Looking at Our STEM Teacher Workforce: How to Model Self-Efficacy

Abstract

There is currently a severe shortage of teachers in the U.S. workforce. The problem is especially acute among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teachers and exacerbated by high turnover among new teachers—those with less than 5 years of teaching experience. In this article, the authors investigate one piece of the puzzle. The authors model a social cognitive approach to understanding self-efficacy, a key precursor to job performance and retention. Their interactionist approach accounts for both demographic (i.e., gender and age) and relational variables (i.e., social networks). The authors test their ideas on a sample of 159 STEM teachers across five geographic regions in the United States. Their analysis reveals patterned differences in self-efficacy across gender that are contingent on the communities of practice in which the teachers are embedded. Together, their theory and findings highlight the value of taking a holistic, interactionist view in explaining STEM teacher self-efficacy.

Keywords

STEM teachers gender age social networks self-efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.

Bandura

(1997). The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura

(2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In Locke

(Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 120-136). Blackwell.

Bandura

(2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Pajares

Urdan

T. C.

(Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Information Age. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanduraGuide2006.pdf

Bandura

(2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606

Bandura

(2013). Social cognitive theory. In Kessler

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (Vol. 1, pp. 711-715). Sage.

Bandura

(2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280

Basow

S. A.

(2000). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students’ choices. Sex Roles, 43(5-6), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026655528055

10.

Baù

Sieger

Eddleston

K. A.

Chirico

(2017). Fail but try again? The effects of age, gender, and multiple-owner experience on failed entrepreneurs’ reentry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 909-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12233

11.

Borgatti

S. P.

Ofem

(2010). Overview: Social network theory and analysis. In Daly

A. J.

(Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 17-31). Harvard Education Press.

12.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Ronfeldt

Wyckoff

(2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20545

13.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669628

14.

Cancian

F. M.

Oliker

S. J.

(2000). Caring and gender. AltaMira Press.

15.

Coburn

C. E.

Mata

W. S.

Choi

(2013). The embeddedness of teachers’ social networks: Evidence from a study of mathematics reform. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 311-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713501147

16.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

17.

Cross

Laseter

Parker

Velasquez

(2006). Using social network analysis to improve communities of practice. California Management Review, 49(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166370

18.

Dellinger

A. B.

Bobbett

J. J.

Olivier

D. F.

Ellett

C. D.

(2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010

19.

Eccles

(1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x

20.

Ellemers

(2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

21.

Ellis

McFadden

Anwar

Roehrig

(2015). Investigating the social interactions of beginning teachers using a video annotation tool. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 404-421.

22.

Ensher

E. A.

Murphy

S. E.

(1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460-481. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.1547

23.

Fiedler

(2018). The creative cycle and the growth of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 433-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617745651

24.

Fields

D. L.

Blum

T. C.

(1997). Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2<181::AID-JOB799>3.0.CO;2-M

25.

Garcia

Weiss

(2019). US schools struggle to hire and retain teachers: The second report in “The perfect storm in the teacher labor market” Series. Economic Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598209.pdf

26.

Hansen

Levesque

Valant

Quintero

(2018). The 2018 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning? The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018-Brown-Center-Report-on-American-Education_FINAL1.pdf

27.

Ingersoll

R. M.

Strong

(2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323

28.

Joshi

Dencker

J. C.

Franz

Martocchio

J. J.

(2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392-414. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51141800

29.

Justo

DeTienne

D. R.

Sieger

(2015). Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 775-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.04.004

30.

Kirchhoff

Lawrenz

(2011). The use of grounded theory to investigate the role of teacher education on STEM teachers’ career paths in high-need schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110397840

31.

Klassen

R. M.

Chiu

M. M.

(2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

32.

Levant

R. F.

(2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. American Psychologist, 66(8), 765-776. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025034

33.

Lévesque

Minniti

(2011). Age matters: How demographics influence aggregate entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.117

34.

Lorber

(2014). The social construction of gender. In Ore

(Ed.), The social construction of difference and inequality: Race, class, gender, and sexuality (pp. 112-119). McGraw-Hill Education.

35.

Lowman

(1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

36.

Luft

J. A.

Roehrig

G. H.

Patterson

N. C.

(2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices and beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10061

37.

Lyons

Kuron

(2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139-S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913

38.

Marlow

Patton

(2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 717-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00105.x

39.

McFadden

Ellis

Anwar

Roehrig

(2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of a digital video annotation tool to promote reflective practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2

40.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

41.

Mehra

Borgatti

S. P.

Soltis

Floyd

Halgin

D. S.

Ofem

Lopez-Kidwell

(2014). Imaginary worlds: Using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. In Brass

D. J.

Labianca

Mehra

Halgin

D. S.

Borgatti

S. P.

(Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks (pp. 315-336). Emerald Group.

42.

Newman

Ucbasaran

Zhu

F. E. I.

Hirst

(2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120-S138. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1916

43.

Oakley

(2016). Sex, gender and society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315243399

44.

O’Connor

K. E.

(2008). You choose to care: Teachers, emotions and professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.008

45.

Parker

S. K.

(1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835-852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835

46.

Pedota

(2015). How can student success support teacher self-efficacy and retention? Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.998600

47.

Peters

Ryan

M. K.

Haslam

S. A.

(2015). Marines, medics, and machismo: Lack of fit with masculine occupational stereotypes discourages men’s participation. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12106

48.

Pfeffer

(2013). Organizational demography. In Kessler

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (Vol. 1, pp. 540-542). Sage.

49.

Polizzi

S. J.

Jaggernauth

Ray

H. E.

Callahan

Rushton

G. T.

(2015). Highly qualified or highly unqualified? A longitudinal study of America’s public high school biology teachers. BioScience, 65(8), 812-821. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv093

50.

Riggs

J. M.

(1997). Mandates for mothers and fathers: Perceptions of breadwinners and care givers. Sex Roles, 37(7-8), 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025611119822

51.

Rigotti

Schyns

Mohr

(2008). A short version of the occupational self-efficacy scale: Structural and construct validity across five countries. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 238-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707305763

52.

Rodriguez

A. C.

(2019). Please don’t go: An examination of teacher retention in high needs schools (Publication No. 13895521) [Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Long Beach]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

53.

Roehrig

G. H.

Donna

J. D.

Billington

B. L.

Hoelscher

(2015). Design of online induction programs to promote reform-based science and mathematics teaching. Teacher Education & Practice, 28(1-2), 286-303.

54.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4-36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813

55.

Rushton

G. T.

Ray

H. E.

Criswell

B. A.

Polizzi

S. J.

Bearss

C. J.

Levelsmier

Kirchhoff

(2014). Stemming the diffusion of responsibility: A longitudinal case study of America’s chemistry teachers. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14556341

56.

Scherer

Siddiq

(2015). Revisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(December), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038

57.

Siciliano

M. D.

(2016). It’s the quality not the quantity of ties that matters: Social networks and self-efficacy beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 227-262. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216629207

58.

StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. Author.

59.

Sutcher

Darling-Hammond

Carver-Thomas

(2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Learning Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606666.pdf

60.

Tschannen-Moran

Hoy

A. W.

(2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

61.

Woolfolk

A. E.

Rosoff

Hoy

W. K.

(1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y

62.

Yarnell

L. M.

Stafford

R. E.

Neff

K. D.

Reilly

E. D.

Knox

M. C.

Mullarkey

(2015). Meta-analysis of gender differences in self-compassion. Self and Identity, 14(5), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1029966