A substantial literature shows that late components of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are delayed in at least some forms of dementia in the elderly. The late-component delay is selective in that earlier components are not affected. More recent work with better defined clinical groups suggests that the selective late-component delay may be characteristic of Alzheimer's disease (AD) rather than an inevitable feature of dementia in general. To overcome problems in traditional VEP component latency measurement the present study uses reference-free Global Field Power (GFP) analysis to more objectively define VEP components and finds that the GFP peak corresponding to the late P2 component of the flash VEP is delayed in a probable AD group but not in a demented unlikely AD group, relative to age-equivalent healthy controls. The late-component delay is again found to be selective in that the GFP peak corresponding to the earlier PI component of the flash VEP does not differ between groups. These findings further strengthen the evidence for electrocortical changes in the visual system of AD patients.
2. Visser SL, Stam FC, Van Tilburg W, et al: Visual evoked response in senile and presenile dementia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1976; 40:385–392.
3.
3. Laurian S, Gaillard J-M, Wertheimer J: Evoked potentials in the assessment of brain function in senile dementia, in Courjon J, Mauguiere F, Revol M (eds): Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology. New York, Raven Press, 1982, pp 287–293.
4.
4. Doggett CE, Harding GFA, Orwin A: Flash and pattern evoked potentials in patients with presenile dementia, abstract. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1981; 52:100 P.
5.
5. Wright CE, Harding GFA, Orwin A: Presenile dementia—the use of the flash and pattern VEP in diagnosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1984; 57:405–415.
6.
6. Wright CE, Harding GFA, Orwin A: The flash and pattern VEP as a diagnostic indicator of dementia. Doc Ophthalmol1986; 62:89–96.
7.
7. Harding GFA, Doggett CE, Orwin A, Smith EJ: Visual evoked potentials in presenile dementia. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser1981; 27:193–202.
8.
8. Harding GFA, Wright CE, Orwin A: Primary presenile dementia: The use of the visual evoked potential as a diagnostic indicator. Br J Psychiatry1985; 147:532–539.
9.
9. Orwin A, Wright CE, Harding GFA, et al: Serial visual evoked potential recordings in Alzheimer's disease. Br Med J1986; 293:9–10.
10.
10. Pollock VE, Schneider LS, Chui HC, et al: Visual evoked potentials in dementia: A meta-analysis and empirical study of Alzheimer's disease patients. Biol Psychiatry1989; 25:1003–1013.
11.
11. Harding GFA, Wright CE, Orwin A, Smith EJ: The visual evoked potential in Alzheimer's disease, in Nodar RH, Barber C (eds): Evoked Potentials II: The Second International Evoked Potential Symposium. Boston, Butterworth, 1984, pp 473–479.
12.
12. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology1984; 34:939–944.
13.
13. Coburn KL, Ashford JW, Moreno MA: VEP latency changes in Alzheimer's disease, in Raz I (ed): Neurological and Psychiatric Applications of Topographic Brain Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials. Chicago, Biologic, 1989, pp 1–7.
14.
14. Coburn KL, Ashford JW, Moreno MA: Visual evoked potentials in dementia: Selective delay of flash P2 in probable Alzheimer's disease. J Neuropsychiatr Clin Neurosci1991; 3:431–435.
15.
15. Coburn KL, Moreno MA: Facts and artifacts in brain electrical activity mapping. Brain Topogr1988; 1:37–45.
17. Lehmann D: From mapping to the analysis and interpretation of EEG/EP maps, in Maurer K (ed): Topographic Brain Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 53–75.
18.
18. Katznelson RD: EEG recording electrode placement and aspects of generator localization, in Nunez P, Katznelson R (eds): Electric Fields of the Brain. London, Oxford University Press, 1981, pp 176–213.
19.
19. Lehmann D: Spatial analysis of EEG and evoked potential data, in Duffy FH (ed): Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity. Boston, Butterworths, 1986, pp 29–61.
20.
20. Lehmann D, Skrandies W: Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review. Prog Neurobiol1984; 23:227–250.
21.
21. Desmedt JE, Tomberg C: Topographic analysis in brain mapping can be compromised by the average reference. Brain Topogr1990; 3:35–42.
22.
22. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed, revised. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1987.
23.
23. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-mental State”—a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975; 12:189–198.
24.
24. Ashford JW, Kolm P, Colliver J, et al: Alzheimer patient evaluation and the mini-mental state: Item characteristic curve analysis. J Gerontol1989; 44:139–146.
25.
25. Parks RW, Coburn KL, Zee RF, et al: Electrocortical mapping, MRI, and neuropsychological measures: Evidence of Alzheimer's disease in the presence of vascular lesions. Arch Clin Neuropsychol1991; 6:393–408.
26.
26. Johnson KA, Holman L, Mueller SP, et al: Single photon emission computed tomography in Alzheimer's disease. Abnormal iofetamine I 123 uptake reflects dementia severity. Arch Neurol1988; 45:392–396.
27.
27. Small GW, Kuhl DE, Riege WH, et al: Cerebral glucose metabolic patterns in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry1989; 46:527–532.
28.
28. Lewis DA, Campbell MJ, Terry RD, Morrison JH: Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer's disease: A quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices. J Neurosci1987; 7:1799–1808.
29.
29. Ashford JW, Fuster JM: Occipital and inferotemporal responses to visual signals in the monkey. Exp Neurol1985; 90:444–466.
30.
30. Coburn KL, Ashford JW, Fuster JM: Visual response latencies in temporal lobe structures as a function of stimulus information load. Behav Neurosci1990; 104:62–73.
