their enhanced crushing stability, balanced peak-force response, and superior energy-absorption characteristics. The highest TEA of 735 kJ and SEA of 7.6 kJ/g were obtained for the 2nd-order, 8-branch bi-tubular structure. Overall, the research proved that biomimetic fractal-vein reinforcement, combined with multi-cell bi-tubular architecture, provides an effective pathway for developing lightweight, high-performance energy-absorbing structures suitable for crashworthiness applications.
DabasaTLemuHGRegassaY. Literature review on thin-walled and cellular structure designs for energy absorption. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2023, vol 1294(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1294/1/012046
3.
Abd El-bakyMAHegazyDAHassanMA. Advanced thin-walled composite structures for energy absorption applications. Appl Compos Mater2022; 29(3): 1195–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-022-10016-5
4.
SuYLiCCaoM, et al.Research progress on advanced carbon fiber reinforced composite honeycomb structures. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 39(4): 1340–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251370253
5.
PatelVTiwariGDumpalaR. Review of the crushing response of collapsible tubular structures. Front Mech Eng2020; 15(3): 438–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0579-1
6.
BaroutajiASajjiaMOlabiAG. On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct2017; 118: 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018
7.
PatelVTiwariGDumpalaR. Crashworthiness analysis of multi-configuration thin walled co-axial frusta tube structures under quasi-static loading. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 154: 106872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106872
8.
EyvazianANajafianSMozafariH, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of a novel aluminum bi-tubular corrugated Tube—experimental study. Advances in Manufacturing Processes: Select Proceedings of ICEMMM 2018. Springer, 2018, pp. 599–607.
GongCYanHChongQ, et al.Crashworthiness design and multi-objective optimization of bionic gradient circular multi-cell structure. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025: 1–15.
12.
XiaoYLiuYWuQW, et al.Structure optimization design for pre-folded external double-layer biomimetic multi-cell thin-walled tubes. J Mech Sci Technol2024; 38(7): 3465–3475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-024-0621-z
13.
WangLZhangYHuangW, et al.A comparative study of gradient designs in bioinspired tree-like fractal energy absorbers under axial and oblique loads. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 220: 114428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.114428
14.
CaiZDengX. Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired hierarchical multi-cell circular tubes under axial crushing. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025; 32(13): 2982–2997. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2387738
15.
QiHDingLZhengM, et al.Variable wheelbase control of wheeled Mobile robots with worm-inspired creeping gait strategy. IEEE Trans Robot2024; 40: 3271–3289. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2024.3400947
16.
ChenYDengXHuangH, et al.Crashworthiness of bionic tree-shaped hexagonal hierarchical gradient structures under oblique crushing conditions. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31(25): 6923–6943. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.2240328
17.
LiuYZouMQiY, et al.Bionic design of thin-walled bilinear tubes with excellent crashworthiness inspired by glass sponge structures. Bioinspiration Biomimetics2024; 19(4): 046018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad580a
18.
LiuLLiLGuoC, et al.The design of a biomimetic hierarchical thin-walled structure inspired by a lotus leaf and its mechanical performance analysis. Materials2023; 16(11): 4116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114116
KuaiTNgBFChenH, et al. Crushing behavior of bio-inspired fractal multi-cell circular tubes fabricated using SLM 3D printing. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2025; 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2025.2491133
QianJDengXHouY. On the crashworthiness of novel right-angle fractal gradient hierarchical multi-cell bi-tubular tubes under axial loading. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025; 32(7): 1406–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2363514
23.
ZengQLiZLiuP, et al.Axially crashworthy performance of thin-walled tubes with various configurations under the same scale. Forces in Mechanics2025; 21: 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmec.2025.100334
24.
San HaNLuG. A review of recent research on bio-inspired structures and materials for energy absorption applications. Compos B Eng2020; 181: 107496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496
25.
LopezCPazJRomeraL, et al.Numerical and experimental crashworthiness assessment of carbon-fiber reinforced thermoplastic energy absorbers. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 39(2): 733–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251355147
26.
RamakrishnaDBala MuraliG. Bio-inspired 3D-printed lattice structures for energy absorption applications: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2023; 237(3): 503–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221121948
27.
WangZLiJLiuX, et al.Diameter-adjustable mandrel for thin-wall tube bending and its domain knowledge-integrated optimization design framework. Eng Appl Artif Intell2025; 139: 109634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109634
28.
YuanSWeiYGongJ, et al.Compressive behavior of improved star-shaped honeycomb multi-cell structures: experiments and simulations. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025; 33: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2025.2457126
29.
ChenCLiuMZhangL, et al.Mimicking from rose petal to lotus leaf: biomimetic multiscale hierarchical particles with tunable water adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11(7): 7431–7440. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b21494
LinJCaiYWangX, et al.Fabrication of biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces inspired by lotus leaf and silver ragwort leaf. Nanoscale2011; 3(3): 1258–1262. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00812e
32.
HuangHYangXYanQ, et al.Crashworthiness analysis and multiobjective optimization of bio-inspired sandwich structure under impact load. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 172: 108840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108840
33.
GongCChenLChongQ, et al.Crashworthiness performance of biomimetic hierarchical hexagonal multicell tubes. Mech Adv Mater Struct2025: 1–13.
WangLWangZZhangS, et al.Multi-unit global-local registration for 3D bent tube based on implicit structural feature compatibility. Adv Eng Inform2025; 65: 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.103120
36.
WeiZWangHBiY, et al.Crashworthiness and gradient optimization of multi-cell thin-walled structures inspired by leaf venation in royal water lily. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 33: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2438912
37.
ZhouHZhongYLanJ, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of novel bidirectional gradient hierarchical double tubes inspired by the leaf tissue. Eur J Mech Solid2024; 107: 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105391
38.
GuoZWangZFanW, et al.Mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of the fractal structure of the royal water lily leaf under quasi-static axial loading. Fractal and Fractional2025; 9(9): 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9090566
39.
KumarAPMohamedMN. Crush performance analysis of combined geometry tubes under axial compressive loading. Procedia Eng2017; 173: 1415–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.203
40.
WangHLeiJChenJ, et al.Comparative study on the dynamic response of an out-of-plane gradient bionic sandwich circular plate under two types of impact loading. Front Mater2024; 11: 1341474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2024.1341474
41.
Praveen KumarA. Comparison of out‐of‐plane crushing behavior of 3D‐Printed biomimetic hexagonal hierarchical tubular structures using COPRAS method. Polym Compos. 2025; 47(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70131
42.
KumarAPKumarAK. Impact crushing response of additively manufactured hybrid metal-composite Structures—a state of the art review. Funct Compos Struct2023; 5(3): 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/acfa7f
43.
TaghipoorHEyvazianAKumarAP, et al.Experimental investigation of the thin-walled energy absorbers with different sections including surface imperfections under low-speed impact test. Mater Today Proc2020; 27: 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.006
44.
MaQRejabMRMHassanSA, et al.Potentiality of MWCNT on 3D-printed bio-inspired spherical-roof cubic core under quasi-static loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2022; 136: 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105514
45.
Praveen KumarA. Experimental analysis on the axial crushing and energy absorption characteristics of novel hybrid aluminium/composite-capped cylindrical tubular structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2019; 233(11): 2234–2252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420719843157
46.
GongCMengCChongQ, et al.Crushing behavior of biomimetic hierarchical multi-cell thin-walled tubes under multi-angle loading. Eng Struct2025; 331: 119996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119996
47.
NikkhahHCrupiVBaroutajiA. Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired thin-walled tubes based on Morpho wings microstructures. Mech Base Des Struct Mach2020; 50(10): 3683–3700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2020.1822184
48.
ChanpuypetchWNiemsakulJAtthirawongW, et al.An integrated AHP-TOPSIS approach for bamboo product evaluation and selection in rural communities. Decis Anal J2024; 12: 100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100503
49.
HanineMBoutkhoumOTikniouineA, et al.Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. SpringerPlus2016; 5(1): 263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z
50.
AbdullahNAZSaniMSMSalwaniMS, et al.A review on crashworthiness studies of crash box structure. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 153: 106795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106795
IsaacCWSokołowskiADuddeckF, et al.Mechanical characterisation and crashworthiness performance of additively manufactured polymer-based honeycomb structures under in-plane quasi-static loading. Virtual Phys Prototyp2023; 18(1): e2273296. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2023.2273296
53.
AshokDBahubalendruniMR. Design and characterization of 2.5D nature-inspired infill structures under out-of-plane quasi-static loading. Adv Mater Sci Eng2023; 2023: 8918937.
54.
ZhouHXuPXieS. Composite energy-absorbing structures combining thin-walled metal and honeycomb structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit2017; 231(4): 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716631579
55.
LiZChenRLuF. Comparative analysis of crashworthiness of empty and foam-filled thin-walled tubes. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 124: 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.12.017
56.
ChengQYinJWenJ, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D-printed hierarchical structures based on sierpinski triangles. Int J Mech Sci2023; 247: 108172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108172
57.
YanXBethersBChenH, et al.Recent advancements in biomimetic 3D printing materials with enhanced mechanical properties. Front Mater2021; 8: 518886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.518886
58.
ChouhanGGunjiBMBidareP, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of 3D printed bio-inspired lattice structures for mechanical behaviour under quasi static loading conditions. Mater Today Commun2023; 35: 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105658
59.
MalekshahiASalamiSJGeramizadehH, et al.A novel combined tubular 3D-printed lattice structures with coupling effects for enhancing energy absorption. Results Eng2025; 26: 105350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105350
60.
KumarAP. Quasi-static crushing behaviour of axially compressed combined aluminium-composite tubes. Int J Mech Eng Technol2018; 9(8): 907–914.
61.
MohamedMNKumarAP. New insight to improve energy absorption characteristics of long circular tubes with stiffeners as controllable energy-dissipating devices. Procedia Eng2017; 173: 1399–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.199
62.
KgA. Effect of the number of stiffeners on the lateral deformation behavior of additively manufactured thin-walled cylindrical tubes. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2024; 31(15): 2473–2485.
63.
Praveen KumarAVetrivel SezhianM. Influence of curvy stiffeners on the axial crushing response of 3D-printed polymer composite cylindrical tubular structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2023; 237(12): 2473–2485. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221137545
WangZWangX. Quantum-classical hybrid genetic evolutionary algorithm for topology optimization of continuum structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng2025; 126(13): e70073. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70073
66.
SongJXuSLiuS, et al.Energy absorption and deformation mechanisms of bio-inspired multicellular tubes under axial impact. Int J Crashworthiness2022; 27(2): 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2020.1807686
67.
DengXWangGCaiZ. Crashworthiness of multicellular tubes with tree-like fractal hierarchical structure under axial impact. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31(28): 10081–10097. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.2284430
