Using data on charter and public school districts in Texas, we test the hypothesis that the labor practices in charter schools, in particular their ability to easily dismiss poorly performing teachers, diminishes the negative effect of teacher turnover on student achievement and graduation rates in comparison to public schools. We find some support for this hypothesis, and discuss implications for theory and practice.
AaronsonDBarrowLSanderW (2007) Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics25(1):95–135, https://doi.org/10.1086/508733.
2.
AbelsonMABaysingerBD (1984) Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. The Academy of Management Review9(2): 331–341, https://doi.org/10.2307/258446.
3.
BallSJ (2012) Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-liberal Imaginary. Abingdon, UK; New York: Routledge.
4.
BankstonCLRavitchDPetrilliMJRenzulliLAPainoMBonastiaC (2013) Charter schools. Contexts12:16–25.
5.
CarruthersCK (2012) New schools, new students, new teachers: Evaluating the effectiveness of charter schools. Economics of Education Review31(2):280–292, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.06.001.
6.
ClotfelterCTLaddHFVigdorJL (2007) Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review26(6):673–682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.002.
7.
CollierTMillimetDL (2009) Institutional arrangements in educational systems and student achievement: A cross-national analysis. Empirical Economics37(2):329–381, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-008-0235-9.
8.
DaltonDRTodorWD (1979) Turnover turned over: An expanded and positive perspective. The Academy of Management Review4(2):225–235, https://doi.org/10.2307/257776.
DayCGuQ (2007) Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education33(4):423–443, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746.
12.
FarrellCWohlstetterPSmithJ (2012) Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Educational Policy26(4):499–532, https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811417587.
HanushekEA (2012) Low-performing teachers have high costs. Education Next12(3):68.
16.
HanushekEARivkinSG (2006) Teacher quality. In: HanushekEWelchF (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 2, Chap. 18. Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier, 1051–1078.
17.
HanushekEARivkinSG (2010) Constrained job matching: Does teacher job search harm disadvantaged urban schools?NBER Working Paper No. 15816. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18.
HanushekEAKainJFO’BrienDMRivkinSG (2005) The market for teacher quality. NBER Working Paper No. 11154. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
HurY (2013) Turnover, voluntary turnover, and organizational performance: Evidence from municipal police departments. Public Administration Quarterly37(1):3–35.
LakeRDusseaultBBowenMDemerittAHillP (2010) The national study of charter management organization (CMO) effectiveness: Report on interim findings. Center on Reinventing Public Education, Seattle, WA.
23.
LubienskiC (2003) Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal40(2):395–443, https://doi.org/10.2307/3699394.
24.
MalloyCLWohlstetterP (2003) Working conditions in charter schools: What’s the appeal for teachers?Education and Urban Society35(2):219–241.
25.
NgTWHFeldmanDC (2010) Organizational tenure and job performance. Journal of Management36(5):1220–1250.
26.
ParkHYOfori-DankwaJBishopDR (1994) Organizational and environmental determinants of functional and dysfunctional turnover: Practical and research implications. Human Relations47(3):353–366.
27.
PodgurskyMBallouD (2001) Personnel policy in charter schools. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, Washington, DC.
28.
RivkinSGHanushekEAKainJF (2005) Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica73(2):417–458, https://doi.org/10.2307/3598793.
29.
RonfeldtMLoebSWyckoffJ (2013) How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal50(1):4–36.
30.
SchneiderMK (2016) School Choice: The End of Public Education?New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
StuitDASmithTM (2012) Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review31(2):268–279, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.007.
TorresAC (2014) Is this work sustainable? Teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education51(8):891–914.
VergariS (2007) The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy21(1):15–39.
39.
VergerAFontdevilaCZancajoA (2016) The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
WatlingtonEShockleyRGuglielminoPFelsherR (2010) The high cost of leaving: An analysis of the cost of teacher turnover. Journal of Education Finance36:22–37.
41.
WelchS (1999) NCAA says it can show ‘direct link’ in athletes’ test scores and graduation rates. The Chronicle of Higher Education45(46):1.
