Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the low cost additive manufacturing (AM) techniques capable of printing complex design (both with commercial and non-commercial feedstock filaments by using different processing parameters). In this paper a comprehensive review has been prepared on FFF operating capabilities from thermoplastics material’s view point. Various thermoplastic materials and composites available commercially and prepared at laboratory scale have been categorized based upon the reported studies performed (for thermal stability, mechanical properties etc.). It was observed that the nano composite based feed stock filament (prepared at lab scale) have edge over the micro-composites from thermo-mechanical properties view point. Further it has been noticed that the 3D printing is in changing phase and moving towards 4D printing of smart composites and designs. But hitherto little has been reported on printing of smart material with FFF platform. Further studies may be focused on printing of smart materials (both micro and nano composites) with FFF, as the low cost 3D printing solution in different engineering applications.

Keywords

Fused filament fabrication feedstock filament development micro-composites nano-composites 4D printing commercial and non commercial feedstock filaments

Introduction

The AM is one of the recent fields for low cost product development. It offers a wide range of variability in design matrix of product which makes it suitable for critical designs (which was previously not possible with any other manufacturing techniques). The parameters of FFF (one of the low cost AM process) affect the quality of product significantly.¹ Effect of process parameters of FFF on mechanical properties of specimen has been investigated by some researchers and it was observed that with increase in number of deposited layers, strength of specimen was enhanced. Similar results were found with raster angle and orientation of deposition. Flexural strength was found in contrast relation with raster angle and layer thickness.² Grey Taguchi analysis has been used as design of experiment technique to improve the dimensional accuracy and to predict the effect of process parameters artificial neural network (ANN) has been used. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) method was also used for optimization of length, width and thickness of specimen and standard set of condition was obtained for a quality product with better dimensional accuracy.³ FFF is generally composed of tractor trolley arrangement just before the nozzle to push the feedstock filament with required tension into the nozzle.^4–7

The technology of FFF is integrated with the computer controls which direct the hardware of FFF to work in accordance with the direction provided by software such as tool path generation, material deposition in layer fashion etc.^8–12 Various different virgin polymer and composite matrix of polymers have been tried for different range of applications varying from typical mechanical industry to highly critical biomedical application.^13–15 Various different composites of polymer have been used on FFF platform to build up a rapid prototype ready for application without any post processing requirements.^16–18 FFF is worldwide adopted technology and has been widely explored by researchers in last two decades for medical, civil (structural and non-structural), space industry, automotive industry and for many other applications. Various companies these days are providing ready to use feedstock filaments for FFF but most of those filaments are of virgin polymer such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyamide (PA), polypropylene (PP) etc. Different composites of polymeric matrix have been prepared on laboratory scale using different techniques such as twin screw extrusion (TSE),^19–21 single screw extrusion,²² and chemical mixing.²³ Figure 1 shows the classification of FFF process based on availability of feedstock filament.

Figure 1.

Classification of FFF on availability of feedstock filament.

Commercial feedstock filaments used on FFF platform

Different ranges of polymeric materials are present in market for FFF. Some of the common materials used on FFF working are ABS, PLA, PA, PP, polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE) etc. The commercially available feedstock filaments of different polymeric materials have numerous engineering applications discussed as under:

ABS is a common thermoplastic which is available in form of feedstock filament for FFF applications. It has been observed that ABS when 3D printed on FFF platform shows anisotropic properties and results into 65–72% tensile strength and 80–90% compressive strength in comparison to injection moulded parts.²⁴ The strength of ABS based fabricated part was less but the design intricacy of FFF was one of the important reasons to fabricate part through FFF technique rather than injection moulding. ABS based translucent parts were fabricated for packing of mechanical and electrical components. Post processing techniques were used for increasing the translucency of part such as (i) elevated temperature technique which resulted into improved transmissivity but shrinkage was observed in fabricated part, (ii) resin in-filtration and (iii) surface sanding which resulted into 16% increase in transmissivity without dimensional shrinkage.²⁵ It has been observed from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) that the ABS printed part with normal built style possessed more strength than double dense and sparse structures whereas the loss modulus was found to be enhanced with increasing temperature but reduction in viscosity was observed for the fabricated part of ABS.²⁶ The process optimization study of FFF for ABS based feedstock filament has proved that the selection of input process parameters was the critical step where the behaviour of printed prototype might get changed such as with raster angle of −45°/45° has shown maximum tensile strength in compare to other raster angles, whereas for flexural properties 0/90° raster angle has shown optimized results.²⁷

It has been observed for the wear resistance of FFF build prototype that layer thickness of 0.127 mm, raster angle of 0°, raster width of 0.5064 mm, air gap of 0.008 mm and build orientation of 0° has provided an optimized FFF processing condition for minimum wear of part. Extensive studies of FFF process parameters have been performed to predict the behaviour of build prototype for wear property.²⁸ Electrical conductivity of printed prototype was enhanced by chemical deposition of Copper (Cu) particles on 3D printed prototype of ABS using chemical etching method and it was observed that the electrically insulator ABS has been successfully converted into conductor and highest electrical conductivity was observed for parts which were chemically etched with chromic acid in comparison to etching done with any other acids.²⁹ Various other researchers have also explored the FFF processing parameters to highlight the mechanical performance of functional prototypes based on ABS.^30–37

These days’ researchers have been focusing on biodegradable polymeric matrix such as PLA. For mechanical performance, it has been observed that 225°C of nozzle temperature has given best tensile modulus for virgin PLA. Whereas part geometry has also played significant role in mechanical performance and processing temperature controlled the morphological behaviour of PLA.³⁸ Various 3D printer based on FFF technology are available in market today such as Divide by zero model, Cube-2 3D printer, Stratasys FFF, and many other. Researchers have explored the tensile properties of PLA for different set of input parameters. Build orientation with 0° has shown maximum tensile strength than any other build orientation angle.³⁹ Further fatigue property of PLA based 3D printed part has shown maximum fatigue life for 45° build orientation for the cyclical loading on universal tensile testing machine (UTM).⁴⁰ PLA represents a biodegradable polymer with high strength properties and thus is beneficial for biomedical applications. Researchers have explored the fusion of silver particles on 3D printed surface of PLA for antimicrobial applications. The study suggested that the printed structure had voids in inter and intra-layer which was found beneficial for synthesis of foreign particles on its surface.⁴¹

From economy point of view studies have been performed on different available low cost printer and it has been observed that reproducibility of printer for the same material was close enough and PLA parts have shown greater strength than 3D printed parts of ABS.⁴² PLA polymeric matrix has been used for printing of textile based designs tom know the capability of it for future textile application.⁴³ The input process parameters of FFF have great impact on adhesiveness of fabricated part and it has been observed that with increasing nozzle speed and raster width the adhesive character of fabricated part increased with the same proportion.^44,45 It has been observed that infill percentage has been observed as one of the most important process parameters which affect the mechanical strength of fabricated prototypes. Also the variability among the different prototype built with same process parameter was observed greater for PLA based 3D printed parts than ABS based parts.⁴⁶ Various other researchers have also investigated the effect of input process parameters on the mechanical, morphological and surface characteristics of PLA based 3D printed parts.^47–50

PA one of the thermoplastic polymer, which exist in semi crystalline form with great flexibility and low density (1 g/cm3), high fatigue and flexural strength which makes it one of the important thermoplastic which could have great role in FFF based applications such as for aerospace industry, consumer goods etc. Researchers have observed that built up angle plays a vital role in mechanical strength of PA specimen. Moreover anisotropy of tensile strength was present for different direction whereas for compressive strength low anisotropy has been observed.⁵¹ High shrinkage stress of nylon-6 was one of problem of FFF fabricated prototype which hinders the applicability of the material for vide range of fields. Researchers have explored the infusion of maleic anhydride grafted poly (ethylene 1-octene) (POE-g-MAH) into the polymeric matrix of nylon-6 to address the shrinkage issue of polyamide and have successfully prepared polyamide which had low shrinkage after solidification of 3D printed part.⁵² Various researchers have explored the FFF process parameters for optimizing the printing condition as well as the output properties for polyamide based feedstock filaments.^53–55

PC is one of the thermoplastics, which possess high toughness and optical transparency (in some cases). Researchers have explored the feedstock filaments of PC for FFF applications. Dynamic mechanical analysis of 3D printed parts have shown that the number of build parameters have affected positively the tensile modulus of parts whereas testing conditions have significant impact over the mechanical performance of fabricated prototype.⁵⁶ Fabrication of prototypes and simulation of failure analysis was performed by researchers to explore the validity of failure model with that of practically obtained results. Predictability of practical results with failure model has shown close relationship thus isotropic material has shown high predictability for failure modes.⁵⁷ Input process parameters such as build angle, orientation angle, raster width, infill speed etc have been explored by researchers to optimize the printing condition for PC based feedstock filaments.^58–62 It has been observed that with decrease in contour and increase in raster to raster air gap, the creep strain increases (upto 10).⁶³

PP thermoplastic polymer also represents a class of polymer which can also be used for FFF application. Researchers have explored the mechanical, flexural properties of PP based 3D printed prototype for its possible applications.^64,65 Different input process parameters have been optimized for the printing of PP and it has been observed that orientation angle of 0°, layer thickness of 0.35 mm, and infill of 100% represented the optimized condition for 3D printing of PP based thermoplastic feedstock filament.⁶⁴ The feedstock filament of PP matrix has been explored for the in-house fabrication of a nano reactor with an integrated magnetic stirrer on FFF setup.⁶⁶ Table 1 shows various commercially available feedstock filaments for FFF platform.

Table 1.

Various polymeric material (commercially available) used on FFF platform.

Materials		Studies performed	References
ABS	(a)	FFF process optimization	^{24,27,30–37}
	(b)	Dynamic behaviour analysis of FFF fabricated part	²⁶
	(c)	Prototype printing for packaging of mechanical and electrical components	²⁵
	(d)	Wear analysis and process optimization of functional prototypes	²⁸
	(e)	Enhancement of electrical conductivity of functional prototypes for electrical and electronics applications	²⁹
PLA	(a)	Testing of PLA properties for FFF 3D printed part for future biomedical application	³⁸
	(b)	FFF process optimization for 3D printed part of PLA	^{39,40,47–50}
	(c)	Fusion of silver particles on PLA prototype for antimicrobial function in biomedical field	⁴¹
	(d)	Comparison of different FFF machine setups to characterize reproducibility of 3D printed parts	⁴²
	(e)	Textile based design printing on FFF setup for soft PLA matrix	⁴³
	(f)	Characterization of Adhesiveness of FFF fabricated prototype	^44,45
	(g)	Comparative study of ABS and PLA prototypes fabricated on 3D printer	⁴⁶
PA	(a)	Anisotropic characterization of nylon based 3D printed specimen for compressive as well as tensile testing	⁵¹
	(b)	Reduction of shrinkage of polyamide based 3D printed part	⁵²
	(c)	FFF process optimization for 3D printed part	^53–55
PC	(a)	DMA analysis of 3D printed prototype for characterizing the PC feedstock filament	⁵⁶
	(b)	Finite element analysis (FEA) of isotropic PC based prototype	⁵⁷
	(c)	FFF process optimization for mechanical performance	^58–62
	(d)	Creep analysis for 3D printed prototype	⁶³
PP	(a)	FFF process optimization and mechanical properties evaluation for PP polymeric feedstock filament	^64,65
PP	(b)	In-house fabrication of miniature nano reactor	⁶⁶

Non-commercial composite feedstock filaments prepared on lab scale for FFF

Various researchers have used commercially available feedstock filaments as explained above but the virgin polymeric feedstock filaments have their own limitations such as low thermal conductivity, poor electrical conductivity, diamagnetic character, inadequate mechanical properties and surface properties etc. To overcome these issues researchers have tried reinforcements of various foreign particles into the polymeric matrix of virgin polymer. Polymeric blend of composite may be prepared by two routes (a) mechanical route and (b) chemical route. The reinforcement particles may be categorized into two classes (depending over their size) (i) micro particles (ii) nano particles. Based on these the composites may also be categorized into two class (1) micro composites and (2) nano composites.

Micro composites

Various types of reinforcement have been tried in polymeric matrix for different applications and alteration of properties of base polymer. In this part we will only discuss the reinforcements which are done in polymeric base matrix for preparation of lab scale feedstock filaments for FFF platform applications. Low density polymer ethylene (LDPE) has been reinforced with SiC/Al₂O₃ particles and the prepared composite has been used for feedstock filament development for FFF. It has been observed that LDPE with 50 wt%, SiC with 25 wt% and Al₂O₃ with 25 wt% could be used to prepare feedstock and has shown best mechanical performance on selected input processing parameter of FFF.^67,68 Nylon polymeric base has been extruded with Al-Al₂O₃ reinforcement and successfully feedstock filament has been developed for FFF and it has been observed that three compositions (Nylon 60 wt%, Al- varying from 26–30 wt% and Al₂O₃ varying of 10–14 wt%) for composite may be selected as per the melt flow index (MFI) requirement. It has been also observed that with the reinforcement of foreign particle (Al/Al₂O₃) in nylon matrix the tensile properties have been affected and got reduced in comparison to virgin nylon matrix.^69,70 DMA analysis of ABS-Cu blend has suggested that with increased Cu filler (22–26% by volume) in polymer matrix the storage modulus and loss modulus have improved significantly.⁷¹

Various fibres such as carbon fibre (CF), glass fibre (GF) and Kevlar fibre (KF) have been tested as reinforcement in nylon matrix and it has been observed that the reinforcement of CF in nylon matrix improved the tensile strength of composite by six times that of non-reinforced matrix.⁷² Reinforcement of thermo-tropic liquid crystalline polymer (TLCP) in PP, it has been proved that with increased fibre content of TLCP (up to 40 wt%) in polymeric matrix the mechanical properties were found to be improved by significant difference. 1.5 times enhancement in tensile modulus has been observed for 40 wt% reinforcement of TLCP in comparison to pure PP and 100% improvement in compare to ABS filament.⁷³ PP has been blended with tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) for bone graft application and it has been observed that the prepared composite possessed 12 MPa of ultimate compressive strength and 263 MPa of compressive modulus. The printed porous structure on FFF held 150–200 micron pore size which was beneficial for cell growth application as per free area requirement.⁷⁴ Friction welding of two dissimilar plastic has been performed using reinforcement of Al powder which make the polymeric matrix compatible for feedstock preparation and FFF platform was used to print objects which were joined at later stage.⁷⁵

Nylon polymeric base has been reinforced with iron powder (Fe) to improve the thermal conductivity of composite and prepared feedstock filament has been printed on FFF setup and it was observed that the prepared prototype held thermal conductivity greater than the virgin nylon matrix and some other composites.⁷⁶ Some researchers have also added polymer as reinforcement in other polymeric base to improve the polymer behaviour for some specific application such as for biocompatibility, wear resistance etc. Ultra high molecular weight poly-ethylene (UHMWPE) has been added in high density poly-ethylene (HDPE) to improve the mechanical and wear characteristics of composite for biomedical implant application.⁷⁷ Researchers have explored PP matrix with reinforcement of GF and maleic anhydride polyolefin (POE-g-MA) by varying content from 0–30 wt%. It has been observed that addition of GF have improved the tensile modulus whereas flexibility of feedstock filament was reduced but on the other hand the POE-g-MA have reduced the tensile strength and improved the flexibility of fabricated part.⁷⁸ Fibre orientation in case of FFF processing has been explored and it was observed that FFF was capable of orienting short fibres in adequate direction ultimately resulting into better mechanical properties in comparison to simple compression moulding technique.⁷⁹ Table 2 shows the list of composite polymeric materials prepared for feedstock filament on lab scale for various applications. Figure 2 shows FFF printed based Al₂O₃ reinforced ABS polymeric composite for compressive testing, Figure 3 shows the nylon reinforced with Al₂O₃ for DMA analysis, Figure 4 shows the Al reinforced ABS printed part and Figure 5 represents the dissimilar plastic welding made possible through metal reinforcement.

Table 2.

Polymeric micro-composite used for preparation of feedstock filament.

Polymer	Reinforcement	Studies performed	References
LDPE	SiC/Al₂O₃	Preparation of feedstock filament with better mechanical properties for LDPE	^67,68
Nylon	(a) Al-Al₂O₃	Development of alternative feedstock comparable to ABS filament in mechanical performance	^69,70
	(b) CF, GF and KF fibre	Comparative study for mechanical performance of different fibre reinforced nylon matrix	⁷²
	(c) Al powder	Prepare compatible composites of ABS and nylon for frictio9n welding application	⁷⁵
	(d) Fe powder	Enhancement of thermal conductivity of polymeric matrix	⁷⁶
ABS	Cu	Dynamic behaviour analysis of polymeric blend	⁷¹
	TLCP	Feedstock filament preparation with modified mechanical properties for FFF printed prototype	⁷³
	Al powder	Prepare compatible composites of ABS and nylon for joining of dissimilar plastic	⁷⁵
	Al/Al₂O₃	Wear characterization for 3D printed part	⁸⁰
	CF	To enhance the mechanical property for fabricated part	⁷⁹
PP	TLCP fibre	Feedstock filament preparation with modified mechanical properties for FFF printed prototype	⁷³
	TCP	Biocompatible scaffold printing with porous structure	⁷⁴
	GF and POE-g-MA	To alter the mechanical properties of PP based fabricated part on FFF setup	⁷⁸
HDPE	UHMWPE	Biomedical implant application with excellent mechanical property	⁷⁷

Figure 2.

FFF printed compressive prototype.⁸⁰

Figure 3.

FFF printed samples for DMA analysis.⁷⁰

Figure 4.

Tensile specimen of 15% Al reinforced ABS.⁷⁵

Figure 5.

Dissimilar joining of polymeric 3D printed part.⁷⁵

Nano-composites

Nano-composites are those composites in which foreign particles which are added in polymeric matrix are of nano size (10⁻⁹ mm). It has been observed that in nano-composites ceramic and metallic reinforcements have been performed whereas in micro-composites the foreign particles are of micro size (10⁻⁶ mm) and non-metallic (polymeric, wood, clay), ceramic and metallic every type of reinforcement have been done by researchers.

Poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK) has been tested with nano sized carbon nano tubes (CNT) varying from 1–5 wt% in polymeric matrix to evaluate the tensile strength of prepared part fabricated through FFF. It has been observed that nano particles of CNT when reinforced in polymeric base reduced the porosity of part in comparison to virgin PEEK. No significant improvement has been observed for mechanical properties.⁸¹ Polyurethane (PU)/PLA reinforced with graphene oxide (GO) have been examined for its biocompatibility and anisotropic behaviour of nano composite. Mechanical and thermal properties were observed to be enhanced significantly with addition of nano size GO.⁸² PLA in reinforcement with multi walled CNT (MWCNT) has been explored for high electrical conductivity and prototype of liquid sensor has been printed for sensor application. Various input process parameters affecting the topography of printed prototype has been evaluated for the optimized condition for best results.⁸³ PU reinforced with MWCNT has been tested for strain sensor applications and various properties such as mechanical, electrical; piezo-resistivity etc. has been evaluated for the printed part. MWCNT has improved the stiffness of composite which ultimately made it compatible for printing on FFF setup whereas some insignificant reduction in elastic modulus was observed. The piezo-resistivity was observed to be 176 on gauge factor and was repeatable for various cyclic loading.⁸⁴ PLA has been reinforced with silica nano clay (4 wt%) to evaluate the composite mechanical, dynamic and morphological behaviour. It has been observed that 115% improvement in elastic modulus was obtained when silica nano clay added to the polymeric matrix. Mechanical, dynamic and morphological properties were observed to be improved than virgin PLA product.⁸⁵

MWCNT when added to the matrix of ABS in varying ratio ranging from 1–8 wt% has shown drastic improvement in yield stress and stiffness whereas strength at break got reduced remarkably. It has been observed that thermal diffusivity of MWCNT in ABS matrix was good enough due to which better diffusion of MWCNT in ABS has been observed and which ultimately resulted into better mechanical and thermal properties.⁸⁶ ABS has been reinforced with graphene nano particles (4 wt%) by researchers and has been explored for the build orientation of FFF and it has been observed that prototype printed with composite feedstock have shown improved elastic modulus and storage modulus with better thermal stability.⁸⁷ Researchers have tried polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) with the reinforcement of CNT and graphene separately and tried to compare the printability and mechanical response of printed prototype. It has been observed that all the observed properties (mechanical, morphological, printability and thermal stability) for PBT/CNT was better than PBT/graphene composite. Figure 6 shows the PBT/CNT and PBT/graphene extruded filaments and printed part on FFF setup.⁸⁸ Researchers have investigated the combination of Polyvinylidene flouride (PVDF) matrix with Barium titanate (BaTiO₃) to club functional properties such as piezo electric behaviour, pyro-electric and dielectric behaviour. It has been observed that the value for piezoelectric constant was three times higher for FFF printed object of composite in comparison to solvent casted nano-composite.⁸⁹ It has been also observed for the MWCNTs/BaTiO₃/PVDF multi composite that CNT has improved the dielectric property of composite and a suitable composite ratio for required dielectric and loss properties were obtained for 1.7 wt% CNT, 45 wt% BaTiO₃ and 53.3 wt% of polymeric matrix.⁹⁰ Investigators have worked on the PLA reinforced matrix with graphene (upto 10 wt%) for electrical, electromagnetic shielding and mechanical performance evaluation for the printed composite feedstock filament. The tensile modulus (2454 MPa) has been improved by 34% and tensile strength got improved by 27% (for 3D printed part). Whereas all other properties; such as electrical, electromagnetic induction etc. were also improved with the reinforcement of graphene.⁹¹ Table 3 shows the different nano composites prepared on lab scale to prepare feedstock filaments of FFF.

Figure 6.

Feedstock filaments of PBT/CNT, PBT/graphene and printed parts on FFF.⁸⁸

Table 3.

Polymeric nano-composite used for preparation of feedstock filament.

Polymer	Reinforcement	Studies performed	References
PEEK	CNT	Mechanical property evaluation for PEEK and CNT composite	⁸¹
PU/PLA	GO	Effect of composite formation on mechanical and thermal property along with biocompatibility	⁸²
PLA	(a) MWCNT	Functional prototype printing of highly conductive liquid sensors	⁸³
	(b) Silicate nano clay	Evaluation of nano clay composite on mechanical, thermal and dynamic properties of fabricated part on FFF	⁸⁵
	(c) Graphene	Evaluation for the mechanical, magnetic and electrical properties of composite	⁹¹
PU	MWCNT	FFF printing of thermoplastic based strain sensors	⁸⁴
ABS	MWCNT	Mechanical and thermal property evaluation for FFF printed electrically and thermally conductive composite feedstock filament	⁸⁶
ABS	Graphene	Evaluation of printed prototype with composite feedstock filament for mechanical, dynamic and thermal properties	⁸⁷
PBT	CNT and Graphene	Comparative analysis of two different nano composite for FFF application	⁸⁸
PVDF	BaTiO₃	Introduce homogeneity in dispersion with FFF printing and club the properties of BaTiO₃ in PVDF matrix	⁸⁹
PVDF	MWCNT/BaTiO₃	Enhance dielectric property of the multi composite for electronic sensor applications	⁹⁰

Figure 7 shows steps involved in composite feed stock filament development and various input parameters. At lab scale for preparation of feed stock filament the process starts with cyogenic grinding of thermoplastics followed by testing for melt flow index (MFI) as per ASTM D 1238. The pre-mixing is usually performed by mechanical/chemical blending. The twin screw extrusion process is used for blending of reinforcement in thermoplastic matrix followed by 3D printing. Finally the 3D printed parts are characterized for thermo-mechanical properties. The steps as explained below has been widely used by researchers to prepare a useful composite material for feestsock filament development for FFF applications.^92–100

Figure 7.

Steps involved in preparation of feed stock filament.

Transformation of 3D printing to four dimensional (4D) printing

Last one decade has witnessed the transformation of 3D printing towards the 4D printing. 4D printing may be defined as the printing of smart materials and designs, which are capable of transforming their shapes and properties at required time when triggered by external stimulus.¹⁰¹ Various nano composites have been explored to induce smart nature in composites.¹⁰² Shape memory alloys (SMA) represent one such category of smart matrix which can be actuated with external stimulus and moreover the SMA can memorize their state of change.^103–106 Similarly design based smartness has also been explored by researchers and it was observed that structure having specific edge dimension and joint angles may be triggered with stimulus for the change in shape.^107–109 Figure 8 shows the 4D behaviour of 3D printed part on application external stimulus.¹¹⁰

Figure 8.

3D to 4D transformation on cooling and heating.¹¹⁰

Case study on reinforcement of various fillers in virgin polymeric matrix

A case study has been performed to highlight the influence of various reinforcements on virgin polymeric matrix of different thermoplastics. Table 4 shows the mechanical properties of various polymeric matrixes tested on Universal tensile testing (UTM) setup. Figure 9 shows the stress vs. strain diagram for various thermoplastic and their composites. It has been observed that with loading of foreign particles there was significant change in mechanical properties. Most of the reinforcements resulted into reduction in the mechanical properties of polymer but has improved the application domain of those polymers. For example reinforcement of chitosan and hydroxyapatite (Hap) particles in PLA results into better biocompatibility for tissue engineering applications, similarly reinforcement of graphite in PLA matrix resulted into electrically conductive polymeric composite matrix.

Table 4.

Mechanical properties of various polymeric/composite matrixes (tested at manufacturing research lab (MRL) at Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College (GNDEC) Ludhiana).

S. no.	Polymers/composites	PL (N)	PE (mm)	BL (N)	BE (mm)	PS (MPa)	BS (MPa)
1	PA	123	10.26	110.7	18.24	51.16	46.05
2	ABS	154.9	4.94	139.41	6.84	64.43	57.99
3	PLA-CH-Hap (1)	15.1	2.47	13.59	3.23	7.07	6.36
4	PLA-CH-Hap (2)	20.7	3.04	18.63	24.13	8.71	7.84
5	PA-5% BF	14.1	6.84	12.69	7.41	7.02	6.31
6	ABS-5% BF	8.6	2.85	7.74	3.04	3.79	3.41
7	HIPS virgin	80.8	1.9	72.72	2.47	4.21	3.79
8	ABS-PLA-HIPS	133.9	2.85	120.51	2.85	6.97	6.28
9	PEEK	30.8	1.14	27.72	1.9	9.81	8.83
10	PLA-MnO₂-ZnCl₂	410.9	3.04	369.81	3.04	17.12	15.41
11	PLA-NH₄Cl	30.4	0.76	27.36	0.76	9.68	8.71
12	PLA-50% Graphite	79.4	1.9	71.46	1.9	25.29	22.76

Figure 9.

Stress vs. strain diagram for various polymeric/composite matrixes.

Summary

In this study a comprehensive review has been made on FFF working from material point of view. Some virgin thermoplastics and composites available commercially and prepared on laboratory scale have been explored from thermo-mechanical properties view point. It been observed that the commercially available feedstock filaments have some limitations as most of polymeric material available in feedstock filaments has poor thermal, magnetic and electrical conductivity. The prepared composites on lab scale has some advantages over commercial feedstock filaments that the proper choice of reinforcement may lead to better mechanical, electrical, thermal and morphological properties. It has been observed that the nano composite prepared on lab scale have edge over the micro-composites as the properties obtained for nano-composite material are better than micro-composites. Therefore it may be concluded that for better mechanical, thermal and electrical properties one must go for nano scale reinforcement in polymeric matrix. It has been also observed that the 3D printing is in changing phase and moving towards 4D printing of composites. But hitherto very less has been reported on printing of smart material on FFF platform. Thus in future, researchers may explore printing of smart material with FFF technique as the cost effectiveness of FFF makes it worthy to be used for smart polymeric blends.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors are obliged to TIET Patiala and Manufacturing research lab of GNDEC Ludhiana for the research facilities and SERB under AISTDF Secretariat for financial support.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by SERB under AISTDF Secretariat (file no. IMRC/AISTDF/R&D/P-10/2017, dated 01-02-2018).

ORCID iDs

Sudhir Kumar

Rupinder Singh

References

Anitha

Arunachalam

Radhakrishnan

. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 2001; 118(1–3): 385–388.

Sood

Ohdar

Mahapatra

. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Design 2010; 31(1): 287–295.

Sood

Ohdar

Mahapatra

. Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Design 2009; 30(10): 4243–4252.

Kruth

Leu

Nakagawa

. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann 1998; 47(2): 525–540.

Guo

Leu

. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 2013; 8(3): 215–243.

Wong

Hernandez

. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012; 2012: 208760.

Masood

. Intelligent rapid prototyping with fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp J 1996; 2(1): 24–33.

Thrimurthulu

KPPM

Pandey

Reddy

. Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2004; 44(6): 585–594.

Hopkinson

Hague

RJM

Dickens

. Rapid manufacturing. An industrial revolution for the digital age. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2006.

10.

Upcraft

Fletcher

. The rapid prototyping technologies. Assem Autom 2003; 23(4): 318–330.

11.

Boparai

Singh

. Development of rapid tooling using fused deposition modeling: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2016; 22(2): 281–299.

12.

Kumar

Ahuja

IPS

Singh

. Application of fusion deposition modelling for rapid investment casting – a review. Int J Mater Eng Innov 2012; 3(3–4): 204–227.

13.

Zein

Hutmacher

Tan

, et al. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2002; 23(4): 1169–1185.

14.

Masood

Son

. Development of new metal/polymer materials for rapid tooling using fused deposition modelling. Mater Design 2004; 25(7): 587–594.

15.

Ning

Cong

Qiu

, et al. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos B Eng 2015; 80: 369–378.

16.

Mohamed

Masood

Bhowmik

. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 2015; 3(1): 42–53.

17.

Jafari

Han

Mohammadi

, et al. A novel system for fused deposition of advanced multiple ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J 2000; 6(3): 161–175.

18.

Petrovic

Vicente Haro Gonzalez

Jordá Ferrando

, et al. Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. Int J Product Res 2011; 49(4): 1061–1079.

19.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Investigations for magnetic properties of PLA-PVC-Fe₃O₄-wood dust blend for self-assembly applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 20 June 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719857778.

20.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Investigations of polylactic acid reinforced composite feedstock filaments for multimaterial three-dimensional printing applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 2019; 233: 5953–5965.

21.

Singh

Kumar

. Polymer waste as fused deposition modeling feed stock filament for industrial applications. Reference module in material science and engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017.

22.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. On investigation of rheological, mechanical and morphological characteristics of waste polymer-based feedstock filament for 3D printing applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 11 June 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719856063.

23.

Singh

Kumar

. Development of low-cost graphene-polymer blended in-house filament for fused deposition modeling. In: Hashmi

(ed) Reference module in materials science and materials engineering. Oxford: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 1–10.

24.

Ahn

Montero

Odell

, et al. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 2002; 8(4): 248–257.

25.

Ahn

Lee

Jeong

. Development of translucent FDM parts by post-processing. Rapid Prototyp J 2004; 10(4): 218–224.

26.

Arivazhagan

Masood

. Dynamic mechanical properties of ABS material processed by fused deposition modelling. Int J Eng Res Appl 2012; 2(3): 2009–2014.

27.

Dawoud

Taha

Ebeid

. Mechanical behaviour of ABS: an experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques. J Manuf Process 2016; 21: 39–45.

28.

Equbal

Sood

Toppo

, et al. Prediction and analysis of sliding wear performance of fused deposition modelling-processed ABS plastic parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 2010; 224(12): 1261–1271.

29.

Equbal

Sood

. Investigations on metallization in FDM build ABS part using electroless deposition method. J Manuf Process 2015; 19: 22–31.

30.

Jami

Masood

Song

. Dynamic response of FDM made ABS parts in different part orientations. Adv Mater Res 2013; 748: 291–294.

31.

Kantaros

Karalekas

. Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Mater Design 2013; 50: 44–50.

32.

Lee

Abdullah

Khan

. Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. J Mater Process Technol 2005; 169(1): 54–61.

33.

Idris

Sharif

Harun

WSW

. Evaluation of ABS patterns produced from FDM for investment casting process. In: Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pacific industrial engineering & management systems conference (APIEMS), Bali, Indonesia, 3–5 December 2008, pp. 1299–1304. Bandung, Indonesia: Department of Industrial Engineering Institut Teknologi Bandung.

34.

Montero

Roundy

Odell

, et al. Material characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) ABS by designed experiments. Soc Manuf Eng 2001; 10: 1–21.

35.

Nuñez

Rivas

García-Plaza

, et al. Dimensional and surface texture characterization in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with ABS plus. Procedia Eng 2015; 132: 856–863.

36.

Rankouhi

Javadpour

Delfanian

, et al. Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev 2016; 16(3): 467–481.

37.

Singh

. Investigations for statistically controlled investment casting solution of FDM-based ABS replicas. Rapid Prototyp J 2014; 20(3): 215–220.

38.

Drummer

Cifuentes-Cuéllar

Rietzel

. Suitability of PLA/TCP for fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 2012; 18(6): 500–507.

39.

Afrose

Masood

Nikzad

, et al. Effects of build orientations on tensile properties of PLA material processed by FDM. Adv Mater Res 2014; 1044: 31–34.

40.

Afrose

Masood

Iovenitti

, et al. Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material. Prog Addit Manuf 2016; 1(1–2): 21–28.

41.

Cuiffo

Snyder

Elliott

, et al. Impact of the fused deposition (FDM) printing process on polylactic acid (PLA) chemistry and structure. Appl Sci 2017; 7(6): 579.

42.

Ebel

Sinnemann

. Fabrication of FDM 3D objects with ABS and PLA and determination of their mechanical properties. RTe J 2014; 2014(1).

43.

Melnikova

Ehrmann

Finsterbusch

. 3D printing of textile-based structures by fused deposition modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials. In: IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2014; 62(1): 012018.

44.

Pan

Huang

Guo

, et al. Effect of FDM process on adhesive strength of polylactic acid (PLA) filament. Key Eng Mater 2016; 667: 181–186.

45.

Richter

Schmülling

Ehrmann

, et al. FDM printing of 3D forms with embedded fibrous materials. In: Design, manufacturing and mechatronics: proceedings of the 2015 international conference on design, manufacturing and mechatronics, ICDMM2015 (ed. Shahhosseini

Mehran A

), Wuhan, China, 17–18 April 2015, pp. 961–969.

46.

Rodríguez-Panes

Claver

Camacho

. The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: a comparative analysis. Materials 2018; 11(8): 1333.

47.

Song

, et al. Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 2017; 123: 154–164.

48.

Torres

Cotelo

Karl

, et al. Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. JOM 2015; 67(5): 1183–1193.

49.

Wurm

Möst

Bergauer

, et al. In-vitro evaluation of polylactic acid (PLA) manufactured by fused deposition modeling. J Biol Eng 2017; 11(1): 29.

50.

Xinhua

Shengpeng

Zhou

, et al. An investigation on distortion of PLA thin-plate part in the FDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2015; 79(5–8): 1117–1126.

51.

Knoop

Schoeppner

Knoop

, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of FDM parts manufactured with polyamide 12. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference (ed. Bourell

), Austin, TX, 10–12 August 2015, pp. 10–12.

52.

Jia

Peng

, et al. Preparation of a new filament based on polyamide-6 for three-dimensional printing. Polym Eng Sci 2017; 57(12): 1322–1328.

53.

Zhang

, et al. Bonding quality and fracture analysis of polyamide 12 parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 2017; 23(6): 973–982.

54.

Rahim

TNAT

Abdullah

Akil

, et al. The improvement of mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide 12 3D printed parts by fused deposition modelling. Express Polym Lett 2017; 11(12): 963–982.

55.

Cruz

Shoemake

Adam

, et al. Tensile strengths of polyamide based 3D printed polymers in liquid nitrogen. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2015; 102(1): 012020.

56.

Domingo-Espin

Borros

Agullo

, et al. Influence of building parameters on the dynamic mechanical properties of polycarbonate fused deposition modeling parts. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2014; 1(2): 70–77.

57.

Domingo-Espin

Puigoriol-Forcada

Garcia-Granada

, et al. Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts. Mater Design 2015; 83: 670–677.

58.

Gajdoš

Kaščák

Spišák

, et al. Flexural properties of FDM prototypes made with honeycomb and sparse structure. Key Eng Mater 2015; 635: 169–173.

59.

Hill

Haghi

. Deposition direction-dependent failure criteria for fused deposition modeling polycarbonate. Rapid Prototyp J 2014; 20(3): 221–227.

60.

Masood

Mau

Song

. Tensile properties of processed FDM polycarbonate material. Mater Sci Forum 2010; 654: 2556–2559.

61.

Puigoriol-Forcada

Alsina

Salazar-Martín

, et al. Flexural fatigue properties of polycarbonate fused-deposition modelling specimens. Mater Design 2018; 155: 414–421.

62.

Smith

Dean

. Structural characteristics of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate material. Polym Test 2013; 32(8): 1306–1312.

63.

Salazar-Martin

Perez

García-Granada

, et al. A study of creep in polycarbonate fused deposition modelling parts. Mater Design 2018; 141: 414–425.

64.

Carneiro

Silva

Gomes

. Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Design 2015; 83: 768–776.

65.

Wang

Gardner

. Effect of fused layer modeling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene. Polymer 2017; 113: 74–80.

66.

Scotti

Nilsson

Haapala

, et al. A miniaturised 3D printed polypropylene reactor for online reaction analysis by mass spectrometry. React Chem Eng 2017; 2(3): 299–303.

67.

Bedi

Singh

Ahuja

IPS

. Effect of SiC/Al₂O₃ particle size reinforcement in recycled LDPE matrix on mechanical properties of FDM feed stock filament. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2018; 13(4): 246–254.

68.

Singh

Ahuja

IPS

. Recycling of polymer waste with SiC/Al₂O₃ reinforcement for rapid tooling applications. Mater Today Commun 2018; 15: 124–127.

69.

Boparai

Singh

. Modeling and optimization of extrusion process parameters for the development of Nylon6–Al–Al₂O₃ alternative FDM filament. Prog Addit Manuf 2016; 1(1–2): 115–128.

70.

Singh Boparai

Singh

. Experimental investigations for development of Nylon6-Al-Al₂O₃ alternative FDM filament. Rapid Prototyp J 2016; 22(2): 217–224.

71.

Sa’ude

Masood

Nikzad

, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of copper-ABS composites for FDM feedstock. Int J Eng Res Appl 2013; 3(3): 257–1263.

72.

Dickson

Barry

McDonnell

, et al. Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2017; 16: 146–152.

73.

Gray

IV RW

Baird

Helge Bøhn

. Effects of processing conditions on short TLCP fiber reinforced FDM parts. Rapid Prototyp J 1998; 4(1): 14–25.

74.

Kalita

Finley

Bose

, et al. Development of porous polymer-ceramic composites as bone grafts. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2002; 726. DOI: 10.1557/PROC-726-Q5.8.

75.

Kumar

Singh

Ahuja

IPS

. Investigations of mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of FDM fabricated parts for friction welding applications. Measurement 2018; 120: 11–20.

76.

Corney

Masood

Song

. Thermal characteristics of a new metal/polymer material for FDM rapid prototyping process. Assem Autom 2005; 25(4): 309–315.

77.

Ramli

Wahab

Ahmad

, et al. FDM preparation of bio-compatible UHMWPE polymer for artificial implant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016; 11(8): 5473–5480.

78.

Sodeifian

Ghaseminejad

Yousefi

. Preparation of polypropylene/short glass fiber composite as fused deposition modeling (FDM) filament. Results Phys 2019; 12: 205–222.

79.

Tekinalp

Kunc

Velez-Garcia

, et al. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 2014; 105: 144–150.

80.

Singh Boparai

Singh

. Wear behavior of FDM parts fabricated by composite material feed stock filament. Rapid Prototyp J 2016; 22(2): 350–357.

81.

Berretta

Davies

Shyng

, et al. Fused deposition modelling of high temperature polymers: exploring CNT PEEK composites. Polym Test 2017; 63: 251–262.

82.

Chen

Mangadlao

Wallat

, et al. 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly (lactic acid)/graphene oxide nanocomposites: anisotropic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2017; 9(4): 4015–4023.

83.

Chizari

Daoud

Ravindran

, et al. 3D printing of highly conductive nanocomposites for the functional optimization of liquid sensors. Small 2016; 12(44): 6076–6082.

84.

Christ

Aliheidari

Ameli

, et al. 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of multiwalled carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Mater Design 2017; 131: 394–401.

85.

Coppola

Cappetti

Di Maio

, et al. Layered silicate reinforced polylactic acid filaments for 3D printing of polymer nanocomposites. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd international forum on research and technologies for society and industry (RTSI), Modena, Italy, 11–13 September 2017, pp. 1–4. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

86.

Dorigato

Moretti

Dul

, et al. Electrically conductive nanocomposites for fused deposition modelling. Synth Met 2017; 226: 7–14.

87.

Dul

Fambri

Pegoretti

. Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2016; 85: 181–191.

88.

Gnanasekaran

Heijmans

Van Bennekom

, et al. 3D printing of CNT- and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. Appl Mater Today 2017; 9: 21–28.

89.

Kim

Fernando

, et al. Fabrication and characterization of 3D printed BaTiO₃/PVDF nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 2018; 52(2): 197–206.

90.

Kim

Johnson

Chavez

, et al. Enhanced dielectric properties of three phase dielectric MWCNTs/BaTiO₃/PVDF nanocomposites for energy storage using fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Ceramics Int 2018; 44(8): 9037–9044.

91.

Prashantha

Roger

. Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly (lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci A 2017; 54(1): 24–29.

92.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. On mechanical characterization of 3-D printed PLA-PVC-wood dust-Fe₃O₄ composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019.

93.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Investigations for mechanical, thermal and magnetic properties of polymeric composite matrix for four-dimensional printing applications. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 2020; 42(4): 1–15.

94.

Kumar

Singh

Batish

, et al. Additive manufacturing of smart materials exhibiting 4-D properties: a state of art review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019.

95.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. On investigations of thermal conductivity, circumferential compressive strength, and surface characterization of 3D-printed hybrid blended magnetostrictive PLA composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2020.

96.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Multi material 3D printing of PLA-PA6/TiO₂ polymeric matrix: flexural, wear and morphological properties. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2020.

97.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Three-dimensional printing of dual thermoplastic materials with different layer combinations: tensile, flexural, and fractured surface investigations. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2020.

98.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. Comparison of mechanical and morphological properties of 3-D printed functional prototypes: multi and hybrid blended thermoplastic matrix. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2020.

99.

Jazi

SHS

Bagheri

Esfahany

. The effect of surface modification of (micro/nano)-calcium carbonate particles at various ratios on mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2015; 28(4): 479–495.

100.

Chirila

Marginean

Iclanzan

, et al. Method for modifying mechanical properties of carbon nano-fiber polymeric composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2007; 20(3): 277–289.

101.

Khoo

Teoh

JEM

Liu

, et al. 3D printing of smart materials: a review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2015; 10(3): 103–122.

102.

Kim

Zhu

, et al. 3D optical printing of piezoelectric nanoparticle–polymer composite materials. ACS Nano 2014; 8(10): 9799–9806.

103.

Meier

Haberland

Frenzel

. Structural and functional properties of NiTi shape memory alloys produced by selective laser melting. In: Meier

Haberland

Frenzel (eds) Innovative developments in design and manufacturing: advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping. 2011, pp. 291–296.

104.

Meier

Haberland

Frenzel

, et al. Selective laser melting of NiTi shape memory components. In: Reddy

(ed.) Innovative developments in design and manufacturing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009, pp. 251–256.

105.

Dadbakhsh

Speirs

Kruth

, et al. Effect of SLM parameters on transformation temperatures of shape memory nickel titanium parts. Adv Eng Mater 2014; 16(9): 1140–1146.

106.

Rossiter

Walters

Stoimenov

. Printing 3D dielectric elastomer actuators for soft robotics. In: Electroactive polymer actuators and devices (EAPAD) 2009, vol. 7287, p. 72870H. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.

107.

Raviv

Zhao

McKnelly

, et al. Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 7422.

108.

Dunn

. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett 2013; 103(13): 131901.

109.

Ritchie

Mao

, et al. Controlled sequential shape changing components by 3D printing of shape memory polymer multimaterials. Procedia Iutam 2015; 12: 193–203.

110.

Dunn

, et al. Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 2014; 23(9): 094007.

Fused filament fabrication: A comprehensive review

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Commercial feedstock filaments used on FFF platform

Non-commercial composite feedstock filaments prepared on lab scale for FFF

Micro composites

Nano-composites

Transformation of 3D printing to four dimensional (4D) printing

Case study on reinforcement of various fillers in virgin polymeric matrix

Summary

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding

ORCID iDs

References