This study focuses on quantifying the economic impact of the automotive industry on Alabama’s economy using a static regional computable general equilibrium model. The findings suggest that the automotive industry has a disproportionate impact across Alabama in terms of a series of indicators including gross state product, employment, and household welfare. Benefits accrue primarily to counties in which the auto plants and their suppliers are located. The spillover effects into nonautomotive-plant counties are modest and about evenly distributed. Middle-income households are the largest gainers, and this is true across all counties, including the Black Belt, a region across the South where rural poverty is concentrated. Despite its rapid growth, the auto industry continues to constitute a small fraction of the state’s economy (less than 3% of gross state product). Thus, overdependence on a cyclical industry is as yet not an issue for policy makers.
AzariadisC.StachurskiJ. (2005). Poverty traps. In AghionP.DurlaufS. N. (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 295-384). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
3.
BerckP.GolanE. (1997). State tax policy, labor, and tax revenue feedback effects. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 36, 399-418.
4.
BlonigenB. A.WilsonW. W. (1999). Explaining Armington: What determines substitutability between home and foreign goods?Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, 1-21.
5.
CaliM.MenonC. (2012). Does urbanization affect rural poverty? Evidence from Indian districts. World Bank Economic Review, 27, 171-201.
Center for Automotive Research. (2008). CAR research memorandum: The impact on the U.S. economy of a major contraction of the Detroit Three automakers. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
8.
Center for Automotive Research. (2010). Contribution of the automotive industry to the economies of all fifty states and the United States. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
9.
de MeloJ.TarrD. G. (1992). A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
Economic Development Partnership of Alabama. (2009). Alabama’s automotive industry, 2009. Birmingham, AL: Author.
11.
Economic Development Partnership of Alabama. (2012). Alabama’s automotive industry, 2012. Birmingham, AL: Author.
12.
EllisonG.GlaeserE. L. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 889-927.
13.
FosterA. D.RosenzweigM. R. (2004). Agricultural productivity growth, rural economic diversity, and economic reforms: India, 1970-2000. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 509-542.
14.
FoxL.SohnesenT. P. (2012). Household enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa: Why they matter for growth, jobs, and poverty reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank.
15.
GreenstoneM.HornbeckR.MorettiE. (2010). Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 536-598.
16.
HaddadE. A.HewingsG. J. (1999). The short-run regional effects of new investments and technological upgrade in the Brazilian automobile industry: An interregional computable general equilibrium analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 27, 359-383.
17.
HaggbladeS.HazellP. B.DoroshP. A. (2007). Sectoral growth linkages between agriculture and the rural nonfarm economy. In HaggbladeS.HazellP.ReardonT. (Eds.), Transforming the rural nonfarm economy: Opportunities and threats in the developing world (pp. 141-182). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
HollandD. (2010). What happens when exports expand: Some ideas for closure of regional computable general equilibrium models. Annals of Regional Science, 45, 439-451.
19.
HollandD.RazackA. (2006, September). Assessing the economic impact of an agricultural export shock on the Washington economy: A tale of two models (Working Paper No. 2006-11). Pullman: Washington State University, School of Economic Sciences.
20.
Information Handling Services. (2013). The economic impact of the motor vehicle parts manufacturing industry on the United States (Prepared for the Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association). Washington, DC: Author.
21.
International Institute for Environment and Development. (2009). Urbanisation and rural-urban linkages. London, England: Author.
22.
JacobsA. J. (2012). Collaborative regionalism and foreign direct investment: The case of the Southeast automotive core and the “new domestics.”Economic Development Quarterly, 26, 199-219.
23.
KebedeE.NganduM. S. (1999). The economic impact of the Mercedes Benz investment on the state of Alabama. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 31, 371-382.
24.
KlineP.MorettiE. (2014). Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 Years of evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 275-331.
25.
KraybillD. S. (1993). Computable general equilibrium analysis at the regional level. In OttoD. M.JohnsonT. G. (Eds.), Microcomputer-based input-output modeling: Applications to economic development (pp. 125-148). Boulder, CO: Westview.
26.
LanjouwJ. O.LanjouwP. (2001). The rural non-farm sector: Issues and evidence from developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 26, 1-23.
27.
LöfgrenH. (2000). Exercises in general equilibrium modeling using GAMS: Microcomputers in policy research (Vol. 4a). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
28.
MiťkováV. (2009). Is growth in automotives beneficial for Slovakia? An applied CGE model study. Ekonomický Časopis, 57, 309-326.
29.
MorettiE.SteinwenderC.Van ReenenJ. (2014, July). The intellectual spoils of war? Defense R&D, productivity, and spillovers (Working Paper). London, England: London School of Economics.
30.
MorettiE.ThulinP. (2013). Local multipliers and human capital in the United States and Sweden. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22, 339-362.
RickmanD. S. (1992). Estimating the impacts of regional business assistance programs: Alternative closures in a computable general equilibrium model. Papers in Regional Science, 71, 421-435.
34.
RotgéV. L.Bagoes MantraI.RijantaR. (2000). Rural-urban integration in Java: Consequences for regional development and employment. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
35.
SatterthwaiteD.TacoliC. (2002). Seeking an understanding of poverty that recognizes rural-urban differences and rural-urban linkages. In RakodiC.Lloyd-JonesT. (Eds.), Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty (pp. 52-70). Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
36.
SerajeM. (2007, October). Livelihood strategies and their implications for rural-urban linkages: The case of Wolenkomi town and the surrounding rural kebeles (Working Paper No. 10 on Population and Land Use Change in Central Ethiopia). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University.
37.
StodickL.HollandD.DevadossS. (2004). Documentation for the Idaho-Washington CGE Model. Pullman: Washington State University, School of Economic Sciences.
38.
TreyzG. I. (1993). Regional economic modeling: A systematic approach to economic forecasting and policy analysis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
39.
WatersE. C.HollandD. W.WeberB. A. (1997). Economic impacts of a property tax limitation: A computable general equilibrium analysis of Oregon’s Measure 5. Land Economics, 73, 72-89.
40.
The World Bank. (2011). Perspectives on poverty in India: Stylized facts from survey data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
