The authors argue that women's dependence on men plays a key role in muting challenges to gender inequality, and they explore that argument through an analysis of gender-related attitudes in five countries. Women's dependence at both the societal and the individual levels is associated with less egalitarian gender attitudes; such dependence especially affects women's attitudes, drawing them toward men's less egalitarian views. Societal-level dependence also strengthens the impact of individual-level dependence on egalitarianism. The authors conclude that women's dependence discourages egalitarian gender attitudes, thus suppressing challenges to the gendered status quo and legitimating gender inequality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, Joan.1973. Women and social stratification: A case of intellectual sexism.American Journal of Sociology87:936-45.
2.
Alwin, Duane F.
, Michael Braun, and Jacqueline Scott.1993. The separation of work and family: Attitudes towards women's labour-force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.European Sociological Review8:13-37.
3.
Australian Women's Bureau.
1986. Women at work: Facts and figures.Canberra: Australian Department of Employment and Industrial Relations.
4.
Banaszak, Lee Ann
, and Eric Plutzer.1993. The social bases of feminism in the European Community.Public Opinion Quarterly57:29-53.
5.
Baxter, Janeen.1992. Power, attitudes and time: The domestic division of labour.Journal of Comparative Family Studies23:165-82.
6.
Blau, Francine D.
, and Marianne A. Ferber. 1990. “Women's work, women's lives: A comparative economic perspective.” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
7.
Blum, Linda M.1987. Possibilities and limits of the comparable worth movement.Gender & Society1:380-99.
8.
Borchorst, Annette
, and Birte Siim. 1987. Women and the advanced welfare state: A new kind of patriarchal power. In Women and the state, edited by Anne Showstack Sassoon. London: Hutchison.
9.
Brenner, Johanna.1987. Feminist political discourses: Radical versus liberal approaches to the feminization of poverty and comparable worth.Gender & Society1:447-65.
10.
Castles, Francis G.
, and Deborah Mitchell. 1990. “Three worlds of welfare capitalism or four?” Discussion Paper, Australian National University, Canberra.
11.
Chafetz, Janet Saltzman
, and Anthony Gary Dworkin. 1986. Female revolt: Women's movements in world and historical perspective.Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
12.
Dale, Angela
, Nigel Gilbert, and Sara Arber.1985. Integrating women into class theory.Sociology19:384-409.
13.
Davis, Nancy J.
, and Robert Robinson.1991. Men's and women's consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.American Sociological Review56:72-84.
14.
de Beauvoir, Simone.
1970. The second sex.New York: Bantam.
15.
Dugger, Karen.1988. Social location and gender-role attitudes: A comparison of Black and white women.Gender & Society2:425-48.
16.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta.1989. The three political economies of the welfare state.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology26:10-36.
17.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta.
1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism.Cambridge, England: Polity.
18.
Heath, Anthony
, and Nicky Britten.1984. Women's jobs do make a difference.Sociology18:475-89.
19.
Hernes, Helga Maria.
1987. Women and the welfare state: The transition from private to public dependence. In Women and the state, edited by Anne Showstack Sassoon. London: Hutchison.
20.
Hobson, Barbara.1990. No exit, no voice: Women's economic dependency and the welfare state.Acta Sociologica33:235-50.
Kane, Emily W.
, and Laura J. Macaulay.1993. Interviewer gender and gender attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly57:1-28.
23.
Kissman, Kris.1991. Women caregivers, women wage earners: Social policy perspectives in Norway.Women's Studies International Forum14:193-9.
24.
Klein, Ethel.
1984. Gender politics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Leira, Arnlaug.
1992. Welfare states and working mothers: The Scandinavian experience.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Littell, Ramon C.
, Rudolf J. Freund, and Philip C. Spector. 1991. SAS system for linear models.3d ed.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
27.
Mason, Karen O.1986. The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies.Sociological Forum1:284-300.
28.
McRae, Susan.
1986. Cross class families.Oxford, England: Clarendon.
29.
Moen, Phyllis.
1989. Working parents: Transformations in gender roles and public policies in Sweden.London: Adamantine.
30.
O'Donnell, Carol
, and Philippa Hall. 1988. Getting equal.Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
31.
Orloff, Ann Shola.1993. Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states.American Sociological Review58:303-28.
32.
Population Reference Bureau.
1985. 1985 world population data sheet.Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
33.
Rosenfeld, Rachel A.
, and Arne L. Kalleberg.1990. A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income.American Journal of Sociology96:69-106.
34.
Ross, Catherine, E.1987. The division of labor at home.Social Forces65:816-33.
35.
Sassoon, Anne Showstack.
1987. Women and the state.London: Hutchison.
36.
Sears, David O.
, and Leonie Huddy. 1990. On the origins of political disunity among women. In Women, politics, and change, edited by Louise A. Tilley and Patricia Gurin. New York: Russell Sage.
37.
Siim, Birte.1987. The Scandinavian welfare states: Towards sexual equality or a new kind of male domination?Acta Sociologica30:255-70.
38.
Smith, Tom W.1985. Working wives and women's rights: The connection between the employment status of wives and the feminist attitudes of husbands.Sex Roles12:501-8.
39.
Stanworth, Michelle.1984. Women and class analysis: A reply to Goldthorpe.Sociology18:159-70.
40.
Tallichet, Suzanne E.
, and Fern K. Willits.1986. Gender-role attitude change of young women.Social Psychology Quarterly49:219-27.
41.
Thornton, Arland
, Duane F. Alwin, and Donald Camburn.1983. Causes and consequences of sex-role attitude change.American Sociological Review48:211-27.
42.
Thornton, Arland
, and Deborah Freedman.1979. Changes in the sex-role attitudes of women, 1962-1977.American Sociological Review44:831-42.
43.
Treiman, Donald J.
, and Patricia A. Roos.1983. Sex and earnings in industrial society: A nine-nation comparison.American Journal of Sociology89:612-50.
44.
United Nations.
1989. 1987 demographic yearbook.New York: United Nations.
45.
Watt, Ian.1980. Linkages between industrial radicalism and domestic role among working women.Sociological Review28:55-74.
46.
Welch, Susan.1975. Support among women for the issues of the women's movement.Sociological Quarterly16:216-27.
47.
Wright, Erik Olin.
1985. Classes.London: Verso.
48.
Wright, Erik Olin
, Cynthia Costello, David Hachen, and Joey Sprague.1982. The American class structure.American Sociological Review47:709-26.
49.
Wright, Erik Olin
, K. Shire, S. L. Hwang, M. Dolan, and Janeen Baxter.1992. The non-effects of class on the gendered division of labor in the home: A comparative study of Sweden and the United States.Gender & Society6: 252-82.
