The recent social and political inequalities women face in the United States have raised new questions about how distinct groups of women respond to a changing landscape. Here, we assess how racial and political differences shape women’s social identity as women and its association with support for abortion and the MeToo movement. Using original survey data, we find that for both Black and white women, gender-linked fate—the belief that one’s fate is tied to the well-being of the gender group—is predicted by political ideology and associated with attitudes about abortion and the MeToo movement. In contrast, social identity as a woman—when one feels deeply tied to and represented in a particular gender group—was common across the political spectrum and insignificant in predicting attitudes about these gendered political issues.
AbramsDominicHoggMichael A.2010. Social identity and self-categorization. In The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination, edited by DovidioJohn F.HewstoneMilesGlickPeterEssesVictoria M.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
ArcherAllison M. N.KamCindy D.2020. Modern sexism in modern times public opinion in the #MeToo era. Public Opinion Quarterly84 (4): 813–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa058
3.
AronsonPamela. 2017. The dynamics and causes of gender and feminist consciousness and feminist identities. In The Oxford handbook of U.S. women’s social movement activism, edited by McCammonHolly J.TaylorVertaRegerJoEinwohnerRachel L.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BegunStephanieWallsN. Eugene. 2015. Pedestal or gutter: Exploring ambivalent sexism’s relationship with abortion attitudes. Affilia30 (2): 200–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109914555216
5.
BergamiMassimoBagozziRichard P.2000. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology39 (4): 555–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164633
6.
BlankenshipBenjamin T.FrederickJennifer K.ÖzgeSavaşStewartAbigail J.SamanthaMontgomery. 2017. Privilege and marginality: How group identification and personality predict right- and left-wing political activism. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy17 (1): 161–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12132
BoyleKaren. 2019. #MeToo, Weinstein and feminism. In #MeToo, Weinstein and feminism, edited by KarenBoyle. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
9.
BracicAnaIsrael-TrummelMackenzieShortleAllyson F.2019. Is sexism for white people? Gender stereotypes, race, and the 2016 presidential election. Political Behavior41 (2): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9446-8
BurkeTarana. 2021. Unbound: My story of liberation and the birth of the me too movement. New York: Flatiron Books.
12.
BurnShawn MeghanRogerAboudCareyMoyles. 2000. The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles42 (11): 1081–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007044802798
13.
Calhoun-BrownAllison. 1999. No respect of persons: Religion, churches and gender issues in the African American community. Women & Politics20 (3): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v20n03_02
14.
CasseseErin C.BarnesTiffany D.2019. Reconciling sexism and women’s support for Republican candidates: A look at gender, class, and whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 presidential races. Political Behavior41 (3): 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2
15.
CasseseErin C.HolmanMirya R.2016. Religious beliefs, gender consciousness, and women’s political participation. Sex Roles75 (9): 514–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0635-9
16.
ChowEsther Ngan-Ling. 1987. The development of feminist consciousness among Asian American women. Gender & Society1 (3): 284–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124387001003004
17.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
18.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
DawsonMichael C.2001. Black visions: The roots of contemporary African-American political ideologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frasure-YokleyLorrie. 2018. Choosing the velvet glove: Women voters, ambivalent sexism, and vote choice in 2016. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics3 (1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2017.35
23.
GandyOscar H.Jr.2001. Racial identity, media use, and the social construction of risk among African Americans. Journal of Black Studies31 (5): 600–18.
24.
GayClaudineHochschildJenniferWhiteAriel. 2016. Americans’ belief in linked fate: Does the measure capture the concept?Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics1 (1): 117–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2015.3
25.
GayClaudineTateKatherine. 1998. Doubly bound: The impact of gender and race on the politics of Black women. Political Psychology19 (1): 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00098
26.
GershonSarah AllenMontoyaCelesteBejaranoChristinaBrownNadia. 2019. Intersectional linked fate and political representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (3): 642–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1639520
27.
GoodeJayne R.KnightKendraDenkerKatherine J.Cronin-FisherValerie. 2021. Political difference in marriage: Wife’s gender linked fate and relational conflict. Communication Studies72 (3): 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1876128
28.
GothreauClaire M.WarrenClarisseSchneiderStephen. 2022. Looking the other way: How ideology influences perceptions of sexual harassment. European Journal of Politics and Gender5 (2): 211–31. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16445951244136
GurinPatriciaMarkusH.1989. Cognitive consequences of gender identity. In The social identity of women, edited by SkevingtonSuzanneBakerDeborah. London: Sage.
31.
GurinPatriciaTownsendAloen. 1986. Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology25 (2): 139–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00712.x
32.
HarbinM. BrielleMargolisMichele F.2022. Nobody’s free until everybody’s free: How feminist identification influences white Americans’ willingness to recognize and respond to racial discrimination. Politics, Groups, and Identities10 (4): 511–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1846132
33.
HarnoisCatherine E.2015. Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women’s political consciousness of gender. Social Psychology Quarterly78 (4): 365–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515607844
34.
HarrisFredrick C.1999. Something within: Religion in African-American political activism. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Henderson-KingDonnaZhermerNatalya. 2003. Feminist consciousness among Russians and Americans. Sex Roles48 (3): 143–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022403322131
36.
HildrethAnneDranEllen M.1994. Explaining womens’ differences in abortion opinion: The role of gender consciousness. Women & Politics14 (1): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v14n01_02
HuddyLeonie. 2001. From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology22 (1): 127–56.
39.
JacobsSue-EllenThomasWesleyLangSabine, eds. 1997. Two-spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
40.
JaramilloPatricia A.2010. Building a theory, measuring a concept: Exploring intersectionality and Latina activism at the individual level. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy31 (3): 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544771003697213
41.
JenkinsShannonPoloni-StaudingerLori M.StrachanJ. Cherie. 2023. Linked fate, #MeToo, and political participation. Politics, Groups, and Identities11 (1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1908371
42.
JonesMartinque K.DaySusan X.2018. An exploration of Black women’s gendered racial identity using a multidimensional and intersectional approach. Sex Roles79 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0854-8
43.
JunnJane. 2017. The Trump majority: White womanhood and the making of female voters in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (2): 343–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1304224
44.
JunnJaneBrownNadia. 2008. What revolution? Incorporating intersectionality in women and politics. In Political women and American democracy, edited by WolbrectChristinaBeckwithKarenBaldezLisa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KraneVikkiBarberHeatherMcClungLisa R.2002. Social psychological benefits of gay games participation: A social identity theory explanation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology14 (1): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200209339009
LeachColin Waynevan ZomerenMartijnZebelSvenVliekMichael L. WPennekampSjoerd F.DoosjeBertjanOuwerkerkJaap W.SpearsRussell. 2008. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95 (1): 144–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
50.
LindersAnnulla. 1998. Abortion as a social problem: The construction of “opposite” solutions in Sweden and the United States. Social Problems45 (4): 488–509. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097209
Lopez BunyasiTehamaSmithCandis Watts. 2019. Do all Black lives matter equally to Black people? Respectability politics and the limitations of linked fate. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics4 (1): 180–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2018.33
53.
LuhtanenRiiaCrockerJennifer. 1992. A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18 (3): 302–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
54.
LukerKristin. 1985. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
MartinJuanita K.HallGordon C. Nagayama. 1992. Thinking Black, thinking internal, thinking feminist. Journal of Counseling Psychology39 (4): 509–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.4.509
56.
MillerArthur H.HildrethAnneSimmonsGrace L.1988. The mobilization of gender group consciousness. In The political interests of gender: Developing theory and research with a feminist face, edited by JonesKathleen B.JonasdottirAnna G. London: Sage.
57.
MyaskovskyLarissaWittigMichele Andrisin. 1997. Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles37 (11): 861–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936344
O’BrienJohnAbdelhadiEman. 2020. Re-examining restructuring: Racialization, religious conservatism, and political leanings in contemporary American life. Social Forces99 (2): 474–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa029
PeekCharles W.LoweGeorge D.WilliamsL. Susan. 1991. Gender and God’s word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces69 (4): 1205–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/69.4.1205
62.
PerrySamuel L.2015. Bible beliefs, conservative religious identity, and same-sex marriage support: Examining main and moderating effects. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion54 (4): 792–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12212
63.
PettersonAinoSuttonRobbie M.2018. Sexist ideology and endorsement of men’s control over women’s decisions in reproductive health. Psychology of Women Quarterly42 (2): 235–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317744531
64.
PhilpotTasha S.2017. Conservative but not republican: The paradox of party identification and ideology among African Americans. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ReedTamilia D.NevilleHelen A.2014. The influence of religiosity and spirituality on psychological well-being among Black women. Journal of Black Psychology40 (4): 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798413490956
66.
ReyesDaisy Verduzco. 2016. Conundrums of desire: Sexual discourses of Mexican-origin mothers. Sexuality & Culture20 (4): 1020–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9372-z
67.
RhodebeckLaurie A.1996. The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations: Feminist identity and feminist opinion. Gender & Society10 (4): 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124396010004003
68.
RinehartSue Tolleson. 1992/2013. Gender consciousness and politics. New York: Routledge.
69.
RoseMelody. 2011. Pro-life, pro-woman? Frame extension in the American antiabortion movement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy32 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.537565
70.
RyanApril. 2022. Black women will save the world: An anthem. New York: HarperCollins.
71.
SchreiberRonnee. 2002. Injecting a woman’s voice: Conservative women’s organizations, gender consciousness, and the expression of women’s policy preferences. Sex Roles47 (7): 331–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021479030885
SimienEvelyn M.2006. Black feminist voices in politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
76.
SimienEvelyn M.ClawsonRosalee A.2004. The intersection of race and gender: An examination of Black feminist consciousness, race consciousness, and policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly85 (3): 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00245.x
77.
SmithCandis WattsBunyasiTehama LopezSmithJasmine Carrera. 2019. Linked fate over time and across generations. Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (3): 684–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638801
78.
SmithChristine A.1999. I enjoy being a girl: Collective self-esteem, feminism, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles40 (3): 281–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018855106539
79.
StoutChristopher T.KretschmerKelsyRuppannerLeah. 2017. Gender linked fate, race/ethnicity, and the marriage gap in American politics. Political Research Quarterly70 (3): 509–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917702499
SwankEricFahsBreanne. 2016. Resources, masculinities, and gender differences among pro-life activists. Sexuality & Culture20 (2): 277–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9320-3
82.
TajfelHenri. 1981. Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
TateKatherine. 1994. From protest to politics: The new Black voters in American elections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
TienCharles. 2017. The racial gap in voting among women: White women, racial resentment, and support for Trump. New Political Science39 (4): 651–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1378296
85.
TurnerJohn C.HoggMichael A.OakesPenelope J.ReicherStephen D.WetherellMargaret S.1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
86.
UhlanerCarole J.1989. Rational turnout: The neglected role of groups. American Journal of Political Science33 (2): 390–422. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111153
87.
WestEmily A.IyengarShanto. 2022. Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization. Political Behavior44 (2): 807–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y
88.
WhiteheadAndrew L.2012. Gender ideology and religion: Does a masculine image of God matter?Review of Religious Research54 (2): 139–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-012-0056-3
89.
WilcoxClyde. 1996. Racial and gender consciousness among African-American women. Women & Politics17 (1): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v17n01_04
WoodberryRobert D.SmithChristian S.1998. Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology24:25–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.25
92.
XiongYingChoMoonheeBoatwright.Brandon2019. Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review45 (1): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
