The authors take up two questions that have not been explored in research on enterprise zones. First, does a considerably longer-run perspective on the effects of state enterprise zones lead to different answers? And second, are there heterogeneous effects of enterprise zones that depend on the set of incentives these programs offer, which can vary widely? The results indicate that whether state enterprise zone programs were observed through a longer-term lens, or through the lens of program heterogeneity, the authors generally did not find any consistent indication of beneficial effects of state enterprise zone programs; if anything, the longer-run effects are negative. The lack of positive effects is consistent with most of the prior evidence that focuses on effects that are short term and homogeneous.
BartikT. J. (2020). Smart place-based policies can improve local labor markets. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 844-851. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22224
BoarnetM. G.BogartW. T. (1996). Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Urban Economics, 40(2), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.0029
6.
BondonioD.EngbergJ. (2000). Enterprise zones and local employment: Evidence from the states’ programs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(5), 519-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00042-9
7.
BurnesD. (2012). An empirical analysis of the capitalization of enterprise zone tax incentives into commercial property values [Unpublished manuscript]. University of California, Irvine.
8.
BussoM.GregoryJ.KlineP. (2013). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place-based policy. American Economic Review, 103(2), 897-947. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.2.897
EasterlyW. (2009). Empirics of strategic interdependence: The case of the racial tipping point. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 9(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1492
13.
ElveryJ. (2009). The impact of enterprise zones on residential employment: An evaluation of the enterprise zone programs of California and Florida. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408326994
14.
FreedmanM. (2012). Teaching new markets old tricks: The effects of subsidized investment on low-income neighborhoods. Journal of Public Economics, 96(11-12), 1000-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.006
15.
FreedmanM. (2013). Targeted business incentives and local labor markets. Journal of Human Resources, 48(2), 311-344. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2013.0008
16.
GobillonL.MagnacT.SelodH. (2012). Do unemployed workers benefit from enterprise zones: The French experience. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9-10), 881-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.06.003
17.
GreenbaumR.EngbergJ. B. (2004). The impact of state enterprise zones on urban manufacturing establishments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20006
18.
HamJ.SwensonC.İmrohoroğluA.SongH. (2011). Government programs can improve local labor markets: Evidence from state enterprise Zones, federal Empowerment Zones and federal Enterprise Communities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.027
KlineP.MorettiE. (2014). Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 275-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt034
21.
KolkoJ.NeumarkD. (2010). Do some enterprise zones create jobs?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20477
22.
LandersJ. (2006). Why don’t enterprise zones work? Estimates of the extent that EZ benefits are capitalized into property values. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 36(1), 15-30. http://www.jrap-journal.org/pastvolumes/2000/v36/F36-1-2.pdf
23.
LoganJ. R.ZhangC. (2010). Global neighborhoods: New pathways to diversity and separation. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1069-1109. https://doi.org/10.1086/649498
24.
MeltzerR. (2012). Understanding business improvement district formation: An analysis of neighborhoods and boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.08.005
25.
NeumarkD. (2018). Rebuilding Communities Job Subsidies. In ShambaughJ.NunnR. (Eds.), Place-based policies for shared economic growth (pp. 71-121). Brookings Institution.
NeumarkD.KolkoJ. (2010). Do enterprise zones create jobs? Evidence from California’s enterprise zone program. Journal of Urban Economics, 68(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.01.002
28.
NeumarkD.SimpsonH. (2015). Place-based policies. In DurantonG.HendersonV.StrangeW. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5, pp. 1197-1287). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59531-7.00018-1
OakleyD.TsaoH.-S. (2006). A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal Empowerment Zone program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(5), 443-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00309.x
31.
OakleyD.TsaoH.-S. (2007). Socioeconomic gains and spillover effects of geographically targeted initiatives to combat economic distress: An examination of Chicago’s Empowerment Zone. Cities, 24(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.10.003
32.
O’KeefeS. (2004). Job creation in California’s enterprise zones: A comparison using a propensity score matching model. Journal of Urban Economics, 55(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2003.08.002
33.
PapkeL. (1994). Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)90069-8
34.
ReynoldsC. L.RohlinS. (2015). The effects of location-based tax policies on the distribution of household income: Evidence from the federal Empowerment Zone program. Journal of Urban Economics, 88(July), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.04.003
35.
SwensonC. (2008). Characteristics of State Enterprise Zone Programs. Unpublished paper, University of Southern California.
36.
WilderM.RubinB. (1996). Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 472-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975713
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
