Cognitive reserve is a resilience construct that mitigates the impact of brain aging and disease on cognition, yet validated instruments remain scarce in older adults with cognitive frailty. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (C-CRIq) among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty.
Methods
A methodological study was conducted. The C-CRIq was translated using a modified Brislin back-translation model, and translation validity was examined. Psychometric testing followed COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), assessing content validity, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and test-retest reliability. Partial Least Squares regression was applied to confirm the measurement model.
Results
A total of 231 participants with cognitive frailty were recruited. Translation validity index reached 100%. Item-level and scale-level content validity indices were high (0.875-1.00; 0.82; 0.98). Convergent validity exceeded 0.60, known-groups validity demonstrated sex differences, and test-retest reliability was strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85).
Conclusions
The C-CRIq is a valid, reliable, and feasible instrument for assessing cognitive reserve in older adults with cognitive frailty, supporting neuropsychiatric care, risk stratification, and cross-cultural geriatric research.
KelaiditiECesariMCanevelliM, et al.Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) International consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17(9):726-734. doi:10.1007/s12603-013-0367-2
2.
ZhangTRenYShenP, et al.Prevalence and associated risk factors of cognitive frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;13(January):1-12. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.755926
3.
FengLZin NyuntMSGaoQFengLYapKBNgTP. Cognitive frailty and adverse health outcomes: findings from the Singapore longitudinal ageing studies (SLAS). J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(3):252-258. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.015
4.
FacalDMasedaAPereiroAX, et al.Cognitive frailty: a conceptual systematic review and an operational proposal for future research. Maturitas. 2019;121:48-56. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.006
5.
SternYArenaza‐UrquijoEMBartrés‐FazD, et al.Whitepaper: defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer's Dement. 2020;16(9):1305-1311. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219
6.
CabezaRAlbertMBellevilleS, et al.Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(11):701-710. doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2
7.
RussTC. Intelligence, cognitive reserve, and dementia: time for intervention?JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(5):e181724. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1724
8.
SternY. Cognitive reserve: implications for assessment and intervention. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2014;65(2):49-54. doi:10.1159/000353443
9.
MogaDCAbnerELSchmittFA, et al.Intervention for cognitive reserve enhancement in delaying the onset of Alzheimer’s symptomatic expression (INCREASE) study: results from a randomized controlled study of medication therapy management targeting a delay in prodromal dementia symptom progre. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(4):646-654. doi:10.14283/jpad.2022.55
10.
BottHHallAMaderoEN, et al.Face-to-face and digital multidomain lifestyle interventions to enhance cognitive reserve and reduce risk of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias: a review of completed and prospective studies. Nutrients. 2019;11(9):2258. doi:10.3390/nu11092258
11.
JonesRNManlyJGlymourMMRentzDMJeffersonALSternY. Conceptual and measurement challenges in research on cognitive reserve. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011;17(4):593-601. doi:10.1017/S1355617710001748
12.
OpdebeeckCMartyrAClareL. Cognitive reserve and cognitive function in healthy older people: a meta-analysis. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit. 2016;23(1):40-60. doi:10.1080/13825585.2015.1041450
13.
BoyleRKnightSPDe LoozeC, et al.Verbal intelligence is a more robust cross-sectional measure of cognitive reserve than level of education in healthy older adults. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):128. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00870-z
14.
SajeevGWeuveJJacksonJW, et al.Late-life cognitive activity and dementia: a systematic review and bias analysis. Epidemiology. 2016;27(5):732-742. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000513
15.
NucciMMapelliDMondiniS. Cognitive reserve index questionnaire (CRIq): a new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(3):218-226. doi:10.3275/7800
16.
WeiWWangKShiJLiZ. Instruments to assess cognitive reserve among older adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Neuropsychol Rev. 2024;34(2):511-529. doi:10.1007/s11065-023-09594-3
17.
MassalhaHMenascuSAlsterSDAloniRKalronA. Adaptation, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the cognitive reserve index questionnaire for the Israeli multiple sclerosis population. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025;93:106189. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106189
18.
CaoTZhangSYuMZhaoXWanQ. The Chinese translation study of the cognitive reserve index questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2022;13(July):1-7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948740
19.
XieXShaSSmithRD, et al.Cognitive reserve in patients with mood disorders: validation study of the Chinese version of the cognitive reserve assessment scale in health. J Affect Disord. 2023;325(December 2022):480-486. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.167
20.
LiuHLiYLiY, et al.Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the cognitive reserve assessment scale in health in patients with cancer. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04506-w
21.
JarvisCBMacKenzieSBPodsakoffPM. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res. 2003;30(2):199-218. doi:10.1086/376806
22.
ColtmanTDevinneyTMMidgleyDFVenaikS. Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement. J Bus Res. 2008;61(12):1250-1262. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013
23.
MokkinkLBde VetHCWPrinsenCAC, et al.COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
24.
PrinsenCACMokkinkLBBouterLM, et al.COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147-1157. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
25.
TerweeCBPrinsenCACChiarottoA, et al.COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-1170. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
26.
vonEEAltmanDGEggerM, et al.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
27.
WangXJXiaHO. Construction and application of a new translation model based on Brislin′s classical back translation model. Journal of Nursing Science (Chinese). 2016;31(7):61-63.
28.
TangSTDixonJ. Instrument translation and evaluation of equivalence and psychometric properties: the Chinese sense of coherence scale. J Nurs Meas. 2002;10(1):59-76. doi:10.1891/jnum.10.1.59.52544
29.
RuanQYuZChenMBaoZLiJHeW. Cognitive frailty, a novel target for the prevention of elderly dependency. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;20:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.004
30.
Van VoorhisCRWMorganBL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2007;3(2):43-50. doi:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
31.
HughesCPBergLDanzigerWLCobenLAMartinRL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140(6):566-572. doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566
32.
NasreddineZSPhillipsNABédirianV, et al.The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695-699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
33.
JessenFAmariglioREBuckleyRF, et al.The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(3):271-278. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0
34.
FriedLPTangenCMWalstonJ, et al.Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-M157. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146
35.
LiXGaoBLiuZ. Norms of Chinese words and vocabulary discerning test. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2007;15(2):111-120.
36.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCMMarkoS. Assessing PLS-SEM results part II: evaluation of the formative measurement models, section. In: HairJF, ed. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed.Sage; 2017:144-146.
37.
PolitDFBeckCT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
38.
PaJAslanyanVCasalettoKB, et al.Effects of sex, APOE4, and lifestyle activities on cognitive reserve in older adults. Neurology. 2022;99(8):e789-e798. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200675
39.
BerezukCKhanMCallahanBLRamirezJBlackSEZakzanisKKAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Sex differences in risk factors that predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022;29:1-9. doi:10.1017/s1355617722000297
40.
SlavićDTomićVNikolaševićŽDjurdjevićNNaumovićN. Age and gender differences in the cognitive reserve index. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022;25(4):767-770. doi:10.4103/aian.aian-1106-21
41.
GarbaAEGrossbergGTEnardKR, et al.Testing the cognitive reserve index questionnaire in an Alzheimer’s disease population. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2020;4(1):513-524. doi:10.3233/adr-200244
42.
OzakbasSYigitPAkyuzZ, et al.Validity and reliability of “Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire” for the Turkish population. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;50(June 2020):102817. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2021.102817
43.
ÇebiMKulceSN. The Turkish translation study of the cognitive reserve index questionnaire (CRIq). Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022;29(6):1536-1542. doi:10.1080/23279095.2021.1896519
44.
CarlsonKDHerdmanAO. Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organ Res Methods. 2012;15(1):17-32. doi:10.1177/1094428110392383
45.
SternYHabeckCMoellerJ, et al.Brain networks associated with cognitive reserve in healthy young and old adults. Cerebr Cortex. 2005;15(4):394-402. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh142
46.
ManlyJJSchupfNTangMXSternY. Cognitive decline and literacy among ethnically diverse elders. J Geriatr Psychiatr Neurol. 2005;18(4):213-217. doi:10.1177/0891988705281868
47.
ManlyJJTouradjiPTangMXSternY. Literacy and memory decline among ethnically diverse elders. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(5):680-690. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.680.14579
48.
KaupARNettiksimmonsJHarrisTB, et al.Cognitive resilience to Apolipoprotein E ε4: contributing factors in black and white older adults. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(3):340-348. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3978
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
