In this article, we examine trends in women’s mobility among male-dominated, gender-neutral, and female-dominated occupations. Earlier research, largely employing data from the 1970s and early 1980s, showed that along with significant net movement by women into male-dominated fields, there was also substantial attrition from male-dominated occupations. Here, we build on previous research by examining how “gender-type” mobility rates have changed in recent decades. The findings indicate that while still quite high, levels of women’s occupational mobility among female, gender-neutral, and male occupations have decreased considerably over time. We suggest that this is the result of increasing differentiation among women. In particular, many women, especially those in high-status occupations, plan to pursue employment in a male-dominated field, succeed in gaining entry, and tend to remain in these fields more often than their counterparts in previous decades. We interpret these findings as evidence that gender segregation is maintained by an enduring but imperfect system of social control that constrains women’s choices before, during, and after entry into the labor market. The evidence presented here underscores the importance of studying gender-type mobility as a distinct dimension of labor market inequality.
AlperJoe. 1993. The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science260 (5106): 409–11.
2.
AntecolHeatherCobb-ClarkDeborah A.2013. Do psychological traits help explain gender segregation in young people’s occupations?Labour Economics21:59–73.
3.
BaroneCarloAssirelliGiulia. 2020. Gender segregation in higher education: An empirical test of seven explanations. Higher Education79:55–78.
4.
BergmannBarbara R.2011. Sex segregation in the blue-collar occupations: Women’s choices or unremedied discrimination? Comment on England. Gender & Society25 (1): 88–93.
5.
BerrymanSue E.1983. Who will do science? Trends, and their causes in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
6.
BilginsoyCihan. 2003. The hazards of training: Attrition and retention in construction industry apprenticeship programs. ILR Review57 (1): 54–67.
7.
BlauFrancine D.BrummundPeterLiuAlbert Yung-Hsu. 2013. Trends in occupational segregation by gender, 1970–2009: Adjusting for the impact of changes in the occupational coding system. Demography50 (2): 471–92.
8.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley.
CechErin A.2013. The self-expressive edge of occupational sex segregation. American Journal of Sociology119 (3): 747–89.
11.
CechErin A.2016. Mechanism or myth: Family plans and the reproduction of occupational gender segregation. Gender & Society30 (2): 265–88.
12.
ChaYoungjoo. 2013. Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & Society27 (2): 158–84.
13.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid B.2004. Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
ChettyRajGruskyDavidHellMaximilianHendrenNathanielManducaRobertNarangJimmy. 2017. The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science356 (6336): 398–406.
15.
CohenPhilip N.2013. The persistence of workplace gender segregation in the U.S. Sociology Compass7 (11): 889–99.
16.
CohenPhilip N.HuffmanMatt L.2003. Occupational segregation and the devaluation of women’s work across U.S. labor markets. Social Forces81 (3): 881–908.
17.
CotterDavidHermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2011. The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology117 (1): 259–89.
18.
DonohueJ. J.1988. Determinants of job turnover of young men and women in the United States: A hazard rate analysis. Research in Population Economics6:257–301.
19.
DuncanGreg J.1984. Years of poverty, years of plenty: The changing economic fortunes of American workers and families. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
20.
DuncanOtis DudleyDuncanBeverly. 1955. A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review20 (2): 210–17.
21.
EnglandPaula. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society24 (2): 149–66.
22.
EnglandPaula. 2011. Reassessing the uneven gender revolution and its slowdown. Gender & Society25 (1): 113–24.
23.
EspinozaRobert. 2017. The changing policy landscape of the direct care workforce. Public Policy & Aging Report27 (3): 101–105.
24.
GandhiAshvinYuHuiziGrabowskiDavid C.2021. High nursing staff turnover in nursing homes offers important quality information. Health Affairs40 (3): 384–91. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00957.
25.
GershonIlana. 2019. Porous social orders. American Ethnologist46 (4): 404–16.
26.
GerstelNaomiMcGonagleKatherine. 1999. Job leaves and the limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The effects of gender, race, and family. Work and Occupations26 (4): 510–34.
27.
GlassJennifer L.1990. The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces68 (3): 779–96.
28.
GlassJennifer L.SasslerSharonLevitteYaelMichelmoreKatherine M.2013. What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces92 (2): 723–75.
29.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review96 (2): 1–21.
30.
Guinea-MartinDanielMoraRicardoRuiz-CastilloJavier. 2018. The evolution of gender segregation over the life course. American Sociological Review83 (5): 983–1019.
31.
HarrisDeborah A.GuiffrePatti. 2015. Taking the heat: Women chefs and gender inequality in the professional kitchen. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
HeilmanMadeleine E.EaglyAlice H.2008. Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology1 (4): 393–98.
36.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
37.
JarvisBenjamin F.SongXi. 2017. Rising intragenerational occupational mobility in the United States, 1969 to 2011. American Sociological Review82 (3): 568–99.
38.
KallebergArne L.2013. Globalization and precarious work. Contemporary Sociology42 (5): 700–706.
39.
KallebergArne L.MouwTed. 2018. Occupations, organizations and intragenerational career mobility. Annual Review of Sociology44:283–303.
40.
LevanonAsafEnglandPaulaAllisonPaul. 2009. Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. Census data. Social Forces88 (2): 865–91.
41.
LevanonAsafGruskyDavid B.2016. The persistence of extreme gender segregation in the twenty-first century. American Journal of Sociology122 (2): 573–619.
42.
LevinePhilip B.ZimmermanDavid J.1995. A comparison of the sex-type of occupational aspirations and subsequent achievement. Work and Occupations22 (1): 73–84.
43.
MandelHadas. 2012. Occupational mobility of American women: Compositional and structural changes, 1980–2007. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility30 (1): 5–16.
44.
MooreGwen. 1988. Women in elite positions: Insiders or outsiders?Sociological Forum3 (4): 566–85.
45.
National Science Foundation. 2019. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/.
46.
OchsenfeldFabian. 2016. Preferences, constraints, and the process of sex segregation in college majors: A choice analysis. Social Science Research56:117–32.
47.
PettitBeckyHookJennifer L.2009. Gendered tradeoffs: Family, social policy, and economic inequality in twenty-one countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
48.
PolaviejaJavier G.PlattLucinda. 2014. Nurse of mechanic? The role of parental socialization and children’s personality in the formation of sex-typed occupational aspirations. Social Forces93 (1): 31–61.
49.
Riegle-CrumbCatherineKingBarbaraMooreChelsea. 2016. Do they stay or do they go? The switching decisions of individuals who enter gender atypical college majors. Sex Roles74 (9): 436–49.
50.
RoyaltyAnne Beeson. 1998. Job-to-job and job-to-nonemployment turnover by gender and education level. Journal of Labor Economics16 (2): 392–433.
51.
ShaumanKimberlee A.2017. Gender differences in the early employment outcomes of STEM doctorates. Social Sciences6 (1): 24.
52.
ShawLois Banfill, ed. 1983. Unplanned careers: The working lives of middle-aged women. Lexington: Lexington Books.
53.
SheridanJeniffer T.1997. The effects of the determinants of women’s movement into and out of male-dominated occupations on occupational sex-segregation. CDE Working Paper 1997-07. Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
54.
SikoraJoanna. 2021. Does teenage interest in a teaching career lead to becoming a teacher? Evidence from Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education101 (May): 103315. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103315.
55.
StainbackKevinTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2012. Documenting desegregation: Racial and gender segregation in private-sector employment since the Civil Rights Act. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56.
ThébaudSarahTaylorCatherine J.2021. The specter of motherhood: Culture and the production of gendered career aspirations in science and engineering. Gender & Society35 (3): 395–421. doi:10.1177/08912432211006037.
57.
TorreMargarita. 2014. The scarring effect of “women’s work”: The determinants of women’s attrition from male-dominated occupations. Social Forces93 (1): 1–29.
58.
TorreMargarita. 2017. Attrition from male-dominated occupations. Variation among occupations and women. Sociological Perspectives60 (4): 665–84.
59.
TorreMargarita. 2019. Women in blue: Structural and individual determinants of sex segregation in blue-collar occupations. Gender & Society33 (3): 410–38.
VespaJonathan. 2009. Gender ideology construction: A life course and intersectional approach. Gender & Society23 (3): 363–87.
62.
XieYuKillewaldAlexandra A.2012. Is American science in decline?Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
63.
XieYuKillewaldAlexandra A.NearChristopher. 2016. Between- and within-occupation inequality: The case of high-status professions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science663 (1): 53–79.
64.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee A.2003. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
65.
ZhouMuzhi. 2017. Motherhood, employment, and the dynamics of women’s gender attitudes. Gender & Society31 (6): 751–76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
