The study aims to identify the perceptions of the principals of public schools in Kuwait regarding the importance of diversifying the sources of school financing, the actual measures taken to increase the sources of school financing and the obstacles in the way of increasing the sources of school financing. The study uses the futures studies’ methodology through implementing Delphi method to achieve the objectives of the study. The implementation of Delphi technique is conducted in four consecutive rounds on a sample of experts in the study area consisting of 25 distinguished school principals in the educational areas, during the second semester of the academic year 2017/2018. The study concluded a number of results, the most important of which are: (1) school principals are convinced of the need to diversify school financing sources and increase its sources in light of the high prices and limited budget granted by the government for this purpose; (2) there are specific measures for increasing the support for school financing, the most important of which is to urge parents and society institutions to donate to schools in order to help fill the budget shortfall; (3) there are obstacles which face the attempts to increase the sources of school financing which are legal, regulatory and community partnership-based obstacles. The study came up with several recommendations that would contribute to diversifying school financing sources.
AbdeenM (2001) The Science of Modern Education Economic. Cairo: Al Dar Al Masriah Al Lubnaniah.
2.
AbdulsallamMZidanHAl-BahairiB (2008) Financing Higher Education and its Modern Trends. Cairo: Books Knowledge.
3.
AkhdarA (2012) The producing school in public education in the KSA: a practical proposal. Unpublished MA Thesis, King Saud University, Riyadh.
4.
Al-AjamiHAl-RashidiHAl-AzmiA (2010) Proposed alternatives for financing university education from the point of view of faculty members in Kuwait in light of some countries experiences. Journal of the Faculty of Education3:211–267.
Al-GhannbousiS (2009) The criteria of nominating educational leaders for the administrative and supervisory rehabilitation programs in the Sultanate of Oman using the Delphi method. Journal of Educational Sciences17:199–229.
7.
Al-HamaidiMH (2011) A proposal to financing higher education in Saudi Arabia in light of increasing social demand. Arab Studies in Education and Psychology5:903–941.
8.
Al-HamdanJAl-QahtaniAAl-AzmiM (2015) Principles in the Economics of Education. Kuwait: Dar Al-Massira Publishing.
9.
Al-JaraiwiS (2015) Evaluation of the efforts of public schools principals to increase the funding sources for the school. International Journal of Education4(3):244–268.
10.
Al-OtaibiF (2003) The private sector’s extent of contribution to the financing of public education in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, King Saud University, Riyadh.
11.
Al-QahtaniAButeibaF (2015) The Economics of Education: Contemporary Issue. Kuwait: The Scientific Publishing Council.
FraenkelJRWallenNE (2006) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
GarnerCW (2004) Education Finance for School Leaders: Strategic Planning and Administration. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall/Merrill.
20.
GuarinoCGalamanTConstantL, et al. (2009) Developing a School Finance System for K-12 Reform in Qatar. Doha: Rand Corporation.
21.
HawkinsJN (2007) The intractable dominant educational paradigm. In: HershockPDMasonMHawkinsJN (eds) Changing Education: Leadership, Innovation and Development in a Globalizing Asia Pacific. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137–162.
22.
HussainKM (2011) Alternatives to financing the Egyptian governmental university education in light of some countries experiences. Journal of the College of Education32:245–310.
23.
JacobWJGokbelV (2018) Global higher education learning outcomes and financial trends: comparative and innovative approaches. International Journal of Educational Development58:5–17.
24.
JerryA (2008) Critical factors affecting the meaningful assessment of student learning outcomes: a Delphi study of the opinions of community college personnel. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University, USA.
25.
JohnstoneDB (2003) Cost sharing in higher education: tuition, financial assistance, and accessibility in a comparative perspective. Czech Sociological Review39(3):351–374.
26.
JohnstoneDB (2004) The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: comparative perspectives. Economic Education Review23(4):403–410.
LambertC (2002) Access to Achievement: Opening Up Good Schools for All. London: Adam Smith Institute.
29.
McMahonW (2015) Financing education for the public good: a new strategy. Journal of Education Finance40(4):414–437.
30.
MitchD (2007) School finance. In: JohnesGJohnesJ (eds) International Handbook on the Economics of Education. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 260–297.
31.
PsacharopoulosGPapakonstantinouG (2005) The real university cost in a “free” higher education country. Economics of Education Review24:103–108.
32.
SalmiJ (2002) New challenges for tertiary education: the World Bank report. International Higher Education28(2):7–9.
33.
SklairL (2002) Globalization: Capitalism and its Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
SkulmoskiGJHartmanFTKrahnJ (2007) The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research6:1–21.
35.
ZaherD (2000) Cost and financing in Arab education systems: a future perspective. In: Fundamental features of the school institution in the twenty first century seminar, Doha, Qatar, 7–10 May 2000. Doha: Arabian Organization for Education, Culture, and Sciences.
36.
ZajdaJRustVD (2016) Current research trends in globalisation and neo-liberalism in higher education. In: ZajdaJRustVD (eds) Globalisation and Higher Education Reforms. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–22.
37.
ZiglioE (1996) The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making. In: AdlerMZiglioE (eds) Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. Bristol: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, Ltd, pp. 3–33.
