Issues of power, inequality, and representation in the production of knowledge have a long history in transnational feminist research. And yet the unequal relationship between ethnographers and participants continues to haunt feminist research. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork with the cooperative Sulá Batsú in Costa Rica between 2015 and 2019, in this essay I argue that centering solidarity and working through discomfort creates relationships that can reinvent and endure the persistent imbalance of power between researcher and participant. I conceptualize a solidarity-based methodology that is uncomfortable, tossing between "us and them," the objective and the subjective, akin to Gloria Anzaldúa’s “nepantla,” a liminal space of both fragmentation and unification, of both anguish and healing: a methodology from the cracks. In this essay, I reflect upon my experiences as a Puerto Rican feminist researcher focusing on Sulá Batsú, specifically on my relationship with the coop’s general coordinator. I conducted ethnographic fieldwork with the coop, including participant observation, in-depth interviews, and textual analysis of their research, briefs, blog posts, presentations, and promotional literature.
AlexanderM. JacquiMohantyChandra Talpade. 1997. “Introduction.” In Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, xiii–xlii. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AnzaldúaGloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
AnzaldúaGloria. 2002. “Preface, (Un) Natural Bridges, (Un) Safe Spaces.” In This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation, edited by AnzaldúaGloriaKeatingAnaLouise, 1–5. Abingdon: Routledge.
4.
AnzaldúaGloria. 2015. Light in the Dark = Luz en lo Oscuro: Rewriting Identity, Spirituality, Reality, edited by KeatingAnaLouise. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
AvishaiOritGerberLynneRandlesJennifer. 2013. “The Feminist Ethnographer’s Dilemma: Reconciling Progressive Research Agendas with Fieldwork Realities.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography42 (4): 394–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241612458955.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
ContrerasRandol. 2012. The Stickup Kids: Race, Drugs, Violence, and the American Dream. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
CurielOchy. 2014. “Construyendo metodologías feministas desde el feminismo decolonial.” In Otras formas de (re)conocer: Reflexiones, herramientas y aplicaciones desde la investigación feminista, edited by AzkueIrantzu MendiaLuxánMartaLegarretaMatxalenGuzmánGloriaZirionIkerCarballoJokin Azpiazu, 45-60. San Sebastián, España: Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional, Universidad del País Vasco.
EscobarArturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
FalcónSylvanna M. 2016. “Transnational Feminism as a Paradigm for Decolonizing the Practice of Research.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies37 (1): 174–94. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.37.1.0174.
15.
González-LópezGloria. 2006. “Epistemologies of the Wound: Anzaldúan Theories and Sociological Research on Incest in Mexican Society.” Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge4 (3): 17-24. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol4/iss3/4.
16.
GrewalInderpalKaplanCaren. 1994. Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
HernándezLeandra HinojosaGutierrez-PerezRobert. 2019. This Bridge We Call Communication: Anzaldúan Approaches to Theory, Method, and Praxis. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
19.
HoangKimberly Kay. 2015. Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. 1st ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
20.
HundleAnneeth KaurSzemanIoanaHoareJoanna Pares. 2019. “What Is the Transnational in Transnational Feminist Research?”Feminist Review121 (1): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778918817525.
KeatingAnaLouise. 2006. “From Borderlands and New Mestizas to Nepantlas and Nepantleras: Anzaldúan Theories for Social Change.” Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge4 (3): 5–16. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol4/iss3/3
23.
KeatingAnaLouise. 2015. “Editor’s Introduction: Re-Envisioning Coyolxauhqui, Decolonizing Reality.” In Light in the Dark/Luz En Lo Oscuro: Rewriting Identity, Spirituality, Reality, ix–xxxvii. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
24.
KleinDeborah. 1996. “Convergent Inquiries: Gloria Anzaldua’s ‘Mestiza’ Consciousness and Critical Ethnography.” New York. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED395996.
25.
MohantyChandra Talpade. 1988. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Feminist Review, 30: 61–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395054.
26.
MohantyChandra Talpade. 2003a. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
MohantyChandra Talpade. 2003b. “‘Under Western Eyes’ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles.” Signs28 (2): 499–535. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/342914
28.
MoragaCherríe. 2015. “La Güera.” In This Bridge Called My Back, Fourth Edition: Writings by Radical Women of Color, 22–29. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29.
MurphyMichelle. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.” Social Studies of Science45 (5): 717–37. doi:10.1177/0306312715589136.
30.
NagarRicha. 2002. “Footloose Researchers, ‘Traveling’ Theories, and the Politics of Transnational Feminist Praxis.” Gender, Place & Culture9 (2): 179–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663960220139699.
31.
NagarRicha. 2014. Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism. 1st ed.Urbana, Chicago, Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
32.
NagarRichaGeigerSusan. 2014. “Reflexivity, Positionality, and Languages of Collaboration in Feminist Fieldwork.” In Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism, 1st ed., 81–94. Urbana, Chicago, Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
33.
NagarRichaSwarrAmanda Lock. 2010. Critical Transnational Feminist Praxis. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
34.
NaplesNancy A.2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
NaplesNancy A.2013. “Whose Feminism? Whose Dilemma: Comments on ‘The Feminist Ethnographer’s Dilemma.’” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography42 (4): 427–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613483565.
36.
Pérez-BustosTania. 2017. “‘No es Sólo una Cuestión de Lenguaje’: Lo Inaudible de Los Estudios Feministas Latino-Americanos en el Mundo Académico Anglosajón.” Scientiae Studia15 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.11606/51678-31662017000100004.
37.
RajanHamsa. 2017. “The Ethics of Transnational Feminist Research and Activism: An Argument for a More Comprehensive View.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society43 (2): 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/693885.
38.
RajanHamsaThornhillKerrie. 2019. “Dilemmas of Feminist Practice in Transnational Spaces: Solidarity, Personal Growth, and Potential Solutions.” Gender, Place & Culture26 (10): 1345–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1618246.
39.
ReinharzShulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Rivera CusicanquiSilvia. 2012. “Ch’ixinakax Utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization.” South Atlantic Quarterly111 (1): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.
41.
SaavedraCinthya M.PérezMichelle Salazar. 2017. “Chicana/Latina Feminist Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Meditations on Global Solidarity, Spirituality, and the Land.” International Review of Qualitative Research10 (4): 450–67. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.450.
42.
SandstromKentOpsalTara. 2013. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Grappling with ‘The Feminist Ethnographer’s Dilemma.’” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography42 (4): 383–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613496702.
43.
SegatoRita Laura. 2011. “Género y colonialidad. En busca de un vocabulario decolonial”. In Feminismos y poscolonialidad: Descolonizando el feminismo desde y en América Latina, edited by BidasecaKarinaLabaVanesa Vázques, 9-29. Buenos Aires: Godot.
44.
Shokooh ValleFiruzeh. 2018. “Moving beyond Co-Optation: Gender, Development, and Intimacy.” Sociology of Development4 (4): 325–45. doi:10.1525/sod.2018.4.4.325.
45.
SimpsonBetasamosake Leanne. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
WalshCatherine E.2018. “Decoloniality In/As Praxis.” In On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, 15–102. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
YarbroughDilara. 2020. “‘Nothing About Us Without Us’: Reading Protests against Oppressive Knowledge Production as Guidelines for Solidarity Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography49 (1): 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241619857134.
