Abstract
This paper examines whether different structures of co-patenting networks affect regional economic adaptation and adaptability in divergent ways. Adaptation differentiates from adaptability by recovering in a pre-shock growth path, while adaptability entails forging a new growth path. Focusing on computer, electronic, and electrical equipment manufacturing industries in U.S. metropolitan and micropolitan areas from 1990 to 2012, the study reveals that complete networks, characterized by closely connected nodes, promote adaptation but weaken adaptability. In contrast, coalitional networks, featuring loosely connected subgroups, enhance adaptability but hurt adaptation. The study contributes to regional economic resilience literature by empirically demonstrating the trade-off relationship between adaptation and adaptability from network structures’ perspective. Practically, the study helps policy makers to effectively allocate stimuli, such as grants and tax incentives, to develop targeted co-patenting networks to improve adaptation or adaptability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
