The shrinking middle class and increasing income polarization in the United States are issues of concern to policy makers and others. Economic development incentives are a key policy tool used at the state and local levels to promote local economic growth, and, presumably, provide employment opportunities. However, these incentives may have unintended consequences that may be contributing to the decline of the middle class. The authors combine detailed industry-level detail on incentives with proprietary county-level industry employment data and two methods for defining middle-class industries. Using an instrumental variable approach, the authors estimate how differential economic development policies affect middle-class jobs. The authors find evidence that incentivizing creative-class and high-wage industries may be contributing to the hollowing out of the middle class. Without hurting employment in other industries, targeting working-class and middle-wage industries alleviates this trend, while reducing incentives on creative-class and high-wage industries could help increase working and middle-class employment.
BartikT. J. (2017). A new panel database on business incentives for economic development offered by state and local governments in the United States (Upjohn Project No. 34435). http://research.upjohn.org/reports/225
BartikT. J. (2018b). Who benefits from economic development incentives? How incentive effects on local incomes and the income distribution vary with different assumptions about incentive policy and the local economy (Upjohn Institute Technical Report No. 18-034). https://doi.org/10.17848/tr18-034
7.
BartikT. J.BiddleS. C. Y.HershbeinB.SotherlandN. (2018). WholeData: Unsuppressed County Business Patterns Data (Version 1.0) [Data set]. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
8.
BartikT. J.ErickcekG. (2014). Simulating the effects of the tax credit program of the Michigan economic growth authority on job creation and fiscal benefits. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(4), 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414548893
9.
BartikT. J.HollenbeckK. (2012). An analysis of the employment effects of the Washington high technology business and occupation (B&O) tax credit: Technical report (Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 12-187). https://research.upjohn.org/up_workingpapers/187/
ChirinkoR. S.WilsonD. J. (2017). Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw?Journal of Public Economics, 155, 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.10.001
13.
DoneganM. T.LesterW.LoweN. (2018). Striking a balance: A national assessment of economic development incentives (Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 18-291) https://research.upjohn.org/up_workingpapers/291/
14.
FatehinS.SjoquistD. L. (2018). The effect of taxes on the number and growth of high-wage employment: Evidence from a state-level panel data set (Working Paper). National Tax Association.
FloridaR.MellanderC. (2016). The geography of inequality: Difference and determinants of wage and income inequality across U.S. metros. Regional Studies, 50(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.884275
17.
FloridaR.MellanderC.KingK. (2017). Building 65 million good jobs: The geography of low-paid service class jobs and how to begin to upgrade them (Martin Prosperity Institute Report). Martin Prosperity Institute.
18.
FooteC. L.RyanR. W. (2015). Labor-market polarization over the business cycle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 29(1), 371-413. https://doi.org/10.1086/680656
HansonA.RohlinS. (2011). The effect of location-based tax incentives on establishment location and employment across industry sectors. Public Finance Review, 39(2), 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110389602
21.
HargerK. R.RossA. (2016). Do capital tax incentives attract new businesses? Evidence across industries from the New Markets Tax Credit. Journal of Regional Science, 56(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12286
22.
HargerK. R.RossA.StephensH. (2019). What matters the most for economic development? Evidence from the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. Papers in Regional Science, 98(2), 883-904. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12396
Martin Prosperity Institute. (2013). Who works where in Peterborough: occupational and industrial distribution in Peterborough: A benchmark and comparison study. Author.
PatrickC. (2014b). Does increasing available non-tax economic development incentives result in more jobs?National Tax Journal, 67(2), 351-386. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2014.2.03
PatrickC.StephensH.RossA. (2017). Designing policies to spur economic growth: How regional scientists can contribute to future policy development and evaluation. In JacksonR.SchafferP. (Eds.), Regional research frontiers: Vol. 1: Innovations, regional growth and migration (pp. 119-133). Springer.
TarrG. A. (1998). Understanding state constitutions. Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
