Mechanical properties and wear performance of denture base polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with nano Al 2 O 3

Abstract

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been widely used as a material in dentistry. The deterioration of pure PMMA denture teeth is a significant issue that can alter the vertical dimensions of dentures. This study investigates the effect of aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) nano-ceramic addition as reinforcements into the heat-cure acrylic resin denture teeth. The PMMA was reinforced with Al₂O₃ concentrations of 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.%. The PMMA without ceramic addition is produced for comparison purposes. The color change, densification, microhardness, and compressive properties of the produced PMMA resin and its composites were investigated to detect the effect of Al₂O₃ nano ceramic addition on the physical and mechanical properties. Furthermore, the microstructure was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. A chewing simulator was utilized to conduct two-body wear testing, employing a human enamel antagonist. The wear behavior of the PMMA and their composites were assessed by measuring the weight loss after submitting them to 37,500 cycles. The SEM microstructure analysis revealed sound specimens of PMMA reinforced with 0, 1, 3, and 5 wt.% Al₂O₃ without any porosity and micro defects using the applied production procedures. In contrast, the aggregated sites and propagation of cracks were detected for the PMMA/10 wt.% Al₂O₃ specimen. The densification and hardness properties of the produced PMMA composites improved with increasing the Al₂O₃ additions. The microhardness of PMMA/10 wt.% Al₂O₃ improved by around 233% compared to the PMMA matrix. The higher compressive properties were detected for the PMMA/5 wt.% Al₂O₃ composite specimen with ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of 54.75 MPa and yield strength (YS) of 45.6 MPa and improved than the PMMA matrix by around 98 % and 117 %, respectively. In addition, incorporating Al₂O₃ nano-ceramic particles into a PMMA matrix revealed a significant improvement in the wear resistance of the produced composites compared to the PMMA matrix.

Keywords

Polymethyl methacrylate denture-based applications mechanical properties wear

Introduction

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been widely used as a base material in dentistry. Since its introduction to denture applications, it has been owing to its excellent biocompatibility in the oral environment, ease of usage, acceptable aesthetic, lower susceptibility to clicking or fracture, color-matching ability, lightweight, and cheap cost.^1–3 Despite this, there are several drawbacks, the most notable of which are inadequate surface hardness and low flexural strength, which might increase the risk of denture fracture.^4,5 Previous investigations showed that over 60 % of PMMA dentures fail within some years after being produced.⁶ Numerous studies have been conducted to enhance the properties of PMMA. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to improve the properties of PMMA involving reinforcement with metallic plates or wires and fibers.^7,8 Firstly, stainless steel or Co/Cr alloys produce metallic plates or wires.^9,10 However, these metallic alloys exhibit limitations at odds with the accepted standards, such as poor bonding between the PMMA resin and the reinforcing metal.¹¹ This poor adhesion reduces the properties of PMMA resin dentures and induces poor aesthetics. In addition, metal-reinforced PMMA becomes noticeably heavier, and they may be costly and tend to corrosion.¹¹ Other studies focused on improving PMMA resin properties include fiber reinforcement.^9,12 Different fibers like aramid fiber,¹³ carbon fiber,^14,15 nylon fiber,^16,17 and glass fiber^18,19 have all been investigated. Ultra-high polyethylene fiber does not indicate good bonding to PMMA resin; thus, no notable improvement in properties has been marked. Aramid and carbon fibers are unsuitable reinforcement due to difficulties in polishing and poor aesthetics of the final products. However, nylon reinforcement improves the properties of the PMMA acrylic resins. An investigation by Vallittu et al.¹⁸ on the heat-cured PMMA resin reinforced with glass fiber revealed improved PMMA/glass fiber properties. However, a random distribution of the fibers in the resin matrix might lead to defects in the final product.²⁰ Also, controlling the orientation of the fibers in the PMMA resin matrix is technically tricky.²¹ Recently, nano-ceramic materials, such as bio-ceramic nanoparticles, have been studied for their potential to enhance the properties of PMMA acrylic resins in recent years.^5,22–24 Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) is a ceramic material commonly used to manufacture dentures as reinforcements for the PMMA.^25,26 It is biocompatible, which means it does not cause an allergic reaction when it comes into contact with the body.^27,28 It is also strong, durable, and wear and tear-resistant.^29,30

Additionally, Al₂O₃ can be colored to match teeth’ natural color, making it an attractive material for dentures. Further, alumina dentures can be customized to fit the natural color and shape of the patient’s teeth, making them a popular choice for those looking for a more realistic and natural-looking denture. Compared to other ceramic materials, Al₂O₃ has a higher strength-to-weight ratio, making it less brittle and more resistant to fractures.^31–33 It also has a high resistance to wear and abrasion, making it suitable for use in areas of high stress and pressure.³⁴ Additionally, Al₂O₃ is biocompatible, which means that it does not cause adverse reactions in the body and is suitable for use in dental restorations.^29,35 Other ceramic materials that are commonly used in dentures include zirconia and lithium disilicate.^36,37 Zirconia is known for its high strength and durability, but it is more brittle than alumina and can be more prone to fractures. Lithium disilicate is known for its high esthetic properties, but it is less durable than alumina and may not be suitable for use in areas of high stress and pressure. Helal et al.³⁸ investigated the effect of SiO₂ (0–0.5 wt.%) and Al₂O₃ (0–0.5 wt.%) nanoparticles on the wear resistance of PMMA acrylic denture teeth. The specimens were subjected to wear testing, and the weight loss and surface roughness were measured. The results showed that teeth modified with nano-SiO₂ exhibited a significant increase in weight loss compared to conventional acrylic teeth, while teeth modified with nano-Al₂O₃ showed a non-significant increase in weight loss, except for the 0.5% subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in surface roughness among the tested groups. Nabhan et al.²⁹ studied the use of a hybrid filler made of Al₂O₃ and TiO₂ nanoparticles to improve the physical and mechanical properties of PMMA. The researchers combined Al₂O₃ and TiO₂ nanoparticles as a potential solution to enhance the properties of PMMA. They varied the concentrations of the filler (0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2.0 wt%) to evaluate its effect. They concluded that incorporating a hybrid Al₂O₃/TiO₂ nanoparticle filler, particularly at an optimized content of 0.8 wt%, can significantly enhance the mechanical and wear properties of PMMA. Table 1 summarizes the previous works focused on the study of the effect of Al₂O₃ addition on the PMMA.

Table 1.

Available previous works applied the Al₂O₃ as reinforcement to produce PMMA/Al₂O₃.

No.	Authors	PMMA matrix	Al₂O₃ (Size/content)	Major observations
1	Vojdani et al.⁶	Heat-cured resin	3 µm/0.5:5 wt.%	Improved the hardness and flexural strength and increased the roughness
2	Gallab et al.³⁹	Cold-cured resin	40–50 nm/0:1 wt.%	Improved the properties of hardness, compressive, and wear
3	Pokuri et al.⁴⁰	Heat-cured resin	>50 nm/0:5 wt.%	Improved flexural strength and hardness
4	Malisicet al.³⁵	Polymethyl methacrylate	50–80 nm/5 wt.%	Increased strength and thermal stability. Pure white specimens turn yellow

PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Based on the available previous works, Vojdani et al.⁶ and Pokuri et al.⁴⁰ applied the Al₂O₃ as reinforcements with a concentration ranging from 0.5:5% and 0:1%, respectively, to enhance the Heat-cure acrylic resins. In the investigation of Vojdani et al.,⁶ the results showed that adding Al₂O₃ nanoparticles up to an optimal concentration of 1% by weight improves the tensile strength, flexural strength, hardness, thermal conductivity, and wear resistance of PMMA nanocomposites compared to pure PMMA. While in the Pokuri et al.⁴⁰ investigation, the optimum content of 0.6 wt% Al₂O₃, the nanocomposites exhibited significant enhancements in compressive yield strength (14% increase), elastic modulus (20% increase), fracture toughness (10% increase), and wear resistance (26% reduction in wear rate) compared to pure PMMA. Based on the available literature, there is a lack of comprehensive studies investigating the effects of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles as a reinforcement for heat-cure acrylic resins on the properties of PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites, particularly their physical, mechanical, and wear characteristics. Consequently, the present investigation aims to bridge this knowledge gap by producing PMMA reinforced with Al₂O₃ nanoparticles (20–50 nm) at a wide range of different concentrations, specifically 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.%. Also, the current work suggested a different production cycle to produce PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites samples. The study aims to evaluate the color changing, density, hardness, compressive, and wear properties of the produced PMMA material and their nano Al₂O₃ composites.

Experimental work

Materials

Heat-cure acrylic resins (Polymethyl methacrylate - PMMA) are used as a matrix and supplied by Acrostone company for Dental and Medical materials in Egypt. Aluminum oxide nano-ceramic particles (Sigma-Aldrich Company, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany) were chosen as reinforcement to fabricate the PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites. Figure 1 displays the SEM images and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the nano Al₂O₃ particles. The XRD patterns provide evidence of the Al₂O₃ powder’s high purity. At the same time, the SEM image reveals that the nano Al₂O₃ powder exhibits irregular shapes and particle sizes ranging from 20 to 50 nm.

Figure 1.

XRD analysis and SEM images of the Al₂O₃ nano ceramic particles. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Fabrication of PMMA/Al₂O₃ nano composites

To produce the PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites, the PMMA matrix was reinforced with additional weight percent (wt.%) of Al₂O₃ of 1, 3, 5, 10 wt.%. The PMMA resin powder and Al₂O₃ nanoparticles were preweighed (Figure 2(a)) using 0,0001g electronic analytical balances (model: BA-E Series, Lixia District, Jinan, Shandong, China). The PMMA/Al₂O₃ mixture composition details and their coding utilized in this investigation are illustrated in Table 2. Afterward, the PMMA resin powder was mixed with Al₂O₃ nanoparticles and liquid monomer. The PMMA powder and the nano Al₂O₃ were thoroughly mixed utilizing a mortar and pestle for the initial blending (Figure 2(b)). Tumbling by hand in a plastic bowl was performed until a uniform color was obtained. The monomer solution was added to the PMMA/Al₂O₃ mixture at a 2:1 ratio by volume (according to the manufacturer’s instructions) in a mixing bowl with a close-fitting lid (Figure 2(c)).

Figure 2.

Illustration sketch of the manufacturing of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composite samples for dentures. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Table 2.

The composition details of the produced PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites.

Sample no.	Sample code	PMMA, (g)	PMMA, (Wt.%)	Al₂O_3, (g)	A1₂O_3, (Wt.%)
1	S0	8	100	0	0
2	S1	7.92	99	0.08	1
3	S3	7.76	97	0.24	3
4	S5	7.60	95	0.40	5
5	S10	7.20	90	0.80	10

PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

The mixing of PMMA and Al₂O₃ proceeded for roughly 20 min until the mixture reached the dough-like stage and was appropriate for handling. Afterward, the mixture was placed into a mold by hand, including two cavities with a 7 mm diameter and height of 50 mm (Figure 2(d)). The mold was formed inside an aluminum flask. Before packing the mixture into the mold, a separating medium of sodium alginate (Acrostone company for Dental and Medical materials in Egypt) was used on the mold surface to subtract the samples easily and quickly. The aluminum flask was then closed, placed in a press at 15 MPa, and the pressure was released (Figure 2(d)). The remaining mixture was taken from the mold and repressed for 15 min at room temperature. The flask with mold was cured for 6 h in a temperature-controlled water bath. The curing procedure required heating to approximately 60 ± 2°C over 1 h and maintaining it for 3 h (Figure 2(e)). The heat polymerization cycle was completed by raising the temperature to approximately 95 ± 2°C over 2 h (Figure 2(f)). After 30 min at ambient temperature, the flask was removed from the curing water. The flask was opened, and the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ samples produced were removed from the mold. The PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ samples were ground and then polished (Figure 2(g)) with pumice powder with the emery paper using a polishing machine (Bench Brinder, Elite, Model: PT-BG011-200, China).

Characterization of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

The densities of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites specimens were produced according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-792. Furthermore, at least two specimens were measured for each composite. Microhardness measurements of the produced PMMA and their nanocomposites were measured at 100 g with a dwell time of 10 s using the BUEHLER 1600-6300 Microhardness Tester, Guiseley, England. The average microhardness of the measured specimens was calculated from at least eight readings for each produced specimen. The compression test of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites was also conducted according to the ASTM D695. The compression test was achieved at room temperature with a 1.2 mm/min crosshead speed using the universal testing machine, WDW-300D, Guangdong, China. For the wear test, caries-free human premolar teeth without fractures or worn cusps were removed for orthodontic treatment and preserved in 0.1% thymol solution (approved by the authorized ethical committee of the Faculty of Dentistry Suez Canal University, no297/2020). The Miniflex diamond disc (No. 943) manufactured by Brasseler, Lemgo, Germany, was used to cut the buccal cusps together with the buccal surfaces. They were placed in a self-cured acrylic resin mold (Acrostone Co., Cairo, Egypt) within a specimen holder. A dental surveyor directed their placement to fit the natural tooth surfaces to the specimen holder’s long axis.⁴¹ The buccal surface of each tooth specimen was wet abraded, and polished with 1000, 2500, and 4000 grit abrasive paper before the wear test to obtain a flat region ranging from 2 to 3 mm for loading during the wear test.⁴¹ The wear test used a Robtonic, Netherlands, Model CS4 chewing simulator (Figure 3(a)). Figure 3(b) shows an illustration sketch of the chewing simulator setup. The buccal surface of premolar teeth was used as an antagonist in the lower plastic container for all PMMA samples (Figure 3). The upper holder held produced PMMA samples in contact with the teeth (Figure 3). 5 kg (49 N) as chewing power was applied, and 37,500 cycles were used to simulate 3 months of clinical function on the tested samples. After the wear test, the tested samples were rinsed with running water and ultrasonically cleaned for 2 min to eliminate any abraded particles during the wear test. The PMMA and their nanocomposite tooth samples were tested for wear using weight loss. The weight loss before and after the wear test was measured using an electronic analytical balance (model: BA-E Series, Lixia District, Jinan, Shandong, China)) with 0.0001 g accuracy. The PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites densities specimens and the worn surface of the wear-tested samples were investigated using SEM model QUANTA FEG 250, FEI Company, USA.

Figure 3.

(a) Chewing simulator and (b) illustration sketch for one testing chamber of the chewing simulator setup.

Results and discussions

PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites color changes

PMMA composite color is of significant importance in dental applications. PMMA and its composites are common in dentistry for fabricating dental. The color of the PMMA composite used in these applications plays a crucial role in achieving natural esthetics of the fabricated dental. The color of the PMMA composite must closely match the natural color of the teeth to create a seamless and natural-looking restoration. Figure 4 illustrates the general effect of the concentration of Al₂O₃ on the transparency and color of the PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites. It can be remarked that the PMMA without Al₂O₃ (0 wt.%) exhibits high transparency compared to the reinforced PMMA samples. With increasing the Al₂O₃ concentrations from 1 to 10 wt.%, the optical properties of the produced PMMA composites are changed, including their transparency and color. At 1 to 3 wt.% concentrations of Al₂O₃, the PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites may show reduced transparency compared to PMMA without Al₂O₃. The presence of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles leads to increased light scattering, reduced transparency, and color changes. In addition, PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites with high 5 and 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ concentrations exhibit significantly reduced transparency with color changes. As Al₂O₃ concentration increases in the PMMA matrix, the probability of aggregation and light scattering increases, leading to reduced light transmittance and increased opacity in the produced PMMA composites. The natural color of teeth can vary, but a typical range for the color of human teeth is between A1 and B4 on the Vita shade guide, which corresponds to a range of hex and RGB color codes.^42,43 The hex code for A1 is #F2EFE9, and the RGB values are R: 242, G: 239, and B: 233. The hex code for B4 is #D4C8BE, and the RGB values are R: 212, G: 200, and B: 190. These color codes are used in dentistry for shade matching and cosmetic dental procedures. Table 3 lists the HEX and RGB codes of the produced PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites. It can be noted that the color codes of the PMMA composites reinforced by the 1 and 3 wt.% Al₂O₃ in the accepted range of the color of human teeth. Besides, the PMMA composites reinforced by the 5 and 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ in the acceptable range of R and the values of G and B are considered close to the upper limits of adequate values.

Figure 4.

Effect of the Al₂O₃ concentrations on the PMMA/Al₂O₃ color. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Table 3.

The composition details of the produced PMMA/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites.

No.	A1₂O_3, (Wt.%)	HEX color code	RGB color code
1	1	#dad9e1	221,220,226
2	3	#d7dce2	215,220,226
3	5	#edf6fd	237,240,236
4	10	#eef3f8	238,244,242

Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Microstructure of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Figure 5 illustrates the SEM microstructure of the produced (a) PMMA sample and their composites reinforced with (b) 1 wt.%, (c) 5 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ ceramic particles. The PMMA matrix has a dark grey appearance, but the Al₂O₃ nanoparticles manifest as white spots dispersed across the PMMA matrix. It can be remarked that the unreinforced PMMA sample revealed no porosity. The absence of porosity in the unreinforced PMMA sample suggests that the applied production technique (Figure 2) can successfully develop sound PMMA composites with high densifications near the theoretical density of composites. The PMMA composites reinforced with Al₂O₃ exhibit a near homogeneous distribution of A1₂O₃ nanoparticles, with few agglomerations up to a 5% Al₂O₃ content, as depicted in Figure 5(b) and (c). The SEM images of the produced samples, which were reinforced with A1₂O₃ up to a concentration of 5%, demonstrated that the employed production technique effectively facilitated the uniform distribution of nanoparticles without any porosities. The developed microstructure of composite samples can be attributed to the influence of the implemented techniques involving mixing, pressing, and heating procedures in manufacturing PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites (Figure 2). So; the applied procedures can be used to manufacture the PMMA/nano-ceramic composites that exhibited a good dispersion of nanoparticles characterized by minimal aggregation sites.

Figure 5.

SEM images of the produced (a) PMMA samples and their corresponding PMMA composites reinforced by (b) 1 wt.%, (c) 5 wt.% Al₂O₃. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 6 shows the microstructure of the PMMA reinforced by the high concentration of 10 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ composite sample. It can be remarked that the addition of a high concentration of 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ within the PMMA matrix has been found to have a pronounced effect on the aggregation of Al₂O₃ particles and promoting crack initiation, as shown in Figure 6(a)–(c). The high concentration of Al₂O₃ results in inter-particle attraction, leading to increased particle aggregation and subsequently negatively affecting the uniformity of dispersion within the PMMA matrix. As a result, these aggregated sites have the potential to serve as sites for stress concentration, hence increasing the initiation and propagation of cracks inside the produced composite. These aggregations are expected to negatively affect densification and mechanical properties and heightened susceptibility to crack formation under external loads.

Figure 6.

Different magnifications of SEM images for the PMMA/10 wt.% Al₂O₃ composite sample. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

The objective of colored elemental mapping is to detect the dispersion of Al2O3 in the PMMA matrix and provide a visual representation of the distribution and concentration of Al and O elements within the PMMA matrix. The color-coded map represents the elemental distribution of the PMMA composite reinforced with 5 wt.% Al₂O₃ is dotted in different colors, as shown in Figure 7. Figure 7(a)–(c) depicts the elemental maps of carbon (C), oxygen (O), and aluminum (Al), respectively. Furthermore, it was observed that the A1₂O₃ nanoparticles exhibit a uniform distribution within the PMMA matrix. The EDS results in Figure 7 demonstrate no evidence of any unwanted phase formation during the preparation and production of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites.

Figure 7.

Elemental colored map and the corresponding composition analysis of the PMMA/5 wt.% Al₂O₃ composite sample. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Density of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Figure 8 shows the bulk and the relative densities of the produced PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites reinforced with five concentrations (0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.%) of Al₂O₃. The bulk density of the PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites increases with increasing Al₂O₃ concentrations, and the relative density decreases. The density of the PMMA matrix and their composites ranged from 1.171 to 1.405 g/cm³ with increasing the Al₂O₃ concentration from 0 to 10 wt%, respectively. In contrast, the lower relative density of 96.88 % was achieved at a higher Al₂O₃ concentration of 10 wt.%, and the higher relative density of 99.26 was obtained at the PMMA sample produced without the Al₂O₃ addition. Firstly, the Al₂O₃ nanoparticles have a higher density than the PMMA matrix. Al₂O₃ has 3.95 g/cm³, while PMMA has 1.18 g/cm³. So, as denser Al₂O₃ nanoparticles are added to the matrix, the bulk density of the PMMA composites increases. In addition, the Al₂O₃ nanoparticles can fill the void spaces between the PMMA chains. This leads to an increase in the bulk density of the produced PMMA composites. On the other hand, the relative density refers to the ratio of its bulk density to the theoretical density of the composite. It can be remarked that increasing the Al₂O₃ concentration decreased the relative density of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites, as shown in Figure 8. It can be noted that increasing the Al₂O₃ concentration leads to reducing the relative density of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites, as shown in Figure 8. This is because Al₂O₃ is denser than the PMMA matrix, and increasing its concentration in the PMMA composites can increase the volume without adding much mass, leading to a decrease in the relative density of the PMMA composite.

Figure 8.

Density and relative density of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites produced at different concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% Al₂O₃. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Moreover, during the heat polymerization process (Figure 2), the applied temperature is attained, and therefore, part of the monomer evaporates, leading to a chance of void formation.⁴⁴ Additionally, adding Al₂O₃ nanoparticles can create voids or pores in the produced composites during the manufacturing process of the PMMA composites. These formed voids decrease the relative density of the PMMA composites. As Panda et al.⁴⁵ mentioned, increasing the proportion of voids within the produced composites can impact their different properties. As a result, the formed void volume fraction (according to Figure 8) in the formed PMMA matrix and their composite remained below 4%, which is considered an acceptable value according to Latief et al. investigation.⁴⁶ Finally, the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composite density slightly increased with the Al₂O₃ wt.% addition. The slight increase in the density property of the PMMA composites preserves the broad applicability of the PMMA and their composites,⁴⁷ especially in dental applications.

Compression test for PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

The compression test is a crucial evaluation test in dentistry for assessing dental materials' mechanical properties and performance. Dental materials, such as PMMA composites, must withstand the compressive forces exerted during chewing, biting, and occlusal loads. Compressive stress–strain curves of the PMMA matrix and their composites reinforced by the different concentrations of 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% are presented in Figure 9. These curves of tested specimens contribute to assessing the compressive properties of the formed PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites compared to the PMMA matrix. Figure 10(a) shows the compressive loading impact of the Al₂O₃ reinforcement on the denture PMMA matrix. UCS at 5% strain and YS were computed from the compressive stress–strain curves (Figure 10(a)). The UCS and the YS improved with increasing the Al₂O₃ nanofiller materials in the PMMA matrix and then decreased with increasing the Al₂O₃ over five wt.%. The maximum UCS of 54.75 MPa and YS of 45.60 MPa were observed in the PMMA/5 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ composite specimen, and compared with the PMMA matrix, the UCS and YS improved than the PMMA matrix by around 99 % and 117 %, respectively, this improvement for the PMMA with adding 1, 3, and 5 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ can be attributed to the homogenous distribution of the nano Al₂O₃ ceramic particles in the PMMA matrix (Figures 5 and 7), which enabled the PMMA to transfer the compressive load to the nano ceramic particles and disperse it. Further, during the compressive testing of PMMA composites, the nano Al₂O₃ can prevent the propagation of PMMA cracks as they start to form [8,9]. The significantly higher compressive properties of nano Al₂O₃ compared to the PMMA matrix.⁴⁶ The observed results indicate that adding the Al₂O₃ with 1, 3, and 5 wt.% can improve the compressive properties of the PMMA matrix, unlike 10 wt.% reinforced ceramic materials that promote aggregation of ceramic particles (Figure 6) and deteriorate the compressive properties like UCS and YS properties. Figure 10(b) illustrates the fracture toughness and the modulus of elasticity of the processed PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites compared to the PMMA matrix. From Figure 10(b), the modulus of elasticity and the fracture toughness increases with the increasing concentration of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles up to 5 wt.% and then decreases at 10 wt.% Al₂O₃. However, the 5 wt.% addition of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles to the PMMA matrix has significantly improved the modulus of elasticity by around ∼82 % compared with the PMMA matrix and slightly improved the fracture toughness by ∼ 1.12 %, as shown in Figure 10(b). This indicates that the toughness and ductility of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composite improvement could be attributed to the addition of the nano ceramic particles.^29,48

Figure 9.

Stress–strain curve of the compressive tested specimens for the PMMA matrix and their composites reinforced by the 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ nanoparticles. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 10.

Compressive properties of (a) UCS, YS, (b) fracture toughness, and modulus of elasticity of the compressive tested PMMA specimens. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate.

Microhardness of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Hardness property is an important test to evaluate dental composites. The hardness value of tested composites can indicate their ability to resist deformation and fracture during chewing, biting, and occlusal loads. As evidenced by Figure 11, the PMMA without the Al₂O₃ addition has a microhardness of 22.8 ± 2.1HV. After adding the Al₂O₃ nanoparticles to the PMMA matrix, the produced PMMA composites were enhanced by increasing the content of nanoparticles. The PMMA matrix with 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% nanoparticles of Al₂O₃ revealed the microhardness values of 25.6 ± 3.3, 36.8 ± 3.1, 41.2 ± 2.5, and 49.5 ± 6.8 HV, with an enhancement around 12, 58, 80, and 115 % compared with the PMMA matrix, as shown in Figure 11. The explanation may be due to the hardness of the Al₂O₃ nano-ceramic particles being much higher than the PMMA matrix. Furthermore, the nano Al₂O₃ ceramic particles reinforce the PMMA matrix by filling in the gaps between the PMMA chains and forming a strong interfacial bonding between the particles and the matrix. As a result, the applied loads are shared across these strong interfaces, forming a hard surface by hindering the motion of the PMMA matrix along the stress direction.^31,49 The wide range of the hardness measurements for the PMMA/10 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ composite specimen was observed due to the agglomeration of the Al₂O₃, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 11.

Microhardness of the PMMA matrix and the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Wear performance of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

The wear test for dental materials like PMMA and their composites holds pivotal significance as it accurately evaluates their durability and longevity within the oral environment by simulating masticatory motions during everyday activities like chewing. This essential evaluation aids in developing high-quality dental prosthetics. The results of the wear test as a function of weight loss for the PMMA matrix and their corresponding PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites are illustrated in Figure 12. Incorporating Al₂O₃ nano-ceramic particles into a PMMA matrix has shown a beneficial effect during wear tests for produced PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites at all 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% concentrations, as shown in Figure 7. This is attributed to the Al₂O₃ nanoparticle’s extremely small size and high surface area, which effectively interacts with the PMMA matrix. In addition, the ability of the nano ceramic particles to absorb and distribute stresses reduces the propensity for cracks and material loss during the wear test.⁴¹ As a result, integrating Al₂O₃ nano-ceramics particles into the PMMA matrix shows considerable potential in improving the durability and dependability of PMMA composites in dental applications. This is achieved by enhancing the composite material’s overall mechanical strength (compressive; Figure 10; hardness; Figure 11) and resistance to wear (Figure 12). Also, it was noticed that the wear resistance of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composite samples went down when the Al₂O₃ concentration was raised to 10 wt.% compared to PMMA/5 wt.% Al₂O₃, as shown in Figure 12. The high concentrations of ceramic particles can lead to stress concentrations around the ceramic particles, resulting in micro-cracking or debonding between the matrix and the ceramic particles (Figure 6). This can accelerate wear by creating more wear debris and roughening the surface.

Figure 12.

Weight loss of the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix and the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

The SEM of worn surfaces for the PMMA and their corresponding PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites were investigated to reveal the different wear mechanisms during the wear test. Figures 13–17 depict the worn surfaces and 3D topography of the wear-tested samples of the PMMA and their PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites. Furthermore, The surface roughness profiles were measured for the worn surfaces of the wear-tested samples (PMMA matrix and their corresponding composites) using the Gwyddion software (An SPM data visualization and analysis tool, Version 2.60), as shown in Figure 18. The PMMA matrix without Al₂O₃ nanoparticles and the PMMA reinforced with a smaller amount of Al₂O₃ (1 wt.%) showed severe wear, as evidenced by deep wear tracks, tearing, and delamination in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. Adding Al₂O₃ nanoparticles at concentrations of 3, 5, and 10 wt.% changed the features of the wear surface, as depicted in Figures 15–17, respectively. As the wear features were less severe, the surface became smoother, corresponding to the increasing Al₂O₃ content up to 10 wt.% (Figure 18). Furthermore, no microcracks were detected, particularly at the 5 and 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ concentrations can be ascribed to the excellent microhardness and mechanical behavior of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites and the Al₂O₃ particles’ ability to withstand loads. Also, these results indicated an increase in the wear resistance of the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites. The entire surface of the PMMA matrix sample and the PMMA reinforced with 1 wt.% Al₂O₃ (Figures 13 and 14) displays debris, deep wear tracks, areas of tear, and delamination. There is evidence of a considerable weight loss of the pure sample on the contact zone due to peeling and wear debris. The SEM images of the worn surface of a PMMA that reinforced 3, 5, and 10 wt.% of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles, respectively, are displayed in Figures 15–17. Because of their high hardness, Al₂O₃ nanoparticles were added, which reduced the areas of tear and delamination. Additionally, the frictional contact forces were decreased by the rolling effect of the Al₂O₃ nanoparticles.^39,49–51 Thus, a low weight loss indicating high wear resistance was obtained by increasing the content of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles in the PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites. However, compared to PMMA included with 0, 1, and 3 wt.% of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles, the SEM picture of PMMA incorporated with 5 and 10 wt.% reveals a low weight loss, indicating higher wear resistance (Figure 12). PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ still has a lower wear rate than the PMMA matrix. As previously indicated, adding more Al₂O₃ nanoparticles to PMMA improves its tribological characteristics. In addition, The PMMA matrix exhibits the highest surface roughness value of 2.96 µm among the wear-tested samples. In contrast, a lower surface roughness value of 1.05 µm is attained for the PMMA/5 wt.% Al₂O₃ denture base sample. The relationship between the tested samples’ wear and the worn surfaces’ roughness is complex and multifaceted. In general, adding nano-Al₂O₃ has a noticeable effect on the roughness of worn surfaces of PMMA/Al₂O₃ wear-tested samples, which was greatly affected by the properties acquired as a result of the addition of nano-ceramics like hardness, wear resistance, and wear mechanisms. First, the wear mechanisms, such as deep wear tracks, tearing, and delamination (Figures 13–15), create deeper grooves and higher peaks, generating rougher surfaces. Meanwhile, shallow wear tracks and smoother areas (Figures 16 and 17) lead to less roughness on worn surfaces. On the other hand, increasing the hardness (Figure 11) resists wear, leading to smoother surfaces.

Figure 13.

(a) SEM images of the worn surfaces (b) 3D topography for the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate.

Figure 14.

(a) SEM images of the worn surfaces (b) 3D topography for the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix reinforced with 1 wt.% nano Al₂O₃. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 15.

(a) SEM images of the worn surfaces (b) 3D topography for the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix reinforced with 3 wt.% nano Al₂O₃. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 16.

(a) SEM images of the worn surfaces (b) 3D topography for the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix reinforced with 5 wt.% nano Al₂O₃. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 17.

(a) SEM images of the worn surfaces (b) 3D topography for the wear-tested specimens of the PMMA matrix reinforced with 10 wt.% nano Al₂O₃. SEM: scanning electron microscopy; PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Figure 18.

The roughness profile of the PMMA matrix and their composites reinforced with 1, 3, 5, and 10 wt.% nano Al₂O₃. PMMA: polymethyl methacrylate; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide.

Conclusions

This study aimed to examine the impact of incorporating Al₂O₃ as a nanoparticle filler in acrylic denture base applications, intending to improve their properties like compressive strength, hardness, and wear resistance. Based on the findings, it is possible to infer the following conclusions:

1. The microstructure results of dentures that have been reinforced reveal that the material preparation was done well utilizing the applicable regime, resulting in a lack of porosity and micro defect. No segregation was detected in the PMMA reinforced with Al₂O₃ nanoparticles up to 5 wt.%.

2. Incorporating Al₂O₃ nanofillers into PMMA denture base material at concentrations up to 10% resulted in a notable increase in the bulk density of the PMMA composites produced with an acceptable porosity of less than 5%.

3. The compressive strength increased until reaching a maximum at composites with 5 wt.% nano Al₂O₃ and then decreased at composites with 10 wt.%. A similar trend was also observed for the yield strength and the modulus of elasticity values of the PMMA composites. The enhancement of the composites' compressive strength compared to that of the PMMA matrix was 82% for the composites with 5 wt.% of Al₂O₃.

4. The microhardness of PMMA was shown to increase upon adding Al₂O₃ nanoparticles at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 wt.%. The highest microhardness value recorded was 49.5 HV, achieved by adding 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ with an improvement of around 115% over the PMMA matrix.

5. Adding Al₂O₃ reduced weight loss relative to the PMMA matrix, indicating improved wear resistance and increasing the nanoparticles up to 10 wt.% Al₂O₃ further improved the wear resistance.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Mohamed Ibrahim AA Habba

References

Arimatéia

Hanken

RBL

Oliveira

ADB

, et al. Effect of alumina on the properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/alumina composites obtained by melt blending. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2021; 34: 451–471.

Alhareb

Akil

HBM

Ahmad

ZAB

. Poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base composites enhancement by various combinations of nitrile butadiene rubber/treated ceramic fillers. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2017; 30: 1069–1090.

Wildner

Drummer

. Nanofiller materials for transparent polymer composites: influences on the properties and on the transparency—A review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019; 32: 1547–1565.

Murakami

Wakabayashi

Matsushima

, et al. Effect of high-pressure polymerization on mechanical properties of PMMA denture base resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013; 20: 98–104.

Pahlevanzadeh

Bakhsheshi-Rad

Kharaziha

, et al. CNT and rGO reinforced PMMA based bone cement for fixation of load bearing implants: mechanical property and biological response. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 116: 104320.

Vojdani

Bagheri

Khaledi

AAR

. Effects of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength, surface hardness, and roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Dent Sci 2012; 7: 238–244.

Alqutaibi

Baik

Almuzaini

, et al. Polymeric denture base materials: a review. Polymers; 15(15): 3258. DOI: 10.3390/polym15153258.

Chęcińska

Chęciński

Sikora

, et al. The effect of zirconium dioxide (ZrO₂) nanoparticles addition on the mechanical parameters of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Polymers; 14(5): 1047. DOI: 10.3390/polym14051047.

Ohno

Araki

Endo

, et al. The adhesion mechanism of dental adhesive resin to the alloy. Dent Mater J 1989; 8: 1–8.

10.

Klawitter

Weinstein

Peterson

. Fabrication and characterization of porous-rooted cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy dental implants. J Dent Res 1977; 56: 474–480.

11.

Pituru

Greabu

Totan

, et al. A review on the biocompatibility of PMMA-based dental materials for interim prosthetic restorations with a glimpse into their modern manufacturing techniques. Materials; 13(13): 2894. DOI: 10.3390/ma13132894.

12.

Vallittu

. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont 1996; 5: 270–276.

13.

John

Gangadhar

Shah

. Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 424–427.

14.

Hamza

Rosenstiel

El-Hosary

, et al. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced PMMA interim fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 223–228.

15.

Alla

Sajjan

Alluri

, et al. Influence of fiber reinforcement on the properties of denture base resins. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 2013; 04: 91–97.

16.

Soygun

Bolayir

Boztug

. Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5: 153–160.

17.

Ucar

Akova

Aysan

. Mechanical properties of polyamide versus different PMMA denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2012; 21: 173–176.

18.

Vallittu

. Some aspects of the tensile strength of undirectional glass fibre-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 100–105.

19.

Khan

Azam

Khan

, et al. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composites: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C 2015; 47: 26–39.

20.

Ali Sabri

Satgunam

Abreeza

, et al. A review on enhancements of PMMA denture base material with different nano-fillers. Cogent Eng ; 8: 1. DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2021.1875968.

21.

Biswas

Satapathy

Patnaik

. Effect of ceramic fillers on mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites: a comparative study. Adv Mat Res 2010; 123–125: 1031–1034.

22.

Wang

Tang

, et al. Reinforcement of denture base PMMA with ZrO₂ nanotubes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 32: 192–197.

23.

Chen

Caneli

Almousa

, et al. A novel antibacterial zirconia-containing PMMA bone cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022; 129: 105135.

24.

Aghajani Derazkola

Simchi

. Effects of alumina nanoparticles on the microstructure, strength and wear resistance of poly(methyl methacrylate)-based nanocomposites prepared by friction stir processing. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 79: 246–253.

25.

Roato

Genova

Duraccio

, et al. mechanical and biological characterization of PMMA/Al₂O₃ composites for dental implant abutments. Polymers; 15(15): 3186. DOI: 10.3390/polym15153186.

26.

Patel

Dhanola

. Influence of CaCO₃, Al₂O₃, and TiO₂ microfillers on physico-mechanical properties of Luffa cylindrica/polyester composites. Eng Sci Technol an Int J 2016; 19: 676–683.

27.

Aly

El-Sayed Seleman

Bakkar

, . Effect of Si content on the thermal expansion of Ti15Mo(0–2 Si) biomaterial alloys during different heating rates. Materials (Basel); 16(13): 4768. DOI: 10.3390/ma16134768.

28.

El-Sayed Seleman

Ataya

Aly

, et al. Effect of the Si content on the dry and wet sliding wear behavior of the developed Ti-15Mo-(0-2) Si alloys for biomedical applications. Metals; 13(11): 1861. DOI: 10.3390/met13111861.

29.

Nabhan

Taha

Ghazaly

. Filler loading effect of Al₂O₃/TiO₂ nanoparticles on physical and mechanical characteristics of dental base composite (PMMA). Polym Test 2023; 117: 107848.

30.

Ibrahim

Seleman

Ahmed

, et al. Phase stability of mechanically alloyed Ti-Fe-Al alloys. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng; 2020, 973. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/973/1/012025.

31.

El-Sayed Seleman

Ataya

Ahmed

MMZ

, et al. The additive manufacturing of aluminum matrix nano Al₂O₃ composites produced via friction stir deposition using different initial material conditions. Materials (Basel); 15(8): 2926. DOI: 10.3390/ma15082926.

32.

El-Sayed

MMS

. Processing of ceramic based nanocomposite using α-Al₂O₃ powder and FeCl₂ solution as starting materials. J Mater Sci Technol 2007; 23: 837–842.

33.

Barakat

Habba

MIA

Ibrahim

, et al. The effect of Cu coated Al₂O₃ particle content and densification methods on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al matrix composites. J Mater Res Technol 2023; 24: 6908–6922.

34.

Hoziefa

Toschi

Ahmed

MMZ

, et al. Influence of friction stir processing on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a compocast AA2024-Al₂O₃ nanocomposite. Mater Des 2016; 106: 273–284.

35.

Malisic

Gajic

Porobic

, et al. The effect of gamma irradiation on the synthesis, microbiological sterility, and improvement of properties of PMMA-Al₂O₃ composite used in dental prosthesis manufacturing. Radiat Phys Chem 2023; 207: 110846.

36.

Widodo

Mulyawan

Djustiana

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of zirconia–silica PMMA nanocomposite for endodontic implants. Dentistry Journal; 11(3): 57. DOI: 10.3390/dj11030057.

37.

Herráez-Galindo

Rizo-Gorrita

Luna-Oliva

, et al. In vitro comparative study of fibroblastic behaviour on polymethacrylate (PMMA) and lithium disilicate polymer surfaces. Polymers; 11(4): 744. DOI: 10.3390/polym11040744.

38.

Helal

Yang

Saad

, et al. Effect of SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ nanoparticles on wear resistance of PMMA acrylic denture teeth. Braz Dent Sci 2020; 23: 1–12.

39.

Gallab

Taha

Rashed

, et al. Effect of low content of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles on the mechanical and tribological properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base material. Egypt J Chem 2022; 65(8): 1–9.

40.

Pokuri

Tadi

Tripuraneni

, et al. Comparison of flexural strength and surface hardness of polymethyl methacrylate resin reinforced with silanised aluminium oxide nanoparticles- an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2021; 15(9)41–46.

41.

El-Tamimi

Bayoumi

Ahmed

MMZ

, et al. The effect of salinized nano ZrO₂ particles on the microstructure, hardness, and wear behavior of acrylic denture tooth nanocomposite. Polymers (Basel); 14(2): 302. DOI: 10.3390/polym14020302.

42.

Joiner

. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004; 32(): 3–12.

43.

Sîmpălean

Petrişor

Măruşteri

MŞ

, et al. A software application to detect dental color. Appl Med Informatics 2015; 37: 31–38.

44.

Karthick

Sirisha

Sankar

. Mechanical and tribological properties of PMMA-sea shell based biocomposite for dental application. Procedia Mater Sci 2014; 6: 1989–2000.

45.

Panda

Mishra

Mantry

, et al. A study on mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy hybrid composites filled with plasma-synthesized AlN. J Compos Mater 2014; 48: 3073–3082.

46.

Latief

Chafidz

Junaedi

, et al. Effect of alumina contents on the physicomechanical properties of alumina (Al₂O₃) reinforced polyester composites. Adv Polym Technol 2019; 2019: 1–10.

47.

Ramanathan

Stankovich

Dikin

, et al. Graphitic nanofillers in PMMA nanocomposites - An investigation of particle size and dispersion and their influence on nanocomposite properties. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 2007; 45: 2097–2112.

48.

Omar

Amin

Younis

. Comparison of using nano-ZnO and nano-Al₂O₃ to improve the properties of prepared polymethyl methacrylate denture base. Appl Phys A 2022; 128: 1–8.

49.

Mallakpour

Khadem

. Recent development in the synthesis of polymer nanocomposites based on nano-alumina. Prog Polym Sci 2015; 51: 74–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.004.

50.

Raza

Shamir

Qureshi

MKA

, et al. On the friction stir welding, tool design optimization, and strain rate-dependent mechanical properties of HDPE–ceramic composite joints. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2018; 31: 291–310.

51.

Devaraju

Kumar

Kotiveerachari

. Influence of addition of Grp/Al₂O₃p with SiCp on wear properties of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 hybrid composites via friction stir processing. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed) 2013; 23: 1275–1280.

Mechanical properties and wear performance of denture base polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with nano Al 2 O 3

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental work

Materials

Fabrication of PMMA/Al2O3 nano composites

Characterization of PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Results and discussions

PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites color changes

Microstructure of PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Density of PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Compression test for PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Microhardness of PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Wear performance of PMMA/nano Al2O3 composites

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References

Fabrication of PMMA/Al₂O₃ nano composites

Characterization of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites color changes

Microstructure of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Density of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Compression test for PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Microhardness of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites

Wear performance of PMMA/nano Al₂O₃ composites