Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA) makes public works investments in distressed areas throughout the nation. In this study, these investments are found to have significantly positive effects on county employment levels after controlling for a variety of geographic, economic, and demographic factors. The investments have no significant effect on employee compensation. The estimates indicate that EDA public works investment provides counties with jobs at relatively low cost, suggesting that such investments are an effective means of job creation and retention in targeted counties. The article’s final section qualifies this conclusion somewhat, discussing the possibility that EDA investments act as a proxy for a coordinated local economic development strategy and evaluating the potential benefits of ameliorating regional decline.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaron, H. (1990). Discussion of “Why is infrastructure important?” In A. Munnell (Ed.), Is there a shortfall in public capital investment? (pp. 51-63). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Aschauer, D. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177-200.

Eberts, R. (1986). Estimating the contribution of public capital stock to metropolitan manufacturing production (Working Paper No. 8610). Cleveland, OH: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Gabriel, S. , Shack-Marquez, J. , & Wascher, W. (1993). Does migration arbitrage regional labor market differentials? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23(2), 211-234.

Garcia-Mila, T. , McGuire, T. , & Porter, R. (1996). The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 177-180.

Graham, R. , & Martin, R. (1977). The economic impact on local areas of the program of the Economic Development Administration. Washington, DC: Office of Economic Research, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Haughwout, A. (1998a). Aggregate production functions, interregional equilibrium, and the measurement of infrastructure productivity. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 216-227.

Haughwout, A. (1998b). Public infrastructure investments, productivity and welfare in fixed geographic areas [Mimeo]. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.

Haughwout, A. , & Inman, R. (1996). State and local assets and liabilities, 1972-1992 [Mimeo]. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.

10.

Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.

11.

Holtz-Eakin, D. (1993). State-specific estimates of state and local government capital. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23(2), 185-210.

12.

Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994). Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 12-21.

13.

Hulten, C. , & Schwab, R. (1991). Is there too little public capital? Paper presented at conference on Infrastructure Needs and Policy Options for the 1990s, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.

14.

Morrison, C. , & Schwartz, A. (1996). State infrastructure and productive performance. American Economic Review, 86, 1095-1111.

15.

Munnell, A. (1990). How does infrastructure affect regional economic performance? In A. Munnell (Ed.), Is there a shortfall in public capital investment? (pp. 69-103). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

16.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1990-1996). County business patterns computer files, 1988-1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

17.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1991). Census of population and housing, summary tape file 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

18.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration . (1997, May). Public Works Program performance evaluation, final report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.

19.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration . (1998, May). Public works program: Multiplier and employment generating effects, final report. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.

20.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Regional Economic Measurement Division . (1998, May). Regional economic information system CD-ROM. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

21.

Wheat, L. (1986). The determinants of 1963-77 regional manufacturing growth: Why the South and West grow. Journal of Regional Science, 26, 635-659.

New Estimates of the Impact of EDA Public Works Program Investments on County Labor Markets

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References