Responsibilization has been seen as a major technique for society’s governing of troublesome youth, yet few previous studies have investigated responsibilization in practice. This article explores a behavior modification program at a youth detention home, specifically how involved self-assessment practices can be conceptualized as a responsibilization strategy (aimed at producing free and self-governing subjects). The study documents and explicates this complex discursive setting, where responsibilization practices are combined with rigorous control. Drawing on video-ethnographic methods, the analyses explore how responsibilization is attempted and resisted in interaction. Institutional rules and manuals were used by residents both to enact resistance and to position themselves as responsibilized, in which self-assessment practices make out a kind of technology of the self (Foucault). Further, the study concludes that both staff and residents at times strategically positioned residents as children, something that ultimately could be conceptualized as both parties jointly enacting resistance in response to the dilemmatic discursive setting.
AnderssonKjerstin. 2008. Talking Violence, Constructing Identity: Young Men in Institutional Care. Ph.D. dissertation, Tema Institute, Linköping University.
2.
AntakiCharles. 2013. “Recipient-side Test Questions.” Discourse Studies15 (1): 3–18.
3.
AronssonKarinGottzénLucas. 2011. “Generational Positions at a Family Dinner: Food Morality and Social Order.” Language in Society40 (4): 405–26.
4.
BengtssonTea. 2012. “Boredom and Action: Experiences from Youth Confinement.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography41 (5): 526–53.
5.
BilligMichael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
6.
BosworthMaryCarrabineEamonn. 2001. “Reassessing Resistance Race, Gender and Sexuality in Prison.” Punishment & Society3 (4): 501–15.
7.
CesaroniCarlaAlviShahid. 2010. “Masculinity and Resistance in Adolescent Carceral Settings.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice52 (3): 303–20.
8.
CoxAlexandra. 2011. “Doing the Programme or Doing Me? The Pains of Youth Imprisonment.” Punishment & Society13 (5): 592–610.
9.
CreweBen. 2007. “Power, Adaptation and Resistance in a Late-Modern Men’s Prison.” British Journal of Criminology47 (2): 256–75.
10.
CromdalJakobOsvaldssonKarin. 2012. “Working towards Trouble: Some Categorical Resources for Accomplishing Disputes in a Correctional Youth Facility.” In Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People, edited by DanbyS.TheobaldM., 141–63. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
11.
DaviesBronwynHarréRom. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour20 (1): 43–63.
12.
DrewPaul. 1987. “Po-Faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics25:219–53.
13.
DurantiAlessandroOchsElinorSchieffelinBambi B.2012. The Handbook of Language Socialization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
FoucaultMichel. 1977. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
15.
FoucaultMichel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.
16.
FoucaultMichel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry8:777–95.
17.
FoucaultMichel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP., 73–86. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
18.
FoucaultMichel. 1997. “Technologies of the Self.” In Michel Foucault, The Essential Works 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, edited by RabinowP., 223–52. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.
19.
FoxKathryn J.1999. “Changing Violent Minds: Discursive Correction and Resistance in the Cognitive Treatment of Violent Offenders in Prison.” Social Problems46 (1): 88–103.
20.
FoxKathryn J.2001. “Self-Change and Resistance in Prison.” In Institutional Selves: Troubled Identities in a Postmodern World, edited by GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A., 176–92. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
GarlandDavid. 1997. “Governmentality and the Problem of Crime.” Theoretical Criminology1 (2): 173–215.
22.
GoffmanErving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
23.
GoodwinCharles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics32:1489–522.
24.
Gradin FranzénAnnaAronssonKarin. 2013. “Teasing, Laughing and Disciplinary Humor: Staff-Youth Interaction in Detention Home Treatment.” Discourse Studies15 (2): 167–83.
25.
GrayPatricia. 2009. “The Political Economy of Risk and the New Governance of Youth Crime.” Punishment & Society11 (4): 443–58.
26.
HepburnAlexaPotterJonathan. 2011. “Threats: Power, Family Mealtimes, and Social Influence.” British Journal of Social Psychology50:99–120.
27.
HicksAllison M.2012. “Learning to Watch Out: Prison Chaplains as Risk Managers.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography41 (6): 636–67.
28.
JeffersonGail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by LernerG. H., 13–31. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
29.
KazdinAllan E.1982. “The Token Economy: A Decade Later.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis15:431–45.
30.
KemshallHazel. 2002. “Effective Practice in Probation: An Example of ‘Advanced Liberal’ Responsibilisation?”Howard Journal of Criminal Justice41 (1): 41–58.
31.
KivettDouglasWarrenCarol A. B.2002. “Social Control in a Group Home for Delinquent Boys.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography31:3–32.
32.
KoshikIrene. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction3 (5): 277–309.
33.
KotthoffHelga. 2009. “An Interactional Approach to Irony Development.” In:Humor in Interaction, edited by NorrickN. R.ChiaroD., 49–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
LevinClaes. 1996. Barnen mellan straff och behandling [The children between punishment and treatment]. In Vård av ungdomar med sociala problem—en forskningsöversikt, edited by ArmeliusB-Å.. eds. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse and Liber.
35.
MillerGaleFoxKathryn J.2004. “Building Bridges: The Possibilities of Analytic Dialogue between Ethnography, CA and Foucault.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by SilvermanD., 33–55. London: Sage.
36.
MuncieJohn. 2006. “Governing Young People: Coherence and Contradiction in Contemporary Youth Justice.” Critical Social Policy26 (4): 770–93.
37.
OchsElinor. 1992. “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by DurantiA.GoodwinC., 335-358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
PeräkyläAnssi. 2004. “Reliability and Validity in Research Based on Naturally Occurring Social Interaction.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by SilvermanD., 201–20. London: Sage.
39.
PhoenixJoKellyLaura. 2013. “‘You Have to Do It for Yourself’: Responsibilization in Youth Justice and Young Peoples Situated Knowledge of Youth Practice.” British Journal of Criminology53:419–37.
40.
PotterJonathan. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
41.
RoseNikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RoseNikolas. 2000. “Government and Control.” British Journal of Criminology40:321–39.
43.
SchwabAvi-Yona M.2008. Does Graduation from a Token Economy Predict Long-Term Outcomes of a Residential Treatment Program? Ph.D. thesis, The State University of New Jersey.
44.
TaylorStephanie. 2001. “Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Research.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. J., 5–48. London: Sage.
45.
WästerforsDavid. 2011. “Disputes and Going Concerns in an Institution for ‘Troublesome’ Boys.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography40 (1): 39–70.
46.
WetherellMargaret. 1998. “Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue.” Discourse and Society9 (3): 387–412.
47.
WetherellMargaret. 2007. “A Step Too Far: Discursive Psychology, Linguistic Ethnography and Questions of Identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics11 (5): 661–81.
