Aiming to address the multi-objective cooperative optimization problem of ship structure lightweight and crashed-resistance, this study proposed a concave reentrant honeycomb-based negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) sandwich structure to replace the stiffened plate. The feasibility of using the sandwich structure to improve ship crashworthiness is demonstrated through finite element analysis. An intelligent optimization method is established to address the issues of multiple parameters and complex effects associated with composite structures and optimize the crashworthiness of the sandwich structure. The effectiveness of the optimization method and the feasibility of the NPR sandwich structure in ship crashworthiness have been validated, providing a reference for the design of new multi-functional ship structures.
LiuBPedersenPTZhuL, et al.Review of experiments and calculation procedures for ship collision and grounding damage. Mar Struct2018; 59: 105–121.
2.
Chien-ChangC. Modelling and simulation of ship collisions in port and coastal waters. Proc Inst Mech Eng2021; 235(3): 737–749.
3.
ContiFLe SourneHVassalosD, et al.A comparative method for scaling SOLAS collision damage distributions based on ship crashworthiness–application to probabilistic damage stability analysis of a passenger ship. Ships Offshore Struct2022; 17(7): 1498–1514.
4.
SteniusIRosenAKuttenkeulerJ. On structural design of energy efficient small high-speed craft. Mar Struct2011; 24(1): 43–59.
5.
QiuALinWMaY, et al.Novel material and structural design for large-scale marine protective devices. Mater Des2015; 68: 29–41.
6.
TianAYeRChenY. A new higher order analysis model for sandwich plates with flexible core. J Compos Mater2016; 50(7): 949–961.
7.
ParkEBJeongYCKangK. A novel auxetic sandwich panel for use in structural applications: fabrication and parametric study. Mater Today Commun2023; 34: 105383.
8.
ShuklaSBeheraBK. Auxetic fibrous structures and their composites: a review. Compos Struct2022; 290: 115530.
9.
ZhangJZhuXYangX, et al.Transient nonlinear responses of an auxetic honeycomb sandwich plate under impact loads. Int J Impact Eng2019; 134: 103383.
10.
LiDYinJDongL, et al.Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci2018; 53, 3493–3499.
11.
LiuJYLiuHT. Energy absorption characteristics and stability of novel bionic negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb under oblique compression. Eng Struct2022; 267: 114682.
12.
WangJLuoXWangK, et al.On impact behaviors of 3D concave structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. Compos Struct2022; 298: 115999.
13.
MaYLiuZZhangT, et al.Crushing behavior and energy absorption performance of a novel 3D folded structure with negative Poisson’s ratio. Advanced Engine Mate2023; 25: 2201769.
14.
SongZLiangHDingH, et al.Structure design and mechanical properties of a novel anti-collision system with negative Poisson’s ratio core. Int J Mech Sci2023; 239: 107864.
15.
QiCJiangFYangS, et al.Dynamic crushing response of novel re-entrant circular auxetic honeycombs: numerical simulation and theoretical analysis[J]. Aero Sci Technol2022; 124: 107548.
16.
LiuXYangPYuanY, et al.Sandwich structure with negative Poisson’s ratio of periodic rectangular tube: mechanical properties and energy absorption. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24(7): 2065–2082.
17.
NiuXXuFZouZ. Bionic inspired honeycomb structures and multi-objective optimization for variable graded layers. J Sandw Struct Mater2023; 25(2): 215–231. DOI: 10.1177/10996362221127969.
18.
YinHMengFZhuL, et al.Optimization design of a novel hybrid hierarchical cellular structure for crashworthiness. Compos Struct2023; 303: 116335.
19.
DjamaluddinFOptimization of multi cell fender under transverse loading. Ocean Eng2023; 272: 113740.
20.
HouWHePYangY, et al.Crashworthiness optimization of crash box with 3D-printed lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci2023; 247: 108198.
21.
JiangFYangSQiC, et al.Blast response and multi-objective optimization of graded re-entrant circular auxetic cored sandwich panels. Compos Struct2023; 305: 116494.
22.
YinHFangHWenG, et al.An adaptive RBF-based multi-objective optimization method for crashworthiness design of functionally graded multi-cell tube. Struct Multidiscip Optim2016; 53: 129–144.
23.
EtemadAShafaatABahmanAM. Data-driven performance analysis of a residential building applying artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA). Build Environ2022; 225: 109633.
24.
CuiYMengXQiaoJ. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on two-archive mechanism. Appl Soft Comput2022; 119: 108532.
25.
CaoPZhangYZhouK, et al.A reinforcement learning hyper-heuristic in multi-objective optimization with application to structural damage identification. Struct Multidiscip Optim2023; 66(1): 16.
26.
Falcón-CardonaJGLeguizamónGCoello CoelloCA, et al.Multi-objective ant colony optimization: an updated review of approaches and applications. Advan Mach Learn Ana2022; 218: 1–32.
27.
WangCYZouSCZhaoWZ. Multi-objective optimization of a novel crash box with a three-dimensional negative Poisson’s ratio inner core. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part D J Automob Eng2019; 233(2): 263–275.
28.
MaQRejabMRMSiregarJP, et al.A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels. J Compos Mater2021; 55(18): 2513–2555.
29.
WangLYanW. Vibration and noise reduction of marine sandwich structures with negative Poisson’s ratio cores. J Sound Vib2019; 460: 114956.
30.
LiuBSoaresCG. Plastic response and failure of rectangular cross-section tubes subjected to transverse quasi-static and low-velocity impact loads. Int J Mech Sci2015; 90: 213–227.
31.
LiuBSoaresCG. Simplified analytical method for evaluating web girder crushing during ship collision and grounding. Mar Struct2015; 42: 71–94.
32.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular solids: structure and properties [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
33.
XiHXuJCenS, et al.Energy absorption characteristics of a novel asymmetric and rotatable Re-entrant honeycomb structure. Acta Mech Solida Sin2021; 34(2):1–11.
34.
TianAYaoPZouJ, et al.Crashworthiness optimization method for sandwich plate structure under impact loading. Ocean Eng2022; 250:110870.
