The authors estimate the value of public infrastructure using a panel of rural and urban counties in the United States from 1970 to 2012. Regression estimates imply public infrastructure increases employment more in urban counties, while improving property values more in rural ones; positive effects on income are similar. Spatial equilibrium modeling suggests public capital has similar quality-of-life and productivity benefits in urban and rural areas but does more to reduce costs of providing housing in urban ones. While public investments in rural and urban counties appear to pass conventional cost–benefit tests, dollar-per-dollar they are more valuable in urban counties.
AlbouyD. (2009). The unequal geographic burden of federal taxation. Journal of Political Economy, 117(4), 635-667. https://doi.org/10.1086/605309
2.
AlbouyD. (2016). What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity, and the total value of amenities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00550
3.
AlbouyD.EhrlichG. (2018). Housing productivity and the social cost of land-use restrictions. Journal of Urban Economics, 107, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.06.002
4.
AlbouyD.FarahaniA. (2017). Valuing public goods more generally: The case of infrastructure (Working Paper No. 17–272). W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://research.upjohn.org/up_workingpapers/272/
5.
AlbouyD.StuartB. (2020). Urban population and amenities: The neoclassical model of location. International Economic Review, 61(1), 127-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12419
AtlasC. M.GilliganT. W.HendershottR. J.ZupanM. A. (1995). Slicing the federal government net spending pie: Who wins, who loses, and why. American Economic Review, 85(3), 624-629. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118192
8.
BartikT. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780585223940
9.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
10.
BomP. R. D.LigthartJ. E. (2014). What have we learned from three decades of research on the productivity of public capital. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(5), 577-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12037
BrownR. H.BarramD. J.EhrlichE. M.ScarrH. A. (1994). Chapter 12 The Urban and Rural Classifications. InGeographic areas reference manual.U.S. Census Bureau.1-24. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/GARM/Ch12GARM.pdf
ConleyT. G. (2008). Spatial econometrics. In Durlauf S. N.BlumeL. E. (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 1-9). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
HaughwoutA. (2002). Public infrastructure investments, productivity and welfare in fixed geographic areas. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00164-X
17.
HaughwoutA.InmanR. (1996). State and local assets and liabilities, 1972–1992. Unpublished paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
18.
Holtz-EakinD. (1994). Public-Sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 503-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109822
19.
KlineP.MorettiE. (2014). People, places, and public policy: Some simple welfare economics of local economic development policies. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 629-662. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041024
20.
LewisJ.SeverniniE. (2020). Short- and long-run impacts of rural electrification: Evidence from the historical rollout of the U.S. power grid. Journal of Development Economics, 143, 102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102412
21.
NotowidigdoM. (2020). The incidence of local labor demand shocks. Journal of Labor Economics, 38(3), 687-725. https://doi.org/10.1086/706048
22.
Office of Management and Budget. (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas.Federal Register, 65(249), 82228-82238. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/00-32997
23.
RobackJ. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1257-1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/261120
24.
Suárez SerratoJ. C.ZidarO. (2016). Who benefits from state corporate tax cuts? A local labor markets approach with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 106(9), 2582-2624. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141702
25.
SyllaR. E.LeglerJ. B.WallisJ. (2006). State and local government [United States]: Sources and uses of funds, census statistics, twentieth century [through 1982]. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06304.v1
26.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2020). Table 7.1. Current-Cost Net Stock of Government Fixed Assets (accessed September 1, 2020).U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=10&step=2#reqid=10&step=2
27.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Census Summary File 1 Table P2 Urban and Rural (accessed July 20, 2020).U.S. Census Bureau.https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2010/dec/summary-file-1.html
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
