The Impact of a State-Level,Place-Based Economic Development Program: A Difference-in-Differences Approach

Abstract

This analysis uses a difference-in-differences approach to examine the impact of the Regional Cities Initiative (RCI) on economic development outcomes in counties that participated in the program relative to those that did not participate. The RCI was a place-based economic development program that was implemented in Indiana beginning in 2015. Through a competitive process, this program provided funding for projects meant to improve the quality of life in three regions of the state. The results indicate that participating counties had higher gross domestic product growth and higher employment growth than nonparticipating counties. There is limited evidence that the program had a positive impact on population growth. There were no discernable effects on house prices or earnings.

Keywords

local economic development place-based policy Regional Cities Initiative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

Glaeser

Summers

(2018). Jobs for the heartland: Place-based policies in 21^st-century America. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2018(1), 151–255. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2018.0002

Bartik

T. J.

(1994). Jobs, productivity, and local economic development: What implications does economic research have for the role of government? National Tax Journal, 47(4), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789113

Betz

M. R.

Partridge

M. D.

Kraybill

D. S.

Lobao

(2012). Why do localities provide economic development incentives? Geographic competition, political constituencies, and government capacity. Growth and Change, 43(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2012.00590.x

Cameron

A. C.

Gelbach

J. B.

Miller

D. L.

(2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(2), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2010.07136

Cook

Schneider

(2016). The relationship between Gov. Mike Pence and House Speaker Brian Bosma? It’s complicated. Indianapolis Star. https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/02/relationship-between-gov-mike-pence-and-house-speaker-brian-bosma-s-complicated/78137158/

Elvery

J. A.

(2009). The impact of enterprise zones on resident employment an evaluation of the enterprise zone programs of California and Florida. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408326994

Freedman

(2015). Place-based programs and the geographic dispersion of employment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.04.002

Freyaldenhoven

Hansen

Perez

J. P.

Shapiro

J.M.

(2021). Visualization, identification, and estimation in the linear panel event-study design [Working Paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29170

Glaeser

E. L.

Gottlieb

J. D.

(2008). The economics of place-making policies. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(1), 155–253. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0005

10.

Goodman-Bacon

(2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014

11.

Ham

J. C.

Swenson

Imrohoroglu

Song

(2011). Government programs can improve local labor markets: Evidence from state enterprise zones, federal empowerment zones and federal enterprise community. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.027

12.

Hanson

(2009). Local employment, poverty, and property value effects of geographically targeted tax incentives: An instrumental variables approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(6), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.07.002

13.

Hanson

Rohlin

(2013). Do spatially targeted redevelopment programs spillover? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.05.002

14.

Hanson

Rohlin

(2011a). Do location-based tax incentives attract new business establishments? Journal of Regional Science, 51(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00704.x

15.

Hanson

Rohlin

(2011b). The effect of location-based tax incentives on establishment location and employment across industry sectors. Public Finance Review, 39(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110389602

16.

Heckman

J. J.

Hotz

V. J.

(1989). Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(408), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478848

17.

Heupel

Hicks

(2013). The future of state and local economic development policy [White Paper]. Ball State University, Center for Business and Economic Research.

18.

Hicks

M. J.

(2017). Regional cities initiative: Preliminary economic impacts [Policy Brief]. Ball State University, Center for Business and Economic Research. https://projects.cberdata.org/130/regional-cities-initiative-preliminary-economic-impacts

19.

Hicks

M. J.

LaFaive

(2011). The influence of targeted economic development tax incentives on county economic growth: Evidence from Michigan’s MEGA credits. Economic Development Quarterly, 25(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242410395135

20.

Hicks

M. J.

Terrell

Heupel

(2015). Regional cities, small towns, and rural places: Policy Issues for Indiana [White Paper]. Ball State University, Center for Business and Economic Research.

21.

Hotchkiss

Moore

Zobay

(2003). Impact of the 1996 summer Olympic games on employment and wages in Georgia. Southern Economic Journal, 69(3), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061702

22.

Indiana Economic Development Corporation. (2015). Indiana Regional Cities Initiative Evaluation Criteria. file:///C:/Users/dgfaulk/Downloads/Regional%20Cities%20Evaluation%20Criteria.pdf.

23.

Kline

Moretti

(2013). People, places and public policy: Some simple welfare economics of local economic development programs (Working Paper No. 19659). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19659

24.

Krupka

D. J.

Noonan

D. S.

(2009). Empowerment zones, neighborhood change and owner-occupied housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.03.001

25.

Leonard

Yang

Zhang

Reed

(2020). Impact of property tax abatement on employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 34(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242420911712

26.

Morin

Partridge

(2020). The impact of small regional economic development commissions: Is there any bang after just a few bucks? Economic Development Quarterly, 35(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242420972475

27.

Neu

(2018). Qualitative impacts of the Regional Cities Initiative: Outcomes from the northeast, north central and southwest regions [Policy Brief]. Ball State University, Indiana Communities Institute. https://projects.cberdata.org/156/qualitative-impacts-of-the-regional-cities-initiative

28.

Neumark

Kolko

(2010). Do enterprise zones create jobs? Evidence from California’s enterprise zone program. Journal of Urban Economics, 68(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.01.002

29.

Neumark

Young

(2021). Heterogeneous effects of state enterprise zone programs in the shorter run and longer run. Economic Development Quarterly, 35(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242420982341

30.

O’Keefe

S. M.

(2004). Job creation in California's enterprise zones: A comparison using a propensity score matching model. Journal of Urban Economics, 55(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2003.08.002

31.

Papke

(1994). Tax policy and urban-development – evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)90069-8

32.

Partridge

M. D.

Rickman

D. S.

Olfert

M. R.

Tan

(2015). When spatial equilibrium fails: Is place-based policy second best? Regional Studies, 49(8), 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.837999

33.

Patrick

(2016). Jobless capital? The role of capital subsidies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 60, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.07.009

34.

Reynolds

C. L.

Rohlin

S. M.

(2015). The effects of location-based tax policies on the distribution of household income: Evidence from the federal empowerment zone program. Journal of Urban Economics, 88, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.04.003

35.

Slattery

Zidar

(2020). Evaluating state and local business incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.34.2.90

36.

Sun

Abraham

(2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006

37.

White

(1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB