Why did gender inequality in secondary school access persist after Mexico made attendance compulsory in 1993? This research reveals an interaction between geography, poverty, and sibship structure in contributing to the underrepresentation of girls in Mexico's poorer southern states. Using regional and contextual information about enrollments and development, a multinomial logistic regression model is estimated. The results show that in addition to family and regional poverty, the position of girls within the sibship contributes to their remaining in or dropping out of school following the primary level and their likelihood of employment or domestic work as an alternative to schooling. The results have implications for Mexico's targeted approach to eliminating the effects of poverty on educational opportunity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berhman, Jere R.
, and Barbara L. Wolfe.1987. Investments in schooling in two generations in pre-revolutionary Nicaragua: The roles of family background and school supply.Journal of Development Economics27:395-419.
2.
Bellew, Rosemary
, and Elizabeth King. 1993. Educating women: Lessons from experience. In Women's education in developing countries: Barriers, benefits and policies, edited by Elizabeth King and M. Anne Hill.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Blake, Judith.
1989. Family size and achievement.Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Boserup, Ester.
1990. Economic change and the roles of women. In Persistent inequalities, edited by Irene Tinker.New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Buchman, Claudia.1996. The debt crisis, structural adjustment and women's education: Implications for status and social development.International Journal of Comparative Sociology37:5-29.
6.
Bustillo, Ines.
1993. Latin America and the Caribbean. In Women's education in developing countries: Barriers, benefits and policies, edited by Elizabeth King and M. Anne Hill.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Butcher, Kristin F.
, and Anne Case.1994. The effect of sibling sex composition on women's education and earnings.Quarterly Journal of Economics109:531-63.
8.
Cernea, Michael M.
1992. The building of blocks of participation: Testing bottom-up planning.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
9.
Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO).
1993. Indicadores Socioeconómicos e Indice de Marginación Municipal.Aguascalientes, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Población.
10.
Cortés Cáceres, Fernando
, and Rosa María Rubalcava Ramos. 1994. El ingreso de los hogares.Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografia e Informática.
11.
Dresser, Denisse.
1992. Pronasol y política: Combate a la pobreza como fórmula de gobernabilidad. In La pobreza en México. Causas y políticas para combatirla.Mexico City: Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
12.
Firestone, Shulamith.
1970. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution.New York: William Morrow.
13.
Graham, Carol.
1994. Safety nets, politics and the poor: Transitions to market economies.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
Greenhalgh, Susan.1985. Sexual stratification: The other side of “growth with equity” in east Asia.Population and Development Review11:265-314.
15.
Grosh, Margaret.
1995. Administering targeted social programs in Latin America: From platitudes to practice.World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
16.
Hartmann, Heidi I.1981. The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society6:366-94.
17.
Hartmann, Heidi I.
1994. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In Social stratification, edited by David Grusky.Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Herward, Christine.
1998. The new discourses of gender, education, and development. In Gender, education, and development, edited by Christine Heward and Sheila Bunwaree.New York: Zed Books.
19.
Herz, Barbara
, K. Subbarao, Habib Masooma, and Laura Raney. 1991. Letting girls learn: Promising approaches in primary and secondary education.World Bank Discussion Papers 133.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
20.
Hill, M. Anne
, and Elizabeth King. 1993. Women's education in development countries: An overview. In Women's education in developing countries: Barriers, benefits and policies, edited by Elizabeth King and M. Anne Hill.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Jimenez, Edgar.1991. Bases del Pensamiento Neoliberal.Ciencias Sociales51-52:113-20.
22.
Knaul, Felicia Marie
, and Susan W. Parker. 1998. Patterns over time and determinants of early labor force participation and school drop out: Evidence from longitudinal and retrospective data on Mexican children and youth. Paper presented at the meetings of the Population Association of America, Chicago.
23.
Langbein, Laura Irwin
, and Allan J. Lichtman. 1978. Ecological inference.Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Levy, Santiago.
1991. Poverty alleviation in Mexico.World Bank Working Papers, no. 679.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
25.
Lustig, Nora.1990. Economic crisis, adjustment and living standards in México 1982-1985.World Development18:1325-42.
26.
Marjoribanks, Kevin.1991. The sibling resource dilution theory: An analysis.Journal of Psychology125:337-46.
27.
Massiah, Jocelin.
1990. Defining women's work in the commonwealth Carribean. In Persistent inequalities, edited by Irene Tinker.New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Mexico.
1985. Informes de Gobierno.Poder Ejecutivo.Mexico.
29.
Mexico.
1989. Informes de Gobierno.Poder Ejecutivo.Mexico.
30.
Nord, Bruce.
1994. Mexican social policy: Affordability, conflict and progress.New York: University Press of America.
31.
Ornelas, Carlos.
1996. El sistema educativo Mexicano: La transición de fin de siglo.Mexico City, Mexico: Cide, Nafinsa, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
32.
Post, David
, and Suet-ling Pong.1998. The waning effect of sibship composition on school attainment in Hong Kong.Comparative Education Review42:99-117.
33.
Powell, Brian
, and Lala Carr Steelman.1989. The liability of having brothers: Paying for college and the sex composition of the family.Sociology of Education62:134-47.
34.
Powell, Brian
, and Lala Carr Steelman.1995. Feeling the pinch: Child spacing and constraints on parental economic investments in children.Social Forces73:1465-86.
35.
Prawda, Juan.
1987. Logros, inequidades y retos del sistema futuro del sistema educativo Mexicano.Mexico City, Mexico: Colección Pedagógica Grijalbo.
36.
Sassler, Sharon.1995. Trade-offs in the family: Sibling effects on daughters' activities in 1910.Demography32:557-75.
37.
Secretaria de Educación Pública (SEP).
1993. Ley General de Educación.Mexico City: Secretaria de Educación Pública.
38.
Sen, Amartya K.
1990. Gender and cooperative conflicts. In Persistent inequalities, edited by Irene Tinker.New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Sorokin, Pitirim.
1927. Social and cultural mobility.New York: Harper & Row.
40.
Stromquist, Nelly.
1989. Recent developments in women's education: Closer to a better social order? In The women and international development annual, Vol. 1, edited by Rita S. Gallin, M. Aronoff, and A. Ferguson.Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
Stromquist, Nelly.1995. Romancing the state: Gender and power in education.Comparative Education Review39:423-54.
42.
Stromquist, Nelly.
1998. Impact of structural adjustment programs in Africa and Latin America. In Gender, education, and development, edited by Christine Heward and Sheila Bunwaree.New York: Zed Books.
43.
Tinker, Irene.
1976. Women in developing societies: Economic independence is not enough. In Economic independence for women: The foundation for equal rights, edited by Jane Roberts Chapman.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Weber, Max.
1958. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, edited by Hans Gerth and C. W. Mills.New York: Oxford University Press.
