In this study, I apply the perspective of gendered organizations to nursing and use ethnographically informed career biographies of nurse practitioners, a subset of highly credentialed nurses, to investigate the reproduction of gender by inclusionary institutional practices. My findings illustrate how nursing’s historically subordinate position as a female profession has led to institutional arrangements and aspirational resources for contemporary careers. Features such as flexible educational institutions and an extended credentials ladder allow women to recast structural constraints into individual possibilities. This recasting allows individuals to make careers but also recirculates notions of “flexible women” whose careers are institutionalized as secondary to family concerns.
AckerJoan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4 (2): 139-58.
2.
AckerJoan. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20:441-64.
3.
AllenDavina. 2004. Re-reading nursing and re-writing practice: Towards an empirically based reformulation of the nursing mandate. Nursing Inquiry11 (4): 271-83.
American Nurses Association. 1965. American Nurses Association’s first position on education for nursing. American Journal of Nursing65 (12): 106-11.
7.
AuerbachDavid I.BuerhausPeter I.StaigerDouglas O.. 2014. Registered nurses are delaying retirement, a shift that has contributed to recent growth in the nurse workforce. Health Affairs33 (8): 1474-80.
8.
AvellarSarahSmockPamela J.. 2003. Has the price of motherhood declined over time? A cross-cohort comparison of the motherhood wage penalty. Journal of Marriage and Family65 (3): 597-607.
9.
BellerAndrea H.1982. The impact of equal opportunity policy on sex differentials in earnings and occupations. American Economic Review72 (2): 171-75.
10.
BerryDaphneBellMyrtle P.. 2012. Inequality in organizations: Stereotyping, discrimination, and labor law exclusions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal31 (3): 236-48.
11.
Blair-LoyMary. 2005. Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Blair-LoyMaryWhartonAmy S.. 2002. Employees’ use of family-responsive policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces80 (3): 813-45.
13.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review66 (2): 204-25.
BykerTanya. 2016a. Paid parental leave laws in the United States: Does short-duration leave affect women’s labor-force attachment?American Economic Review106 (5): 242-46.
18.
BykerTanya. 2016b. The opt-out continuation: Education, work, and motherhood from 1984-2012. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2 (4): 34-70.
19.
ChaYoungjoo. 2013. Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & Society27 (2): 158-84.
20.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid. 2005. Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren. 2009. Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology114 (4): 924-76.
22.
CorrellShelley J.2001. Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology106 (6): 1691-730.
23.
CorrellShelley J.2004. Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review69 (1): 93-113.
24.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112 (5): 1297-338.
25.
CoserLewis A.1974. Greedy institutions; Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.
26.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.OvadiaSethVannemanReeve. 2001. The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces80 (2): 655-81.
27.
DamaskeSarah. 2011. For the family? How class and gender shape women’s work. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
DasTirthatanmoyPolachekSolomon W.. 2015. Unanticipated effects of California’s paid family leave program. Contemporary Economic Policy33 (4): 619-35.
29.
DingwallRobertAllenDavina. 2001. The implications of healthcare reforms for the profession of nursing. Nursing Inquiry8 (2): 64-74.
30.
DuffyRyan D.DikBryan J.StegerMichael F.. 2011. Calling and work-related outcomes: Career commitment as a mediator. Journal of Vocational Behavior78 (2): 210-18.
31.
EmersonRobert M.FretzRachel I.ShawLinda L.. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, 1st ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
EnglandPaula. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society24 (2): 149-66.
33.
EnglandPaulaBudigMichelleFolbreNancy. 2002. Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems49 (4): 455-73.
34.
EnglandPaulaAllisonPaulWuYuxiao. 2007. Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, does feminization reduce pay, and how can we tell with longitudinal data?Social Science Research36:1237-56.
35.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review96 (2): 1-21.
36.
GranfieldRobert. 1992. Making elite lawyers: Visions of law at Harvard and beyond. New York: Routledge.
37.
GuendelmanSylviaGoodmanJuliaKharraziMartinLahiffMaureen. 2014. Work–family balance after childbirth: The association between employer-offered leave characteristics and maternity leave duration. Maternal and Child Health Journal18 (1): 200-8.
38.
HakimCatherine. 2016. Key issues in women’s work: Female diversity and the polarisation of women’s employment, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
39.
HanShin-KapMoenPhyllis. 2001. Gendered careers: A life-course perspective. In Working families: The transformation of the American home, edited by HertzRosannaMarshallNancy L.. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
HanWen-JuiWaldfogelJane. 2003. Parental leave: The impact of recent legislation on parents’ leave taking. Demography40 (1): 191-200.
41.
Health Resources and Services Administration. 2010. The registered nurse population: Findings from the 2008 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
42.
HegewischArianeLiepmannHannah. 2013. Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap in the U.S. In Handbook of research on gender and economic life, edited by FigartDeborah M.WarneckeTonia L.. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
43.
HerrJane LeberWolframCatherine D.. 2012. Work environment and opt-out rates at motherhood across high-education career paths. ILR Review65 (4): 928-50.
44.
HineDarlene Clark. 1982. The Ethel Johns Report: Black women in the nursing profession, 1925. Journal of Negro History67 (3): 212-28.
45.
HofferthSandraCollinsNancy. 2000. Child care and employment turnover. Population Research and Policy Review19 (4): 357-95.
46.
JagsiReshmaTarbellNancy J.WeinsteinDebra F.. 2007. Becoming a doctor, starting a family—Leaves of absence from graduate medical education. New England Journal of Medicine357 (19): 1889-91.
KelloggKatherine C.2011. Challenging operations: Medical reform and resistance in surgery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
KellyErinDobbinFrank. 1999. Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. American Journal of Sociology105 (2): 455-92.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2002. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment to advanced practice nurses and physicians. Washington, DC: MedPac.
NelsonSiobanGordonSuzanne. 2006. Moving beyond the virtue script: Creating a knowledge based identity for nurses. In The complexities of care: Nursing reconsidered, edited by NelsonSiobhanGordonSuzanne. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
57.
PolachekSolomon William. 1981. Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure. Review of Economics and Statistics63 (1): 60-69.
58.
ReskinBarbara F.McBrierDebra Branch. 2000. Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review65 (2): 210-33.
59.
ReverbySusan. 1987. Ordered to care: The dilemma of American nursing, 1850-1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.. 2004. Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues60 (4): 683-700.
61.
SmithRyan A.2012. Money, benefits, and power: A test of the glass ceiling and glass escalator hypotheses. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science639 (1): 149-72.
62.
SpiveyChristy. 2005. Time off at what price? The effects of career interruptions on earnings. ILR Review59 (1): 119-40.
UsdanskyMargaret L.WolfDouglas A.. 2008. When child care breaks down: Mothers’ experiences with child care problems and resulting missed work. Journal of Family Issues29 (9): 1185-210.
65.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002. Projected Supply, Demand, and Shortages of Registered Nurses: 2000-2020. Washington, DC: Bureau of Health Professions.
66.
VERBI Software. 1989. MAXQDA. Berlin, Germany: Sozialforschung GmbH.
67.
WhartonAmy S.ChiversSarahBlair-LoyMary. 2008. Use of formal and informal work-family policies on the digital assembly line. Work and Occupations35 (3): 327-35.
68.
WilliamsChristine L.1992. The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems39 (3): 253-67.
69.
WilliamsChristine L.2013. The glass escalator: Revisited gender inequality in neoliberal times. Gender & Society27 (5): 609-29.
70.
WilliamsJoan C.2001. Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
WilliamsJoan C.Blair-LoyMaryBerdahlJennifer L.. 2013. Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 209-34.
72.
WingfieldAdia Harvey. 2009. Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society23 (1): 5-26.
