This study extends art-related development literature by examining the causal relationships among artists, knowledge-class workers, and local income growth through direct and indirect paths. The units of analysis are 260 metropolitan statistical areas in the United States from 2001 to 2012. The results suggest that arts industries directly enhance the local economy. The arts industries also indirectly enhance the local economy through the accumulation of a knowledge-class workforce.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
3.
AtkinsonR.EasthopeH. (2009). The consequences of the creative class: The pursuit of creativity strategies in Australia’s cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 64-79.
4.
BarroJ.Sala-I-MartinX. (1992). Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 59, 645-661.
5.
BellD. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BlumenfeldH. (1971). The economic base of the metropolis: Critical remarks on the “basic–non-basic” concept. In SpreiregenP. D. (Ed.), The modern metropolis, its origins, growth, characteristics, and planning: Selected essays by Hans Blumenfeld (pp. 331-368). Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
BorénT.YoungC. (2013). The migration dynamics of the “creative class”: Evidence from a study of artists in Stockholm, Sweden. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 195-210.
8.
BoschmaR. A.FritschM. (2009). Creative class and regional growth: Empirical evidence from seven European countries. Economic Geography, 85, 391-423.
9.
BoveV.EliaL. (2017). Migration, diversity, and economic growth. World Development, 89, 227-239.
10.
CastellsM. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11.
CastellsM. (2000). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
DelgadoM.PorterM. E.SternS. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495-518.
14.
DelgadoM.PorterM. E.SternS. (2012). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. (NBER Working Paper No. 18250). Retrieved from the National Bureau of Economic Research website http://www.nber.org/papers/w18250
15.
DoneganM.DruckerJ.GoldsteinH.LoweN.MaliziaE. (2008). Which indicators explain metropolitan economic performance best? Traditional or creative class. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 180-195.
16.
DruckerP. F. (1983). Concept of the corporation. New York, NY: New American Library.
17.
FeldmanM.P.MartinR. (2005). Constructing jurisdictional advantage. Research Policy, 34, 1235-1249.
18.
FloridaR. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
FloridaR. (2005). Cities and creative classes. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
FloridaR. (2007). The flight of the creative class. London, England: HarperCollins.
21.
FloridaR.MellanderC.StolarickK. M. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 615-649.
22.
GarofaloA.YamarikS. (2002). Regional convergence: Evidence from a new state-by-state capital stock series. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 316-323.
23.
GemmellN.KnellerR.SanzI. (2016). Does the composition of government expenditure matter for long-run GDP levels? Oxford Bulletin ofEconomics and Statistics, 78, 0305-9049.
24.
GibsonL. J. (2004). Economic base theory and applied geography. In BaillyA.GibsonL. J. (Eds.), Applied geography (pp. 113-131). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
HabibM.M.MilevaE.StraccaL. (2017). The real exchange rate and economic growth: Revisiting the case using external instruments. Journal of International Money and Finance, 73, 386-398.
27.
Holtz-EakinD. (1993). State-specific estimates of state and local government capital. Regional Science & Urban Economics, 23, 185-210.
28.
Holtz-EakinD.NeweyW.RosenH. (1998). Estimating vector auto regression with panel data. Econometrica, 56, 1371-1395.
29.
HoustonD.FindlayA.HarrisonR.MasonC. (2008). Will attracting the “creative class” boost economic growth in old industrial regions? A case study of Scotland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B: Human Geography, 90, 133-149.
30.
KetelsC.MemedovicO. (2008). From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1, 375-392.
31.
KlamerA.PetrovaL. (2007). Financing the arts: The consequences of interaction among artists, financial support, and creativity motivation. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 37, 245-256.
32.
KnellerR.BleaneyM.F.GemmellN. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD counties. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 171-190.
33.
LeeG.PerryJ. (2002). Are computers boosting productivity? A test of the paradox in state governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 77-102.
34.
LeighN. G.BlakelyE. J. (2012). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
LeslieD.CantungalJ. (2012). Social justice and the creative city: Class, gender, and racial inequities. Geography Compass, 6, 111-122.
36.
LoboJ.RantisiN. (1999). Investment in infrastructure as determinant of metropolitan productivity. Growth and Change, 30, 106-127.
37.
LoweN.FeldmanM.P. (2018). Breaking the waves: Innovating at the intersections of economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 32, 183-194.
38.
MaliziaE.E. (1994). A redefinition of economic development. Economic Development Review, 12, 83-83.
39.
MaliziaE.FeserJ. (1999). Understanding local economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Planning Research.
40.
MarkusenA. (2006). Urban development and politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, 1921-1940.
41.
MarkusenA.SchrockG. (2006). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43, 1661-1686.
42.
McGranahanD.WojanT. (2007). Recasting the creative class to examine growth processes in rural and urban counties. Regional Studies, 41, 197-216.
43.
McLeanM. L.VoytekK. P. (1992). Understanding your economy: Using analysis to guide local strategic planning. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
44.
MellanderC.FloridaR.StolarickK. (2011). Here to stay – The effects of community satisfaction on the decision to stay. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6, 5-24.
45.
MoomawR.MullenK.WilliamsM. (2002). Human and knowledge capital: A contribution to the empirics of state economic growth. American Economic Journal, 30, 48-59.
46.
MorettiE. (2013). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Mariner Books.
NelsonA.LangR. (2011). Megapolitan America. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association Press.
49.
NelsonA. C.DawkinsC. J.GanningJ. P.KittrellK. G.EwingR. (2016). The association between professional performing arts and knowledge class growth: Implications for metropolitan economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 33, 88-98.
50.
OttL.R.LongneckerM. (2001). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
51.
PeckJ. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 740-770.
52.
PorterM.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
53.
PorterM. E. (1998). Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments, and institutions. In PorterM. E. (Ed.), On competition (pp. 197-299). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
54.
PorterM. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.
55.
RauschS.NegreyC. (2006). Does the creative engine run? A consideration of the effect of the creative class on economic strength and growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 473-489.
56.
ReichR. (1993). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. London, England: Simon & Schuster.
57.
RoodmanD. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9, 86-136.
58.
RosenfieldS. (2004). Art and design as competitive advantage: A creative enterprise cluster in the Western United States. European Planning Studies, 12, 891-904.
59.
ScottA. (2006). Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 1-17.
60.
ShawS. (2015). Art crawls: Locating artists and audiences in the creative city. Ethnography, 16, 51-73.
61.
ShearmurR. (2007). The new knowledge aristocracy: The creative class, mobility, and urban growth. Work Organization, Labor, and Globalization, 1, 31-47.
62.
SrithongrungA. (2008). The impacts of state capital management programs on state economic performance. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28, 83-107.
63.
SrithongrungA.KrizK. (2014). The impact of sub-national fiscal policies on economic growth: A dynamic analysis approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Managememt, 33, 912-928.
64.
StarkD. (2011). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
StenholmP.AcsZ.WuebkerR. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurship activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 176-193.
66.
StormR.FeiockR. (1999). Economic development consequences of state support for higher education. State and Local Government Review, 31, 97-105.
67.
SwannP. (1992). The dynamics of industrial clusters. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
68.
TomljanovichM. (2004). The role of state fiscal policy in state economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, 318-330.
69.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2016). Fixed assets tables. Suitland, MD: Author.
