Education human resources (HR) professionals have often been neglected in education research. This study seeks to better understand their role in the American school industry, by first examining how districts conceptualize the position of HR professionals and then exploring how the professionals themselves understand their role in school business. Emphasis is placed on identifying the dominant employee management philosophy (i.e. personnel vs. strategic HR management) that is promoted for and practiced by the professionals. Data was collected by document analysis and focus group interviews. The document analysis was conducted with data from a recruitment/job advertising system that most school employers use in the state of California, USA. The focus group was conducted with HR professionals in primary and secondary education institutions across Northern California (n = 14). Findings suggest that personnel management is emphasized for HR professionals in public school districts more often than strategic HR management. Results are discussed.
AltheideD (1996) Process of qualitative document analysis. In: AltheideDQualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp.23–43.
2.
ArmstrongM (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 10th ed. London: Kogan Page.
3.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
4.
BogardusAM (2007) PHR/SPHR: Professional in Human Resources Certification Study Guide. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sybex.
5.
BillingsleyFFWhiteORMunsonR (1980) Procedural reliability: a rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment2: 229–241.
6.
BowenDEGalangCRajnandiniP (2002) The role of human resource management: An exploratory study of cross-country variance. Human Resources Management41: 103–122.
7.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112(1): 155–159.
DarwishTKSinghSMohamedFA (2013) The role of strategic HR practices in organizational effectiveness: An empirical investigation in the country of Jordan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management24(17): 3343–3362.
10.
Edjoin.org (nd) Edjoin.org-America’s premiere online job search site. Available at:www.edjoin.org (accessed 21–28 September 2014).
11.
ForresterG (2011) Performance management in education: Milestone or millstone?Management in Education25(1): 5–9.
12.
FreitasHOliveiraMJenkinsM. (1998) The focus group, a qualitative research method: Reviewing the theory, and providing guidelines to its planning. ISRC Working Paper 010298. ISRC, Merrick School of Business, University of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.
13.
GillPStewartKTreasureE. (2008) Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal204: 291–295.
14.
GooderhamPNNordhaugORingdalK (1999) Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 507–531.
15.
HanushekE (2007) The single salary schedule and other issues of teacher pay. Peabody Journal of Education82(4): 574–586.
16.
HR Certification Institute (nd) HR Certification Institute. Available at: http://www.hrci.org (accessed 20 August 2014).
17.
HuselidMAJacksonSESchulerRS (1997) Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management40(1): 171–188.
18.
McMahanGCBellMPVirickM (1998) Strategic human resource management: Employee involvement, diversity and international issues. Human Resource Management Review8(3): 193–214.
19.
MammanAAl KulaibyKZ (2014) Is Ulrich’s model useful in understanding HR practitioners’ roles in non-western developing countries? An exploratory investigation across private and public sector organizations in Sultanate Kingdom of Oman. The International Journal of Human Resource Management25(20): 2811–2836.
20.
MonksK (1992) Models of personnel management: A means of understanding the diversity of personnel practices?Human Resource Management Journal3(2): 29–41.
21.
MorganDL (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications.
22.
MorseJMBarretMMayanM. (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods1(2): 13–22.
23.
MortonS (2011) Performance management or managing performance? Supporting a vision to become outstanding. Education in Management25(1): 10–14.
24.
NyeBKonstantopouloSHedgesLV (2004) How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26(3): 237–257.
25.
PowellW (1998) Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review40: 228–240.
26.
RajeshJISuganthiL (2014) The satisfaction of teachers with their supervisors’ interpersonal communication skills in relation to job burn-out and growth satisfaction in southern India. Management in Education27(4): 128–137.
27.
RamirezAClouseWDavisKW (2014) Teacher evaluation in Colorado: How policy frustrates practice. Management in Education28(2): 44–51.
28.
SchulerRS (1994) World class human resource departments: Six critical issues. Accounting and Business Review1: 43–72.
29.
ShowunmiV (2013) Governing and governance in education: Introduction. Management in Education27(3): 83.
30.
SmethemL (2007) Retention and intention in teaching careers: Will the new generation stay?Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice13(5): 465–480.
31.
StraussAL (1987) Codes and coding. In: StraussALQualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–31.
32.
TeoSTTRodwellJJ (2007) To be strategic in the new public sector, HR must remember its operational activities. Human Resource Management46: 305–349.
33.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (2008) The ADA: Your responsibilities as an employer. Available at: www.eeoc.gov/facts/ada17.html (accessed 15 September 2014).
34.
WrightPMMcMahanGCMcCormickB. (1998) Strategy, core competence and HR involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance. Human Resource Management37: 17–30.
