Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Shape-memory polymers (SMPs) and their composites (SMPCs), as a kind of smart materials, can respond to particular external stimulus and recover the original shape. They present outstanding features encompassing shape-memory effect, deformability, biocompatibility, variable stiffness, lightweight, and so on. They have attracted considerable research interest in recent years. Several stimulation methods to actuate the deformation of SMPs and SMPCs, of which the thermal stimulation is the common one, and many types of reinforcements have been developed over the past few years. It is revealed that the SMPC thermal and mechanical properties can be improved by introducing a number of reinforcements. Therefore, to well investigate the SMPC characteristics upon exposure to a specific external stimulus, a deep knowledge and understanding of the potential reinforcements as well as the available stimulation methods are crucial. In this review, reinforcements such as fibers, ceramics, and nanocarbons are first concisely presented. Next, numerous novel stimulation methods used to trigger the memory effect of the SMPCs are introduced, where the mechanisms of electrical, magnetic, thermal, light, and solution stimulations are briefly discussed. Finally, considering the increase of the number of interesting reinforcements as well as the efficient stimulation methods, SMPCs are expected to have great potential applications in different fields.

Keywords

Shape-memory polymers composites (SMPCs)nanocomposites stimulation reinforcement

Introduction

Shape-memory materials (SMMs) are characterized by the shape memory effect (SME), which is defined as the ability to recover the original form after a large deformation under the effect of a stimulus.^1,2 Several SMMs have been developed over the past few decades. Shape-memory alloys (SMAs; Au-Cd) were first discovered in 1932 by Arne Ölander,^3,4 whereas the shape-memory polymers (SMPs) were discovered by Vernon, who cited the SME for the first time in polymers in the year 1941.⁵ Recently, shape-memory polymer composites (SMPCs) have attracted a lot of intention from the scientific community, as can be clearly seen in Figure 1, which depicts the increasing number of scientific publications over the past three decades. Many countries are involved in the SMPCs research field. China and United States are the leading ones, with more than 950 publications for both of them. Figure 2 shows the number of scientific articles produced by various active countries during the past three decades.

Figure 1.

Illustration of the annual number of scientific publications since 1991, using the search terms “shape-memory polymer composites”. Data analysis completed using Scopus search system on October 3, 2019.

Figure 2.

Illustration of the number of scientific publications by country, using the search terms “shape-memory polymer composites.” Data analysis completed using Scopus search system on October 3, 2019.

SMPCs (Figure 3) are reinforced polymeric matrices with improved properties compared to SMPs for which the application is restricted by their low driving force and evident viscoelasticity.^6–8 The reinforcing phase with suitable volume fraction not only enhances the mechanical and thermomechanical features of SMPC’s but also enriches the driving methods such as light, magnetism, electricity, radio frequency, and so forth. This type of materials is able to recover its initial form when subjected to physical or chemical stimulations such as temperature variation,^9–13 electric impulse,¹⁴ magnetic field,^15,16 light,^17,18 solution,¹⁹ and so on.

Figure 3.

Composition of the shape-memory polymer composites.

Broadly, the memory effect encountered in SMPC’s is related to polymeric matrix. The introduction of reinforcement in the polymer matrix improves certain properties. It increases the recovery of the original form in addition to further interesting characteristics such as electrical conductivity,^20–22 magnetism,^23–25 optical,^26,27 bio functionality…^8,28

Over the last decade, SMPCs have received considerable attention because of their outstanding properties compared to the pure polymer matrices.^29–31 Therefore, to elaborate an SMPC, it is necessary to choose the suitable polymer that contains desirable properties. The improvement of the characteristics of this latter can be achieved by the incorporation of numerous reinforcing agents such as ceramic, metal, organic, and inorganic, with different size, shape, distribution, volume fraction, alignment, and disposition of loads. These additives can be classified either by their geometrical shape (fiber, tube, particle, layer, etc.) or by their size (nano or micro).^7,8,32 SMPC’s with nanometric charges have outstanding properties compared to those filled with micronized charges. Moreover, it was revealed that the use of higher volume fractions of reinforcement increases some properties of materials such as tensile strength. The addition of small amounts of active charges (metal oxide, nanometals, etc.) into the polymer matrix improves certain material properties such as electrical and magnetic properties.^10,14,33

On the other hand, the dispersion of the reinforcement within the polymeric matrix and the degree of interfacial adhesion between them are considered as the key factors, which affect the performance of such materials. Thus, better interfacial bonding between the polymer and the fibers imparts good mechanical properties to the composite due to the hydrogen bonds between the (–OH) groups present on the fiber and the polymer matrix.^34,35 The huge surface of the nanoparticles ensures a strong interfacial interaction between the nanoparticles and the polymer, which hence improves the properties of the composites. Several studies have confirmed that the formation of interfacial covalent bonds improves the uniform dispersion of the reinforcement by virtue of adhesive forces between the polymeric matrix and the reinforcement.^36–38 This better dispersion results in good mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties.^39,40 Moreover, the presence of better interfacial bonds and good reinforcement dispersion facilitates the stimulation of the composite material, which results in a good memory effect trigger.

The incorporation of reinforcements into SMPs has widened their application domains. For instance, in the field of aerospace,^10,41 the addition of reinforcement charges with good electrical, magnetic or luminous properties contributes in stimulation processes such as electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation, and light stimulation.^14,41–44 This has led to the fabrication of many parts with SMPCs in this area. It is demonstrated that SMPCs are easy to use in various fields, inexpensive, potentially biocompatible and biodegradable, antimicrobial, and capable to undergo large deformations. Many researchers used these materials in the biomedical field^45,46 such as endovascular thrombectomy devices,^47,48 cardiovascular stent,^48–51 and artificial muscles.^48,52 SMPCs also have many applications in other fields such as smart textile,^53,54 packaging and automotive field.^8,55

Numerous review articles in the field of SMPCs dealt with the SME and the application of this type of materials. The present review however will focus on the recent advances in the field of reinforcing agents as well as the new stimulation methods. Firstly, the most types of reinforcements according to their shape are concisely presented. Then, the role of these reinforcements and their influence on the SMPC properties are introduced. Finally, the stimulation methods are discussed along with the advantages and drawbacks of each method supported by some examples from the literature.

Fiber-reinforced SMPCs

In recent years, researchers in the field of materials have given great importance for composite materials with SME. They focused their efforts on the improvement of the polymeric matrix properties of SMPC’s such as the deformation capacity, low density, rigidity, strength, and shape effect. Such improvements in properties are reached by the reinforcement of the polymeric matrix by using nanometal, nano-ceramic, fibers (glass or carbon), graphene oxide (GO), and so on.

Before discussing the SMP reinforced by fibers and their performance, a brief description of the types of fibers is presented. Short fibers, continuous fibers, particulate fibers, and uniaxial continuous and woven fibers are the most common fibers used as reinforcements in polymers composite. In the field of polymer composites, the influence of the fibers type on the composite properties has been extensively explored in several studies, whereas in the field of SMPCs, to the best of our knowledge, there are scarce investigations in the literature.^56–60 Therefore, the influence of fiber types on the memory effect of such materials could be the scope of many future studies.

Generally, an SMPC with good characteristics is the result of the synergetic effect between polymer properties, the type of reinforcement, and the nature of stimulation. In addition, the SMPC characteristics depend closely on the reinforcement material type, volume fraction, and its orientation distribution. Table 1 presents some types of fibers as well as their corresponding physical properties.

Table 1.

Some of the fibers and their physical properties.

	Fibers	Type of fibers	Tensile Strength (MPa)	Tensile modulus (GPa)	Elongation (%)	References
Natural Fibers	Jute	Continuous fiber	393–800	10–30	1.5–1.8	^61–66
	Sisal	Continuous fiber Short fiber Particulate fiber	227–400	9–20	2–14
	Cellulose	Continuous fiber Short fiber Particulate fiber	300–500	10	—
	Flax	Continuous fiber	345–1500	27.6–80	1.2–3.2
	Alfa	Continuous fiber Short fiber Particulate fiber	35	22	5.8
	Softwood	Particulate fiber	1000	40	4.4
	Kenaf	Short fiber	250	4.3	—
Carbon fibers	GP	Short fiber Continuous fiber Woven fabrics	680–784	30–48	1.4–2.2	^61,67
Carbon fibers	HP	Short fiber Continuous fiber Woven fabrics	3530–7060	230–294	1.5–2.4	^61,67
Glass fibers	A-Glass	Short fiber Continuous fiber Woven fabrics	3310	68.9	4.8	^60,61
	C-Glass		3310	68.9	4.8
	D-Glass		2415	51.7	4.6
	E-Glass		3445	72.3	4.8
	S-2-Glass		4890	86.9	5.7

GP: general purpose; HP: high-performance.

Carbon fibers

Carbon fibers (CFs) have been widely used in extremely demanding applications requiring high modulus (HM), low density, and high resistance such as automobiles, sporting goods, aerospace, among others. CFs contain at least 92% carbon. This higher content of carbon provides higher tensile strength, resistance, fatigue resistance, and thermal conductivity, as well as excellent structural stability with a lower coefficient of thermal expansion.^68,69 Consequently, the CFs are considered a promising reinforcement to improve the properties of SMPCs.^68,70 Few years ago, Lan et al. have studied the shape recovery (R_r) behavior of a thermosetting styrene-based SMPC reinforced with CF fabrics.⁶⁸ They have shown that the SMPC exhibited a higher storage modulus than a pure SMP. At above T_g, the recovery rate of the SMPC shape after flexion is greater than 90%. The SMPC R_r properties become relatively stable after certain packaging/deployment cycles. It is revealed that the micro-fiber joint is the main mechanism for obtaining a significant stress during the flexion of the SMPC.

Glass fibers

Nowadays, glass fibers (GFs) have been widely used in numerous applications owing to their many interesting features such as low manufacturing cost and exceptional tensile strength. GF are the most commonly used fibers in the polymer composites field. The introduction of oxides such as silicon oxide (SiO₂), alumina (Al₂O₃), B₂O₃, CaO, and so on proved the modification and improvement of the final properties of GF.^71,72 Thus, to improve the mechanical weakness of PU, Ohki et al.⁷³ have reinforced it using GFs with different weight fractions. The obtained results claimed that the optimal weight fraction of the GFs was between 10% and 20% to generate an extremely low residual stress during the cyclic loading. The authors also showed that the SME is diminished with the increase of the GF weight fraction.⁷³

Natural fibers

The SMPCs are considered as a new generation of intelligent materials. High portions of research efforts within this field are concentrated on the employment of nanoparticles and carbon-based reinforcements. While a limited number of research articles treated the natural fiber (NF) reinforcements, intensive studies need to be conducted in the future to shed light on the impact of this type of reinforcement on SMPC properties.

NFs are widely used as polymer reinforcing agents. This is mainly due to their biodegradability and their interesting properties such as good mechanical properties, high strength, low cost, low density, and are nonabrasive.^65,74–76 The most used NFs are categorized into three main categories as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Natural fibers classification.⁶²

Composite fibers

Recently a new class of fibers has emerged and used to reinforce polymers such as the SMPs. These composites are fibers grafted in their surface one or more other fillers such as nanoparticles, graphene, GO, CF/GO,^77,78 CNT/CF,^79,80 GF/MWCNT,⁸¹ and so on. These composite fibers present outstanding properties such as good mechanical properties, high strength, low cost, and low density.

Recently, a study, which investigated the R_r performance by electric stimulation (Joule heating) in SMP reinforced by composite fiber (CFs/GO), has been reported by Lu et al.⁷⁷ The GO is self-assembled and grafted onto CFs to improve THE interfacial bonding with the SMP matrix via van der Waals and covalent cross-linking as displayed in Figure 5. The experimental results confirmed that the electrical properties of the SMPC are considerably improved, thanks to the synergistic effect of composite fiber (CF/GO).⁷⁷

Figure 5.

The role of GO in the interfacial bonding between carbon fiber and epoxy-based SMP matrix via Van der Waals bonding and covalent cross-linking.⁷⁷

Ceramic-reinforced SMPCs

A new and effective technique for improving the thermal and mechanical properties consists of reinforcing polymer matrices with micro- or nanoparticles.^82–84 The fillers used should have interesting properties such as high strength, better wear properties, high hardness, corrosion resistance, high toughness, and high operating temperatures.^85–88 Among the fillers, Al₂O₃, aluminum nitride (AlN), titanium oxide (TiO₂), silicon carbide (SiC), SiO₂, silicon nitride (Si₃N₄), and boron carbide (B₄C) are the most common ones. Some of them are discussed below.

AlN has a high thermal conductivity and a low coefficient of thermal expansion and ideal dielectric properties. Because of their excellent properties, AlN fillers have been used successfully to improve the thermal and mechanical properties of polymer matrices.⁸⁹ To improve the thermal properties of SMPs, a composite matrices based on polyurethane (PU) loaded with AlN have been studied.⁹⁰ The reported results showed that the thermal conductivity of these SMPCs is related to the AlN charge concentration and could be improved by 50 times compared to that of a pure SMP. In addition, a significant decrease in the glass transition temperature (T_g) has observed. Concerning the mechanical properties of the composite storage module, the results showed that they increase with the increase of AlN content in vitreous and rubbery states. However, the final recovery rate of the shape-memory measurement has obviously decreased.⁹⁰

SiC has been widely used to strengthen various polymeric matrices such as epoxy resins, PolyetheretherKetone (PEEK), polyamide, polyester, PU, and phthalonitrile. SiC has excellent properties, such as high thermal stability, high resistance and modulus, good corrosion resistance, superior hardness, good wear resistance, and low dielectric constant.^88,91 A study on a SMP reinforced with different fractions of SiC particles of an average diameter of 300 nm, namely, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% has been undertaken.⁷ The obtained results showed that the addition of 40% by weight of SiC to the polymer enhances the microhardness and modulus of elasticity threefold. The R_r capacity depends on the SiC fraction. For instance, using the 180° bend tests, for SiC fractions less than 40%, the recovery capacity was perfect.⁷

Owing to the high hardness, high chemical stability, very low coefficient of thermal expansion, low dielectric constant and losses dielectric of SiO₂ nanoparticles, silicon dioxide (SiO₂) has been widely used in polymeric materials as a reinforcing agent.^92–94 Zhang et al. prepared a shape-memory composite (polycaprolactone (PCL)/SiO₂). The comparison of this composite (PCL/SiO₂) with traditional (PCL) has shown that the introduction of SiO₂ imparts excellent mechanical strength and good shape-memory properties to the composite. For instance, the elasticity (E) and the tensile strength modulus (σ _m ) of (PCL/SiO₂) were increased up to 500 MPa and 90 MPa, respectively, at room temperature. High proportions (approximately 100%) and recovery rates (>95%) have also been reported for (PCL/SiO₂).⁹⁵ In another work, Huang et al. have prepared a PU/SiO₂ composite by solution method in tetrahydrofuran (THF). The scanning electron microscopy showed that the nano-SiO₂ particles are well dispersed in PU matrix. In addition, the shape-memory performance of the pure PU is more than that of (PU/SiO₂) composite with 3% SiO₂. Moreover, differential scanning calorimetry and wide-angle X-ray diffraction indicated that the addition of SiO₂ has very little influence on the crystallization process.⁹⁶ These two studies, among others,^97,98 have demonstrated that SiO₂ nanoparticles have excellent ability to reduce the coefficient of friction and improve the wear resistance of polymer composites.

Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), known as alumina, is one of the most cost-effective and widely used materials for its interesting properties such as HM, good hardness, improved thermal conductivity, and good dielectric properties.^37,88 The introduction of alumina nanoparticles into SMPs can improve the overall thermal and mechanical properties of PVA/Al₂O₃. The physical cross-linking of 10% by weight of Al₂O₃ with PVA could considerably improve the mechanical and thermal properties of the materials. At the same time, the SMPC presents excellent R_r, induced by heat and water⁹⁹ as shown in Figures 6 and 7.

Figure 6.

The shape recovery of (a) PVA-SMP and (b) PVA-A10 performed at 90°C. “Permanent shape is straight shape.”

Figure 7.

The shape recovery of (a) PVA-SMP and (b) PVA-A10 performed in water. “Permanent shape is straight shape.”

TiO₂ has been the subject of many research works in recent decades. It is one of the most widely used nanometric materials as filler for polymeric matrices. This nanofiller can also improve the hardness, resistance, thermal, and thermomechanical properties of SMP’s. TiO₂-loaded polymers are well-known antimicrobial materials in the biomedical field and have a positive effect on corrosion protection as well.^72,100 For example, some research works on epoxy and polybenzoxazine reinforced with various amounts of titanium oxide nanoparticles have shown that excellent anticorrosion behavior has been obtained.^101,102 Furthermore, a study on TiO₂/poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) nanocomposites and their properties has been described elsewhere.¹⁰³ A significant improvement of the tensile properties of the 5% TiO₂/PLCL nanocomposite has been found. An increase of 113% in tensile strength and 11% elongation at break of pure PLCL polymer. TiO₂/PLCL nanocomposites containing a certain amount of TiO₂ have better shape-memory properties than pure PLCL polymer. Thus, TiO₂ nanoparticles play an additional role in physical cross-linking, which helps to improve the properties of shape-memory as well.¹⁰³

Zinc oxide (ZnO): The reinforcement of polymeric matrix with ZnO nanoparticles improves the SMPCs properties. This is due to the ZnO physicochemical properties, including chemical stability, low dielectric constant, high light transmittance, high catalytic activity, and exceptional thermal stability.¹⁰⁴ In addition, ZnO nanoparticles have outstanding optical characteristics such as intensive absorption of UV and infrared rays.¹⁰⁵ Subsequently, it can be used in light-stimulated applications.

A series of hybrid nanocomposites has been prepared by a solution casting process with various weight fractions of ZnO nanoparticles (0, 1, 3 and 5%).¹⁰⁶ Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the thermal stability increases with the increase of ZnO nanoparticle fraction. On the other hand, the moisture in the hybrid nanocomposites decreases as the ZnO nanoparticle fraction increases. The mechanical properties of the material also increase with the increase of the ZnO nanoparticle fraction. In addition, SMPCs showed a shape-memory behavior by placing the sample at room temperature and then at 55°C.¹⁰⁶

Iron oxide is another interesting filler. Various types of iron oxides have been reported, among which there are hematite (α-Fe₂O₃), maghemite (γ-Fe₂O₃), and magnetite (Fe₃O₄). Each of these three forms has its unique biochemical, magnetic, catalytic, and other properties.^107–109 The well-known mineral form is α-Fe₂O₃. It is ocher to rust in powder form but gray to black in crystallized form. It is a stable paramagnetic iron oxide, a hydrated form of which constitutes rust. It is one of the three main oxides of iron, the other two being iron oxide (II) FeO, rather rare, and γ-Fe₂O₃ and Fe₃O₄. Their structures have been illustrated in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Crystallographic of different iron oxides.¹¹⁰

A shape-memory composite based on (PU/Fe₃O₄) was prepared by Soso et al.¹⁰⁸ The recovery of the initial shape was triggered when the composite is exposed to an alternating magnetic field with a frequency of 260 kHz and a magnetic field density of 48 kA/mw, with a recovery time of less than 30 s. The use of this type of reinforcement in the field of shape-memory composite will be explained in the magnetic stimulation section.

Si₃N₄ has been revealed to an interesting filler and has been used to reduce the brittleness of materials, improve breaking strength, as well as to reduce friction and improve wear resistance. Si₃N₄ nanofillers are recognized as one of the most important materials for high temperature and strength applications because of its advantageous characteristics, such as good corrosion resistance, better wear properties with low dielectric constant and superior hardness with low density.¹¹¹ Numerous studies have investigated the effects of Si₃N₄ reinforcement on different polymer matrices, such as epoxy polymers, polypropylene, polyethylene (PE), polyimide 6, cyanate ester, PEEK, and bismaleimide.^112–115

Carbonic fillers

The incorporation of carbonic fillers in SMPCs has recently attracted many attention due to their naturally high mechanical performance and their exceptional transport features.^38,116 Besides, their addition at low concentrations in polymers could solve problems such as the transport properties of materials. This type of reinforcement leads to the decrease in electrical resistance. Significant improvements in shape-memory properties related to the geometric characteristics of this type of carbonic fillers, which provide better interaction with the polymer matrix.^38,40 Carbon filler reinforcements, for example, graphene, GO, carbon nanotube (CNT), and so on. Carbonic fillers have very different physical and electrochemical properties from each other (Table 2).

Table 2.

Important parameters of some carbon fillers.^117–120

Materials	CNT		Graphene	GO
Materials	SWCNT	MWCNT	Graphene	GO
Hybridization	sp²	sp²	sp²	sp³
Density (g/cm³)	0.8	1.8	2.26	∼1.8
Tensile strength (GPa)	60–150		130 ± 10	32
Thermal conductivity (W/mK)	6000	2000	(4.84 ± 0.44) × 10³ to (5.30 ± 0.48) × 10³	2000 for pure 600 on Si/SiO₂ substrate
Electrical conductivity (S/m)	10²–10⁶	10³–10⁵	7200	10⁻¹ (S/cm)
Bond length (Å)	1.44 (C=C)		1.42 (C=C)	1.45–1.61 (C=C)
Electronic properties (eV)	Meta/semiconductor ∼0.3–1.1		Zero-gap semiconductor	With epoxide ∼1.8 With hydroxyls ∼0.7

GO: graphene oxide.

Carbon nanotubes

Since the discovery of CNTs by Iijima,^121,122 CNTs, as shown in Figure 9, have been widely studied in the last decade because of their unique electrical, mechanical, optical, and thermal properties.^{116,123–127} Depending on their structural parameters, CNTs are the only material that can be metallic and semiconductors. CNTs are one-dimensional systems, graphene sheets wound on themselves, where (sp²) bonds have a character (sp³).^125,128

Figure 9.

The types of carbon nanotubes.

The most used types of CNTs are:

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNT), CNTs multi-walled;

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT), CNTs single-walled.

To investigate the influence of MWNT weight percentage on the spinning capacity, fracture morphology, thermal and mechanical properties, and shape-memory behavior of the SMP, Meng et al.¹²⁹ synthesized shape-memory polyurethane (SMPU) containing various amounts of MWNT by melt spinning. The results showed that the spinning capacity of (SMPU-MWNT) decreased considerably with the increase of MWNT percentage weight. If the MWNT weight percentage exceeds 8%, the SMPU cannot be produced due to the poor rheological properties of the composite. At low MWNT level, the crystallization in SMPU is favored because the MWNT acted as a nucleating agent, whereas, at high MWNT levels, the crystallization is hampered due to the restricted movement of PU chains. It is exhibited that MWNT aligned and homogeneously distributed what preserved the SMF with high tenacity and initial modulus. During stretching and fixing, the MWNT fibers facilitate the storage of internal elastic energy, which improves the recovery ratio as well as the recovery force.¹²⁹ SMPU reinforced by CNT/Graphene was studied by Kang et al.¹³⁰ This composite is used in the field of soft electronics and wearable technology, where a combination of mechanical and electronic deformations are needed. The characterization of the resulting micro-honeycomb (graphene/CNT/SMPU) composites showed a relatively low resistivity of 5 Ω, a resistance variation of less than 10% in the (stretching/loosening) states of 50%, long-term stability and superior shape memory, including 95.6% form fixity and a recovery rate of 90.6%. A regular distribution of graphene-CNT structures provides heterogeneous nucleation sites and undisturbed crystal growth in well-designed SMPU abutments, thus conferring superior shape-memory properties. This type of composites (graphene-CNT/SMPU) offers potential applications as an emergency circuit breaker in telephone batteries.¹³⁰ In another work, Yi et al.¹³¹ used a 1D thin-walled carbon nanotube (TWNT) compound and a 2D reduced graphene oxide (GRO) to strengthen the PU shape memory. A photothermal process using a near infrared laser activated the R_r of the composite. The best laser-induced R_r was obtained for composites (TWNT/RGO) of (7/3) with a nanocarbon content of 1% by weight (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

(a) Scheme of laser-induced actuation for (TWNT/RGO/PU) composite, (b) the photothermal shape recovery actuation behavior in a bending mode for the (TWNT/RGO/PU) composite (7/3 TWNT/RGO composition ratio and 1 wt% nanocarbon content) during the NIR irradiation, and (c) the photothermal shape recovery actuation behavior in an extension mode for the (TWNT/RGO/PU) composite (7/3 TWNT/RGO composition ratio and 1 wt% nanocarbon content).¹³¹

The tensile modulus and the electrical conductivity of the composites also showed a similar dependence of the TWNT/RGO composition ratio on the recovery of the photothermal form.¹³¹

Graphene

Graphene is the two-dimensional building block for carbon allotropes of every other dimensionality.^132–134 Graphene can be transferred in other forms such as GO, fullerene and CNTs (Figure 11). The prominent conductivity, electron mobility, and large specific surface area are the main characteristics of graphene.^133,135 The use of graphene in polymer matrices as reinforcement confers unique mechanical, chemical, electrical, and optical properties. The employment of graphene in several applications such as sensors, supercapacitors, solar cells, transistors, biosensors, and drug delivery systems has been reported.^133,136

Figure 11.

The structure of graphene and its derivatives.¹³³

Abbasi et al. studied the effect of incorporating graphene nanoplates (0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% by weight) into a matrix of PCL-PU. The obtained results showed an R_r rate of around 95–99% and a shape fixity (R_f) rate of around 91–96%.¹³⁷

Graphene oxide

GO is commonly considered as precursor material of graphene. However, it has different properties compared to graphene.^39,138 Firstly, the structure of the GO is characterized by the fact that GO sheet is composed of a hexagonal ring carbon lattice having both sp² and sp³ hybridized carbon atoms bearing oxygenated functional groups (Figure 11). GO has a better solubility than graphene in different solvents and has a low electrical conductivity.^{39,134,138–140} However, the incorporation of GO into the polymer matrix improves the actuation strain of elastomeric composites and increases the dielectric permittivity.^{134,135,141–144} GO has good mechanical properties with a Young’s modulus of 32 GPa. In addition to these different characteristics, GO also has interesting optical properties due to the presence of photoluminescence phenomenon. This luminescence is in the UV-near infrared region.^39,145,146 Recently, PU/GO composite was studied.¹⁴⁶ Three different weights (0.5%, 1%, and 2%) GO are incorporated into the PU matrix. Performance studies for 2% of GO showed a considerable improvement in toughness (2540–6807 MJ/m⁻³), as well as tensile strength (7–16 MPa), elongation at break (695–810%) and the scratch hardness of the formation (5–6.5 kg). Such SMPCs retained their R_r (approximately 99.5%) and R_f (approximately 90%) behaviors, as depicted in Figure 12, where the recovery shape memory of the SMPCs and the molecular mechanism are illustrated.

Figure 12.

(a) Recovery shape memory of HPU and their composites and (b) possible molecular mechanism of the SMPC.¹⁴⁶

Stimulation methods of SMPCs

Composite materials with shape memory (SMPs and SMPCs) are part of intelligent, controllable, and programmable materials.⁴¹ Stimulation methods are actions to activate the SMP and SMPC memory recovery process. The thermal stimulation method is the most common approach used in the field of SMPs and their composites. However, new stimulation methods such as electrical, magnetic, light, and solution stimulations have emerged during the last few decades.^6,10,44

Thermal stimulation

The thermal stimulation is one of the most used methods in the fields of SMPs and SMPCs. Heuchel et al. explains the phenomenon relying on the transmission of the thermal energy from external environment to the thermal sensitive SMP via conduction, convection or thermal radiation in a direct contact way.¹⁴⁷ Figure 13 illustrates the mechanisms of heat-sensitive SMP. At low temperatures (a), the elastic and transition segments are hard. When the heating exceeds the transition temperature (glass transition or melting), the transition segment becomes soft and can be easily deformed (b). As a result, the elastic segment is deformed and the elasticity energy is accumulated and stored therein. Cooling below the transition temperature triggers the hardening of the transition segment. If a temporary deformation is maintained during cooling, it will also be maintained largely even after displacement of stress (c).¹⁴⁸ Below the transition temperature, the transition segment is hard, which prevents elasticity recovery of the segments.

Figure 13.

The mechanism of thermal stimulation and shape-memory effect in SMPs.

The transition segments relax after another heating above the transition temperature. Therefore, the elastic segments cannot be hold in their places anymore. The free end of PMF gains back its original shape as a result of elasticity energy released by the elastic segments (e).¹⁴⁸ Currently, a lot of research activities have been done worldwide on SMPs and SMPCs. Several investigations on the nature of the recovery of the initial form and their applications under the stimulus of heat have been reported. The mechanical performance and heat transfer efficiency of SMPs can be ameliorated by the incorporation of nanoparticles into its structure.⁴⁴ As an example, integrating spherical Ni nanoparticles into epoxy SMP reduces its T_g,^6,149 while the addition of CNF/MWCNT in styryl SMP augments its T_g.^6,150 The comparison of the thermomechanical behavior by the bending test was made between the pure epoxy resin SMP and the epoxy resin reinforced with SiC nanoparticles. The obtained results revealed that the SMPC had a higher modulus of elasticity and recovery force.¹⁵¹ Likewise, the reinforcement of pure SMPs by fiberglass has been carried out to validate the SME of the produced SMPCs using a thermal stimulation.¹⁰ It is demonstrated that fiberglass is an interesting reinforcing agent which confer a better feature to SMPs.

As an example in the medical field, it is important to obtain materials that retain their shape memory as a function of the body temperature of 37°C. Lendlein et al. have reported a series of biodegradable thermoplastic polymers such as (PU-PCL) to obtain an SMP that reacts at the temperature of the human body.^48,152 Figure 14 shows an SMP stent manufactured to react and modify at human body temperature.^152,153 The stent showed an excellent behavior with high corrosion resistance, biocompatible, and nonmagnetic.⁴

Figure 14.

A stent with shape memory, the time necessary to recover the original form at 37°C in less than 10 s.^152,154

Novel stimulation of SMPCs

Electric stimulation

Electrical stimulation is the most used process in the field of SMPC.⁶ Since external heating is undesirable in many applications, much research activities have been devoted to electricity as a stimulant to study the R_r mechanism, the electrical properties of the reinforced SMPs and the corresponding applications.^155,156 It is widely reported that SMPs reinforced with carbon (conductive) materials such as CNT and graphene,^157–160 fibers, and nanometals^161,162 provide numerous advantages such as high efficiency, stability, and ease of design.^10,14,163 Figure 15 shows the recovery of the initial form of a reinforced SMPC sample stimulated at a constant voltage of 30 V DC. The recovery of the initial (permanent) form took 80 s.¹⁶²

Figure 15.

Electrical stimulation for the recovery of the initial form of SMPCs.¹⁶²

Several research studies have shown that the electrical stimulation of the SMPC has a recovery effect of the initial shape. The work of Goo et al., who added MWNT to the SMPU to improve mechanical properties and electrical conductivity, confirmed such behavior.^164,165 An analysis of the electrical resistivity and electric conductivity of an SMP reinforced with powders or nano-CFs has been carried out by Leng et al.^166–168 They revealed that the addition of a reduced size nickel powder to the SMP could significantly improve the electrical conductivity.¹⁴⁹

In the field of electrical stimulation results, electro-reactive SMPs can be manufactured to be intelligent stress structures or temperature sensors in application, because of the relationship between stress and electrical resistivity with different temperatures.^{149,166,168,169}

Figure 16 shows another example of shape-memory conductive composites using a conductive polymer reinforced with a CNT. Such composite seems to be prominent to be used as electro-stimulated actuators and remote sensing.^164,170

Figure 16.

An electro-stimulated shape-memory composite based on PU/polypyrrole.^44,170

Most of SMPs have high electrical and thermal resistance. Therefore, when temperature is used as the main actuator to activate the memory effect of the matrix, conductive charges are integrated as heating sources inside the SMPs to facilitate the passage of electric current and Joule heating. When the internal temperature is higher than the transition temperature, the recovery of the deformation is triggered.^14,44,170

The type of charges, their orientation, and volume play a very important role to control the rate of matrix recovery. The effect of the type of charges is due to their electrical conductivity in the matrix, while the volume of the charges increases the intensity of the electrical current, which automatically increases the polymeric matrix temperature. This has a direct influence on the R_r.

Magnetic stimulation

The SME of SMPC’s can be activated by a magnetic stimulation, also known as inductive heating, when an alternating external magnetic field is applied to SMP matrices reinforced with magnetic nanoparticles such as Fe₂O_3, Fe₃O₄, and Ni.^171–175 An inductive heating is a technique based on the application of a low-frequency alternating current to generate a magnetic field at the SMPC particles.^{176, 177} Huang et al. presented a systematic study of the influence of magnetic particles on the thermomechanical properties of SMPCs. They have even explored some unconventional applications of magnetic particles (Fe₃O₄ and Ni) to modify the surface roughness and morphology to improve the electrical conductivity of SMPs.¹⁴⁸ Buckley et al. confirmed the usefulness of such contactless approach to stimulate SMPCs as well as their suitability for many applications, especially in biomedical devices for reducing invasive surgeries.^178,179 For an efficient inductive heating, a certain size limit needs to be applied to nanoparticles.¹⁸⁰ As an example, the magnetically induced SME is demonstrated in Figure 17.¹⁶

Figure 17.

The shape-memory effect of a SMPC at 10% nanoparticle (Fe₂O₃).¹⁶

Light stimulation

As the stimulation using heat, electricity, or a magnetic field has various negative effects on the SMPCs, another stimulation method based on the light has emerged to avoid the disadvantages of other stimuli.¹⁸¹ According to Razzaq, Lendlein, Long et al., SMPs and SMPCs can react either with light alone to produce a R_r¹⁸² or with both light and temperature to regain its original shape.^10,182,183

The nature of the materials involved to strengthen SMPs plays an important role in the response to light to recover the initial state of the SMPCs. Among the materials used, one can cite gold nanoparticles (AuNPs),¹⁸⁴ carbon black,¹⁸⁵ and CNTs.¹⁸⁶ Figure 18 shows an AuNP-reinforced PU, which can stretch until 100% deformation at room temperature. A recovery of its initial shape was done by laser exposure. The SMPC raises a load of 350 times of its weight.¹⁸⁴ Leng et al. uses carbon black to absorb a light wave and convert it into heat, which activates the process of recovering from the original shape.¹⁸⁵ In this field, researchers have encountered some issues because most of the SMPCs are thick, while light penetrates only thin films.⁴⁴

Figure 18.

AuNP-reinforced PU, the recovery of its initial shape was performed by laser.¹⁸⁴

Solution stimulation

Another less known stimulation method for the R_r SMPs and SMPCs is the solution stimulation. It is based on the principle of reducing the T_g to trigger the original R_r process. In general, the mechanism of the R_r of SMPs and SMPCs by stimulation in a solution (water, solvent, or mixture) consists of the fact that the solution has a plasticizing effect on the polymers, which increases the flexibility of the macromolecules and decreases the T_g until the recovery of the form.^19,187–190

Water stimulation

As shown in Figure 19, Huang et al. have studied the action of initial form recovery of the PU-type SMPC reinforced by CNTs.¹⁸⁸ The water plays the role of a plasticizer that diffuses into the polymer, which activates the process of reducing the T_g to recover the initial form.

Figure 19.

Initial form recovery of an SMPC (PU/CNT) immersed in water.¹⁸⁸

In another work, Wang et al. have synthesized new shape-memory composite films (PU reinforced with cellulose nano-fibers) with water stimulation. The PU/CNF composite film with a composition of 70/30 shows a high recovery ratio (95%) and a fast-form recovery rate (1 min), which gives fast and excellent shape-memory capabilities. A schematic presentation of the process is displayed in Figure 20.¹⁹⁰

Figure 20.

Recovery procedure of initial shape of a shape-memory composite film (PU/CNF) with a water stimulation.¹⁹⁰

Solvent stimulation

Using the solvent stimulation, the recovery of the initial shape of the material can be obtained by reducing the T_g of the material itself during the immersion in a solvent. The actuation triggered when the material is immersed in the solution instead of heating the material above its T_g. This decrease in T_g is related to the absorption of the solvent molecules on the SMP, which weakens the elastic modulus and activates the recovery of the initial form. Recently, Lv et al. studied the recovery of the form of thermosetting styrene-based SMP (T_g = 65°C) in a solution of 100 ml of N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The polymer was thrown into the DMF at a temperature of 22°C. This work demonstrated that the SMP recovers its initial form after the formation of hydrogen bonds, which directly influences the T_g of the material, and therefore the activation of the recovery of the form (Figure 21).¹⁸⁹

Figure 21.

Shape recovery of SMP styrene wire in DMF.¹⁸⁹

Mixing solution stimulation (water/solvent)

The initiation of the R_r in a solution started with the reduction of the T_g) of the materials during the stimulation by mixing (water/solvent). In the recent years, Zhang et al. studied the R_r of chitosan (CS)/glycerol (GL) composite film in a solution (water/ethanol) at 50% v/v. This study has proved that the formation of hydrogen bonds must belong to residual water molecules, which interacts with CS molecules and releases the memory effect of the composite film (Figure 22).^190,191

Figure 22.

Recovery process of (CS/GL) composite film in mixed (water/ethanol) solution.¹⁹¹

Based on the excellent performance of fast-acting shape-memory trigged by solution (water/solvent), SMPCs with solution stimulation can find applications in various potential uses such as in biomedical field as drugs, medical devices, and intelligent sensors.

Conclusion and future trends of SMPC research

SMPs and SMPCs have demonstrated exceptional characteristics that led to suggest them to be implemented as advanced intelligent materials for the current and potential applications. The present review has systematically discussed two main aspects of SMPC’s, encompassing the following points:

The common fillers used as reinforcements provided quite limited shape-memory features and characteristics because their abilities to recover the original shape are only based on heating sources. Therefore, the emergence of new fillers, fibers, and particles at micro/nano and their hybrids is principally crucial to be considered to meet the required functions and performance.

The use of emerging and new fillers to reinforce SMPs and SMPCs will not only improve the mechanical and shape-memory properties but also will allow obtaining noble features after being subjected to any thermal, electro-, magnetic, light, or solution stimulation.

Since they have high design variety, numerous SMMs can be developed through the modification of their physicochemical features to meet the requirements for different applications.

The use of reinforcements that are chemically linked with the polymer matrix are more effective in improving the mechanical properties as well as the performance of shape memory of SMPCs. The use of blends SMPs with reinforcements can open new research studies.

However, there are still many challenges to overcome in SPMC materials for practical application or commercial uses. The development of efficient fillers and the synthesis of SMP material systems with broad transition temperature ranges, large modulus spans, multiple SME in addition to the development of novel effective fabrication methods with complicated structures (3D and 4D) and coupling of different actuation methods to obtain programmable and remotely controllable actuation. Another aspect that needs to be taken into account is the current environmental issues through the employment of petroleum-based polymers. Thus, the development of bio-based SMPs is important in addition to the employment of natural reinforcements to manufacture a new generation of environmentally friendly SMMs. Therefore, the combination of several factors such as the suitable chemical composition, good compatibility, biodegradability, sustainability, simple and efficient stimulation mode, SMPs, and SMPCs are expected to a broaden application in widespread uses from medical to aerospace.

Footnotes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Ammar Boudjellal

References

Otsuka

Wayman

. Mechanism of shape memory effect and superelasticity. Shape Memory Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 27–48.

Huang

Ding

Wang

, et al. Shape memory materials. Mater Today 2010; 13: 54–61.

Ölander

. An electrochemical investigation of solid cadmium-gold alloys. J Am Chem Soc 1932; 54: 3819–3833.

Jani

Leary

Subic

, et al. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des (1980-2015) 2014; 56: 1078–1113.

Vernon

. Process of manufacturing articles of thermoplastic synthetic resins. Google Patents, 1941.

Liu

Lan

, et al. Shape memory polymers for composites. Compos Sci Technol 2018; 160: 169–198.

Gall

Dunn

Liu

, et al. Shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Acta Mater 2002; 50: 5115–5126.

Madbouly

Lendlein

. Shape-memory polymer composites. In: Lendlein

(ed.) Shape-memory polymers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010, pp. 41–95.

Xie

Rousseau

. Facile tailoring of thermal transition temperatures of epoxy shape memory polymers. Polymer 2009; 50: 1852–1856.

10.

Leng

Lan

Liu

, et al. Shape-memory polymers and their composites: stimulus methods and applications. Prog Mater Sci 2011; 56: 1077–1135.

11.

Leng

Liu

. Effect of a linear monomer on the thermomechanical properties of epoxy shape-memory polymer. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18: 095031.

12.

Xiao

Kong

Qiu

, et al. Shape-memory polymers with adjustable high glass transition temperatures. Macromolecules 2015; 48: 3582–3589.

13.

Xie

Huang

Liu

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of high temperature cyanate-based shape memory polymers with functional polybutadiene/acrylonitrile. Polymer 2014; 55: 5873–5879.

14.

Liu

Lan

, et al. Review of electro-active shape-memory polymer composite. Compos Sci Technol 2009; 69: 2064–2068.

15.

Zhang

Luo

, et al. Remote, fast actuation of programmable multiple shape memory composites by magnetic fields. J Mater Chem C 2015; 3: 11290–11293.

16.

Mohr

Kratz

Weigel

, et al. Initiation of shape-memory effect by inductive heating of magnetic nanoparticles in thermoplastic polymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 103: 3540–3545.

17.

Zhang

Xia

Zhao

. Light-controlled complex deformation and motion of shape-memory polymers using a temperature gradient. ACS Macro Lett 2014; 3: 940–943.

18.

Lendlein

Jiang

Jünger

, et al. Light-induced shape-memory polymers. Nature 2005; 434: 879–882.

19.

Liu

Leng

, et al. Qualitative separation of the effect of the solubility parameter on the recovery behavior of shape-memory polymer. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18: 085003.

20.

Chen

Zhao

, et al. Electrochemical fabrication of a memory device based on conducting polymer nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 2007; 111: 18392–18396.

21.

Liu

Shi

M-M

Pan

X-W

, et al. Photoinduced electron transfer and enhancement of photoconductivity in silicon nanoparticles/perylene diimide composites in a polymer matrix. J Phys Chem C 2008; 112: 15865–15869.

22.

Tang

, et al. Enhanced electrical conductivity of highly crystalline polythiophene/insulating-polymer composite. Macromolecules 2007; 40: 6579–6584.

23.

Liu

Wang

Yang

. Synthesis of pH-sensitive hollow polymer microspheres with movable magnetic core. Polymer 2009; 50: 2578–2586.

24.

Guo

Zhang

, et al. Preparation and characterization of magnetic composite microspheres using a free radical polymerization system consisting of DPE. Polymer 2009; 50: 1887–1894.

25.

Kommareddi

Tata

John

, et al. Synthesis of superparamagnetic polymer−ferrite composites using surfactant microstructures. Chem Mater 1996; 8: 801–809.

26.

Ravindranath

Ajikumar

Muhammad Hanafiah

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of luminescent conjugated polymer−silica composite spheres. Chem Mater 2006; 18: 1213–1218.

27.

Sainz

Small

Young

, et al. Synthesis and properties of optically active polyaniline carbon nanotube composites. Macromolecules 2006; 39: 7324–7332.

28.

. Shape memory polymers: fundamentals, advances and applications. Shawbury: Smithers Rapra, 2014.

29.

Mark

. Some novel polymeric nanocomposites. Acc Chem Res 2006; 39: 881–888.

30.

Song

Kim

Park

. Three-dimensional hierarchically organized magnetic nanoparticle polymer composites: achievement of monodispersity and enhanced tensile strength. J Phys Chem C 2008; 112: 5397–5404.

31.

Schaefer

Justice

. How nano are nanocomposites? Macromol 2007; 40: 8501–8517.

32.

Hussain

Hojjati

Okamoto

, et al. Polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: an overview. J Compos Mater 2006; 40: 1511–1575.

33.

Meng

. A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites. Polymer 2013; 54: 2199–2221.

34.

Jiang

Wang

, et al. Significant reinforcement of polypropylene/wood flour composites by high extent of interfacial interaction. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019; 32: 577–592.

35.

Wang

Song

. Unidirectional continuous fiber-reinforced polypropylene single-polymer composites prepared by extrusion–calendering process. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 5 November 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719886898.

36.

Singh

Kumar

, et al. Waste thermosetting polymer and ceramic as reinforcement in thermoplastic matrix for sustainability: thermomechanical investigations. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719847237.

37.

Ramdani

Liu

Wang

, et al. Ceramic-based polybenzoxazine micro-and nanocomposites. In: Advanced and emerging polybenzoxazine science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 861–919.

38.

Sarmad

Abrisham

Noroozi

, et al. Deep focusing on the role of microstructures in shape memory properties of polymer composites: a critical review. Eur Polym J 2019; 117: 280–303.

39.

Zhu

Murali

Cai

, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 3906–3924.

40.

Panahi-Sarmad

Goodarzi

Amirkiai

, et al. Programing polyurethane with systematic presence of graphene-oxide (GO) and reduced graphene-oxide (rGO) platelets for adjusting of heat-actuated shape memory properties. Eur Polym J 2019; 118: 619–632.

41.

Liu

, et al. Shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications: a review. Smart Mater Struct 2014; 23: 023001.

42.

Sokolowski

Tan

Pryor

. Lightweight shape memory self-deployable structures for gossamer applications. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 19–22 April 2004, p. 1660.

43.

Sokolowski

Tan

. Advanced self-deployable structures for space applications. J Spacecr Rockets 2007; 44: 750–754.

44.

Liu

Zhou

Yao

, et al. Stimulus methods of multi-functional shape memory polymer nanocomposites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2017; 100: 20–30.

45.

Lendlein

Behl

Hiebl

, et al. Shape-memory polymers as a technology platform for biomedical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7: 357–379.

46.

Wache

Tartakowska

Hentrich

, et al. Development of a polymer stent with shape memory effect as a drug delivery system. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2003; 14: 109–112.

47.

Ortega

Hartman

Rodriguez

, et al. Virtual treatment of basilar aneurysms using shape memory polymer foam. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41: 725–743.

48.

Lendlein

Langer

. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 2002; 296: 1673–1676.

49.

Zhang

Zhou

Liu

, et al. Microwave synthesis and actuation of shape memory polycaprolactone foams with high speed. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 11152.

50.

. A shape memory polymer based syntactic foam with negative Poisson’s ratio. Mater Sci Eng: A 2011; 528: 6804–6811.

51.

Quadrini

Bellisario

Santo

, et al. Shape memory foams of microbial polyester for biomedical applications. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 2013; 52: 599–602.

52.

Rodriguez

Y-J

Miller

, et al. Opacification of shape memory polymer foam designed for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40: 883–897.

53.

Meng

, et al. A review of stimuli-responsive polymers for smart textile applications. Smart Mater Struct 2012; 21: 053001.

54.

Chan Vili

. Investigating smart textiles based on shape memory materials. Text Res J 2007; 77: 290–300.

55.

Thostenson

Ren

Chou

T-W

. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 2001; 61: 1899–1912.

56.

Hong

Jang

Park

, et al. Three-dimensional constitutive model of woven fabric-reinforced shape memory polymer composites considering thermal residual stress. Smart Mater Struct 2019; 28.

57.

Zeng

Leng

, et al. Modeling the thermomechanical behaviors of short fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites. Int J Mech Sci 2020; 166: 105212.

58.

Gao

Chen

, et al. Effect of temperature on the mechanical behaviours of a single-ply weave-reinforced shape memory polymer composite. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 159: 336–345.

59.

Herath

Epaarachchi

Islam

, et al. Carbon fibre reinforced shape memory polymer composites for deployable space habitats. Engineer 2019; 52: 1–9.

60.

Dogan

. Single and repeated low-velocity impact response of E-glass fiber-reinforced epoxy and polypropylene composites for different impactor shapes. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 7 November 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719886911.

61.

Mochane

Mokhena

Mokhothu

, et al. Recent progress on natural fiber hybrid composites for advanced applications: a review. eXPRESS Polymer Letters 2019; 13: 159–198.

62.

Pakravan

Latifi

Jamshidi

. Hybrid short fiber reinforcement system in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 2017; 142: 280–294.

63.

Trache

Donnot

Khimeche

, et al. Physico-chemical properties and thermal stability of microcrystalline cellulose isolated from Alfa fibres. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 104: 223–230.

64.

Trache

Khimeche

Mezroua

, et al. Physicochemical properties of microcrystalline nitrocellulose from Alfa grass fibres and its thermal stability. J Therm Anal Calorim 2016; 124: 1485–1496.

65.

Lotfi

Dao

, et al. Natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review on material, manufacturing, and machinability. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 28 April 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719844546.

66.

Sanjay

Madhu

Jawaid

, et al. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: a comprehensive review. J Cleaner Prod 2018; 172: 566–581.

67.

Medjahed

Derradji

Zegaoui

, et al. Processability and mechanical properties of surface-modified glass-fibres/phthalonitrile composite and Al–Li alloy fibre-metal-laminates. Mater Sci Technol 2019; 35: 661–668.

68.

Lan

Liu

, et al. Fiber reinforced shape-memory polymer composite and its application in a deployable hinge. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18: 024002.

69.

Benmokrane

Zhang

Laoubi

, et al. Mechanical and bond properties of new generation of carbon fibre reinforced polymer reinforcing bars for concrete structures. Can J Civ Eng 2002; 29: 338–343.

70.

Gall

Mikulas

Munshi

, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2000; 11: 877–886.

71.

Mallick

. Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design. Boca Raton: CRC press, 2007.

72.

Battawi

Abed

Khuder

AWH

. Effects of reinforcements (fiber glass, TiO₂ and Y₂O₃) with different volume fraction on the mechanical properties of epoxy composite. Int J Mech Eng Technol 2019; 10: 507–515.

73.

Ohki

Q-Q

Ohsako

, et al. Mechanical and shape memory behavior of composites with shape memory polymer. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2004; 35: 1065–1073.

74.

Saheb

Jog

. Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol: J Polym Process Inst 1999; 18: 351–363.

75.

Sanchez-Garcia

Gimenez

Lagarón

. Morphology and barrier properties of solvent cast composites of thermoplastic biopolymers and purified cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym 2008; 71: 235–244.

76.

Wang

Pattarachaiyakoop

, et al. A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 2011; 42: 856–873.

77.

Yao

Huang

, et al. Noncovalently functionalized carbon fiber by grafted self-assembled graphene oxide and the synergistic effect on polymeric shape memory nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 2014; 67: 290–295.

78.

Gupta

Srivastava

. Mechanical properties of hybrid fibers-reinforced polymer composite: a review. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 2016; 55: 626–642.

79.

Malekimoghadam

Icardi

. Prediction of mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composites using multi-scale finite element modelling. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 177: 107405.

80.

Boroujeni

Al-Haik

. Carbon nanotube–Carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with extended fatigue life. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 164: 537–545.

81.

Wood

Palmeri

Putz

, et al. Nanoscale structure and local mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites containing MWCNT-grafted hybrid glass fibers. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72: 1705–1710.

82.

Kumar

Fellner

. Polymer–ceramic composite protonic conductors. J Power Sources 2003; 123: 132–136.

83.

Ginés

Libanori

Studart

, et al. Ceramic–polymer composites with improved dielectric and tribological properties for semi-active damping. Compos Part B Eng 2015; 72: 80–86.

84.

Pomogailo

. Hybrid polymer-inorganic nanocomposites. Russ Chem Rev 2000; 69: 53–80.

85.

Ihom

Nor

Alabi

, et al. Recent trends and developments in surface hardening technology: a focus on new ceramics for surface modification in industry. Int J Sci Eng Res 2012; 3: 1–22.

86.

Munz

Fett

. Ceramics: mechanical properties, failure behaviour, materials selection. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

87.

Früh

Willmann

Pfaff

. Wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 873–876.

88.

Singh

Ahuja

. Thermomechanical investigations of SiC and Al₂O₃-reinforced HDPE. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019; 32: 1347–1360.

89.

Ramdani

Derradji

Wang

, et al. Effects of aluminium nitride silane-treatment on the mechanical and thermal properties of polybenzoxazine matrix. Plast Rubber Compos 2016; 45: 72–80.

90.

Razzaq

Frormann

. Thermomechanical studies of aluminum nitride filled shape memory polymer composites. Polym Compos 2007; 28: 287–293.

91.

Derradji

Ramdani

Zhang

, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of phthalonitrile resin reinforced with silicon carbide particles. Mater Des 2015; 71: 48–55.

92.

Yan

Fan

, et al. Study of surface-functionalized nano-SiO₂/polybenzoxazine composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 120: 1525–1532.

93.

Devaraju

Vengatesan

Kumar

, et al. Polybenzoxazine–silica (PBZ–SiO₂) hybrid nanocomposites through in situ sol–gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 2011; 60: 33.

94.

Agag

Takeichi

. Synthesis and characterization of benzoxazine resin-SiO₂ hybrids by sol-gel process: the role of benzoxazine-functional silane coupling agent. Polymer 2011; 52: 2757–2763.

95.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. High-strain shape memory polymer networks crosslinked by SiO₂. J Mater Chem 2011; 21: 9073–9078.

96.

Huang

Dong

Gao

, et al. Probing the structure evolution/orientation induced by interaction between polyurethane segments and SiO₂ surface in shape memory process. Polym 2014; 55: 4289–4298.

97.

Dueramae

Jubsilp

Takeichi

, et al. Thermal degradation mechanism of highly filled nano-SiO₂ and polybenzoxazine. J Therm Anal Calorim 2014; 116: 435–446.

98.

Zou

Feng

, et al. Preparation and properties of cardanol-based polybenzoxazine/SiO₂ hybrids by sol-gel technique. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 128: 4164–4171.

99.

Bai

Zhang

, et al. Thermal and water dual-responsive shape memory poly (vinyl alcohol)/Al₂O₃ nanocomposite. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 91213–91217.

100.

Derradji

Ramdani

Zhang

, et al. Effect of silane surface modified titania nanoparticles on the thermal, mechanical, and corrosion protective properties of a bisphenol-A based phthalonitrile resin. Prog Org Coat 2016; 90: 34–43.

101.

Shi

Liu

Yang

, et al. Characterization of protective performance of epoxy reinforced with nanometer-sized TiO₂ and SiO₂. Prog Org Coat 2008; 62: 359–368.

102.

Escobar

Poorteman

Dumas

, et al. Thermal curing study of bisphenol A benzoxazine for barrier coating applications on 1050 aluminum alloy. Prog Org Coat 2015; 79: 53–61.

103.

X-L

LÜ

X-Q

Wang

J-Y

, et al. Preparation and shape memory properties of TiO₂/PLCL biodegradable polymer nanocomposites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 2013; 23: 120–127.

104.

Derradji

Ramdani

Gong

, et al. Mechanical, thermal, and UV-shielding behavior of silane surface modified ZnO-reinforced phthalonitrile nanocomposites. Polym Adv Technol 2016; 27: 882–888.

105.

Salavati-Niasari

Mir

Davar

. ZnO nanotriangles: synthesis, characterization and optical properties. J Alloys Compd 2009; 476: 908–912.

106.

Kotharangannagari

Krishnan

. Biodegradable hybrid nanocomposites of starch/lysine and ZnO nanoparticles with shape memory properties. Mater Des 2016; 109: 590–595.

107.

Salah

. Effect of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles on performance of shape memory polymers foam using solid state foaming process. 2019. https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/mechan_theses/7.

108.

Soto

Meiorin

Actis

, et al. Magnetic nanocomposites based on shape memory polyurethanes. Eur Polym J 2018; 109: 8–15.

109.

Kumar

Singh

, et al. On mechanical characterization of 3-D printed PLA-PVC-wood dust-Fe₃O₄ composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2019. Epub ahead of print 8 October 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719879195.

110.

Zhu

Winterstein

Maimon

, et al. Atomic structural evolution during the reduction of α-Fe₂O₃ nanowires. J Phys Chem C 2016; 120: 14854–14862.

111.

Ramdani

Wang

, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of silicon nitride reinforced polybenzoxazine nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2014; 105: 73–79.

112.

Yan

Zhang

Liu

, et al. Nano-Si₃N₄/epoxidized silane/cyanate ester composites for electronic packaging. Polym Bull 2013; 70: 2923–2933.

113.

Hongxia

Pengbo

Junping

, et al. Mechanical properties of novel bismaleimide nanocomposites with Si₃N₄ nanoparticles. J Reinf Plast Compos 2010; 29: 1515–1522.

114.

Sato

Yamamoto

Takeuchi

, et al. Humidity sensitivity of Lamb waves on composite polyimide/ZnO/Si₃N₄ structure. Jpn J Appl Phys 1993; 32: 2380.

115.

Shi

Zhang

Rong

, et al. Friction and wear of low nanometer Si₃N₄ filled epoxy composites. Wear 2003; 254: 784–796.

116.

Klonos

Tegopoulos

Koutsiara

, et al. Effects of CNTs on thermal transitions, thermal diffusivity and electrical conductivity in nanocomposites: comparison between an amorphous and a semicrystalline polymer matrix. Soft Matter 2019; 15: 1813–1824.

117.

Mittal

Dhand

Rhee

, et al. A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 2015; 21: 11–25.

118.

Kuilla

Bhadra

Yao

, et al. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 2010; 35: 1350–1375.

119.

Atta

Galal

El-Ads

. Graphene—a platform for sensor and biosensor applications. In: Biosensors-micro and nanoscale applications. Toonika Rinken, IntechOpen, 2015, pp. 37–84. https://www.intechopen.com/books/biosensors-micro-and-nanoscale-applications/graphene-a-platform-for-sensor-and-biosensor-applications.

120.

Xie

Wang

, et al. Significant thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids containing graphene nanosheets. Phys Lett A 2011; 375: 1323–1328.

121.

Iijima

. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991; 354: 56.

122.

Iijima

Ichihashi

. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 1993; 363: 603.

123.

Dresselhaus

Riichiro

. Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.

124.

Coleman

Khan

Blau

, et al. Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Carbon 2006; 44: 1624–1652.

125.

Spitalsky

Tasis

Papagelis

, et al. Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog Polym Sci 2010; 35: 357–401.

126.

Kapoor

Goyal

Jindal

. Enhanced thermal, static, and dynamic mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene nanocomposite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead of print 7 November 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719886012.

127.

Noroozi

Panahi-Sarmad

Abrisham

, et al. Nanostructure of aerogels and their applications in thermal energy insulation. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2019; 2: 5319–5349.

128.

Bogicevic

Liu

Jacobsen

, et al. Island migration caused by the motion of the atoms at the border: size and temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient. Phys Rev B 1998; 57: R9459.

129.

Meng

Zhu

. Shape-memory polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2007; 106: 837–848.

130.

Kang

T-H

Kim

, et al. 2D reentrant micro-honeycomb structure of graphene-CNT in polyurethane: high stretchability, superior electrical/thermal conductivity, and improved shape memory properties. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 162: 580–588.

131.

Yoo

Mahapatra

, et al. The synergistic effect of the combined thin multi-walled carbon nanotubes and reduced graphene oxides on photothermally actuated shape memory polyurethane composites. J Colloid Interface Sci 2014; 432: 128–134.

132.

Liang

Shi

, et al. Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem Rev 2013; 113: 3766–3798.

133.

Kausar

. Technical viewpoint on polystyrene/graphene nanocomposite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead print 24 February 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0892705720907653.

134.

Chou

S-Y

Xie

, et al. Morphological/nanostructural control toward intrinsically stretchable organic electronics. Chem Soc Rev 2019; 48: 1741–1786.

135.

Panahi-Sarmad

Zahiri

Noroozi

. Graphene-based composite for dielectric elastomer actuator: a comprehensive review. Sens Actuators, A 2019; 293: 222–241.

136.

Kuila

Bose

Mishra

, et al. Chemical functionalization of graphene and its applications. Prog Mater Sci 2012; 57: 1061–1105.

137.

Abbasi

Mir Mohamad Sadeghi

Ghasemi

, et al. Shape memory performance of green in situ polymerized nanocomposites based on polyurethane/graphene nanoplatelets: synthesis, properties, and cell behavior. Polym Compos 2018; 39: 4020–4033.

138.

Pandey

Tewari

Dhali

, et al. Effect of graphene oxide on the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene oxide/hytrel nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. Epub ahead print 14 April 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719838010.

139.

Feng

Zhou

, et al. Synthesis of highly stable graphene oxide membranes on polydopamine functionalized supports for seawater desalination. Chem Eng Sci 2016; 146: 159–165.

140.

D’Elia

Ahmed

Feilden

, et al. Electrically-responsive graphene-based shape-memory composites. Appl Mater Today 2019; 15: 185–191.

141.

Panahi-Sarmad

Chehrazi

Noroozi

, et al. Tuning the surface chemistry of graphene oxide for enhanced dielectric and actuated performance of silicone rubber composites. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2019; 1: 198–209.

142.

Javadi

Panahi-Sarmad

Razzaghi-Kashani

. Interfacial and dielectric behavior of polymer nano-composites: effects of chain stiffness and cohesive energy density. Polymer 2018; 145: 31–40.

143.

Zhang

, et al. Effect of graphene liquid crystal on dielectric properties of polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 176: 107338.

144.

Panahi-Sarmad

Razzaghi-Kashani

. Actuation behavior of PDMS dielectric elastomer composites containing optimized graphene oxide. Smart Mater Struct 2018; 27: 085021.

145.

Suk

Piner

, et al. Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2010; 4: 6557–6564.

146.

Thakur

Karak

. Bio-based tough hyperbranched polyurethane–graphene oxide nanocomposites as advanced shape memory materials. RSC Adv 2013; 3: 9476–9482.

147.

Heuchel

Razzaq

Kratz

, et al. Modeling the heat transfer in magneto-sensitive shape-memory polymer nanocomposites with dynamically changing surface area to volume ratios. Polymer 2015; 65: 215–222.

148.

Huang

Bin

Qing

. Polyurethane shape memory polymers. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2012; ISBN-13: 978-971–4398.

149.

Leng

Lan

Liu

, et al. Electrical conductivity of thermoresponsive shape-memory polymer with embedded micron sized Ni powder chains. Appl Phys Lett 2008; 92: 014104.

150.

Lei

Pei

, et al. Micro-mechanics of nanostructured carbon/shape memory polymer hybrid thin film. Soft Matter 2016; 12: 106–114.

151.

Liu

Gall

Dunn

, et al. Thermomechanics of shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Mech Mater 2004; 36: 929–940.

152.

Ajili

Ebrahimi

Soleimani

. Polyurethane/polycaprolactane blend with shape memory effect as a proposed material for cardiovascular implants. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1519–1530.

153.

Machado

Savi

. Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Braz J Med Biol Res 2003; 36: 683–691.

154.

Puppi

Pirosa

Lupi

, et al. Design and fabrication of novel polymeric biodegradable stents for small caliber blood vessels by computer-aided wet-spinning. Biomed Mater 2017; 12: 035011.

155.

Liu

Gou

, et al. Synergistic effect of carbon nanofiber and carbon nanopaper on shape memory polymer composite. Appl Phys Lett 2010; 96: 084102.

156.

Liu

Gou

, et al. Electroactive shape-memory polymer nanocomposites incorporating carbon nanofiber paper. Int J Smart Nano Mater 2010; 1: 2–12.

157.

Fei

, et al. A spatially and temporally controlled shape memory process for electrically conductive polymer–carbon nanotube composites. Soft Matter 2012; 8: 5123–5126.

158.

Rastogi

Kaushal

Tripathi

, et al. Comparative study of carbon nanotube dispersion using surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci 2008; 328: 421–428.

159.

Mahapatra

Yadav

Yoo

, et al. Tailored and strong electro-responsive shape memory actuation in carbon nanotube-reinforced hyperbranched polyurethane composites. Sens Actuators, B 2014; 193: 384–390.

160.

Raja

Ryu

Shanmugharaj

. Influence of surface modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and electroactive shape memory properties of polyurethane (PU)/poly (vinylidene difluoride)(PVDF) composites. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 2014; 450: 59–66.

161.

Dong

Q-Q

, et al. Novel vapor-grown carbon nanofiber/epoxy shape memory nanocomposites prepared via latex technology. Mater Lett 2014; 132: 206–209.

162.

Liang

Yao

, et al. Self-assembled multi-layered carbon nanofiber nanopaper for significantly improving electrical actuation of shape memory polymer nanocomposite. Compos Part B Eng 2014; 59: 191–195.

163.

Liu

, et al. Mechanical and shape recovery properties of shape memory polymer composite embedded with cup-stacked carbon nanotubes. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2014; 25: 1264–1275.

164.

Cho

Kim

Jung

, et al. Electroactive shape-memory polyurethane composites incorporating carbon nanotubes. Macromol Rapid Commun 2005; 26: 412–416.

165.

Paik

Goo

Jung

, et al. Development and application of conducting shape memory polyurethane actuators. Smart Mater Struct 2006; 15: 1476.

166.

Leng

Lan

Liu

, et al. Electroactive thermoset shape memory polymer nanocomposite filled with nanocarbon powders. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18: 074003.

167.

Lan

Leng

Liu

, et al. Investigate of electrical conductivity of shape-memory polymer filled with carbon black. In: Advanced materials research 2008. Stafa-Zurich: Trans Tech Publ, pp. 714–717.

168.

Leng

Liu

, et al. Electroactivate shape-memory polymer filled with nanocarbon particles and short carbon fibers. Appl Phys Lett 2007; 91: 144105.

169.

Liu

, et al. Sensing and actuating capabilities of a shape memory polymer composite integrated with hybrid filler. Smart Mater Struct 2010; 19: 065014.

170.

Sahoo

Jung

Goo

, et al. Conducting shape memory polyurethane-polypyrrole composites for an electroactive actuator. Macromol Mater Eng 2005; 290: 1049–1055.

171.

Razzaq

Anhalt

Frormann

, et al. Thermal, electrical and magnetic studies of magnetite filled polyurethane shape memory polymers. Mater Sci Eng A 2007; 444: 227–235.

172.

Razzaq

Behl

Lendlein

. Magnetic memory effect of nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 2012; 22: 184–191.

173.

Weigel

Mohr

Lendlein

. Investigation of parameters to achieve temperatures required to initiate the shape-memory effect of magnetic nanocomposites by inductive heating. Smart Mater Struct 2009; 18: 025011.

174.

Yakacki

Satarkar

Gall

, et al. Shape-memory polymer networks with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles for remote activation. J Appl Polym Sci 2009; 112: 3166–3176.

175.

Schmidt

. Electromagnetic activation of shape memory polymer networks containing magnetic nanoparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun 2006; 27: 1168–1172.

176.

Sturman

Jr Gray

. Induction heating of polymer matrix composites in a mold press. Google Patents, 1996.

177.

Bayerl

Duhovic

Mitschang

, et al. The heating of polymer composites by electromagnetic induction—A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2014; 57: 27–40.

178.

Kumar

Kratz

Heuchel

, et al. Shape-memory nanocomposites with magnetically adjustable apparent switching temperatures. Adv Mater 2011; 23: 4157–4162.

179.

Buckley

McKinley

Wilson

, et al. Inductively heated shape memory polymer for the magnetic actuation of medical devices. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 2075–2083.

180.

Keblinski

Cahill

Bodapati

, et al. Limits of localized heating by electromagnetically excited nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 2006; 100: 054305.

181.

Leng

Zhang

Liu

, et al. Study on the activation of styrene-based shape memory polymer by medium-infrared laser light. Appl Phys Lett 2010; 96: 111905.

182.

Long

Scott

, et al. Photomechanics of light-activated polymers. J Mech Phys Solids 2009; 57: 1103–1121.

183.

Behl

Razzaq

Lendlein

. Multifunctional shape-memory polymers. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 3388–3410.

184.

Zhang

Xia

Zhao

. Optically triggered and spatially controllable shape-memory polymer–gold nanoparticle composite materials. J Mater Chem 2012; 22: 845–849.

185.

Leng

Liu

. Infrared light-active shape memory polymer filled with nanocarbon particles. J Appl Polym Sci 2009; 114: 2455–2460.

186.

Koerner

Price

Pearce

, et al. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites—stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat Mater 2004; 3: 115.

187.

Leng

Liu

, et al. Shape-memory polymer in response to solution. Adv Eng Mater 2008; 10: 592–595.

188.

Huang

Yang

, et al. Water-driven programmable polyurethane shape memory polymer: demonstration and mechanism. Appl Phys Lett 2005; 86: 114105.

189.

Liu

Zhang

, et al. Solution-responsive shape-memory polymer driven by forming hydrogen bonding. In: Advanced materials research 2008. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publ, pp. 258–261.

190.

Wang

Cheng

Liu

, et al. Cellulose nanofibers/polyurethane shape memory composites with fast water-responsivity. J Mater Chem B 2018; 6: 1668–1677.

191.

Zhang

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Shape memory effect of chitosan/glycerol composite film in mixed water/ethanol solution. J Appl Polym Sci 2019; 136: 47037.

Stimulation and reinforcement of shape-memory polymers and their composites: A review

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Fiber-reinforced SMPCs

Carbon fibers

Glass fibers

Natural fibers

Composite fibers

Ceramic-reinforced SMPCs

Carbonic fillers

Carbon nanotubes

Graphene

Graphene oxide

Stimulation methods of SMPCs

Thermal stimulation

Novel stimulation of SMPCs

Electric stimulation

Magnetic stimulation

Light stimulation

Solution stimulation

Water stimulation

Solvent stimulation

Mixing solution stimulation (water/solvent)

Conclusion and future trends of SMPC research

Footnotes

Funding

ORCID iD

References