A consensus has evolved that the outcomes of local community development organizations are not amenable to traditional evaluation methods and that local self-learning versus knowledge production is a necessary concession. A documentary review and interviews with the principals at national grant and policy-making organizations are undertaken to deconstruct this outcome measurement impasse. Basic criteria for an analytical framework to measure community development outcomes are suggested both to clarify the current institutional mindset and suggest an alternative approach. Available empirical data from practitioner interviews and existing social theory provide the basis for a conceptual understanding and an analytical framework to guide the systematic evaluation of community development initiatives.
Auspos, P., & Kubisch, A.C. ( 2004). Building knowledge about community change: Moving beyond evaluations. New York, NY: Aspen Institute.
2.
Bender, T. ( 1978). Community and social change in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Bloom, D. ( 1999). Exploring community change: Causes, effects, and motivation . National Civic Review, 88, 293-302.
4.
Brown, P., Chaskin, R., Hamilton, R., & Richman, H. ( 2003). Toward greater effectiveness in community change: Challenges and responses for philanthropy. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.
5.
Cary, L.J. ( 1989). Teaching community development. In J . A. Christensen & J. W. Robinson (Eds.), Community development in perspective (pp.159-172). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
6.
Clavel, P., Pitt, J., & Yin, J. ( 1997). The community option in urban policy. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 435-458.
7.
Denise, P. S., & Harris, I. M. (Eds.). (1989). Experiential education for community development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
8.
Dorius, N. ( 2007). Practitioner perspectives on change in poor communities . Journal of the Community Development Society, 38(4), 1-12.
9.
Dorius, N. ( 2009a). The social change role of community development corporations: A transformation of private lives and community institutions. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
10.
Dorius, N. ( 2009b). Understanding change in poor communities: What is it and how will we know when it happens. Journal of Urban Affairs , 31, 97-109.
11.
Emery, M., & Flora, C. ( 2006). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Journal of the Community Development Society , 37(1), 9-25.
12.
Fawcett, S.B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V.T., Schultz, J.A., Richter, K.P., Lewis, R.K., . . . Fisher, J.L. ( 1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 677-697.
13.
Ferguson, R. F., & Dickens, W. T. (Eds.). (1999). Urban problems and community development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14.
Fisher, R., & Kling, J. (Eds.). (1993). Mobilizing the community: Local politics in the era of the global city. London, England: Sage.
15.
Goetz, E., & Sidney, M. ( 1995). Community development corporations as neighborhood advocates: A study of the political activism of nonprofit developers. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 3, 1-20.
16.
Hatry, H., VanHouten, T., Plantz, M., & Greenway, M.T. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
17.
Hirst, P. ( 1994). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
18.
Kingsley, G.T. ( 1998). Neighborhood indicators: Taking advantage of the new potential. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
19.
Kingsley, G.T., & Petit, K.L.S. ( 2004). Neighborhood information systems: We need a broader effort to build local capacity. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
20.
Madan, R. ( 2007). Demystifying outcome measurement in community development . Washington, DC: NeighborWorks America and Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
21.
Matthews, D. ( 1994). Community change through true public action. Conversations on renewal. National Civic Review, 83, 400-404.
22.
Mier, R., & Bingham, R.D. ( 1993). Metaphors of economic development. In R. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Theories of local economic development: Perspectives from across the disciplines (pp. 284-304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Morley, E., Vinson, E., & Hatry, H.P. ( 2001). Outcome measurement in nonprofit organizations: Current practices and recommendations. Washington, DC: Independent Sector and the Urban Institute.
24.
Mott, A. ( 2005). University-based education for community change: A vital strategy for progress on issues of poverty, race and community-building. Washington, DC: Community and Resource Development Program, Ford Foundation.
25.
Nathan, R.P. ( 2001). Introduction in Forsythe, D. W. (Ed.), Quicker better cheaper: Managing performance in American government. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
Plantz, M.C., Greenway, M.T., & Hendricks, M. ( 2007). Outcome measurement: Showing results in the nonprofit sector. In K. E. Newcomer (Ed.), Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs (pp. 15-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Rubin, H.J. ( 1994). There aren’t going to be any bakeries here if there is no money to afford jellyrolls: The organic theory of community based development . Social Problems, 41, 401-424.
29.
Rubin, H.J. ( 2000). Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despair: The community-based development model. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Sanders, I.T. ( 1970). The concept of community. In L. J. Cary (Ed.), Community development as a process (pp. 9-31). Columbia : University of Missouri Press.
31.
Simon, W.H. ( 2001). The community economic development movement: Law, business, and the new social policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. ( 2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civil renewal. Los Angeles : University of California Press.
33.
Stoecker, R. ( 1997). The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 191, 1-22.
34.
Stoecker, R. ( 2005). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
35.
Stoutland, S.E. ( 1999). Community development corporations: Mission, strategy, and accomplishments. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp.193-240). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
36.
Voth, D. ( 1989). Evaluation for community development. In J . A. Christensen & J. W. Robinson (Eds.), Community development in perspective (pp. 219-252). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
37.
Warren, R. ( 1963). The community in America. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
38.
W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2007). Designing initiative evaluation: A systems-oriented framework for evaluating social change efforts. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
