The Philippines is one of very few countries in the world where schools have continuously remained closed since the coronavirus pandemic began in 2019. There is little known about how school principals face the challenges that arise from the pandemic, and the future goals for the new normal. The purpose of this article is to explore the school principals’ management practices, leadership styles, challenges encountered, and future goals in response to the pandemic in the context of Philippine schools. This study employed a qualitative research approach using an open-ended online survey with 52 school principals. Findings rendered a contextualisation of their school management practices, leadership styles, challenges encountered during the pandemic, and future goals for the new normal. This study contributes to the knowledge base on school leadership during the pandemic by providing unique insights into the Philippines.
AbdullahWJKimS (2020) Singapore’s responses to the COVID-19 outbreak: a critical assessment. American Review of Public Administration50(6–7): 770–776.
2.
AdamsDCheahKSLThienLM, et al. (2021) Leading schools through the COVID-19 crisis in a South-East Asian country. Management in Education08920206211037738. DOI: 10.1177/08920206211037738
3.
AdamsDMuthiahV (2020) School principals and 21st century leadership challenges: a systematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)5(1): 189–210.
4.
AdamsDNgAMYMuniandyV (2020) Principal leadership preparation towards high-performing school leadership in Malaysia. Asian Education and Development Studies9(4): 425–439.
5.
AhlströmBLeoUNorqvistL, et al. (2020) School leadership as (un) usual. Insights from principals in Sweden during a pandemic. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)48(2): 35–41.
BellibaşMŞKılınçAÇPolatcanM (2021) The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: an integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly57(5): 776–814.
8.
BogdanRTaylorSJ (1975) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
9.
BraunVClarkeVBoultonE, et al. (2021) The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology24(6): 641–654.
10.
BressmanSWinterJSEfronSE (2018) Next generation mentoring: supporting teachers beyond induction. Teaching and Teacher Education73: 162–170.
CahapayMB (2021) The phenomenon of leading without guidebook: educational leadership practices of philippine school principals in virulent COVID-19 times. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management: 1–3. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3825325.
CranstonJKusanovichK (2015) Learning to lead against the grain dramatizing the emotional toll of teacher leadership. Issues in Teacher Education24(2): 63–78.
15.
Department of Education (2020) Revised guidelines on alternative work arrangements in the Department of Education during the period of state of national emergecy due to COVID-19 pandemic, DepEd Order, no. 011, 2. 2020. Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration1–16.
16.
DubeySBiswasPGhoshR, et al. (2020) Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews14(5): 779–788.
17.
Fideliz (2021) Modular printed learning modality: A responses to covid 19 threat on education. Retrieved from Press Reader:https://bit.ly/3o4CS5E
18.
FotheringhamPHarriottTHealyG, et al. (2021) Pressures and influences on school leaders navigating policy development during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Educational Research Journal 48: 201–227.
19.
FranciscoCDNuquiAV (2020) Emergence of a situational leadership during COVID-19 pandemic called new normal leadership. Online Submission4(10): 15–19.
20.
GkorosDBratitsisT (2022) E-leadership and distance education in Greece during COVID-19 pandemic. Management in Education: 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/08920206221081611.
21.
GortonRAAlstonJA (2018) School Leadership & Administration: Important Concepts, Case Studies, & Simulations (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
GrayD (2009) Emotional intelligence and school leadership. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation4(4): 1–3.
23.
GubaEG (1978) Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Monograph 8. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
24.
GuiamalonTSLumapenetHTKatogMS, et al. (2022) Coping with COVID-19: how public secondary school principals adapt to the new normal?International Journal of Early Childhood 14(1): 2363–2367.
25.
GyangTS (2020) Educational leadership response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis in Nigeria. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)48(3): 73–79.
26.
HarrisA (2020) COVID-19–school leadership in crisis?Journal of Professional Capital and Community 5: 321–326.
27.
HarrisAJonesM (2020) COVID 19 – school leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management40(4): 243–247.
28.
HenninkMKaiserBN (2021) Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine: 114523.
29.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
30.
HungDHuangJSTanC (2020) Leadership in times of pandemics: reflections from Singapore. International Studies in Educational Administration48(2): 56–63.
31.
KrosnickJAPresserS (2010) Question and questionnaire design. In: James DW and Peter VM (Eds) Handbook of Survey Research, San Diego, CA: Elsevier, pp. 263–314.
32.
MathraniASarveshTUmerR (2021) Digital divide framework: online learning in developing countries during the COVID-19 lockdown. Globalisation Societies and Education 20: 625–640.
33.
MenonME (2023) Transformational school leadership and the COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions of teachers in Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/17411432231166515.
34.
NaranasamyKAdamsD (2020) Headmasters safety management and performance in two Malaysian National Primary Schools. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership3(1): 43–58.
35.
NetolickyDM (2020) School leadership during a pandemic: navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3–4): 391–395.
36.
NoddingsN (2015) The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education (2nd ed.). New York: Techer College Press.
37.
NomanMAwang HashimRShaik AbdullahS (2018) Contextual leadership practices: the case of a successful school principal in Malaysia. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(3): 474–490.
38.
PolitDFBeckCT (2010) Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies47: 1451–1458.
39.
PollockK (2020) School leaders’ work during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-pronged approach. International Studies in Educational Administration48: 38–44.
40.
ReidDB (2021) Suppressing and sharing: how school principals manage stress and anxiety during COVID-19. School Leadership & Management 42: 1–17.
41.
Reyes-GuerraDMaslin-OstrowskiPBarakatMY, et al. (2021) Confronting a compound crisis: the school principal’s role during initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education6: 617875.
42.
RyanGWBernardHR (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods15(1): 85–109.
43.
SahlbergP (2020) Will the pandemic change schools?Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3/4): 359–365.
44.
San MiguelNVPascualEA (2021) School leaders’ resilience amidst pandemic in the division of laguna, Philippines. International Journal of Research Publications88(1): 22–22.
45.
SearbyLBrowne-FerrignoTWangCH (2017) Assistant principals: their readiness as instructional leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools16(3): 397–430.
46.
SmithLRileyD (2012) School leadership in times of crisis. School Leadership & Management32(1): 57–71.
47.
Stone-JohnsonCMiles WeinerJ (2020) Principal professionalism in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3–4): 367–374.
48.
ThienLMAdamsD (2021) Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment to change in Malaysian primary schools: the contextual influence of gender and teaching experience. Educational Studies47(2): 179–199.
van der VyverCPvan der WesthuizenPCMeyerLW (2014) Caring school leadership: a South African study. Educational Management Administration and Leadership42(1): 61–74.
52.
VinerRMRussellSJCrokerH, et al. (2020) School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. Lancet Child & Adolescent Health4(5): 397–404.
53.
WeinerJFrancoisCStone-JohnsonC, et al. (2021) Keep safe, keep learning: principals’ role in creating psychological safety and organizational learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education5: 618483.
54.
World Bank (2018) World Development Report 2018. Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
55.
World Bank (2020) The COVID-19 Pandemic: Shocks to Education and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33696.
56.
WuMJZhaoKFils-AimeF (2022) Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports7: 100206.
57.
YutingZAdamsDLeeKCS (2022) The relationship between technology leadership and teacher ICT competency in higher education. Education and Information Technologies27(7): 10285–10307.
