Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Participation in phenomenology-based ethnography is about involvement and “doing-it-yourself,” which generates data derived from immediate experience that can contribute to the reconstruction of the internal viewpoint by uncovering the essence of a phenomenon. This phenomenological orientation is the main focus of interest of the present paper. Based on reflections on the ethnographer as a participant who voluntarily assumes the role of the stranger, we demonstrate how observation can be supplemented with participation. We exemplify it with an ongoing research project on the deployment of a so-called social robot in dementia care. Our aim is to show that a subjective perspective, which does not claim to be superior but rather to be of value in its own right, increases the knowledge yield.

Keywords

phenomenology-based ethnography life-world-analytical ethnography phenomenological method observant participation ethnographer as stranger technology social robots artificial companions dementia care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar

1980. The Professional Stranger. An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. Bradford, UK: Emerald Group.

Atkinson

Hammersley

2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York: Routledge.

Boellstorff

Nardi

Pearce

Taylor

T. L.

2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Breidenstein

Hirschauer

Kalthoff

Nieswand

2013. Ethnographie. Die Praxis der Feldforschung. Konstanz: UVK.

Burzan

2010. “Zur Debatte um die Verknüpfung qualitativer und quantitativer Sozialforschung.” In Fragile Sozialität, edited by Honer

Meuser

Pfadenhauer

, 93–102. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Christmann

2007. Robert E. Park. Konstanz: UVK.

Dellwing

Prus

2012. Einführung in die interaktionistische Ethnografie. Soziologie im Außendienst. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Denscombe

2003. The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Research Projects. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Fine

G. A.

1979. “Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams.” American Sociological Review 44:733–45.

10.

Freilich

1970. Marginal Natives: Anthropologists at Work. New York: Harper and Row.

11.

Goffman

(1974) 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

12.

Göttlich

Sebald

Weyland

2011. “Editorischer Bericht zu Schütz’ Fremden.” In Alfred Schütz Werkausgabe Band IV2, Relevanz und Handeln 2, edited by Göttlich

Sebald

Weyand

, 55–58. Konstanz: UVK.

13.

Gold

1958. “Roles in Sociological Field Observation.” Social Forces 36:217–23.

14.

Häussling

2010. “Zum Design(begriff) der Netzwerkgesellschaft. Design als zentrales Element der Identitätsformation in Netzwerken.” In Relationale Soziologie. Zur kulturellen Wende der Netzwerkforschung, edited by Fuhse

Mützel

, 137–62. Wiesbaden: VS.

15.

Hitzler

1986. “Die Attitüde der künstlichen Dummheit. Zum Verhältnis von Soziologie und Alltag.” Sozialwissenschaftliche Informationen (SOWI) 15:53–59.

16.

Hitzler

2000. “Die Erkundung des Feldes und die Deutung der Daten. Annäherungen an die (lebensweltliche) Ethnographie.” In Ethnographische Methoden in der Jugendarbeit. Zugänge, Anregungen und Praxisbeispiele, edited by Lindner

, 17–31. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

17.

Hitzler

2012. “Am Ende der Welt? Zur Frage des Erlebens eines Menschen im Wachkoma.” In Lebenswelt und Ethnographie, edited by Schröer

Hinnenkamp

Kreher

Poferl

, 355–66. Essen: Oldib.

18.

Honer

1993. Lebensweltliche Ethnographie. Wiesbaden: DUV.

19.

Ihde

1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

20.

Jerolmack

Khan

2014. “Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy.” Sociological Methods & Research 43:178–209.

21.

Junker

Buford

. 1960. Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Knoblauch

Schnettler

2009. “Konstruktivismus.” In Qualitative Marktforschung, edited by Buber

Holzmüller

, 127–35. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

23.

König

1965. “Praktische Sozialforschung.” In Das Interview (Praktische Sozialforschung I), edited by König

, 13–33. Cologne: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

24.

Lamont

2000. “Meaning Making in Cultural Sociology: Broadening our Agenda.” Contemporary Sociology 29 (4): 602–7.

25.

Lamont

Swidler

2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–71. http://scholar.harvard.edu/lamont/publications/praise-methodological-pluralism-methods-theory-debate.

26.

Levi-Strauss

(1962) 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

27.

Lindner

1990. Die Entdeckung der Stadtkultur. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

28.

Luckmann

1979. “Persönliche Identität, soziale Rolle und Rollendistanz.” In Identität, edited by Marquard

Stierle

, 109–20. Munich: Fink.

29.

Merz

2006. “The Topicality of the Difference Thesis. Revisiting Constructivism and the Laboratory.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, Special Issue 1:11–24.

30.

Moustakas

1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Park

R. E.

(1928) 1950. “Human Migration and the Marginal Man.” In The Collected Papers of Robert Ezra Park. Vol. I Race and Culture, edited by Hughes

E. C.

Johnson

C. S.

Masuoka

Redfield

Wirth

, 345–56. Glencoe IL: Free Press.

32.

Pfadenhauer

1999. “Rollenkompetenz. Träger, Spieler und Professionelle als Akteure für die hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie.” In Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie. Standpunkte zur Theorie der Interpretation, edited by Hitzler

Reichert

Schröer

, 267–85. Konstanz: UVK.

33.

Pfadenhauer

2003. “Wir V-Leute. Über das beiläufig Perfide beobachtender Teilnahme.” In Entstaatlichung und soziale Sicherheit. Verhandlungen des 31. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Leipzig Part 1 (CD-ROM), edited by Allmendinger

Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

34.

Pfadenhauer

2008. “Doing Phenomenology: Aufgrund welcher Merkmale bezeichnen wir ein Handeln als kompetentes Organisieren?” In Phänomenologie und Soziologie. Positionen, Problemfelder, Analysen, edited by Raab

Pfadenhauer

Stegmaier

Dreher

Schnettler

, 339–48. Wiesbaden: VS.

35.

Pfadenhauer

2009. “At Eye-Level. The Expert Interview—A Talk between Expert and Quasi-Expert.” In Interviewing Experts, edited by Bogner

Littig

Menz

, 81–97. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

36.

Pfadenhauer

2014. “On the Sociality of Social Robots. A Sociology of Knowledge perspective.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 10 (1): 137–63.

37.

Pfadenhauer

2015. “The Contemporary Appeal of Artificial Companions. AC Technologies as Vehicles to Cultural Worlds of Experience.” The Information Society 31 (3).

38.

Pfadenhauer

Dukat

2015. “Robot Caregiver or Robot-Supported Caregiving? The Performative Deployment of the Social Robot PARO in Dementia Care.” International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (3): 393-406.

39.

Pfadenhauer

Dukat

Forthcoming. “Professionalisierung lebensweltlicher Krisen durch Technik? Zur Betreuung demenziell erkrankter Personen mittels sozial assistiver Robotik.” In Routinen der Krise – Krisen der Routine. Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Trier 2014, edited by Lessenich

40.

Rehberg

K.-S.

2008. “Soziologie als ‘Wirklichkeitswissenschaft’ jenseits von Naturalismus und Virtualitätseuphorie: Eröffnungsvortrag des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie.” In Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006, edited by Rehberg

K.-S.

, 23–41. Frankfurt: Campus.

41.

Röhl

2013. Dinge des Wissens. Schulunterricht als sozio-materielle Praxis. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

42.

Scholtz

C. P.

2008. Alltag mit künstlichen Wesen. Theologische Implikationen eines Lebens mit subjektsimulierenden Maschinen am Beispiel des Unterhaltungsroboters Aibo. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

43.

Schutz

Alfred

. (1942) 1976. “The Stranger.” In Alfred Schutz Collected Papers II, edited by Brodersen

, 91–105. The Hague: Nijhoff.

44.

Stonequist

E. V.

(1937) 1961. The Marginal Man. New York: Russell & Russell.

45.

Swidler

1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–86.

46.

Turkle

1984. The Second Self. New York: Simon & Schuster.

47.

Turkle

2006. “A Nascent Robotics Culture. New Complicities for Companionship.” AAAI Technical Report Series, July 2006.

48.

Turkle

2011. Alone Together. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

49.

Watkins

S. C.

Swidler

2009. “Hearsay Ethnography: Conversational Journals as a Method for Studying Culture in Action.” Poetics 37:162–84.

Uncovering the Essence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References