Stay-at-home fathers challenge norms related to masculinity and gendered divisions of parenting roles. We conduct a content analysis of 94 print news articles about at-home fathers published 1987–2016 in the United States, identifying key themes and comparing results with our earlier research on news depictions of at-home mothers. We also analyze national trends in fathers staying home using Current Population Survey data to understand contexts in which articles were published. Articles were family-centric and disproportionately focused on economic elites, emphasizing their “choice” to stay home, but economic reasons for fathers staying home were described more commonly than in portrayals of mothers. Stigmatization experiences were pervasive in articles, appearing more commonly when staying home was reported as discretionary, but less commonly when staying home resulted from involuntary unemployment in recent periods. Portrayals reflect, reinforce, contribute to, and challenge father-as-provider norms, mirroring changes in masculinity norms over time and revealing cultural ambivalence toward at-home fathers.
AltheideDavid L.SchneiderChristopher J.2012. Qualitative media analysis. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2.
BarrettFrank J.1996. The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US Navy. Gender, Work & Organization3 (3): 129–42.
3.
BoyceAnthony S.RyanAnn MarieImusAnna L.MorgesonFrederick P.2007. “Temporary worker, permanent loser?” A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management33 (1): 5–29.
4.
BridgesTristanPascoeC. J.2014. Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass8 (3): 246–58.
5.
BrownBruce W.1978. Wife-employment and the emergence of egalitarian marital role prescriptions: 1900-1974. Journal of Comparative Family Studies9 (1): 5–17.
6.
Burkstrand-ReidBeth. 2012. Dirty Harry meets dirty diapers: Masculinities, at-home fathers, and making the law work for families. Texas Journal of Women and the Law22 (1): 1–44.
7.
ChesleyNoelle. 2011. Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender & Society25 (5): 642–64.
8.
ClelandJohn. 2001. Potatoes and pills: An overview of innovation-diffusion contributions to explanations of fertility decline. In Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Selected perspectives, edited by John B. Casterline. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9.
ColtraneScottAdamsMichele. 2008. Gender and families. 2nd ed.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
ConnellR. W.2005. Masculinities. 2nd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
de VreeseClaes H.2005. News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design13 (1): 51–62.
13.
DoucetAndrea. 2004. “It’s almost like I have a job, but I don’t get paid”: Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice about Men as Fathers2 (3): 277–303.
14.
DoucetAndrea. 2018. Do men mother? Fathering, care and domestic responsibility. 2nd ed.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
15.
ElliottKarla. 2016. Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities19 (3): 240–59.
16.
EnglandPaula. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society24 (2): 149–66.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRodgersRenaeRugglesStevenWarrenJ. Robert. 2018. Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 6.0 [data set]. Minneapolis: Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. https://www.ipums.org/projects/ipums-cps/d030.v6.0.
19.
FurstenbergFrank. 1988. Good dads-bad dads: Two faces of fatherhood. In The changing American family and public policy, edited by CherlinAndrew J.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
20.
GamsonWilliam A.ModiglianiAndre. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95 (1): 1–37.
21.
GansHerbert J.1979. Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, newsweek, and time. New York: Pantheon Books.
22.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Stigma; Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
23.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
HarknettKristenKuperbergArielle. 2011. Education, labor markets and the retreat from marriage. Social Forces90 (1): 41–63.
HunterSarah C.RiggsDamien W.AugoustinosMartha. 2017. Hegemonic masculinity versus a caring masculinity: Implications for understanding primary caregiving fathers. Social and Personality Psychology Compass11 (3): e12307.
27.
HunterSarah C.RiggsDamien W.AugoustinosMartha. 2020. Constructions of primary caregiving fathers in popular parenting texts. Men and Masculinities23 (1): 150–69.
28.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2016. Unpacking Americans’ views of the employment of mothers and fathers using national vignette survey data: SWS presidential address. Gender & Society30 (3): 413–41.
29.
KramerKaren Z.KellyErin L.McCullochJan B.2015. Stay-at-home fathers: Definition and characteristics based on 34 years of CPS data. Journal of Family Issues36 (12): 1651–73.
30.
KuperbergArielleStonePamela. 2008. The media depiction of women who opt out. Gender & Society22 (4): 497–517.
31.
LaRossaRalph. 2015. The culture of fatherhood and late-twentieth-century new fatherhood movement: An interpretive perspective. In Deconstructing dads: Changing images of fathers in popular culture, edited by TroppLauraKellyJanice. Lanham: Lexington Books.
32.
LeeJoyce Y.LeeShawna J.2018. Caring is masculine: Stay-at-home fathers and masculine identity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity19 (1): 47–58.
33.
LinkBruce G.PhelanJo C.2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology27:363–85.
MarksLorenPalkovitzRob. 2004. American fatherhood types: The good, the bad, and the uninterested. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research & Practice about Men as Fathers2 (2): 113–29.
38.
MarshallDavidDavisTeresaHoggMargaret K.SchneiderTanjaPetersenAlan. 2014. From overt provider to invisible presence: Discursive shifts in advertising portrayals of the father in Good Housekeeping, 1950-2010. Journal of Marketing Management30 (15–16): 1654–79.
39.
MerskinDebra. 1998. Sending up signals: A survey of Native American media use and representation in the mass media. Howard Journal of Communications9 (4): 333–45.
40.
MertonRobert K.1976. Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: Free Press.
41.
MilkieMelissa A.DennyKathleen E.2014. Changes in the cultural model of father involvement: Descriptions of benefits to fathers, children, and mothers in Parents’ Magazine, 1926-2006. Journal of Family Issues35 (2): 223–53.
42.
MyersKristenDemantasIlana. 2015. Being “the man” without having a job and/or providing care instead of “bread.” In Families as they really are, 2nd ed., edited by RismanBarbara J.RutterVirginia E.New York: W.W. Norton.
43.
ParkB. C. Ben. 2013. Cultural ambivalence and suicide rates in South Korea. In Suicide and culture: Understanding the context, edited by Erminia Colucci and David Lester. Cambridge: Gogrefe.
RandlesJennifer. 2018. “Manning up” to be a good father: Hybrid fatherhood, masculinity, and U.S. responsible fatherhood policy. Gender & Society32 (4): 516–39.
46.
RochlenAaron B.McKelleyRyan A.WhittakerTiffany A.2010. Stay-at-home fathers’ reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men and Masculinity11 (4): 279–85.
47.
SchmitzRachel M.2016. Constructing men as fathers: A content analysis of formulations of fatherhood in parenting magazines. The Journal of Men’s Studies24 (1): 3–23.
48.
ShaferKevinPettsRichard J.ScheiblingCasey. 2021. Variation in masculinities and fathering behaviors: A cross-national comparison of the United States and Canada. Sex Roles84:439–53. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01177-3.
49.
SmithCalvin D.1998. “Men don’t do this sort of thing”: A case study of the social isolation of househusbands. Men and Masculinities1 (2): 138–72.
50.
SnitkerAundrea. 2018. Not Mr. Mom: Navigating discourses for stay-at-home fathers. The Journal of Men’s Studies26 (2): 203–21.
51.
SpencerSteven J.LogelChristineDaviesPaul G.2016. Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology67:415–37.
52.
SteinourHeidi. 2018. “I am not Mr. Mom”: A qualitative analysis of at-home father’s struggle for legitimacy. Journal of Gender Studies27 (4): 388–400.
53.
VavrusMary Douglas. 2002. Domesticating patriarchy: Hegemonic masculinity and television’s “Mr. Mom.”Critical Studies in Media Communication19 (3): 352–75.
54.
WallGlendaArnoldStephanie. 2007. How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender & Society21 (4): 508–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
