Age-Related Differences in Visual Search Task Performance: Relative Stability of Parallel but not Serial Search

Abstract

The hypothesis that visual search tasks requiring effortful, serial processing are more sensitive to aging than those requiring relatively automatic, parallel processing was tested in 96 healthy adults who performed parallel and serial visual search tasks with fixed presentation times. Reaction times and error rates increased with age in both tasks, but there was no difference between young and old in the effect of increasing numbers of distractors on reaction times. However, the older subjects made significantly more errors with increasing numbers of distractors in the serial search task. Older subjects have disproportionately more difficulty performing serial compared to parallel visual search tasks than do younger subjects. Additionally, this difference is not caused solely by cautious response strategies in the elders.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Birren JE , Schaie KW . Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, 1985.

2. Kramer NA , Jarvik LF . Intellectual changes in the elderly. In: Raskin A , Jarvik LF , Eds. Psychiatric symptoms and cognitive loss in the elderly. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp, 1979: 221–271.

3. Salthouse TA . Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In: Birren JE , Schaie KW , Eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, 1985: 400–426.

4. Welford AT . Reaction time, speed of performance, and age. Ann NY Acad Sci 1988; 515:1–17.

5. McDowd JM , Craik FI . Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 1988; 14:267–280.

6. Craik FM . Age differences in human memory. In: Birren JE , Schaie KW , Eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977: 384–420.

7. Wickens CD , Braune R , Stokes A. Age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: 1. a dual-task approach. Psychol Aging 1987; 2:70–78.

8. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

9. Julesz B. Preattentive human vision: link between neurophysiology and psychophysics. In: Plum F , ed. Handbook of physiology. Section I: The nervous system. Volume V: Higher functions of the brain. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1987: 585–604.

10.

10. Treisman A , Souther J. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. J Exp Psychol [Gen] 1985; 114:285–310.

11.

11. Oken BS , Stern P. Relationship between serial and parallel visual search and target discriminability. Abstracts, Society for Neuroscience 1989; 15: 730.

12.

12. Treisman A , Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev 1988; 95:15–48.

13.

13. Moraglia G. Visual search: spatial frequency and orientation. Percept Mot Skills 1989; 69:675–689.

14.

14. Pashler H. Detecting conjunctions of color and form: reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Percept Psychophysics 1987; 41:191–201.

15.

15. Wolfe JM . “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing. Vision Res 1992; 32:757–763.

16.

16. Plude DJ , Doussard-Roosevelt JA . Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychol Aging 1989; 4:98–105.

17.

17. Plude DJ , Hoyer WJ . Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. Psychol Aging 1986; 1:4–10.

18.

18. Folstein MF , Folstein SE , McHugh PR . Mini-Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189–198.

19.

19. Kiernan RJ , Mueller J , Langston JW , van Dyke C. The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but differentiated approach to cognitive assessment. Ann Int Med 1987; 107:481–485.

20.

20. Bleecker ML , Bolla-Wilson K , Kawas C , Agnew J. Age-specific norms for the Mini-Mental State Exam. Neurology 1988; 38:1565–1568.

21.

21. Heeren TJ , Lagaay AM , Beek WCA , Rooymans HGM . Reference values for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in octo- and nonagenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38:1093–1096.

22.

22. Alexopoulos GS , Abrams RC , Young RC , Shamoian CA . Use of the Cornell Scale in nondemented patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36:230–236.

23.

23. Brink TL , Yesavage JA , Lum O , et al. Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist 1982; 1:37–43.

24.

24. Treisman A. Features and objects in visual processing. Sci Am 1986; 255:114–125.

25.

25. Bergen JR , Julesz B. Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature 1983; 303:696–698.

26.

26. Eriksen CW , Hamlin RM , Breitmeyer RG . Temporal factors in visual perception as related to aging. Percept Psychophysics 1970; 7:354–356.

27.

27. Salthouse TA . Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. Ergonomics 1979; 22:811–821.

28.

28. Madden DJ , Allen PA . Adult age differences in the rate of information extraction during visual search. J Gerontol 1991; 46:124–126.

29.

29. Owsley C , Sloane ME . Vision and aging. In: Boller F , Grafman J , Eds. Handbook of neuropsychology. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991: 229–249.

30.

30. McKhann G , Drachman D , Folstein M , et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1984; 34:939–944.