A Threshold Analysis of the Effect of House Prices on U.S. Local Labor Markets

Abstract

This paper uses a threshold regression model to examine whether the effect on total employment of an exogenous change in tradable sector employment differs in systematic ways depending on the average house price. The results based on data from 321 U.S. metropolitan areas suggest the presence of a threshold effect. The local employment multiplier increases with the average house price until some house price threshold level beyond it decreases, suggesting that affordable local housing markets not only help attract companies but also allow local economies to maximize the benefits from location-based development policies aimed at creating more jobs.

Keywords

house prices local labor markets tradable nontradable local employment multiplier threshold analysis J23 R11 R23 R31

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

(2022). Housing affordability and economic growth. Housing Policy Debate, 33(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2065328

Bartik

T. J.

(1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Bartik

T. J.

(2020). Using place-based jobs policies to help distressed communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.99

Bartik

T. J.

Sotherland

(2019). Local job multipliers in the United States: Variation with local characteristics and with high-tech shocks (Upjohn Institute Working Paper 19-301). W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://research.upjohn.org/up_workingpapers/301/ .

Glaeser

Gyourko

(2018). The economic implications of housing supply. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.1.3

Glaeser

E. L.

Gyourko

Saks

R. E.

(2006). Urban growth and housing supply. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi003

Hansen

B. E.

(1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica, 64(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171789

Hansen

B. E.

(2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00124

Jensen

N. M.

(2019). Five economic development takeaways from the Amazon HQ2 bids. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/ five-economic-development-takeaways-from-the-amazon-hq2-bids.

10.

Malas

(2019). California has the jobs but not enough homes. The Wall Street Journal. https://www. wsj.com/articles/california-has-the-jobs-but-not-enough-homes-11553007600 .

11.

Moretti

(2010). Local multipliers. American Economic Review, 100(2), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.373

12.

Moretti

(2011). Local labor markets. In Ashenfelter

Card

(Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1237–1313). Elsevier.

13.

Osei

M. J.

Sengupta

(2019). Heterogeneity in the local employment multipliers in the United States. Growth and Change, 50(3), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12319

14.

Osei

M. J.

Winters

J. V.

(2019). Labor demand shocks and housing prices across the United States: Does one size fit all? Economic Development Quarterly, 33(3), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419846371

15.

Partridge

M. D.

Rickman

D. S.

Rose Olfert

Tan

(2017). International trade and local labor markets: Do foreign and domestic shocks affect regions differently? Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw006

16.

Saks

R. E.

(2008). Job creation and housing construction: Constraints on metropolitan area employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(1), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.12.003

17.

van Dijk

J. J.

(2017). Local employment multipliers in U.S. Cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw010