This research provides an exhaustive review of U.S. property tax abatement programs and identifies and compares critical structural differences of abatement programs across states. Program differences are much greater than the existing literature recognizes. As a result, perhaps the most comprehensive database on the diversity of property tax abatements is offered to practitioners who are considering the design of a new abatement program or the revision of an existing one, as well as to researchers interested in furthering research on the effectiveness of this policy tool. For each of the identified abatement program features, advantages and disadvantages are discussed in light of existing literature.
Alyea, P. E. (1969). Property-tax inducements to attract industry. In R. W. Lindblom (Ed.), Property taxation USA (pp. 139-158). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
Anderson, J. E., & Wassmer, R. W. (1995). The decision to “bid for business”: Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 739-757.
3.
Anderson, J. E., & Wassmer, R. W. (2000). Bidding for business: The efficacy of local economic development incentives in a metropolitan area. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Annala, C. N. (2003). Have state and local fiscal policies become more alike? Evidence of beta convergence among fiscal policy variables. Public Finance Review, 31, 144-165.
5.
Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
6.
Bartik, T. J. (1994). Jobs, productivity, and local economic development: What implications does economic research have for the role of government?National Tax Journal, 47(4), 847-861.
7.
Beck, J. H. (1985). Government shortsightedness and discretionary tax abatement: Local tax rates and business investment. In J. M. Quigley (Ed.), Perspectives on local public finance and public policy (Vol.2, pp.203-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8.
Beck, J. H. (1993). Tax abatement and tax rates in a system of overlapping revenue-maximizing governments. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23, 645-665.
9.
Byrnes, P., Marvel, M. K., & Sridhar, K. (1999). An equilibrium model of tax abatement—City and firm characteristics as determinants of abatement generosity. Urban Affairs Review, 34(6), 805-819.
10.
Chang, Y.-C. (2001). Evaluating the structural effects of property tax abatements on economic development across industries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
11.
Coffin, D. A. (1982). Property tax abatement and economic development in Indiana polis. Growth and Change, 13(2), 18-23.
12.
Fisher, P. S., & Peters, A. H. (1997, March/April). Tax and spending incentives and enterprise zones. New England Economic Review, 109-130. Retrieved April 12, 2002, from http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/neer
13.
Lynch, R. G. (1996). Do state & local tax incentives work?Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
14.
McGuire, T. (1992). Review of Bartik’sWho benefits from state and local economic development policies? National Tax Journal, 45, 457-459.
15.
Mikesell, J. L., Zorn, C. K., Dalehite, E. G., & Park, S. J. (2002). A guide to the structure of property tax abatements in the United States (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
16.
Morgan, W. E., & Hackbart, M. M. (1974). An analysis of state and local industrial tax exemption programs. Southern Economic Journal, 41(2), 200-205.
17.
Morse, G. W., & Farmer, M. C. (1986). Location and investment effects of a tax abatement program. National Tax Journal, 39, 229-236.
18.
Nunn, S. (1994). Regulating local tax abatement policies: Arguments and alternative policies for urban planners and administrators. Policy Studies Journal, 22(4), 574-588.
19.
Reese, L. (1991). Municipal fiscal health and tax abatement policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 5(1), 23-32.
20.
Ross, W. D. (1953). Louisiana’s industrial tax exemption program. Louisiana Business Bulletin, 15(2), 1-49.
21.
Royse, M. (1994). Evaluating an economic development program: The case of tax abatement in Allen County. Economic Development Review, 12(4), 61-64.
22.
Severn, A. K. (1992). Building tax abatements: An approximation to land value taxation. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 51, 237-246.
23.
Wassmer, R. W. (1991). Taxes, property tax abatement, expenditure, and the composition of the property base in communities within a metropolitan area. 1990 Proceedings of the Eighty-Third Annual Conference on Taxation (pp. 132-140). Columbus, OH: National Tax Association-Tax Institute of America.
24.
Wassmer, R. W. (1992). Property tax abatement and the simultaneous determination of local fiscal variables in a metropolitan area. Land Economics, 68(3), 263-282.
25.
Wassmer, R. W., & Anderson, J. E. (2001). Bidding for business: New evidence on the effect of locally offered economic development incentives in a metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(2), 132-148.
26.
Wasylenko, M. (1997, March/April). Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature. New England Economic Review. Retrieved April 12, 2002, from http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/neer/neer1997/neer297c.pdf
27.
Wilson, R. H. (1993). States and the economy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
Wolkoff, M. J. (1981). An analysis of the use of tax abatement policy to stimulate urban economic development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
29.
Wolkoff, M. J. (1983). The nature of property tax abatement awards. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(1), 77-84.
30.
Wolkoff, M. J. (1985). Chasing a dream: The use of tax abatement to spur urban economic development. Urban Studies, 22, 305-315.
