To extract favorable terms from local governments, developers can take advantage of intermunicipal competition and threaten to relocate or abandon a land development project. Some say that model of regional competition undercuts the economic, environmental, and societal benefits of development while others claim it boosts the efficiency of municipal operations. The authors examine the likelihood that land developers will push local governments to compete against each other for projects. Their study of New York municipalities (N = 306) finds that one third of local governments have been threatened and that one third of those reacted by reducing burdens or increasing incentives for developers. Their logistic regression model reveals that more cooperative intermunicipal relations across a region decrease the chances of developers threatening to move projects. Interestingly, the model suggests that public participation increases the chances of a threat.
AndranovichG. (1995). Achieving consensus in public decision making: Applying interest-based problem solving to the challenges of intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 429-445. doi:10.1177/0021886395314003
2.
BartikT. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
3.
BaxterJ. W.EylesJ. D.ElliottS. J. (1999). From siting principles to siting practices: A case study of discord among trust, equity, and community participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42, 501-525. doi:10.1080/09640569911037
4.
BeenV. (1991). “Exit” as a constraint on land use exactions: Rethinking the unconstitutional conditions doctrine. Columbia Law Review, 91, 473-545. doi:10.2307/1122797
5.
BeierleT. C.KoniskyD. M. (2000). Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 587-602.
6.
BentonJ. E. (2013). Local government collaboration: Considerations, issues, and prospects. State and Local Government Review, 45, 220-223.
7.
BermanE.WangX. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60, 409-420. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00104
8.
BetzM. R.PartridgeM. D.KraybillD. S.LobaoL. (2012). Why do localities provide economic development incentives? Geographic competition, political constituencies, and government capacity. Growth and Change, 43, 361-391. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2012.00590.x
9.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547-558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
10.
BowmanA. O. (1988). Competition for economic development among southeastern cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 511-527. doi:10.1177/004208168802300403
11.
BrysonJ. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6, 21-53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
12.
CoganA.SharpeS.HertzbergJ. (1986). Citizen participation. In SoF. S.HandI.McDowellB. D. (Eds.), The practice of state and regional planning (pp. 283-305). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
13.
CoxK. R. (1995). Globalisation, competition, and the politics of local economic development. Urban Studies, 32, 213-224.
14.
ElthamD.HarrisonG.AllenS. (2008). Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning. Energy Policy, 36, 23-33. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.010
15.
FeiockR. C.LeeI. W.ParkH. J.LeeK. H. (2010). Collaboration networks among local elected officials: Information, commitment, and risk aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 241-262. doi:10.1177/1078087409360509
16.
FeiockR. C.SteinackerA.ParkH. J. (2009). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, 69, 256-270. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.x
17.
ForesterJ. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53, 303-314. doi:10.1080/01944368708976450
18.
ForesterJ. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
FungA. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75, 513-522. doi:10.1111/puar.12361
21.
GerlachM. (2015). Developer threatens to walk away from waterfront project. Retrieved from www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/
22.
GoetzE. G.KayserT. (1993). Competition and cooperation in economic development: A study of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 63-78. doi:10.1177/089124249300700106
23.
GoetzS. J.PartridgeM. D.RickmanD. S.MajumdarS. (2011). Sharing the gains of local economic growth: Race-to-the-top versus race-to-the-bottom economic development. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 428-456. doi:10.1068/c1077r
24.
GordonV. (2007). Partners or competitors? Perceptions of regional economic development cooperation in Illinois. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 60-78. doi:10.1177/0891242406291573
25.
HaminE. M.MarcucciD. J. (2008). Ad hoc rural regionalism. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 467-477. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.009
HartleyN.WoodC. (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Implementing the Aarhus convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 319-340. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002
28.
HawkinsC. V. (2010). Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 253-275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00492.x
29.
HomsyG. C. (2018). Capacity, sustainability, and the community benefits of municipal utility ownership in the United States. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17487870.2018.1515014
30.
HomsyG. C.MendelsonA.WarnerM. E.QianB. (2014). Coordination and innovation: The delivery of planning services in New York State (Share Services Series). Binghamton, NY: Binghamton University.
International City/County Management Association. (2012). Recruitment guidelines for selecting a local government administrator. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
IrvinR. A.StansburyJ. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review, 64, 55-65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
35.
JamiA.WalshP. (2014). The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: The case study of Ontario, Canada. Renewable Energy, 68, 194-202. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.004
36.
KapucuN. (2008). Collaborative emergency management: Better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters, 32, 239-262. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01037.x
37.
LackeyS. B.FreshwaterD.RupasinghaA. (2002). Factors influencing local government cooperation in rural areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley. Economic Development Quarterly, 16, 138-154. doi:10.1177/0891242402016002004
38.
LeeI. W.FeiockR. C.LeeY. (2012). Competitors and cooperators: A micro-level analysis of regional economic development collaboration networks. Public Administration Review, 72, 253-262. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02501.x
39.
LeRouxK.CarrJ. B. (2007). Explaining local government cooperation on public works: Evidence from Michigan. Public Works Management & Policy, 12, 344-358. doi:10.1177/1087724X07302586
40.
LobaoL.JeantyP. W.PartridgeM.KraybillD. (2012). Poverty and place across the United States: Do county governments matter to the distribution of economic disparities?International Regional Science Review, 35, 158-187. doi:10.1177/0160017611435356
41.
LoringJ. (2007). Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: Factors influencing project success. Energy Policy, 35, 2648-2660. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.008
McGuireM.SilviaC. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70, 279-288. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x
44.
MichelsA.GraafL. D. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36, 477-491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
45.
ModlinS.StewartL. S. (2014). Local government staff involvement in the external audit process: Reassessing independent auditee satisfaction levels among professionally administered county governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 38, 246-272.
46.
OrfieldM.WallaceN. (2007). The Minnesota Fiscal Disparities Act of 1971: The Twin Cities’ struggle and blueprint for regional cooperation. William Mitchell Law Review, 33, 591-612.
47.
OstromE. (2015). Governing the Commons (Reissue ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PatrickC. (2014). The economic development incentives game: An imperfect information, heterogeneous communities approach. Annals of Regional Science, 53, 137-156.
49.
PothukuchiK. (2005). Attracting supermarkets to inner city neighborhoods: Economic development outside the box. Economic Development Quarterly, 19, 232-244. doi:10.1177/0891242404273517
50.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
51.
ReschovskyA. (1980). An evaluation of metropolitan area tax base sharing. National Tax Journal, 33, 55-66.
52.
SchivelyC. (2007). Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 21, 255-266. doi:10.1177/0885412206295845
53.
ThurmaierK.WoodC. (2002). Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket–fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review, 62, 585-598. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00239
54.
TieboutC. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424. doi:10.1086/257839
55.
VisserJ. A. (2004). Townships and nested governance: Spoilers or collaborators in metropolitan services delivery?Public Performance & Management Review, 27(3), 80-101. doi:10.1080/15309576.2004.11051803
56.
WagenetL. P.PfefferM. J. (2007). Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning. Society & Natural Resources, 20, 801-813. doi:10.1080/08941920701216578
57.
WarnerM.HefetzA. (2002). Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity, and voice. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 70-89. doi:10.1177/107808702401097808
58.
WilsonJ. D.WildasinD. E. (2004). Capital tax competition: Bane or boon. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1065-1091. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00057-4
59.
WolmanH.SpitzleyD. (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150. doi:10.1177/089124249601000201
60.
ZhangX.WarnerM. E.HomsyG. C. (2017). Environment, equity, and economic development goals: Understanding differences in local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 31, 196-209. doi:10.1177/0891242417712003
