Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The use of tax increment financing (TIF) remains a popular, yet highly controversial, tool among policy makers in their efforts to promote economic development. This study conducts a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of Missouri’s TIF program, specifically in Kansas City and St. Louis, in creating economic opportunities. We build a time-series data set starting 1990 through 2012 of detailed employment levels, establishment counts, and sales at the census block-group level to run a set of difference-in-differences with matching estimates for the impact of TIF at the local level. Although we analyze the impact of TIF on a wide set of indicators and across various industry sectors, we find no conclusive evidence that the TIF program in either city has a causal impact on key economic development indicators.

Keywords

tax increment financing economic development incentives economic impact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. E.

(1990). Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growth. National Tax Journal, 43(2), 155-163.

Ashenfelter

Card

(1985). Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 649-660.

Barnatchez

Crane

L. D.

Decker

R. A.

(2017). An assessment of the National Establishment Time Series (NETS) Database (Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-110). Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. doi:10.17016/FEDS.2017.110

Brueckner

J. K.

(2001). Tax increment financing: a theoretical inquiry. Journal of Public Economics, 81, 321-343.

Byrne

P. F.

(2010). Does tax increment financing deliver on its promise of jobs? The impact of tax increment financing on municipal employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 13-22.

Coffin

(2014). Tax increment financing in St Louis County, 2000-2012 (Report of the Applied Research Collaborative). Retrieved from https://pprc.umsl.edu/pprc.umsl.edu/data/tif-legislative.pdf

Council of Governments. (2011). An assessment of the effectiveness and fiscal impacts of the use of local development incentives in the St. Louis region (Final Report 35). Louis, MO: East-West Gateway. Retrieved from http://www.ewgateway.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/TIFFinalRpt.pdf

Dube

Lester

T. W.

Reich

(2010). Minimum wage effects across state borders: Estimates using contiguous counties. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4):945-964.

Dye

R. F.

Merriman

D. F.

(2000). The effects of tax increment financing on economic development. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(2), 306-328.

10.

Fitzgerald

Green-Leigh

(2002). Economic revitalization: Cases and strategies for city and suburb. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Gibson

(2003). Neighborhood characteristics of tax increment financing in Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 309-327.

12.

Gillerman

(2010, July 8). Walmart store gets Bridgeton’s approval. St. Louis Post Dispatch. http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/walmart-store-gets-bridgeton-s-approval/article_8d158273-5237-5e5d-b0d8-fc23c94dc3ff.html

13.

Greenbaum

Landers

(2014). The tiff over TIF: A review of the literature examining the effectiveness of the Tax Increment Financing. National Tax Journal, 67, 655-674.

14.

Green-Leigh

Blakely

E. J.

(2016). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Hicks

M. J.

Faulk

Deveraj

(2016). The fiscal impact of tax increment financing in Indiana (Policy Brief). Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research, Muncie, IN.

16.

Hicks

M. J.

Faulk

Quirin

(2015). Some economic effects of tax increment financing in Indiana. Muncie, IN: Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research.

17.

Kane

Weber

(2016). Municipal investment and property value appreciation in Chicago’s tax increment financing districts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36, 167-181.

18.

Lester

T. W.

(2014). Does Chicago’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Programme Pass the ‘but-For’test? Job creation and economic development impacts using time-series data. Urban Studies, 51, 655-674.

19.

Luce

(2003, April 1). Tax increment financing in the Kansas City and St. Louis Metropolitan Areas. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/tax-increment-financing-in-the-kansas-city-and-st-louis-metropolitan-areas/

20.

Merriman

D. F.

Skidmore

M. L.

Kashian

R. D.

(2011). Do tax increment finance districts stimulate growth in real estate values? Real Estate Economics, 39, 221-250.

21.

Missouri House of Representatives. (2016). House Bill 1434.

22.

Moffit

(2017, February 21). Are TIF, Tax Abatement Being used in St. Louis in the best way? St. Louis Public Radio. Retrieved from http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/are-tif-tax-abatement-being-used-st-louis-best-way-tale-2-differing-philosophies#stream/0

23.

Neumark

Zhang

Wall

. (2007). Employment dynamics and business relocation: New evidence from the National Establishment Time Series. In Polachek

S. W.

Bargain

(Eds.), Aspects of worker well-being: Research in labor economics (Vol. 26; pp. 39-83). Bingley, England: Emerald.

24.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies of causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.

25.

Smith

B. C.

(2009). If you promise to build it, will they come? The interaction between local economic development policy and the real estate market: Evidence from Tax Increment Finance Districts. Real Estate Economics, 37, 208-234.

26.

Swenson

C. W.

(2015). The death of California redevelopment areas did the state get it right? Economic Development Quarterly, 29, 211-228. doi:10.1177/0891242414567944

27.

Warner

Zheng

(2011). Economic development strategies for recessionary times: Survey results from 2009. In The ICMA Municipal Year Book (pp. 33-42). Washington, DC: ICMA.

28.

Weber

Bhatta

S. D.

Merriman

D. F.

(2007). The impact of tax increment financing on residential property values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 259-281.

29.

Yadavalli

Landers

(2017). Tax increment financing: A propensity score approach. Economic Development Quarterly, 31, 312-325.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB

Does Tax Increment Financing Pass the “But-for” Test in Missouri?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material