Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Nanocomposites of conjugated polymers polypyrrole (PPy) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) as matrices and 1,4-phenylenediamine (PDA) as a linker with amine functional graphite (FG-NH₂) as filler have been efficiently fabricated using in situ oxidative polymerization, and the effect of various mass ratios on physicochemical characteristics of prepared nanocomposite was investigated. The layer-by-layer oxidative polymerization of various matrices on host filler surface is confirmed by Fourier transform infrared, energy dispersive X-ray, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy examinations. Field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed fibrillary morphology of obtained nanocomposites. Thermal stability, glass transition temperature, and melting and crystallization temperature of the nanocomposites were increased with the incorporation of modified graphite. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis explored the improved adsorption capacity (128 cm³ g⁻¹) of the nanocomposite with higher feeding ratio of pyrrole. The influence of FG-NH₂ and pyrrole on electrical conductivity performance of composites was also investigated. Functionalized graphite in the resultant PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites played an important role in forming conducting network in PPy matrix indicating synergistic effect between PPy and FG-NH₂.

Keywords

Conjugated polymers layer-by-layer polymerization nanocomposites conducting network physicochemical characteristics

Introduction

Carbon nanostructures with large specific surface area and chemical stability have gained a considerable attention owing to unique physical and chemical characteristics. The integration of carbon material with polymers, polyelectrolytes, biomolecules, and inorganic materials leads to the formation of new materials including sensors. In addition, the novel material can be achieved by the combination of carbon material with conducting polymers.¹ The high-performance and cost-effective devices having long-term stability are indispensable for conventional technologies and energy storage devices allowing numerous potential applications in near future including clothes and smart biosensors.² Compared with conventional batteries, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) offer relatively high specific capacity and thus find its several applications in important power sources such as digital cameras, mobile phones, hybrid electrical vehicles, and laptop computers.³ Graphite is normally used in such commercial LIBs where it acts as anode material due to easy Li⁺ insertion/de-insertion, low cost, and increasing supply of raw materials.⁴ However, there are some features which limit its applications such as low lithium storage capacity (372 mAh g⁻¹) and low lithium diffusion coefficient restricting its wide range of applications and making it very critical issue to explore novel carbon anode materials.⁵ Compared with carbon materials, pseudo-capacitive materials including conducting polymers possess high charge storage capacity. But some drawbacks limit its direct application in super capacitors such as poor stability, high resistance, and lower cycle life in charging discharging process.^6,7 Thus, electrochemical performance can be improved by the combination of conducting polymers with carbon materials.⁶ Conducting polymers such as polyaniline, polypyrrole (PPy), and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as well as their derivatives are very important material to be utilized in supercapacitors showing high conductivity in doped state with several advantages such as good environmental stability, low cost, adjustable redox capacity, and high storage capacity.⁸ Among these conducting polymers, PPy is the most commonly applied conducting polymer owing to its good electrical conductivity, ease of processing, and good environmental stability.⁹

The poor electrochemical activity of graphite electrodes is major hurdle in its way requiring acid treatment, thermal treatment in air, medication with metals, and electrochemical oxidation prior to use. Most of the approaches involve oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface such as C=O and C–OH¹⁰ providing large surface area and interfacial interaction with polymer matrix.¹¹ Liu et al.¹² carried out the synthesis of PPy/silver chloride nanotubes and studied their antimicrobial properties. Recently, a group of researchers such as Duan et al.,¹³ Sun and Mo,¹⁴ Chen et al.,¹⁵ Yang et al.,¹⁶ and Bonaccorso et al.¹⁷ have successfully prepared PPy-based composites and films. They concluded that even low volume fraction of expanded graphite (EG) was sufficient in order to meet the percolation threshold of conductivity in the fabricated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/EG, polystyrene (PS)/EG, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-NH₂/G, and PPy/EG nanocomposites. However, some drawbacks of these composites were also noticed made by blending of EG with polymers directly such as poor mechanical strength as well as existence of aggregates of graphitic sheets which may interlock with each other and hence poor conducting networks will result due to such aggregation. This aggregation may also result from insufficient intercalation of polymers or monomers into galleries of graphite sheets. In addition, no more monomer or polymers can penetrate into pore owing to closeness of pores in nature and thus polymers might not separate the graphite sheets around such pores but will overlap with each other.

To overcome all these problems as well as homogeneous dispersion of graphite into polymeric matrix, we implemented a chemical oxidative layer-by-layer in situ polymerization route to develop functional graphite (FG) treated with hexamethylene diamine (FG-NH₂)-based nanocomposites using PPy and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) as matrices and 1,4-phenylenediamine (PDA) as a linker which crosslink these nanocomposites and modified graphite was dispersed as a filler. In this endeavor, we have fabricated different series of multilayered PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites as a result of in situ polymerization, and effect of various concentrations of conducting polymer on resulting nanocomposites was investigated keeping filler concentration constant. To the best of our knowledge, the core shell PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ hybrids were chemically synthesized for the first time through this route. Using numerous suitable techniques, the physical characteristics of the resulting material were explored. The idea underlying this study was to achieve nanocomposites with excellent electrical conductivity without decrease in thermal properties. The usage of cheaper, more efficient, and non-contaminating energy source is also one of the major challenges at present. The use of LIBs is an attractive route which converts chemical energy into electrical energy via chemical bond cleavage. The liquid electrolytes can be replaced successfully by ionically conducting polymers termed as polymer electrolytes in rechargeable LIBs. In the same way, conducting polymer composites can be utilized in rechargeable LIBs due to advantage of high stability toward environmental exposition, reasonable conductivity, biocompatibility, and chemical synthesis.¹⁸

Experiment

Materials

Graphite fine powder (99%), pyrrole (Py, 99%), PVC (99%), and PDA (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri, United States) and kept at 0°C prior to use. Other reagents such as potassium dichromate (K₂Cr₂O₇, 99.9%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), nitric acid (HNO₃, 70%), and tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99.9%) were also procured from Aldrich and used as received.

Purification of graphite

Natural graphite is 98.5% pure but still contains some impurities such as aluminum (Al), iron, chromium, and other metals. These impurities may have been incorporated in graphite during the synthesis process. These metallic impurities must be eliminated by thermal oxidation or acid treatment using HF, HNO₃, or HCl. In this attempt, graphite was purified by HCl treatment. For this purpose, 6-g graphite was introduced into a two-necked round-bottomed flask containing 50-mL HCl. The mixture was refluxed at 65°C for 2 h. Afterward, the purified graphite was filtered, washed with distilled water until pH = 7 was attained and dried in an oven at 90°C.

Functionalization of graphite

An easy way to modify the properties of nanocomposites containing graphite as filler is the attachment of the distinct functional groups on the surface of graphite which enhance the physical characteristics due to significant interaction between the matrix and filler. Terminated functional groups around the graphite core are known to stimulate the possible applications for graphite. Among all types of FG, more conveniently produced are the carboxylated FG. Carboxylation was performed by treating the purified graphite with strong acids, that is, HNO₃ at room temperature with continuous stirring for 24 h. This whole mixture was refluxed at 140°C for 24 h. Later, 500 mL of deionized water was added to the above mixture, filtered (0.2-mm cellular membrane filter paper) and washed several times with deionized water till pH =7 was obtained. The FG was dried in an oven at 60°C for 2 h and is termed as graphite oxide (GO).

Amide grafting on acid-treated graphite

Hexamethylene diamine (HMDA) consisting of long hydrophobic chain of alkyl groups and hydrophilic amine groups was chemically reacted with acid-treated graphite (GO). The alkyl amine chains were chemically grafted on GO. The amine groups were attached with carboxylic acid sites of functionalized graphite and are labeled as FG-NH₂ as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of amide grafting of graphite.

Synthesis of first-layered PPy@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite

Synthesis of PPy@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites was achieved utilizing oxidative in situ layer-by-layer polymerization route. In this typical synthetic procedure, 2 mL of pyrrole and 200 mL of 1M HCl (aqueous) were mixed and vigorously stirred for 1 h. Then, 5 g of FG-NH₂ was added to the above reaction mixture. The oxidation reaction was initiated by drop wise addition of 200-mL K₂Cr₂O₇/HCl (1M) solution at 0°C with continuous stirring. The reaction mixture was filtered using a vacuum pump through cellular membrane filter paper (pore size 0.4 mm). The product was obtained as a wet cake and dried in an oven at 60°C for 2 h.

Preparation of second-layered PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite

First, 4-g PVC was dissolved in 100-mL THF and stirred for 1 h. Subsequently, the solution was poured into a two-necked round-bottomed flask containing 4-g PPy@FG-NH₂ dispersed in 300 mL of THF. Afterward, the mixture was refluxed at 50°C for 8 h. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered, and then was dried in an oven at 60°C for 2 h.

Fabrication of third-layered PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite

For the fabrication of third-layered nanocomposite, 3-g PDA was dissolved in 30-mL THF and then the solution was poured into a two-necked round-bottomed flask containing 3 g of PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ dissolved in 250-mL THF. The mixture was refluxed at 50°C for 12 h. Subsequently, the product was filtered and dried in an oven at 60°C for 2 h. The formation of layered nanocomposite is illustrated in Figure 2. Sample codes and composition of nanocomposites used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Preparation of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite.

Table 1.

Sample codes and composition of nanocomposites.

Codes	Sample
PPy@FG-NH₂	Polypyrrole@amine functionalized graphite
PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂	Polypyrrole/polyvinychloride@amine functionalized graphite
PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂	Polypyrrole/polyvinychloride/1,4-phenylenediamine@amine functionalized graphite
Composition of nanocomposites	Py (mL)	FG-NH₂ (g)
Composite I	2	5
Composite II	5	5
Composite III	10	5

Py: pyrrole; FG-NH₂: functional graphite treated with hexamethylene diamine.

Characterization

A Nexus 870 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Madison, Wisconsin, USA) was used to record IR spectra in the transmission mode (4000-450). PerkinElmer PHI system (Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was carried out using Hitachi S-4800 (Tokyo, Japan). The fractured surfaces (under liquid nitrogen) of samples were vacuum coated with thin layer of gold. Thermal stability of the prepared samples was analyzed by a themogravimetric analyzer (TGA)/differential thermal analyzer (DTA) (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, Florida, USA). Approximately 5 mg of samples in an aluminum oxide crucible was used at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹. The thermal properties were evaluated with a Mettler Toledo differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) 822 (Switzerland) differential scanning calorimeter by taking 5–10 mg of samples in Al pans at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹. PW 3040/60 X’pert PRO (Panalytical, Netherland; Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation, 40 kV, 30 mA) was used for X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of prepared nanocomposites. A Micromeritics Tristar II automatic adsorption instrument (Norcross, Georgia, USA) was employed for the surface area calculations through nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K. The electrical conductivity of rectangular shape (25 × 10 × 1 ± 0.05 mm³) thin composite films was measured using the four-point method under ambient atmosphere by Keithley 2401 (Cleveland, Ohio, USA).

Results and discussion

Spectroscopic analysis

To confirm the presence of PPy and PVC as a component of nanocomposites, the samples were characterized by FTIR. Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra before and after the formation of layered nanocomposites. Figure 3(a) represents the FTIR spectrum of FG-NH₂ which shows the broad band around at 2900 cm⁻¹ corresponding to –CH asymmetric and symmetric stretching of CH₂ groups indicating the presence of alkylamine on GO surface. Upon grafting of amine groups on GO, a shift is resulted in stretching vibration of –C=O (1720 cm⁻¹) and C–O (1229 cm⁻¹) at higher wave number. There is also appearance of some additional peaks at 2829 cm⁻¹ (–CH symmetric stretching) and 2969 cm⁻¹ (–CH asymmetric stretching), confirming the presence of amine groups. The nature of interaction of FG-NH₂ is confirmed by the appearance of peaks at 1720 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretching), 1582 cm⁻¹ (N–H bending of amide group) along with the peak at 1053 cm⁻¹ (C-N stretching), 1025 cm⁻¹ (C–O stretching), and 3409 cm⁻¹ (N–H stretching) revealing the successful formation of amide linkages.^19
–21

Figure 3.

FTIR spectra of (a) FG-NH₂, (b) PPy@FG-NH₂, (c) PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and (d) PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH2.

The peak appearing at 1573 cm⁻¹ was due to C–C–C symmetric stretching vibrations. The broad band at 3410 cm⁻¹ attributed to –OH stretching vibration. The peaks originating from PPy component of nanocomposites can be seen in Figure 3(b). The peak at 549 cm⁻¹ corresponds to C–N stretching of PPy chains indicating the presence of shorter delocalization length of poly conjugated system.²² The peak at 928 cm⁻¹ corresponds to bipolaron state of PPy.²³ The downward shifting of this peak was due to H-bonding between hydrogen atoms in PPy and –OH group on layer of treated graphite. The absorption band at 3130 cm⁻¹ appeared due to N–H stretching of PPy. A new shoulder around 1552 cm⁻¹ indicated conjugation for PPy@FG-NH₂. In addition, the peak owing to –COOH group was shifted downward at 1706 cm⁻¹, probably due to the π–π interaction between aromatic rings of PPy and graphite layers.²⁴ The characteristic peaks at 1560 and 1406 cm⁻¹ correspond to stretching vibrations of C=C and C–N of PPy.²⁵ The higher intensity of peaks also reflects longer effective π-conjugation along the PPy chains which in turn increase the conductivity of resulting nanocomposites²⁶ and are in good agreement with reported literature for PPy.²⁷ Also, peak at 1054 cm⁻¹ corresponds to in-plane deformation of the C–H and N–H bonds of pyrrole ring.²⁸ For PPy/PVC@FG-NH_2, C–H stretching mode can be observed at 2920 cm⁻¹ and CH₂ deformation mode at 1300 cm⁻¹.²⁹ The peak at 684 cm⁻¹ was attributed to C–Cl stretching vibrations whereas band at 1210 cm⁻¹ represents C–H in phase bending. The peaks associated with N–H and C–N stretching were shifted downward to 3411 and 1406 cm⁻¹ indicating complexation between PPy and PVC (Figure 3(c)).³⁰ The representative FTIR spectrum of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ is shown in Figure 3(d). The broad band centered at 3341 cm⁻¹ was due to stretching vibration of free N–H suggesting the presence of secondary amino groups (–NH–). A very weak shoulder at 3193 cm⁻¹ might be due to C–H stretching on aromatic rings. The sharp peak at 1601 cm⁻¹ was associated with aromatic ring stretching.³¹ Table 2 established the corresponding FTIR data of PPy@FG-NH₂, PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composites.

Table 2.

FTIR data of PPy@FG-NH₂, PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂.

Sample	υC=C	υC–C	υC–N	υN–H	υC=O	υC–Cl	υC–H
FG-NH₂	—	1574	1053	1582	1720	—	2900str
PPy@FG-NH₂	1483	1553	1483	3460	1707	—	802, 929
PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂	1693	1553	1406	3411	1714	684, 802	2929, 1210_rock, 929_wagg
PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂	1602	1504	1412	3341	—	627	3193

FTIR: Fourier transform infrared; PPy: polypyrrole; PVC: polyvinyl chloride; PDA: 1,4-phenylenediamine; FG-NH₂: functional graphite treated with hexamethylene diamine.

XPS analysis

Survey quantification

The presence of functional groups on the surface of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ was also confirmed by XPS. Figure 4(a) and (b) shows the wide scan spectra for FG-NH₂ and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composites. Compared with FG-NH₂, the peak for nitrogen with increased intensity at 399.5 eV in the entire range of XPS spectrum for PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ clearly indicates the existence of nitrogen species which comes by the deposition of PPy spread over the entire sheets of FG-NH₂. The signals for C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s observed in the survey scan of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ at different binding energies were attributed to the elements originating from polymers backbone. The intensity of peak is correlated with the abundance of that specie. As indicated by the broad scan that relative concentration of nitrogen is high owing to grafting of PPy. In addition, there was no appearance of peaks for Al and silicon (Si) in composite survey scan of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ showing complete coverage of graphite surface with polymers. Furthermore, oxygen signal intensity is reduced reflecting its bonding with polymer via hydrogen bonding. Besides, a less intense peak for chlorine from poly(vinyl chloride) revealed hydrogen bonding between NH of PPy and C–Cl (PVC).³²

Figure 4.

XPS survey scan of (a) FG-NH₂ and (b) PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂.

The component of hybrid core–shell or specific chemical composition of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ and their corresponding XPS spectra along with fitted curves are demonstrated in Figure 5. The XPS C 1s spectrum (Figure 5(a), (d), and (g)) can be deconvoluted into three components peaks at 284.4, 285.4, and 288.3 eV, respectively. The major peak with large intensity which appeared at 284.4 eV is attributed to C–C or C–H groups present in pyrrole ring. The peak at 285.4 eV can be assigned to C–N groups confirming the deposition of PPy. The high energy peak is attributed to C–O and C=O bond in polymer chain.³³ The deconvoluted N 1s spectrum (Figure 5(b), (e), and (h)) presents four Gaussian peaks constituting binding energy of 398.7, 399.6, 399.9, and 400.9 eV which are assigned to imine-like structure (–C=N–), neutral and amine-like structure, and positively charged structure (–NH⁺–).^34,35 The contributions of nitrogen at 400.9 eV can be ascribed to positively charged nitrogen. Of note, the distinct signal at 531.7 eV in Figure 5(c) is attributed to C–O or C=O groups. The well resolved peaks fitting at 532.2 and 533.0 eV can be assigned to C–OH and O–C=O. The two component peaks correspond to two kinds of carbon; one for –CH₂ and other for –CHCl in the backbone of PVC.³⁶ Apparently, there is a shift of main peak (Figure 5(f)) toward low binding energy. They are located at 197.1, 199.8, 201.6, and 202.2 eV, respectively. It should be noted by a careful observation that main peak splits into two peaks with a small shoulder. The two peaks with high intensity reflect C–Cl moieties which are linked by covalent bonding. The two small less intense peaks are attributed to delocalization of lone pair electrons from Cl inside the frame of whole composite containing PPy and PVC. As electron pair resides no more on chlorine strictly through p–π effect so extends the range of delocalization changing the state of covalent bond of C–Cl leading to split of spectrum and appearance of peak at 199.8 eV.³⁶ ^–38 Inspecting Cl 2p spectra, it was revealed that peak intensity for Cl also decreases in PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ compared with PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ indicating crosslinking (Figure 5(i)). By a careful observation, it was noticed that peak area gradually decreases indicating crosslinking in nano-complex and there is a continuous increase in electron delocalization changing C–Cl covalent state due to crosslinking owing to PDA leading to an enhancement in conductivity. PVC undergoes to high degree of dehydrochlorination upon exposure to high energetic particles such as electrons. The electrical conductivity of resulting nanocomposites was increased due to synergism effect of PPy and PVC such that decomposition product of PVC would be captured by the neighboring moieties.³⁵ Table 3 describes the values of binding energies at which relative peaks appeared.

Figure 5.

The deconvolution of the XPS. (a) C 1s, (b) N 1s, and (c) O 1s peaks of PPy@FG-NH₂; (d) C 1s, (e) N 1s, and (f) Cl 2p peaks of PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂; and (g) C 1s, (h) N 1s, and (i) Cl 2p peaks of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂.

Table 3.

Binding energies (eV) and their assignment for the major core levels.

Sample	C 1s		N 1s		Cl 2p
PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂	Assignment	BE (eV)	Assignment	BE (eV)	Assignment	BE (eV)
	C=C	284	N=C	398.5	Cl 2p_3/2	196.7
	C–C	285	NH	399.4	Cl 2p_1/2	198.8
	C–NH	285.5	NH⁺	400.2	C–Cl	201.3
	C=N	286.4	—	—	—	—

PPy: polypyrrole; PVC: polyvinyl chloride; PDA: 1,4-phenylenediamine; FG-NH₂: functional graphite treated with hexamethylene diamine; BE: binding energy.

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis

Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was performed to investigate the composition of functionalized graphite and nanocomposites. The component elements and their corresponding percentages shown in Figure 6 confirmed the presence of C, O, N, and Cl in PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite attributed to the characteristic elements of FG-NH₂ and PPy, whereas other elements such as Al and Si are present as an impurity. The atomic percent of carbon (80.11%) in PPy/PVC/PDA composite reflected the successful coating of polymers. The small amount of oxygen from functional groups of –COOH and –OH on the surface of FG-NH₂ partially may as a result of oxidation by air. It also showed a small amount of K in sample which may arise from K₂Cr₂O₇ used in the polymerization of pyrrole monomer.

Figure 6.

EDX spectrum of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH2.

Morphological investigations

The high and low resolution SEM micrographs of layered composites revealed large sized aggregates and rough topology of FG-NH₂ (Figure 7(a) and (b)) that can be attributed to crystal structure of graphite. It could be recognized that PPy chains are well dispersed and well adhered on the wrinkled surface of functionalized graphite (Figure 7(c) and (d)). This well adherence of Py⁺ can be explained on the basis of electron donor and acceptor interaction between Py⁺ and π-electron system in modified graphite. The larger spaces between graphite flakes can be produced by the intercalation of Py⁺ to more complex formation. In Py⁺@FG-NH₂, a better dispersion of Py⁺ chains was manifested by FG-NH₂ which verified that Py⁺ may helpful in separation of graphitic layers. The GO particles are covered by protruding out chains of PPy to form multilayer aggregates probably owing to weak interparticle interaction.³⁹ The prepared PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite has cauliflower-like structure⁴⁰ with highly porous, spongy, and connected channels as shown in Figure 7(e) and (f). Such type of highly porous polymer-based materials can be utilized in numerous applications, including absorbents, ion exchange applications, and bio separators.^41
–43 A closer look at the micrographs explores bridge formation and crosslinking between polymers owing to the presence of PDA as depicted in Figure 7(g) and (h).

Figure 7.

Representative FESEM micrographs. FG-NH₂ at (a) 20 and (b) 50 μm; PPy@FG-NH₂ at (c) 1 μm and (d) 500 nm; PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ at (e) 1 μm and (f) 500 nm; and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ at (g) 1 μm and (h) 500 nm.

The final nanocomposites obtained by the introduction of PDA have an irregular morphology constituting polymer junks with tightly woven network of interconnected fibers providing excellent pathways for the transportation of ions leading to enhanced electrochemical characteristics. Figure 8 discloses the influence of concentration change on morphology. From Figure 8(a), it can be seen that PPy possesses globular submicron structure. The topography of nanocomposites was altered by the incorporation of PPy particles. Compared with pure FG-NH₂, the puckering features of FG-NH₂ disappear in nanocomposites owing to agglomerate formation. The SEM micrographs of composites I and II (Figure 8(b) and (c)) showed large laminar layers with smaller ones. These composites have no any distinguishable PPys while composite III constitutes many PPys with shorter nanofibrillar morphology (Figure 8(d)) which built an improved electron conducting network affecting the conductivity performance. It was observed that addition of PPy played a significant role in polymerization of PPy by the incorporation of PPy chains to grow with an ordered morphology.^37,44

Figure 8.

SEM micrographs of (a) PPy, (b) composite I, (c) composite II, and (d) composite III.

Thermal gravimetric analysis

A comparison of weight loss of PPy@FG-NH₂ and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites for all concentrations (composites I to III) under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹ is shown in Figure 9. It can be seen that PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites showed increased thermal stability which may be attributed to compactness of nanocomposites owing to strong interactions among polymer chains as well as crosslinking due to the presence of PDA acting as a linker. The contents of each composite can be checked according to their weight transition in temperature range of 250–500°C. The major and sharp weight loss of PPy@FG-NH₂ and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ occurred at temperature range around 200 and 400°C, respectively. No apparent weight loss was observed for PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ crosslinked nanocomposites in the range of 0–400°C due to strong interaction between PPy and PVC. This delayed decomposition relative to PPy@FG-NH₂ reflected the strong interfacial interaction between filler and polymer shells. The two steps and rapid loss were observed for PPy@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite. Upon heating, PPy@FG-NH₂ starts to lose weight mass and this small weight loss was found at temperature range from around 150°C due to evaporation of physically absorbed water moieties. The weight loss from 150°C to 250°C was associated with the release of labile oxygen-containing functional groups and yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and water vapors. Moreover, above 315°C, the weight decrease in PPy@FG-NH₂ would be due to the elimination of pyrrole chain in addition to loss of oxygen from skeleton leaving behind residual carbon.¹ It can be seen from TGA curves of composites I to III that weight loss between 0°C and 100°C results due to volatilization of water moieties from sample. After 10% weight loss around 350°C, the curves change smoothly and level off which is accredited to pyrolysis of main chain and due to dehydrochlorination of PVC after which rate of loss become slowdown.⁴⁵ The composite I had residual weight of about 78% at 600°C while composites II and III exhibited residual weight of about 79 and 85%, respectively, at the same temperature. The data of temperature at various weight losses demonstrated that temperatures for composite with higher concentrations are higher in comparison with composites with lower concentration indicating enhanced thermal stability of composite. This is associated with the reason that increased concentration of conducting PPy imposed restrictions to the thermal decomposition reaction because of poor gas circulation between graphite layers and polymer chains. In the same way, the lamellar structure of graphite sheets also limited the activity of PPy molecules and hence hindering the thermal decomposition reaction.^24,25,46

Figure 9.

Thermal degradation curves of (a) PPy@FG-NH₂, (b) composite I, (c) composite II, and (d) composite III.

Differential scanning calorimetry

The DSC heating traces of PPy@FG-NH₂ and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposites (I to III) are displayed in Figure 10. This demonstrated the influence of concentration change of PPy on glass transition temperature (T_g) and melting behavior of the composites. The T_g (measured as middle point of variation in the slope of baseline of DSC curve) was found to be 43 and 45°C for composites I and II while it was 48°C for nanocomposite III constituting higher concentrations, respectively. Noticeably, nanocomposite constituting higher feeding ratio exhibited higher T_g accrediting to enhanced chain rigidity leading to hindrance in segmental motion. There was also observed a significant shift in melting behavior. The incorporation of PPy@FG-NH₂ in PVC matrix results in the rise of about 28°C in melting temperature in comparison with the neat composite which is attributed to strong interactions between filler and matrix. The polymeric chain rigidity can be associated with the existence of both physical and chemical interactions between matrix and filler and ultimately leading to an enhanced melting temperature. These findings indicated that the crosslinking occurs between PPy and PVC due to PDA linker leading to an enhancement in T_g and melting temperature. Well dispersion of modified graphite functioned as filler may also hinder the molecular motion of polymeric chains which could also be responsible for an increased T_g of nanocomposite.³⁸

Figure 10.

DSC thermograms of (a) PPy@FG-NH₂, (b) composite I, (c) composite II, and (d) composite III.

XRD analysis

The structure of composites was also evaluated by employing XRD. Figure 11(a) shows two characteristic XRD diffraction peaks for FG at 2θ = 26.5° and 54.8° with d-spacing of 3.36 corresponding to (002) and (004) planes of graphite.⁴⁷ The peaks for FG-NH₂ (Figure 11(b)) are shifted toward lower angle with decreased intensity as well as d-spacing of 4.45 was comparatively larger than FG owing to intercalation of amine functional groups after treating with HMDA. In addition, there is a complete lost or diminishing of (004) diffraction peak of graphite in PPy@FG-NH₂ composite (Figure 11(c)) verifying the disorganization along the c-axis. It was interesting to note that after polymerization of Py⁺ there was a separation of graphite layers into mono or few layered sheets as consistent with SEM. This separation occurs as a result of intercalation of pyrrole into interlayers of treated graphite which act as molecular wedges that move deeper and deeper inside the layers providing drive force and finally leading to separation of layers. After dispersing PVC, there was no significant change in peak position. The appearance of peak at 2θ = 22.1 (Figure 11(d)) indicated that the layered structure of PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ with a d-spacing of 3.36 was slightly greater than PPy@FG-NH₂, that is, 3.33. The relative shift of peak position with corresponding change of d-spacing by change of weight ratios for composites I to III is shown in Figure 11(e) to (g) and data are listed in Table 4. The characteristic peak for composites I to III was shifted toward higher angle indicating intercalation of PPy chains within graphitic sheets. It can be seen from XRD pattern that the small characteristic diffraction peak which appeared at 2θ = 54 vanished in composites and there is no characteristic diffraction peak indicating that regular periodic structure of FG-NH₂ has been lost and graphite sheets were delaminated in the composites.^30,43

Figure 11.

XRD diffraction patterns for (a) FG, (b) FG-NH₂, (c) PPy@FG-NH₂, (d) PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, (e) composite I, (f) composite II, and (g) composite III.

Table 4.

XRD parameters showing relative peak position.

Sample	Peak position	d-Spacing	FWHM
FG-NH₂	22.42	4.45	0.47
Composite I	26.79	3.32	0.35
Composite II	26.80	3.35	0.15
Composite III	26.86	3.34	0.27

XRD: X-ray diffraction; FWHM: full width at half maximum; FG-NH₂: functional graphite treated with hexamethylene diamine.

Surface area and porosity

The nitrogen adsorption–desorption experiments were conducted for the prepared nanocomposites in order to quantify pore size distribution, pore volume, and surface area as shown in (Figure 12(a) and (b)). The composites showed type-III isotherms attributed to multilayers formation of nitrogen at low pressure. The knee or inflection point falls close to the completion of monolayer while the second and higher layers achieved with the increase in relative pressure. The calculated Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area for neat FG-NH₂ is 10.69 m² g⁻¹ which was increased by the deposition of PPy, that is, 50.48 m² g⁻¹ but onward surface area again decreases for PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composites which may be ascribed to restacking of graphite layers⁴⁸ as well as charge broadening in addition to π–π interactions within the framework of composites. It can be observed by the pore size distribution plots of PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ that pore size below 4 nm mainly contributed by carbon.^49,50 The influence of grafting of various polymers and linker on BET surface area and pore volume is enlisted in Table 5. It was observed that both surface area and pore volume first increase and then decrease. This ascribed to fierce generation of pores upon initial deposition of PPy@FG-NH₂ and henceforth surface area, amount of microspores, and pore volume also increase at first but further deposition as well as incorporation of PDA (acting as a linker) resulted progressively transformation to pore extension and increases the mesopores while decreasing micropores.

Figure 12.

(a) BET adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) BJH pore size distribution curves for (inset (a)) FG-NH₂, (inset (b)) PPy@FG-NH₂, (inset (c)) PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and (inset (d)) PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂.

Table 5.

Textural properties PPy@FG-NH₂, PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ including data for various mass ratios.

Sample	Surface area (m² g⁻¹)	Pore size (nm)	Pore volume (cm³ g⁻¹)
FG-NH₂	10.69	1.68	9.02
PPy@FG-NH₂	50.48	1.13	2.85
PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂	34.66	1.84	3.20
PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂	16.19	2.17	1.75
Composite I	12.80	1.7	1.09
Composite II	14.94	2.19	1.64
Composite III	16.19	2.17	1.75

PPy: polypyrrole; PVC: polyvinyl chloride; PDA: 1,4-phenylenediamine; FG-NH₂: functional graphite treated with hexamethylene diamine.

The influence of feeding ratios of conducting polymer (PPy) on the adsorption–desorption and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda pore distribution curves are presented in Figure 13(a) and (b), respectively. The type-II isotherm is observed when adsorption takes place on powders with pore diameter larger than micropores. The size of micropores observed for PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composites I to III was 1.7, 2.19, and 2.17 nm, respectively. At higher pressure, the composites with higher mass ratio showed better adsorption capacity around 128 cm³ g⁻¹ compared with low mass having adsorption capacity around 115 and 73 cm³ g⁻¹, respectively. The surface area of composite with higher feeding ratio of PPy was found to be 16.19 m² g⁻¹ greater than composites with low feeding ratios (14.94 and 12.80 m² g⁻¹, respectively). It is reported that the enhanced pore volume provides more surface area for the adsorption and consequently facilitating the catalytic activity as well.⁵¹

Figure 13.

(a) A preliminary comparison of all surface areas and (b) pore size distribution curves for (inset (a)) composite I, (inset (b)) composite II, and (inset (c)) composite III.

Electrical conductivity performance

The variation of electrical conductivity of PPy@FG-NH₂, PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composites with temperature is displayed in Figure 14. The composite constituting PPy and PVC as a matrix and PDA as linker showed a dramatic increase in conductivity and approaches to a maximum value attributed to the presence of PPy and FG-NH₂ moiety. In PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ composite, the conductive passageways were formed by partial network connections leading to a dramatic increase in conductivity.^43,52,53 In spite of this, some conjugated structures also resulted in conductivity of composites. Moreover, in the case of PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ composite (indicated by filled red circles), a slight increase in temperature results with decrease in conductivity due to the removal of solvent which is bounded to polymer chains and oligomers of low molecular weight. The cause of such decrease in conductivity may be that initial increase in temperature is being used up in filler orientation instead of hopping of electron from highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to lowest occupied molecular orbit (LUMO) and hence decrease in conductivity. Then, at higher temperature, increase in conductivity was observed due to inter and intrachain hopping leading to high charge carrier mobility within the composite.

Figure 14.

Electrical conductivity display of (a) PPy@FG-NH₂, (b) PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂, and (c) PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂.

Figure 15 showed the influence of mass ratios of PPy on conductivity. It can be clearly seen from bar chart that composite III with higher concentration has more conductivity than with lower once. This can be attributed to several factors such as increased concentration of PPy have more opportunity to get attached on the surface of modified graphite providing more diffusion paths and hence facilitating the electrochemical activities of PPy in nanocomposite.⁵⁴ At higher concentration of PPy, increase in conductivity may also be attributed to π–π stacking between FG-NH₂ and PPy for which electron mobility inside the composite increases.

Figure 15.

Electrical conductivity display of (a) composite I, (b) composite II, and (c) composite III.

Conclusions

In this article, we reported a rational design and synthesis of hierarchical multilayered mesoporous hybrid material. First, pretreatment of graphite (acidic functionalization) without damaging the structural properties of filler was carried out. Afterward, the incorporation of functionalized filler into a polymeric matrix by means of in situ polymerization led to a high-performance multilayered PPy/PVC/PDA nanocomposite. The effect of various concentrations of conducting polymer on the physicochemical properties of composites was investigated. The structural and morphological results reveal encapsulation of FG-NH₂ by PPy and PVC. The fabricated nanocomposites showed improvement in thermal stability as measured by thermal analysis. The increase in electrical conductivity can be ascribed to the formation of conducting network which is also consistent with SEM investigation demonstrating well dispersion of filler inside the matrix without agglomeration. Composite III constituting a higher concentration of PPy displayed higher conductivity as well as increased surface area could have potential application in rechargeable batteries. Increasing concentration of PPy chains provides channels for the transportation of electrons. Overall, FG-NH₂ has also demonstrated an exciting ability to simultaneously improve multiple physical, thermal, electrical, and surface characteristics of polymer nanocomposites making it a multifunctional nano-reinforcement and can be used in energy storage devices, biosensors, and other fields.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan, under the indigenous PhD fellowship scheme.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan, under the indigenous PhD fellowship scheme.

ORCID iD

Rabia Sattar

References

Mykhailiv

Imierska

Petelczyc

, et al. Chemical versus electrochemical synthesis of carbon nano-onion/polypyrrole composites for supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 5783–5793.

Huang

Tao

Meng

, et al. Super-high rate stretchable polypyrrole-based supercapacitors with excellent cycling stability. Nano Energy 2015; 11: 518–525.

Lee

Urban

, et al. Unlocking the potential of cation-disordered oxides for rechargeable lithium batteries. Science 2014; 343: 519–522.

Zhu

Sakaushi

Clavel

, et al. A general salt-templating method to fabricate vertically aligned graphitic carbon nanosheets and their metal carbide hybrids for superior lithium ion batteries and water splitting. J Am Chem Soc 2015; 137: 5480–5485.

Fujimoto

Ikeda

, et al. Electrochemical characteristics of lithiated graphite (LiC6) in PC based electrolytes. J Power Sources 2001; 93(1-2): 224–229.

Ning

Popov

. Cycle life modeling of lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2004; 151: A1584–A1591.

Liu

(2015). Charge and discharge characterization of lithium-ion electrode materials through coin cell testing. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Bora

Sharma

Dolui

, et al. Polypyrrole/sulfonated graphene composite as electrode material for supercapacitor. J Phys Chem C 2014; 11: 29688–29694.

Sun

, et al. Facile fabrication of reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite hydrogels with excellent electrochemical performance and compression capacity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2015; 3(9): 862–870.

10.

Park

Kim

. Fabrication of nitrogen-doped graphite felts as positive electrodes using polypyrrole as a coating agent in vanadium redox flow batteries. J Mater Chem A 2015; 3: 12276–12283.

11.

Forati

Atai

Rashidi

, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of graphene oxide/polyethersulfone nanocomposites. Polym Adv Technol 2014; 25(3): 322–328.

12.

Liu

Wang

, et al. One-pot synthesis of polypyrrole/AgCl composite nanotubes and their antibacterial properties. IET Micro & Nano Lett 2015; 10(1): 50–53.

13.

Duan

Deng

Wang

, et al. Preparation of polypyrrole nanocomposites for supercapacitor using spent battery powder as raw materials. Electrochimica Acta. 2016; 210: 646–654.

14.

Sun

. Synthesis, characterization and supercapacitors of electrically conductive PPy/graphene/rare earth ions composites. Polym Bull 2014; 71(9): 2173–2184.

15.

Chen

Meng

Zhou

, et al. One-step synthesis of graphene/polyaniline hybrids by in situ intercalation polymerization and their electromagnetic properties. Nanoscale 2014; 6: 8140–8148.

16.

Yang

Liu

Zhao

, et al. Three-dimensional macroporous polypyrrole-derived graphene electrode prepared by the hydrogen bubble dynamic template for supercapacitors and metal-free catalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015; 7(42): 23731–23740.

17.

Bonaccorso

Colombo

, et al. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 2015; 347(6217): 1246501–1246509.

18.

Lee

Kim

, et al. Polypyrrole-carbon nanotube composite films synthesized through gas-phase polymerization. Synth Met 2010; 160: 814–818.

19.

Long

Jiang

, et al. Facile synthesis of functionalized porous carbon with three-dimensional interconnected pore structure for high volumetric performance supercapacitors. Carbon 2015; 93: 412–420.

20.

Akbarinezhad

. Synthesis of conductive polyaniline–graphite nanocomposite in supercritical CO₂ and its application in zinc-rich epoxy primer. J Supercrit Fluids 2014; 94: 8–16.

21.

Özerol

Şenkal

Okutan

. Preparation and characterization of graphite composites of polyaniline. Microelectron Eng 2015; 146: 76–80.

22.

Tabačiarová

Mičušík

Fedorko

, et al. Study of polypyrrole aging by XPS, FTIR and conductivity measurements. Polym Degrad Stab 2015; 392–401.

23.

Liu

Lin

. Strategy and characteristics of polypyrrole deposited on silver substrates with silver-containing nanocomplexes. J Phys Chem B 2003; 107(41): 11370–11375.

24.

Chang

Lai

, et al. Preparation and comparison of the physical properties of PMMA/thermally reduced graphene oxides composites with different carboxylic group content of thermally reduced graphene oxides. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2014; 65: 108–114.

25.

Selşuk

Karakisla

Saçak

. Polypyrrole/natural zeolite composite prepared by in situ oxidative polymerization: thermal and humidity sensing properties. J Macromol Sci Part A: Pure Appl Chem 2014; 51: 405–411.

26.

Pérez-Rodríguez

Ovando-Medina

Martínez-Amador

, et al. Bioanode of polyurethane/graphite/polypyrrole composite in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2016; 21(2): 305–313.

27.

Park

, et al. Capacitance properties of graphite/polypyrrole composite electrode prepared by chemical polymerization of pyrrole on graphite fiber. J. Power Sources 2002; 105: 20–25.

28.

Zare

Sharif

Kashkooli

, et al. Study on the effect of polypyrrole and polypyrrole/graphene oxide nanoparticles on the microstructure, electrical and tensile properties of polypropylene nanocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2014; 53: 1392–1401.

29.

Ramesh

Leen

Kumutha

, et al. FTIR studies of PVC/PMMA blend based polymer electrolytes. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2007; 66(4-5): 1237–1242.

30.

Shan

Chen

Tian

, et al. Fabrication of polypyrrole/nano-exfoliated graphite composites by in situ intercalation polymerization and their microwave absorption properties. Composites Part B: Eng 2015; 73: 181–187.

31.

Tayebi

Ahmad Ramazani

Hamed Mosavian

, et al. LDPE/EVA/graphene nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and gas permeability properties. Polym Adv Technol 2015; 26: 1083–1090.

32.

Zhu

Hiltz

Mezour

, et al. Facile covalent modification of a highly ordered pyrolytic graphite surface via an inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reaction under ambient conditions. Chem Mater 2014; 26(17): 5058–5062.

33.

Idla

Talo

Niemi

HEM

, et al. An XPS and AFM study of polypyrrole coating on mild steel. Surf Interface Anal 1997; 25: 837–854.

34.

Louarn

Aubert

, et al. Polypyrrole-modified graphene sheet nanocomposites as new efficient materials for supercapacitors. Carbon 2016; 105: 510–520.

35.

Atanasoska

Naoi

Smyrl

. XPS studies on conducting polymers: polypyrrole films doped with perchlorate and polymeric anions. Chem Mater 1992; 4(5): 988–994.

36.

. Conductive properties and mechanism of polyvinyl chloride doped by a multi-walled carbon nanotube–polypyrrole nano-complex dopant. RSC Adv 2014; 4(8): 3966–3973.

37.

Wang

Shu

, et al. A facile approach for fabrication of mechanically strong graphene/polypyrrole films with large areal capacitance for supercapacitor applications. RSC Adv 2015; 5(124): 102643–102651.

38.

Alain-Rizzo

Galmiche

, et al. Functionalization of graphene oxide by tetrazine derivatives: a versatile approach toward covalent bridges between graphene sheets. Chem Mater 2015; 27(12): 4298–4310.

39.

Kherde

Shinde

Kulkarni

. Synthesis, characterization and conductivity studies of polypyrrole-expanded graphite–composites. Int J Res Eng Technol 2016; 3(6): 2530–2533.

40.

Yuan

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of polypyrrole doped with anionic spherical polyelectrolyte brushes. Express Polym Lett 2012; 6(9): 697–705.

41.

Liu

. Society of plastic engineers, plastics research online. 2014; DOI: 10.2417/spepro.005273.

42.

Pedrazzoli

Pegoretti

Kalaitzidou

, et al. Synergistic effect of graphite nanoplatelets and glass fibers in polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2015; 132: 1–8.

43.

Thanh

Kapralkova

Hromádková

, et al. Effect of graphite nanoplatelets on the structure and properties of PA6-elastomer nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 2014; 50: 39–45.

44.

Chen

IWP

Huang

Saint Jhou

, et al. Exfoliation and performance properties of non-oxidized graphene in water. Sci Rep 2014; 4(1): 3928–3933.

45.

Massoumi

Farnoudian-Habibi

Jaymand

. Chemical and electrochemical grafting of polythiophene onto poly(vinyl chloride): synthesis, characterization, and materials properties. J Solid State Electr 2016; 20(2): 489–497.

46.

Xie

Zhao

, et al. Synthesis of PPy/nano-graphite sheets/TbCl₃ composites with high conductivity. Mater Manuf Process 2012; 27: 1343–1347.

47.

Kim

Jun

Gerbec

, et al. Sulfur infiltrated mesoporous graphene–silica composite as a polysulfide retaining cathode material for lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 2014; 69: 543–551.

48.

Liu

Chen

Cheng

, et al. Preparation and structure analysis of expanded graphite-based composites made by phosphoric acid activation. J Porous Mater 2010; 17(4): 425–428.

49.

Sombatmankhong

. Improved performance and stability of direct borohydride fuel cells (DBFCs) with porous polypyrrole support. J Porous Mater 2015; 22(3): 675–687.

50.

Jameel

Zhu

Chen

, et al. Green epoxidation of cyclooctene with molecular oxygen over an ecofriendly heterogeneous polyoxometalate-gold catalyst Au/BW₁₁/Al₂O₃ . J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2016; 17(12): 1000–1012.

51.

Basnayaka

Ram

Stefanakos

, et al. Graphene/polypyrrole nanocomposite as electrochemical supercapacitor electrode: electrochemical impedance studies. Graphene 2013; 2(2): 81–87.

52.

Zhang

. Thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites: mechanisms, properties, and applications. Polymers 2017; 9(9): 437.

53.

Naz

Sattar

Siddiq

. Preparation and properties of high performance multilayered PANi/PMMA/PPG-b-PEG-b-PPG/FGHMDA nanocomposites via in situ polymerization. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2018; 58(3): 1–13.

54.

Qia

, et al. Percolation for coated conductive paper: electrical conductivity as a function of volume fraction of graphite and carbon black. BioResources 2015; 10(3): 4877–4885.

Influence of pyrrole feeding ratios on physicochemical characteristics of high-performance multilayered PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH 2 nanocomposites

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experiment

Materials

Purification of graphite

Functionalization of graphite

Amide grafting on acid-treated graphite

Synthesis of first-layered PPy@FG-NH2 nanocomposite

Preparation of second-layered PPy/PVC@FG-NH2 nanocomposite

Fabrication of third-layered PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH2 nanocomposite

Characterization

Results and discussion

Spectroscopic analysis

XPS analysis

Survey quantification

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis

Morphological investigations

Thermal gravimetric analysis

Differential scanning calorimetry

XRD analysis

Surface area and porosity

Electrical conductivity performance

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding

ORCID iD

References

Synthesis of first-layered PPy@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite

Preparation of second-layered PPy/PVC@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite

Fabrication of third-layered PPy/PVC/PDA@FG-NH₂ nanocomposite