Carbon fiber reinforced composite honeycomb (CFRCH) materials have attracted more and more attention due to their unique properties in aerospace, automobile manufacturing and other industries. The research on this high-performance composite material is also deepening, covering many aspects such as structural optimization, manufacturing process and mechanical properties. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically review the existing research results and analyze their development trends and challenges in order to promote their further development. The article explores several innovative designs, including negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) structures, biomimetic gradient designs, filler designs, and more, which improve the impact resistance and energy absorption efficiency of materials through special deformation mechanisms or inspiration from natural structures. At the same time, the application of 3D printing technology, vacuum-assisted resin molding, and multi-process composite technology in CFRCH preparation is introduced, emphasizing the importance of these advances for the realization of high-performance composite materials.
TripathiLBeheraBK. Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites. J Mater Sci2021; 56(28): 15609–15652.
2.
KhaireNTiwariGRathodS, et al.Perforation and energy dissipation behaviour of honeycomb core cylindrical sandwich shell subjected to conical shape projectile at high velocity impact. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 171: 108724.
3.
LiZYZhangWMZouS, et al.Quasi-static uniaxial compression and low-velocity impact properties of composite auxetic CorTube structure. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 202: 112059.
4.
LiHDengYZhangZ, et al.High-velocity impact characteristics of 3D auxetic composite cylindrical shell panels: theory and experiment. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 206: 112648.
5.
DengYHuXNiuY, et al.Experimental and numerical study of composite honeycomb sandwich structures under low-velocity impact. Appl Compos Mater2024; 31(2): 535–559.
6.
XuSZhangWCaiY, et al.Study on anti-penetration performance of kevlar reinforced honeycomb liquid-filled cabin on warship: experimental verification and numerical analysis. Ocean Eng2023; 283: 114959.
7.
WangWLiZFengY, et al.Damage mechanism and bending properties degradation of aviation composite honeycomb sandwich structures under laser irradiation. Opt Laser Technol2025; 181: 111635.
8.
WeiXXiongJWangJ, et al.New advances in fiber-reinforced composite honeycomb materials. Sci China Technol Sci2020; 63(8): 1348–1370.
9.
NiuWYanXHeQ, et al.Experimental study on compression properties of composite aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures. Polym Compos2024; 45(16): 14706–14714.
10.
SarafrazMSeidiHKakavandF, et al.Free vibration and buckling analyses of a rectangular sandwich plate with an auxetic honeycomb core and laminated three-phase polymer/GNP/fiber face sheets. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 183: 110331.
11.
WangJWangCChenR, et al.Residual compressive strength of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets after low-velocity impact. Appl Compos Mater2023; 30(4): 1061–1079.
12.
IshakMRYidrisNZuhriMYM, et al.Full-scale evaluation of creep coefficients and viscoelastic moduli in honeycomb sandwich pultruded GFRP composite cross-arms: experimental and numerical study. Results Eng2024; 21: 101850.
13.
KimJKimJHLeeYH, et al.Flexural performance of a steel-concrete composite deck system strengthened with lattice reinforcement and hat-shaped shear connectors. J Build Eng2024; 97: 110913.
14.
HuangSWenKLiuY, et al.Optimized design, fabrication, and enhanced performance of honeycomb sandwich structure for excellent impact resistance and broadband microwave absorption. J Colloid Interface Sci2025; 681: 365–375.
15.
HuaLDingLWangX, et al.Out-of-plane energy absorption of 3D printed basalt-fiber-reinforced hierarchical honeycomb composite. Int J Mech Sci2025; 285: 109784.
16.
WangYLiuKZhangS, et al.Research on the deformation law of ultra-thin fiber metal laminates under the synergistic effect of nano-reinforcement and scale effect. Mater Des2024; 243: 113059.
17.
YuMWangZJiangX, et al.In-plane compression properties and parameters optimization of a lightweight and high-strength bamboo honeycomb sandwich material. Compos Sci Technol2025; 261: 111018.
18.
QiCJiangFYangS. Advanced honeycomb designs for improving mechanical properties: a review. Compos B Eng2021; 227: 109393.
19.
GeYXueJLiuL, et al.Advances in multiple assembly Acoustic structural design strategies for honeycomb composites: a review. Mater Today Commun2024; 38: 108013.
20.
XingSJiangZZhaoJ, et al.Failure mechanism and crashworthiness optimization of variable stiffness nested origami crash box. Eng Fail Anal2025; 167: 108953, (PartA).
21.
SongSXiongCYinJ, et al.Flexural behavior, failure analysis, and optimization design of a hybrid composite kagome honeycomb sandwich structure. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 187: 110743.
22.
WangGShiSZhaoZ, et al.The effect of short kevlar fibers interfacial toughening on impact properties of carbon fiber/aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Aero Sci Technol2024; 155: 109623.
23.
ZhaoWLiuZYuG, et al.A new multifunctional carbon fiber honeycomb sandwich structure with excellent mechanical and thermal performances. Compos Struct2021; 274: 114306.
24.
XieHLiXHuJ, et al.Honeycomb-inspired design of double-layer photothermal/electrothermal fabric for all-weather steam generation. Desalination2025; 601(000): 118579.
25.
El-DessoukyHMMcHughC. Multifunctional auxetic and honeycomb composites made of 3D woven carbon fibre preforms. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 22593.
26.
GaoQLiaoWHHuangC. Theoretical predictions of dynamic responses of cylindrical sandwich filled with auxetic structures under impact loading. Aero Sci Technol2020; 107: 106270.
27.
ChoudhryNKNguyenTKNguyen-VanV, et al.Auxetic lattice reinforcement for tailored mechanical properties in cementitious composite: experiments and modelling. Constr Build Mater2024; 438: 137252.
28.
DuLShiWGaoH, et al.Mechanically programmable composite metamaterials with switchable positive/negative Poisson's ratio. Adv Funct Mater2024; 34(22): 2314123.
29.
TanXWangLZhuS, et al.A general strategy for performance enhancement of negative stiffness mechanical metamaterials. Eur J Mech Solid2022; 96: 104702.
30.
HuangCChenL. Negative Poisson's ratio in modern functional materials. Adv Mater2016; 28(37): 8079–8096.
31.
ZhangXGRenXJiangW, et al.A novel auxetic chiral lattice composite: experimental and numerical study. Compos Struct2022; 282: 115043.
32.
LiTLiuFWangL. Enhancing indentation and impact resistance in auxetic composite materials. Compos B Eng2020; 198: 108229.
33.
LiDShenG. Study on mechanical properties of an isotropic negative Poisson’s ratio voronoi foam and its foam-filled tube. Smart Mater Struct2022; 31(6): 065017.
34.
TehraniMBoroujeniAYHajjR, et al.Mechanical characterization of a hybrid carbon nanotube/carbon fiber reinforced composite. In Mechanical characterization of a hybrid carbon nanotube/carbon fiber reinforced composite. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, vol. 56383, p. V009T10A034.
LiTChenYHuX, et al.Exploiting negative Poisson's ratio to design 3D-printed composites with enhanced mechanical properties. Mater Des2018; 142: 247–258.
37.
MaYYuXZhaoF, et al.Negative Poisson’s ratio design, static mechanical properties and deformation behaviors on PVA-Carbon fiber reinforced concrete. J Mater Sci2023; 58(4): 1568–1585.
38.
ChaJHKumarSKSJangWH, et al.Multidisciplinary space shield origami composite: incorporating cosmic radiation shielding, space debris impact protection, solar radiative heat shielding, and atomic oxygen erosion resistance. Compos B Eng2025; 288: 111876.
39.
WuJZhangYHuangW, et al.Multi-directional crushing characteristics of curved origami metamaterials with glass fiber-reinforced polyamides. Eng Struct2023; 276: 115380.
40.
LiuHLiD. Study on the energy absorption effect and impact resistance of a composite sandwich panel with carbon fiber reinforced re-entrant hexagonal honeycomb core with negative Poisson's ratio. Eur J Mech Solid2025; 109: 105447.
41.
GaoYLiZWeiX, et al.Carbon fiber reinforced composite 3D origami-inspired auxetic honeycomb with omni-directional high stiffness. Int J Solid Struct2024; 297: 112860.
42.
GünaydınKReaCKazancıZ. Energy absorption enhancement of additively manufactured hexagonal and re-entrant (auxetic) lattice structures by using multi-material reinforcements. Addit Manuf2022; 59: 103076.
43.
DongKPanahi-SarmadMCuiZ, et al.Electro-induced shape memory effect of 4D printed auxetic composite using PLA/TPU/CNT filament embedded synergistically with continuous carbon fiber: a theoretical & experimental analysis. Compos B Eng2021; 220: 108994.
44.
WuYLiuQFuJ, et al.Dynamic crash responses of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP panels. Compos B Eng2017; 121: 122–133.
RenXZhangYHanCZ, et al.Mechanical properties of foam-filled auxetic circular tubes: experimental and numerical study. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 170: 108584.
47.
NiuDWuZChangJ, et al.Fabrication of agaric derived porous carbon materials with bionic honeycomb structure by etching process for superior microwave absorption. Mater Sci Eng, B2025; 313: 117877.
48.
GuoCChengXLuL, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired multi-order self-similar polymer honeycomb under axial quasi-static and dynamic loading. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 209: 112877.
49.
IngroleAAguirreTGFullerL, et al.Bioinspired energy absorbing material designs using additive manufacturing. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2021; 119: 104518.
50.
JieDBaiJRanM, et al.Bending performance and crack propagation in biomimetic honeycomb structures for sustainable lightweight design. Eur J Mech Solid2025; 112: 105640.
51.
ChenY, ZJinZKangW, et al.3D printed bio-inspired self-similar carbon fiber reinforced composite sandwich structures for energy absorption. Compos Sci Technol2024; 248: 110453.
52.
LiSZhangHLuZ, et al.Fabrication of bamboo-inspired continuous carbon fiber-reinforced SiC composites via dual-material thermally assisted extrusion-based 3D printing. J Mater Sci Technol2025; 208: 92–103.
53.
CaiZBLiZYDingY, et al.Preparation and impact resistance performance of bionic sandwich structure inspired from beetle forewing. Compos B Eng2019; 161: 490–501.
54.
TewariKPanditMKBudarapuPR, et al.Analysis of sandwich structures with corrugated and spiderweb-inspired cores for aerospace applications. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109812.
55.
WangHXieSFengZ, et al.Out-of-plane mechanical properties of nomex® honeycomb with embedded aluminum tubes. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31(27): 9677–9691.
56.
LiZYWangWJYeXD, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D continuous CFRP composite graded auxetic structures. Constr Build Mater2024; 440: 137379.
57.
YuSLiuZCaoX, et al.The compressive responses and failure behaviors of composite graded auxetic re-entrant honeycomb structure. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 187: 110721.
58.
LiuZLiuJLiuJ, et al.The impact responses and failure mechanism of composite gradient reentrant honeycomb structure. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 182: 110228.
59.
LiSLiQMTseKM, et al.Functionally graded foam materials for head impact protection. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 203: 112193.
60.
ChengLSiYJiZ, et al.A novel linear gradient carbon fiber array integrated square honeycomb structure with electromagnetic wave absorption and enhanced mechanical performances. Compos Struct2023; 305: 116510.
61.
YeWDouHLiuJ, et al.Additive manufacture of programmable multi-matrix continuous carbon fiber reinforced gradient composites. Addit Manuf2024; 89: 104255.
62.
ZhouXYouQGaoY, et al.Buckling analysis on resin base laminated plate reinforced with uniform and functional gradient distribution of carbon fiber in thermal environment. Polymers2023; 15(9): 2086.
63.
YangFDongYWangY, et al.Carbon nanowire modified nextel 610/SiOC composites with gradient periodic structure for enhanced broadband electromagnetic-wave absorption performance at elevated temperatures. J Alloys Compd2025; 1012: 178527.
64.
LiZJiangYWangT, et al.In-plane crushing behaviors of piecewise linear graded honeycombs. Compos Struct2019; 207: 425–437.
65.
YuRLuoWYuanH, et al.Experimental and numerical research on foam filled re-entrant cellular structure with negative Poisson's ratio. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 153: 106679.
66.
SongSYinJLiuL, et al.Low‐velocity impact responses of polymethacrylimide foam–reinforced all‐composite kagome honeycomb sandwich structures. Polym Compos2024; 45(7): 6155–6168.
67.
ShiNZhangWLiuH, et al.Experimental and simulation study of fiber-reinforced and foam-filled anti-tetrachiral and re-entrant structures. Mater Today Commun2024; 41: 110916.
68.
LiuZYangLWangZ, et al.Anti-penetration properties of negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb sandwich structure filled with foam. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 32: 2511–2521.
69.
BaiCShiHYanQ, et al.All-composite honeycomb-enhanced corrugated hybrid structures to improve flexural responses. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2024; 184: 108282.
70.
ChenJZhuLFangH, et al.Study on the low-velocity impact response of foam-filled multi-cavity composite panels. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 173: 108953.
71.
PengXLSoyarslanCBargmannS. Phase contrast mediated switch of auxetic mechanism in composites of infilled re-entrant honeycomb microstructures. Extreme Mechanics Letters2020; 35: 100641.
LiuWHuangJDengX, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of cylindrical tubes filled with conventional and negative Poisson's ratio foams. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 131: 297–308.
74.
XuHHLuoHCZhangXG, et al.Mechanical properties of aluminum foam filled re-entrant honeycomb with uniform and gradient designs. Int J Mech Sci2023; 244: 108075.
75.
LiHBiSCaiJ, et al.Reduced graphene oxide/nonwoven fabric filled honeycomb composite structure for broadband microwave absorption. Carbon2024; 223: 119005.
76.
Shafiei GhazaniANasiraeiHNajafzadehM, et al.Thermal management of photovoltaic panel by honeycomb-like metal structure filled with phase change material. Int Commun Heat Mass Tran2024; 156: 107649.
77.
SongSXiongCYinJ, et al.Cell-filling reinforced materials for improving the low-velocity impact performance of composite square honeycomb sandwiches: polymethacrylimide foam vs. aluminum foam. Alex Eng J2023; 78: 543–560.
78.
ZhaoCGohKLLeeHP, et al.Experimental study and finite element analysis on energy absorption of carbon fiber reinforced composite auxetic structures filled with aluminum foam. Compos Struct2023; 303: 116319.
79.
XieSWangHJingK, et al.Mechanical properties of nomex honeycombs filled with tubes of carbon fibre reinforced vinyl ester resin composites. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109933.
80.
LiZLiHYangY, et al.Nonlinear vibration behaviours of foam-filled honeycomb sandwich cylindrical shells: theoretical and experimental investigations. Aero Sci Technol2024; 151: 109252.
81.
MengZXuYXieJ, et al.Unraveling the reinforcing mechanisms for cementitious composites with 3D printed multidirectional auxetic lattices using X-ray computed tomography. Mater Des2024; 246: 113331.
82.
EtemadiEZhangMGholikordM, et al.Quasi-static and dynamic behavior analysis of 3D CFRP woven laminated composite auxetic structures for load-bearing and energy absorption applications. Compos Struct2024; 340: 118182.
83.
ScheidCMonteiroSAMelloW, et al.A novel honeycomb-like 3D-printed device for rotating-disk sorptive extraction of organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides from environmental water samples. J Chromatogr A2024; 1722: 464892.
84.
Van de WerkenNTekinalpHKhanboloukiP, et al.Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf2020; 31: 100962.
85.
PuYChangSHuangD, et al.Improving the mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced plastic Composite/nomex honeycomb sandwich panels by proposing a low-cost and operational process strategy. Mater Lett2025; 388: 138283.
86.
YeWDouHChengY, et al.Self-sensing properties of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA/TPU honeycomb structures during cyclic compression. Mater Lett2022; 317: 132077.
87.
WangYJYaoYSXuL, et al.Alleviation of honeycomb print-through of NiP/Cu coated carbon fiber composite mirror via robot-arm wheel polishing. Mater Chem Phys2022; 283: 126028.
88.
ChengYLiJQianX, et al.3D printed recoverable honeycomb composites reinforced by continuous carbon fibers. Compos Struct2021; 268: 113974.
89.
VellaisamySMunusamyR. Experimental study of 3D printed carbon fibre sandwich structures for lightweight applications. Def Technol2024; 36: 71–77.
90.
GuanSWangFWangH, et al.Enhancing planar compression performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced honeycomb sandwich structures using interleaved core paths. J Manuf Process2024; 120: 940–950.
91.
ZhangYZhengWFengX, et al.Wet twisting treatment, process parameter optimisation and mechanical failure mechanisms of 3D printed carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos Commun2025; 55: 102308.
92.
LiXWangXMeiD, et al.Acoustic-assisted DLP 3D printing process for carbon nanofiber reinforced honeycomb structures. J Manuf Process2024; 121: 374–381.
93.
AmarTAKumarAYadavDK. A comparative study on the properties of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites developed by hand layup and vacuum bagging molding techniques. J Inst Eng India Ser D2024; 106: 263–275.
94.
LiZXuePXiongJ. Fabrication and mechanical properties of CFRP honeycomb cylinder based on the transforming from the flat honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol2025; 259: 110948.
95.
AliaRAAl-AliOKumarS, et al.The energy-absorbing characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy honeycomb structures. J Compos Mater2019; 53(9): 1145–1157.
96.
OkurMZKangalSTanoğluM. Development of aluminum honeycomb cored carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite based sandwich structure. Preprints2018.
ZhangJLinGVaidyaU, et al.Past, present and future prospective of global carbon fibre composite developments and applications. Compos B Eng2023; 250: 110463.
99.
WangZLiJZhangW, et al.Fabrication and in-plane compressive collapse of CFRP honeycomb metamaterials. Compos Sci Technol2024; 258: 110888.
100.
ChengPPengYLiS, et al.3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite lightweight structures: a review and outlook. Compos B Eng2023; 250: 110450.
101.
ZhangHLiAWuJ, et al.Multi-material 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoset composites with tailored fibre paths and bespoke conforming thermoplastic moulds. Compos B Eng2025; 298: 112373.
102.
DengGChenLZhuS, et al.Preparation and quasi-static compressive behavior of fiber-reinforced truncated conical shells. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 210: 113035.
103.
LiKZhangMEtemadiE, et al.Quasi-static compression response and structural parameter optimization of CFRP 3D hybrid auxetic lattice structure with enhanced stiffness. Eng Struct2025; 328: 119681.
104.
TianCTianZTuP, et al.Research on the energy absorption characteristics of lattice composite sandwich structural beams subjected to pure bending loads. Structures2024; 65: 106715.
105.
SunXHuangZWangT, et al.Study on axial compression property of thin walled tube filled with negative Poisson’s ratio lattice. Adv Mech Eng2023; 15(3): 16878132231160929.
106.
MansooriHHamzeheiRDariushiS. Crashworthiness analysis of cylindrical tubes with coupling effects under quasi-static axial loading: an experimental and numerical study. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2022; 236(3): 647–662.
107.
LiuJZhangDTaoY, et al.Effect of ICCP on tensile performance of carbon fiber bundles in seawater sea-sand cementitious matrix. J Build Eng2024; 95: 110042.
108.
LiuJZhangDTaoY, et al.A pull-out equivalent telescopic layered failure model of carbon fiber bundles in seawater sea-sand cementitious matrix. Eng Struct2024; 308: 118052.
109.
DuYDongCZhouF, et al.Research on high-performance adhesive based on the tensile properties of impregnated carbon fiber bundles under harsh environment. Constr Build Mater2025; 459: 139824.
110.
OkumuraTTakahashiRHagitaK, et al.Improving the strength and toughness of macroscale double networks by exploiting Poisson’s ratio mismatch. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 13280.
111.
ChenXWangRChuZ, et al.Bending and compressive properties of ultralight carbon fiber honeycomb sandwich beams via stretching process. Eur J Mech Solid2025; 109: 105460.
112.
DongHWangHHazellPJ, et al.Effects of printing parameters on the quasi-static and dynamic compression behaviour of 3D-Printed Re-entrant auxetic structures. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 210: 113000.
113.
DouHYeWZhangD, et al.Comparative study on in-plane compression properties of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composite honeycomb and aluminum alloy honeycomb. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 176: 109335.
114.
WeiXWangYJiaoY, et al.Bending behaviors of carbon fiber composite honeycomb cores with various in-plane stiffness. Compos Struct2024; 347: 118448.
115.
ZhangXZhengXHanY, et al.Failure mechanisms and process defects of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced composite circular honeycomb structures with different stacking directions. Aero Sci Technol2024; 148: 109075.
116.
FeliSNamdari PourMH. An analytical model for composite sandwich panels with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact. Compos B Eng2012; 43(5): 2439–2447.
117.
ShiSWangGHuC, et al.Impact response of carbon fiber/aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures under multiple low-velocity loads. Compos Sci Technol2025; 261: 111027.
118.
YunZZhaoWChenL, et al.Thermoplastic sandwich cylindrical structure with hierarchical honeycomb core: dynamic/static compression and compression-after-impact behavior. Int J Impact Eng2025; 201: 105289.
119.
DengYHuX. Dynamic response of composite honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to strong dynamic loading. Eng Struct2025; 322: 119032.
120.
ChenCAiroldiACaporaleAM, et al.Impact response of composite energy absorbers based on foam-filled metallic and polymeric auxetic frames. Compos Struct2024; 331: 117916.
121.
SimpsonJKazancıZ. Crushing investigation of crash boxes filled with honeycomb and re-entrant (auxetic) lattices. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 150: 106676.
GhovehoudMRSarramiSAzhariM, et al.Dynamic instability analysis of sandwich plates with auxetic honeycomb core and three-phase hybrid composite layers stiffened by curved stiffeners using isogeometric analysis. Eng Struct2024; 308: 117960.
124.
LiZMaZWangJ, et al.Low-velocity impact behavior and damage mechanisms of honeycomb sandwich structures with elastomeric interlayers in CFRP skins. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 205: 112482.
125.
LiuZLuoXHeX, et al.The dynamic response of composite auxetic re-entrant honeycomb structure subjected to underwater impulsive loading. Int J Impact Eng2024; 191: 104999.
126.
YuanKShenLXiongW, et al.The impact and post-impact flexural behaviors of CFRP/aluminum-honeycomb sandwich. Int J Impact Eng2023; 174: 104507.
127.
WangYWeiXLiZ, et al.Low-velocity impact responses and failure of sandwich structure with carbon fiber composite honeycomb cores. Int J Impact Eng2024; 192: 105034.
128.
ZhongRRenXYu ZhangX, et al.Mechanical properties of concrete composites with auxetic single and layered honeycomb structures. Constr Build Mater2022; 322: 126453.
129.
PengYYinJWangX, et al.Analysis of the tensile mechanical performance of the adhesive and rivet hybrid connection in carbon fiber reinforced composite rail vehicles. Compos Commun2025; 56: 102347.
130.
WangFMingYZhaoY, et al.Fabrication of a novel continuous fiber 3D printed thermoset all-composite honeycomb sandwich structure with polymethacrylimide foam reinforcement. Compos Commun2024; 45: 101794.
131.
WuLZhaoFLuZ, et al.Impact energy absorption composites with shear stiffening gel-filled negative poisson's ratio skeleton by kirigami method. Compos Struct2022; 298: 116009.
132.
LiJJiaDJiaoY, et al.Preparation of biomimetic reinforced modified carbon fiber composites and study of their friction properties. Ceram Int2024; 50(13): 24539–24548.
133.
YuHChenHLiangB, et al.Bending behaviors and toughening mechanism of carbon fiber-aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with stitched fiber belts. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2024; 180: 108072.
134.
FengLJYangZTYuGC, et al.Compressive and shear properties of carbon fiber composite square honeycombs with optimized high-modulus hierarchical phases. Compos Struct2018; 201: 845–856.
135.
WangZChenXYuG, et al.Improving shear strength of carbon fiber composite honeycombs with the surface microprinting technology. Compos Struct2023; 304: 116420.
136.
GuoLWangHLiW, et al.Multi-scale damage modeling and out-of-plane shear behavior of carbon/carbon honeycomb structure. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 192: 111103.
137.
GaoQLiaoWHWangL, et al.Crashworthiness optimization of cylindrical negative Poisson’s ratio structures with inner liner tubes. Struct Multidiscip Optim2021; 64: 4271–4286.
138.
LiZWangYXiongJ. Low-velocity impact performance and damage mechanisms of all-CFRP honeycomb sandwich shell. Int J Impact Eng2025; 199: 105231.
139.
LiuXBaiCXiX, et al.Impact response and crashworthy design of composite fuselage structures: an overview. Prog Aero Sci2024; 148: 101002.
140.
GuoYZhangJChenL, et al.Deformation behaviors and energy absorption of auxetic lattice cylindrical structures under axial crushing load. Aero Sci Technol2020; 98: 105662.
141.
LiuYZhaoCXuC, et al.Shape recovery effect and energy absorption of reusable honeycomb structures. Compos Struct2025; 352: 118708.
HeoJChoNKKimDK. Enhanced energy absorption and reusability of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre reinforced honeycomb beams under three-point bending loads. Eng Struct2025; 329: 119877.
144.
HuangQDengQLiX, et al.Deformation mode and energy absorption of self-assembly CFRP composites cellular structure by 3D printing. Mater Lett2024; 372: 137014.
145.
PehlivanLBaykasoğluC. In-plane crushing behavior and energy absorption of CFRP honeycombs with different core topologies. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 205: 112566.
146.
AndrewJJUddinMAKumarS, et al.Mechanical and piezoresistive performance of additively manufactured carbon fiber/PA12 hybrid honeycombs. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 201: 111950.
147.
LiuAWangAJiangQ, et al.Structure design and performance evaluation of fibre reinforced composite honeycombs: a review. Appl Compos Mater2024; 31: 2019–2045.
148.
GuoLWangHYangY, et al.A multi-scale damage model and mechanical behavior for novel light-weight C/C honeycomb sandwich structure. J Mater Res Technol2023; 25: 2097–2111.
149.
XieBTianRZhaoH, et al.Controlling crack propagation in layered beams with architected lattice-reinforced composite interlayer designs. Constr Build Mater2024; 426: 136174.
