Policies affecting cultural assets are popular yet imperfectly understood tools to shape local economic development. Historic preservation policies, for example, can have markedly different implications for original residents, prospective residents, and developers, even in the same city. Therefore, merely identifying its average effect can obscure important heterogeneity in its impact. This study examines the property value impacts of local and national historic districts across the distribution of property prices and how those differential impacts vary with the restrictiveness of the policy. A quantile regression model identifies the heterogeneity of effects among higher and lower end properties. The results reveal large differences between national and local districts, interior and buffer properties, and for different property values. These findings highlight the importance of and complexity in how housing markets react to attempts to guide local economic development.
AhlfeldtG. M.MastroA. (2012). Valuing iconic design: Frank Lloyd Wright architecture in Oak Park, Illinois. Housing Studies, 27(8), 1079-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.728575
2.
AsabereP. K.HuffmanF. E. (1994). Historic designation and residential market values. Appraisal Journal, 62(3), 396-401.
BeenV.EllenI. G.GedalM.GlaeserE.McCabeB. J. (2016). Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City. Journal of Urban Economics, 92, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.002
5.
ClarkD. E.HerrinW. E. (1997). Historical preservation districts and home sale prices: Evidence from the Sacramento housing market. Review of Regional Studies, 27(1), 29-48.
6.
CoulsonN. E.LahrM. L. (2005). Gracing the land of Elvis and Beale Street: Historic designation and property values in Memphis. Real Estate Economics, 33(3), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2005.00127.x
GilderbloomJ. I.HankaM. J.AmbrosiusJ. D. (2009). Historic preservation’s impact on job creation, property values, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Urbanism, 2(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903056821
9.
GlaeserE. L. (2010). Preservation follies. City Journal, 20(2), 62-67.
10.
HaugheyP.BasoloV. (2000). The effect of dual local and national register historic district designations on single-family housing prices in New Orleans. Appraisal Journal, 68(3), 283-289.
11.
HeintzelmanM. D.AltieriJ. A. (2013). Historic preservation: Preserving value?Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 46(3), 543-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-011-9338-8
12.
IjlaA.RybergS.RosentraubM. S. (2011). Historic designation and the rebuilding of neighborhoods: New evidence of the value of an old policy tool. Journal of Urbanism, 4(3), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2011.635262
13.
ImmergluckD. (2009). Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: The case of the Atlanta beltline. Urban Studies, 46(8), 1723-1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009105500
14.
KinahanK. L. (2018). The neighborhood effects of federal historic tax credits in six legacy cities. Housing Policy Debate, 29(1), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1452043
KosterH. R.van OmmerenJ. N.RietveldP. (2014). Historic amenities, income and sorting of households. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 203-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu047
17.
LeichenkoR. M.CoulsonN. E.ListokinD. (2001). Historic preservation and residential property values: An analysis of Texas cities. Urban Studies, 38(11), 1973-1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120080880
18.
Loukaitou-SiderisA.SoureliK. (2012). Cultural tourism as an economic development strategy for ethnic neighborhoods. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(1), 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242411422902
19.
MaskeyV.BrownC.LinG. (2009). Assessing factors associated with listing a historic resource in the National Register of Historic Places. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(4), 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242409342571
20.
McCabeB. J. (2018). Protecting neighborhoods or priming them for gentrification? Historic preservation, housing, and neighborhood change. Housing Policy Debate, 29(1), 181-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1506391
21.
McCabeB. J.EllenI. G. (2016). Does preservation accelerate neighborhood change? Examining the impact of Historic Preservation in New York City. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(2), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1126195
22.
MillerA. (2018). College scholarships as a tool for economic development? Evidence from the Kalamazoo Promise. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417747704
23.
MinnerJ. (2016). Revealing synergies, tensions, and silences between preservation and planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(2), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1147976
24.
NoonanD. S. (2007). Finding an impact of preservation policies: Price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in Chicago, 1990-1999. Economic Development Quarterly, 21(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242406296326
25.
NoonanD. S. (2013). Market effects of historic preservation. In RizzoI.MignosaA. (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage (pp. 344-363). Edward Elgar.
26.
NoonanD. S.KrupkaD. J. (2010). Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: Why we preserve what we preserve. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-009-9110-6
27.
NoonanD. S.KrupkaD. J. (2011). Making—or picking—winners: Evidence of internal and external price effects in historic preservation policies. Real Estate Economics, 39(2), 379-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00293.x
28.
ObaT.NoonanD. S. (2017). The many dimensions of historic preservation value: National and local designation, internal and external policy effects. Journal of Property Research, 34(3), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2017.1362027
29.
ParkJ. I. (2017). Who benefits more from manufacturing foreign direct investment? Examining its earnings distribution effects across earnings quantiles. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(4), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417730901
30.
Ryberg-WebsterS. (2015). The landscape of urban preservation: A spatial analysis of federal rehabilitation tax credits in Richmond, Virginia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(4), 410-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12151
31.
Ryberg-WebsterS.KinahanK. L. (2014). Historic preservation and urban revitalization in the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 29(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412213510524
32.
Ryberg-WebsterS.KinahanK. L. (2017). Historic preservation in declining city neighbourhoods: Analysing rehabilitation tax credit investments in six U.S. cities. Urban Studies, 54(7), 1673-1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016629313
33.
SchaefferP. V.MillerickC. A. (1991). The impact of historic district designation on property values: An empirical study. Economic Development Quarterly, 5(4), 301-312.
34.
TalenE.MenozziS.SchaeferC. (2015). What is a “great neighborhood?” An analysis of APA’s top-rated places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573
Zahirovic-HerbertV.ChatterjeeS. (2012). Historic preservation and residential property values: Evidence from quantile regression. Urban Studies, 49(2), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011404936
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
