Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The neglected advantages of “new markets” in marginalized rural and inner-city areas have been touted in the policy arena since the early 1990s. Althoughmuch of the motivation has been based on equity, there are potentially strong efficiency arguments for such renewed attention. This article proposes a unique combination of classic and more recent work on informational market failures to understand new markets as examples of informational asymmetries, which can provide the rationale for both private and public support of new market ventures. Furthermore, this perspective can help explain persistent intraregional differences in economic development prospects due to path dependencies inherent in varying informational settings.

Keywords

information asymmetry new markets economic development market failure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.

Bates, T. (2002). Government as venture capital catalyst: Pitfalls and promising approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 16(1), 49-59.

Boston Consulting Group& Initiative for a Competitive Inner City . (1998). The business case for pursuing retail opportunities in the inner city. Boston: Author.

Greenwald, B. ,& Stiglitz, J. (1986). Externalities in markets with imperfect information and incomplete markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 229-264.

Grossman, S. J. , & Stiglitz, J. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70, 393-408.

Henderson, J. (2002). Building the rural economy with high-growth entrepreneurs. Economic Review(Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City), 87(3), 45-70.

Lang, W. W. , & Nakamura, L. I. (1993). A model of redlining. Journal of Urban Economics, 33, 223-234.

Porter, M. (1997). New strategies for inner-city economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1). In J. Blair & L. Reese (Eds.), Approaches to economic development(pp. 32-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Originalwork published 1993)

Scorsone, E. A. (2002). Economic progress in Kentucky Appalachian communities(Staff Paper No. 430). University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics, Lexington.

10.

Stigler, G. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213-225.

11.

Stiglitz, J. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441-1478.

12.

Stiglitz, J. ,& Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.

13.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development . (1999). New markets: The untapped retail buying power in America’s inner cities. Washington, DC: Author.

14.

Weiler, S. (2000a). Information and market failure in local economic development: A new role for universities? Economic Development Quarterly, 14(2), 194-203.

15.

Weiler, S. (2000b). Pioneers and settlers in LoDo Denver: Private risk and public benefits in urban redevelopment. Urban Studies, 37(1), 167-179.

16.

Weiler, S. , Hoag, D. ,& Fan, C. M. (2003). Prospecting for returns to economic research: Adding informational value at the market fringe(working paper). Colorado State University, Department of Economics.

17.

Weiler, S. , Scorsone, E. ,& Pullman, M. (2000). Information linkages in local economic development. Growth and Change, 31(3), 367-384.

18.

Weiler, S. , Silverstein, J. , Chalmers, K. , Lacey, E. , Rogers, W. , & Widner, B. (2003). Understanding the retail business potential of inner cities. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(4), 1075-1106.

New Markets as Informational Asymmetries

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References