Because the use of tax abatements to foster local economic development is widespread despite uncertainty about their effectiveness, is it possible to allocate abatements in a way that increases the likelihood that tangible benefits will result? This research suggests that few municipalities place conditions on abatements, most never evaluate the performance of firms granted abatements, and abatement requests are seldom or never rejected. The project focuses on the implementation of tax abatements, explores the use of tax abatements over a relatively long time period, and makes explicit policy recommendations for more effective policy implementation. Changes in state enabling legislation targeting abatements to distressed areas and adding requirements for evaluation may produce more effective use of abatements at the local level.
Ahlbrandt, R. S., & DeAngelis, J. P. (1987). Local options for economic development in a maturing industrial region. Economic Development Quarterly, 1, 41-51.
2.
Ambrosius, M. (1985, April). Olsen’s thesis and economic growth in the states: The role of interest group strength in state economic development policymaking, 1969-1980. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
3.
Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Calzonetti, F. J., & Walker, R. T. (1991). Factors affecting industrial location decisions: A survey approach. In H. W. Herzog & A. M. Schlottmann (Eds.), Industry location and public policy (pp. 221-240). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
5.
Clarke, S. E., & Gaile, G. L. (1999). The next wave: Postfederal local economic development strategies. In J. P. Blair & L. A. Reese (Eds.), Approaches to economic development (pp. 165-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Fisher, P. S., & Peters, A. H. (1998). Industrial incentives: Competition among American states and cities. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
8.
Glickman, N., & Woodward, D. (1989). The new competition: How foreign investors are changing the U.S. economy. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Goetz, E. G. (1990). Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 170-190.
10.
Goss, E. P., & Phillips, J. M. (2001). Do business tax incentives contribute to a divergence in economic growth?Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 217-228.
11.
Gramlich, E. M. (1997). Subnational fiscal policy. In J. M. Quigley (Ed.), Perspectives on local public finance and fiscal policy (pp. 3-27). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12.
Hood, J. (1994). Ante-freeze: Stop the state bidding wars for big business. Policy Review, 68, 62-67.
13.
Hovey, H. (1986). Interstate tax competition and economic development. In S. Gold (Ed.), Reforming state tax systems (pp. 89-100). Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
14.
International City/County Management Association. (1989). Economic development survey. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
International City/County Management Association. (1999). Economic development survey. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
Kale, S. (1984). U.S. industrial development incentives and manufacturing growth during the 1970’s. Growth and Change, 15, 26-34.
17.
Ledebur, L. C., & Woodward, D. P. (1990). Adding a stick to the carrot: Location incentives with claw backs, recisions, and recalibrations. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 221-237.
18.
Lynch, R. G., Fishgold, G., & Blackwood, D. L. (1996). The effectiveness of firm-specific state tax incentives in New York. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 57-68.
19.
McCalley, H., & Silkman, R. (1982). An inquiry into the impact of state and local taxation upon industry location. New York: Management Sciences Group.
20.
Peters, A., & Fisher, P. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 27-37.
21.
Premus, R. (1982). The location of high technology firms and regional economic development (Subcommittee on Monetary and Fiscal Policy of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
22.
Reese, L. A. (1998). Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities utilize Type II policies?Urban Affairs Review, 33, 686-711.
23.
Reese, L. A., & Fasenfest, D. (1996, June). Local economic development policy in Canada and the US: Similarities and differences. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, pp. 100-121.
24.
Reese, L. A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2002). The civic culture of local economic development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Reese, L. A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2004). Local economic development in the U.S. and Canada: Institutionalizing policy approaches. American Review of Public Administration, 34, 277-292.
26.
Reese, L. A., Rosenfeld, R. A., & Fasenfest, D. (2002). The state of local economic development policy. In The 2002 municipal yearbook (pp. 10-17). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
27.
Rubin, M. (1991). Urban enterprise zones in New Jersey: Have they made a difference? In R. Green (Ed.), Enterprise zones: New directions in economic development (pp. 105-121). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Sands, G., & Zalmezak, P. (2001, February). Michigan industrial property tax abatements: A summary of activity under Public Act 198 of 1974, 1985-98. Paper presented at the Urban Research Seminar, Detroit, MI.
29.
Schmenner, R. W. (1982). Making business location decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Schwarz, J. E., & Volgy, T. J. (1992, September). The impacts of economic development strategies on wages: Exploring the effect on public policy at the local level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
31.
Warner, P. D. (1987). Business climate, taxes, and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 383-390.
32.
Wassmer, R. W. (1994). Can local incentives alter a metropolitan city’s economic development?Urban Studies, 31, 1251-1278.
33.
Wassmer, R. W., & Anderson, J. E. (2001). Bidding for business: New evidence on the effect of locally offered economic development incentives in a metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 132-148.
