The targeting of economic development incentives at distressed locations or particular industries is typically justified based on equity and efficiency grounds. However, existing empirical studies fail to fully explain the distribution of incentives in a region or state because they do not account for variations in the distribution of population or industries. This article contributes to the literature on the targeting of incentives in several important ways, using the example of Ohio. The distribution of economic incentives is examined using the intensity of incentives, which allows for examination of whether incentives are targeted to distressed locations or industries. Intensity of incentives is measured as the value or number of incentives weighted by the number of employees and firms in each location or industry. We find that policies are missing the mark if they are indeed intended to target areas of distress or particular industries.
Anderson, J.E., & Wassmer, R.W. ( 1995). The decision to "bid for business": Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 739-757.
2.
Baldwin, R.E., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2007). Entry and asymmetric lobbying: Why governments pick losers. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 1064-1093.
3.
Bartik, T.J. ( 1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Bondonio, D., & Greenbaum, R.T. (2007). Do local tax incentives affect economic growth? What mean impacts miss in the analysis of enterprise zone policies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 121-136.
5.
Buss, T.F. ( 1999). The case against targeted industry strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 339-356.
6.
Byrnes, P., Marvel, M.K., & Sridhar, K. ( 1999). An equilibrium model of tax abatement: City and firm characteristics as determinants of abatement generosity. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 805-819.
7.
Citron, M. ( 2008). Predicting job creation and retention in Ohio Community Reinvestment Area agreements. Unpublished thesis, The John Glenn School of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University. Columbus.
8.
Coulton, C., & Hollister, R. ( 1998). Measuring comprehensive community initiative outcomes using data available for small areas. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
9.
Courant, P.N. ( 1994). How would you know a good economic development policy if you tripped over one? Hint: Don’t just count jobs. National Tax Journal, 47, 863-861.
10.
Donovan, T. ( 1993). Community controversy and the adoption of economic development policies. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 386-402.
11.
Feiock, R.C., & Clingermayer, J. (1986). Municipal representation, executive power, and economic development policy activity. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 211-229.
12.
Fisher, L. ( 2008). Ohio, home of innovation & opportunity: A strategic plan for the Ohio Department of Development. Columbus: Ohio Department of Development.
13.
Fisher, P. ( 2007). The fiscal consequences of competition for capital. In A. Markusen (Ed.), Reining in the competition for capital (pp. 57-85). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
14.
Fisher, P., & Peters, A. ( 1998). Industrial incentives: Competition among American states and cities. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
15.
Fitzgerald, J., & Leigh, N.G. ( 2002). Economic revitalization: Cases & strategies for city and suburbs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Fleischmann, A., Green, G.P., & Kwong, T.M. ( 1992). What’s a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. Western Political Quarterly , 45, 677-699.
17.
Green, G.P., & Fleischmann, A. (1991). Promoting economic development: A comparision of central cities, suburbs, and nonmetropolitan communities . Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 145-154.
18.
Greenbaum, R.T. ( 2004). Siting it right: Do states target economic distress when designating Enterprise Zones? Economic Development Quarterly , 18, 67-80.
19.
Greenbaum, R.T., & Bondonio, D. ( 2004). Losing focus: A comparative evaluation of spatially targeted economic revitalization programs in the US and the EU. Regional Studies, 38, 319-334.
20.
Greenbaum, R.T., & Engberg, J.B. ( 2004). The impact of state enterprise zones on manufacturing establishments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 23, 315-339.
21.
Gyourko, J. ( 1998). Place-based aid versus people-based aid and the role of an urban audit in a new urban strategy. Cityscape, 3, 205-229.
22.
Hultquist, A. ( 2007). An evaluation and comprison of geographically targeted economic development programs in Ohio and Piedmont, Italy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. Columbus.
23.
Krueger, A.O. ( 1990). Asymmetries in policy between exportables and import competing goods. In R. W. Jones and A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of international trade: Essays in honor of Robert E. Baldwin (pp. 161-178). Cambridge, MA, Blackwell.
24.
Ladd, H. ( 1994). Spatially-targeted economic development policies: Do they work? Cityscape, 1, 193-218.
25.
Levitan, S.A., & Miller, E.I. ( 1992). Enterprise zones are no solution for our blighted areas . Challenge, 35, 4-8.
26.
Markusen, A. ( 2004). Targeting occupations in regional and community economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association , 70, 253-268.
27.
Markusen, A., & Glasmeier, A. ( 2008). Overhauling and revitalizing federal economic development programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 83-91.
28.
McMillion, C.W. ( 2008). Ohio’s job losses: 2000 to 2007 worst losses since the depression. Washington, DC: MBG Information Services.
29.
Niquette, M. ( 2009, January 25). Can Gov. Strickland right the ship?The Columbus Dispatch, pp. A1, A12.
30.
The Ohio ES202 Network. (2008). Ohio urban university program. Cleveland, OH: Author. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.ohioes202network.org/
31.
Partridge, M.D., & Rickman, D.S. ( 2006). The geography of American poverty. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
32.
Pelissero, J.P., & Fasenfest, D. ( 1989). A typology of suburban economic development policy orientations . Economic Development Quarterly, 3, 301-311.
33.
Pepper, J.V. ( 2002). Robust infereneces from random clustered samples: An application using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Economics Letters, 75, 341-345.
34.
Peters, A.H., & Fisher, P.S. ( 2002). State enterprise zone programs: Have they worked?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
35.
Peters, A., & Fisher, P. ( 2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 27-37.
36.
Porter, M. ( 1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
37.
Reese, L.A. ( 1991). Municipal fiscal health and tax abatement policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 5(1), 23-32.
38.
Reese, L.A. ( 2006). Not just another determinants piece: Path dependency and local tax abatements. Review of Policy Research, 23, 491-504.
39.
Reese, L.A., & Sands, G. ( 2008). Creative class and economic prosperity: Old nostrums, better packaging?Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 3-7.
40.
Rubin, H.J. ( 1986). Local economic development organizations and the activities of small cities in encouraging economic growth. Policy Studies Journal, 14, 363-388.
41.
Schwartz, D., Pelzman, J., & Keren, M. ( 2008). The ineffective-ness of location incentive programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 167-179.
42.
Sharp, E.B. ( 1991). Institutional manifestations of accessibility and urban economic development polity. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 129-147.
43.
Vey, J.S. ( 2007). Restoring prosperity: The state role in revitalizing America’s older industrial cities. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program .
44.
White, S.B., Zipp, J.F., McMahon, W.F., Reynolds, P.D., Osterman, J.D., & Binkley, L.S. ( 1990). ES202: The data base for local employment analysis. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 240-253.
45.
Wolman, H., & Spitzley, D. ( 1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150.
46.
Wooldridge, M. ( 2003). Cluster sample methods in applied economics. American Economic Review, 93, 133-138.
