Discrepancies in the number of females occupying superintendent positions in the United States continue to exist; therefore, this study utilized a survey design to examine the perceived barriers to achieving the top positions in education as well as differences by gender among aspiring superintendents in K-12 in Illinois. Statistical analyses (Mann-Whitney U test and factor analysis) were performed on the results from the Aspiring Superintendents Perceived Barriers Questionnaire developed by Dulac, and its underlying constructs were used to investigate the extent to which aspiring female and male administrators perceived barriers to the superintendency position. Eighty-four participants completed the survey either online or on paper. The study found significant differences between male and female aspiring superintendents in 10 of the 21 perceived barriers. Factor analysis yielded two factors (societal issues and workplace expectations) as barriers identified by females, and three concepts (societal issues, workplace expectations, and masculinity in leadership) as barriers identified by males.
BellCChaseS (1993) The underrepresentation of women in school leadership. In: MarshallC (ed.) The New Politics of Race and Gender. Washington, DC: Palmer, pp. 141–154.
2.
BellCChaseS (1995) Gender in theory and practice of educational leadership. Journal for a Just and Caring Education1:200–223.
3.
BernalCMonosovNStenclerA, et al. (2017) Gender bias within the superintendency: a comparative study. Journal of School Administration Research and Development2(1):42–52.
4.
BjörkLG (2000) Introduction: women in the superintendency – advances in research and theory. Educational Administration Quarterly36(1):5–17.
5.
BlountJ (1998) Destined to Rule the Schools: Women and the Superintendency, 1873–1995. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6.
BolmanLGDealTE (2003) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BrunnerCC (2000) Unsettled moments in settled discourse: women superintendents’ experiences of inequality. Educational Administration Quarterly36(1):76–116.
8.
BrunnerCC (2003) Invisible, limited, and emerging discourse: research practices that restrict and/or increase access for women and persons of color to the superintendency. Journal of School Leadership13(4):428–450.
9.
BrunnerCCGroganM (2005) Women superintendents and role conception. In: BjörkLGKowalskiTJ (eds) The Contemporary Superintendent: Preparation, Practice, and Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 227–249.
10.
ConnellPHCobiaFHodgePH (2015) Women’s journey to the school superintendency. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership2:37–63.
11.
DanaJABourisawDM (2006) Women in the Superintendency: Discarded Leadership. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
12.
DavisSA (2010) Navigating the labyrinth: women school superintendents in North Carolina. Doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University, NC, USA.
13.
DennesonA (2016) The impact of mentorship on women superintendents in Minnesota. Culminating Projects in Education Administration and Leadership. 20. Available at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/edad_etds/20 (accessed 24 September 2019).
14.
DentithAMBradyJFHammettRF (2006) Feminism and theories of leadership. In: EnglishFW (ed.) Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration (Vol. 1). London: Sage Publications, pp. 384–388.
15.
DerringtonMLStarattG (2009) Female superintendents: breaking barriers and challenging life styles. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin75(2):8–12.
16.
DobieDHummelB (2001) Successful women superintendents in a gender biased profession. Equity and Excellence34(2):22–28.
17.
DulacBJ (1992) Women superintendents and school board presidents: profiles and perceptions of barriers and strategies that have an effect on women in attaining the superintendency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, MA, USA.
18.
EaglyACarliL (2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
FinnanLAMcCordRS (2017) 2016 AASA Superintendents’ Salary & Benefit Survey. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
21.
FowlerFC (2013) Policy Studies for Educational Leadership: An Introduction, 4th edn. London: Pearson.
22.
FunkC (1998) What women bring to executive school positions. In: IrbyBJBrownG (eds) Women Leaders: Structuring Success. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, pp. 33–42.
23.
FunkCPankakeASchrothG (2002) Archetypes of Outstanding Female Superintendents. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 481-622.
24.
GarnGBrownC (2008) Women and the superintendency: perceptions of gender bias. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership6(1):49–71.
25.
GlassTE (1992) The 1992 Study of the American Superintendency: America’s Education Leaders in a Time of Reform. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
26.
GlassTE (2000) Where are all the women superintendents?AASA School Administrator. Available at: http://www.aasa.org/SA/june0005.htm (accessed 24 September 2019).
27.
GoffneyLEdmonsonSL (2012) Perceptions of race and gender in the superintendency. Journal of Texas School Women Executives1(1):3–17.
28.
GroganM (1996) Voices of Women Aspiring to the Superintendency. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
GroganM (1999) Equity/equality issues of gender, race, and class. Educational Administration Quarterly35(4):518–536.
30.
GroganM (2000) Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly36(1):117–142.
31.
GroganMShakeshaftC (2011) Women and Educational Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
GulloGLSperandioJ (2020) Gender and the superintendency: the power of career paths. Frontiers in Education5:68.
33.
HansenK (2011) An Exploratory Study of the Ascendency of Women to the Position of K12 Superintendent. Fullerton, CA: California State University.
34.
HasegawaKShinoharaCBroadbentJP (2007) The effects of ‘social expectation’ on the development of civil society in Japan. Journal of Civil Society3(2):179–203.
35.
HeffermanDJWasongaTA (2017) Demographic effects on quality of life among superintendents. Athens Journal of Education4(2):149–168.
36.
KamlerEShakeshaftC (1999) The role of search consultants in the career paths of women superintendents. In: BrunnerCC (ed.) Sacred Dreams: Women and the Superintendency. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 51–62.
37.
KatzSJ (2006) Influencing others: women superintendents speak (reluctantly). Educational Leadership4(2):103–111.
38.
KowalskiTJMcCordRSPetersenGH, et al. (2010) The American School Superintendent: 2010 Decennial Study. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
39.
KowalskiTJStouderJG (1999) Female experiences related to becoming a superintendent. Contemporary Education70(4): 32–40.
40.
Lane-WashingtonLWilson-JonesL (2010) Women superintendents: challenges, barriers and experiences as senior level leaders. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal27(4):2–7.
41.
LewinK (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: channels of group life, social planning, and action research. Human Relations1:143–153.
42.
LewinK (1951) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York, NY: Harper.
43.
MatthaeiJA (1982) An Economic History of Women in America: Women’s Work, the Sexual Division of Labor and the Development of Capitalism. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
44.
MeierKJWilkinsVM (2002) Gender differences in agency head salaries: the case of public education. Public Administration Review62(4):405–411.
45.
MertzNT (2003) The promise of title IX: longitudinal study of women in administration 1972–2002. Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, SIG: Research on Women, Knoxville, TN.
46.
MertzNTMcNeelySR (1988) The changing profile of school leadership: women in administration. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the American Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
47.
NewtonRM (2006) Does recruitment message content normalize the superintendency as male?Educational Administration Quarterly42(4):551–577.
PetersonM (2017) Stress and the female superintendent: contributing factors and stress management strategies from the voices of California female superintendents. Dissertations. 153. Available at: https://digitalcommons.brandman.edu/edd_dissertations/153 (accesed 2 October 2019).
50.
RamseyK (2000) Domestic relationship of the superintendency: a research study examines the impact of the superintendent’s husband on her career. AASA on the Personal Side. Available at: http://www.aasa.org/personalside/ramsey.htm (accessed 2 October 2019).
51.
ShakeshaftC (1989) Women in Educational Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
ShakeshaftCBrownGIrbyBJ, et al. (2007) Increasing gender equity in educational leadership. In: KleinS (ed.) Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity Through Education, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press, pp. 103–129.
53.
SharpWLMaloneBGWalterJK, et al. (2004) Women superintendents: why so few?Educational Research Quarterly27(3):22–37.
54.
ShoemakerPJ (1991) Gatekeeping. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
55.
SkrlaL (1999) Femininity/masculinity: hegemonic normalizations in the public school superintendency. Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 1999, Montreal, Canada.
56.
SkrlaLReyesPScheurichJJ (2000) Sexism, silence, and solutions: women superintendents speak up and speak out. Educational Administration Quarterly36(1):44–75.
57.
TallericoM (2000) Gaining access to the superintendency: headhunting, gender, and color. Educational Administration Quarterly36(1):18–43.
58.
TallericoMBlountJM (2004) Women and the superintendency: insights from theory and history. Educational Administration Quarterly40(5):633–662.
59.
WickhamD (2007) Female superintendents: perceived barriers and successful strategies used to attain the superintendency in California. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific, CA, USA.
60.
YongAGPearceS (2013) A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology9(2):79–94.
61.
YoungMDMcLeodS (2001) Flukes, opportunities, and planned interventions: Factors affecting women’s decisions to become school administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly37(4):462–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X01374003
