As a further tribute to feminist scholar Jessie Bernard, in this paper, we review the entire collection of the National Council on Family Relations’ Jessie Bernard Outstanding papers awarded to feminist junior scholars spanning from 1990 to 2018. In so doing, we showcase Jessie Bernard’s devotion to mentoring young scholars as we highlight evolving feminist family scholarship of student/new professionals. In this paper, we sought to:(a) honor Jessie Bernard’s intellectual legacy, (b) celebrate contributions of young feminist family scholar’s work, and (c) explore how the award collection maps on to wider feminist theoretical debates and empirical shifts within feminist family science over the past three decades.
AllenK. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 4–17.
2.
AllenK. (2016). Family theory in family studies: History, reflection and critique. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 8(2), 207–224.
3.
AllenK.Jaramillo-SierraA. (2015). Feminist theory and research on family relationships: Pluralism and complexity. Sex Roles, 73(3–4), 93–99.
4.
AllenK.LloydS.FewA. (2009). Reclaiming feminist theory, method, and praxis for family studies. In LloydS.FewA.AllenK. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 3–17). SAGE Publications.
BannisterR. (1991). Jessie Bernard: The making of a feminist. Rutgers.
7.
BernardJ. (1964). Academic women. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
8.
BernardJ. (1972/1982). The future of marriage. Yale University Press.
9.
BernardJ. (1974). The future of motherhood. Dial Press.
10.
BernardJ. (1981). Women’s educational needs. In ChickeringA. W. (Ed.), The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society (pp. 256–278). Jossey-Bass.
11.
BerkowitzD. (2011). Maternal urges, biological clocks, and soccer moms: Gay men’s procreative and fathering narratives. Symbolic Interaction, 34(4), 514–535.
12.
BrainerA. K. (2009). Being straight is not a choice (Unpublished manuscript).
13.
BrockK. F. (1994). Social conflict avoidance: An alternative to masochistic interpretations (Unpublished manuscript).
CrossmanK.HardestyJ. (2018). Placing coercive control at the center: What are the processes of coercive control and how is control coercive. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 196–206.
18.
DenisA. (2008). Review essay: Intersectional analysis: A contribution of feminism to sociology. International Sociology, 23(5), 677–694.
19.
EdwardsA.Few-DemoA. (2016). African American maternal power and the racial socialization of preschool children. Sex Roles, 75(1–2), 56–70.
20.
EnglandP. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166.
21.
FassingerP. A. (1993). Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers: Insights into gender inequality. In HoodJ. C. (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 195–216). SAGE Publications.
22.
FewA.StephensD.Rouse-ArnettM. (2003). Sister-to-sister talk: Transcending boundaries and challenges in qualitative research with Black women. Family Relations, 52(3), 205–215.
23.
FreedmanS. A.LipsH. (1998). Articulating Feminist Identity Against a Backdrop of Heterosexuality (Unpublished manuscript).
24.
GlaserB. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
25.
GoldbergA.AllenK. (2007). Imagining men: Lesbian mothers’ perceptions of male involvement during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 352–365.
26.
GoslingA. L.ZangariM. E. (1996). Feminist family therapy and the narrative approach: Dovetailing two frameworks. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 8(1), 47–63.
27.
GrabeS. (2018). Transnational feminism in psychology: Women’s human rights, liberation, and social justice. In HammackP. (Ed.), The oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice, (193). Oxford University Press.
28.
HaddockS. A.ZimmermanT. S.MacPheeD. (2000). The power equity guide: Attending to gender in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), 153–170.
29.
HardestyJ. L.GanongL. H. (2006). How women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(4), 543–563.
30.
HaselschwerdtM.HardestyJ.HansJ. (2011). Custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic violence allegations during divorce: Feminist and family violence perspectives. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1694–1719.
31.
HorneR.M., et al (2017). Time, money, or gender? Predictors of the division of household labour across life stages. Sex Roles. doi 10.1007/s11199-017-0832-1
32.
HoskinR.A. (2017). Femme Theory: Refocusing the Intersectional Lens. www.msvu.ca/atlantis
33.
Jaramillo-SierraS. (2016). Has the future of marriage arrived? {Review of the book The future of marriage, by J. Bernard]. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 8(2), 236–241.
34.
Jaramillo-SierraA. L.AllenK. R. (2013). Who pays after the first date? Young men’s discourses of the male-provider role. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14(4), 389–399.
35.
KaestleC. (2016). Feminist perspectives advance four challenges to transform family studies. Sex Roles, 75(1-2), 71–77.
36.
KenneyC. T. (2006). The power of the purse: Allocative systems and inequality in couple households. Gender & Society, 20(3), 354–381
37.
KibriaN. (1990). Power, patriarchy and gender conflict in the Vietnamese immigrant community. Gender & Society, 4(9–24), 431–444.
38.
KimmelM.BesenY. (Eds). (2008). The Jessie Bernard reader. Paradigm Publishers.
39.
KingL.Harrington-MeyerM. (1997). The politics of reproductive benefits: U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments, Gender and Society, 11(1), 8–30.
40.
Kiter EdwardsM. L. (2004). We’re decent people: Constructing and managing family identity in rural working-class families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 515–529.
41.
KohlerJ. (2001). The anticipated consequences of covenant marriage laws for women: Understanding women’s perspective (Unpublished manuscript).
42.
LaRossaR. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 837–857.
43.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. Routledge.
44.
Lipman-BlumenJ. (1988). Jessie Bernard: A “reasonable rebel” speaks to the world. Gender & Society, 2(3), 271–273.
45.
LloydS.FewA.AllenK. (2009). Preface. In LloydS.FewA.AllenK. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. vii–ix). SAGE Publications.
46.
MatthewsS. (2005). Crafting qualitative research articles on marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 799–808.
47.
OswaldR. F. (2000). A member of the wedding? Heterosexism and family rituals. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(3), 349–368.
48.
PfefferC. A. (2010). “Women’s work”? Women partners of transgender men doing housework and emotion work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72I(1), 165–183.
49.
PykeK. D. (1996). Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power. Gender and Society, 10(5), 527–549.
50.
RandlesJ. (2016). Redefining the marital power struggle through relationship skills: How U.S. marriage education programs challenge and reproduce gender inequality. Gender & Society, 30(2), 240–264.
51.
RobyP. A. (2004). Jessie Bernard. In WareS. (Ed.). Notable American women: A biographical dictionary (pp. 51–53). Harvard University Press.
SharpE. A.BlumeL. (2016). Feminist perspectives on families. ShehanConstance (Ed.), The encyclopedia of family studies. Wiley Blackwell.
54.
SharpE. A.WeaverS. (2015). Feeling like feminist frauds: Theorizing feminist accountability in feminist family studies research in a neoliberal, postfesminist context. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 299–320.
55.
Skilken-CatlettB.McKenryP. C. (1996). Implications of feminist scholarship for the study of women’s post-divorce economic disadvantage. Family Relations, 45(1), 91–97.
56.
SollieD. L.LeslieL. A. (1994). Feminist journeys: Final reflections. In SollieD. L.LeslieL. A. (Eds.), Gender, families, and close relationships: Feminist research journeys (pp. 263–283). SAGE Publications.
57.
StaceyJ. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women Studies International Forum, 11, 21–27.
58.
ThompsonL.WalkerA. (1995). The place of feminism in family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(4), 847–865.
59.
WalkerA. (2009). A feminist critique of family studies. In LloydS.FewA.AllenK. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 18–27). SAGE Puiblications.
60.
WalkerA.ThompsonL. (1984). Feminism and family studies. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 545-570.
YavorskyJ. E.DushC. M. K.Schoppe-SullivanS. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679.
63.
YouH. K.McGrawL. A. (2011). The intersection of motherhood and disability: Being a ‘good’ Korean mother to an ‘imperfect’ child. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(4), 579-598.
64.
YlloK. (1994). Reflections of a feminist family violence researcher. In SollieD. L.LeslieL. A. (Eds.), Gender, families, and close relationships: Feminist research journeys (pp. 213–235). SAGE Publications.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
