Because families are primary venues for self construction, they are also common sites of identity disruption, loss, and inner turmoil. Sociologists have a long tradition of studying the personal effects of troublesome family circumstances such as separation or divorce, illness, and death. However, scholars of these topics contribute to separate lines of research and rarely build on one another’s work. Drawing from interviews with middle-class parents whose children suffered from a range of problems, this article introduces “family trouble” as a concept that captures the similar social psychological elements of disruptive family events. On a broader level, the article highlights the relationship between the disruption of social order and the disruption of selves.
AdlerPatricia A.AdlerPeter. 2006. The deviance society. Deviant Behavior27: 129-48.
2.
ArendellTeresa. 1986. Mothers and Divorce. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
ArendellTeresa. 1995. Fathers and Divorce. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BergerPeter L.1963. Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Anchor Books.
5.
BergerPeter L.1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
6.
BergerPeter L.KellnerHansfried. 1964. Marriage and the Construction of Reality: A Contribution to the Microsociology of Knowledge. Diogenes12: 1-24.
7.
BestJoel. 2004. DevianceMayBe Alive, But Is It Intellectually Lively? A Reaction to Goode. Deviant Behavior25: 483-92.
8.
BianchiSuzanne M.2000. Maternal Employment and Time with Children: Dramatic Change or Surprising Continuity?Demography37: 401-14.
9.
BirenbaumArnold. 1970. On Managing Courtesy Stigma. Journal of Health and Social Behavior11: 196-206.
10.
BlumerHerbert. 1969. Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
BlumsteinPhilip. 1991. The Production of Selves in Personal Relationships. In The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action, edited by HowardJudith A.CalleroPeter L., 305-22. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BurgessErnest. 1926. The Family as a Unity of Interacting Personalities. The Family7: 3-9.
13.
ButlerJudith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
14.
CahillSpencer E.1987. Children and Civility: Ceremonial Deviance and the Acquisition of Ritual Competence. Social Psychology Quarterly50: 312-21.
15.
CastAlicia D.2004. Well-being and the Transition to Parenthood: An Identity Theory Approach. Sociological Perspectives47: 55-78.
16.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
CharmazKathyMitchellRichard G.2001. Grounded Theory in Ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by AtkinsonPaulCoffeyAmandaDelamontSaraLoflandJohnLoflandLyn, 160-72. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
ChealDavid. 1993. Unity and Difference in Postmodern Families. Journal of Family Issues14: 5-19.
19.
CollettJessica. 2005. What Kind of Mother Am I?Symbolic Interaction28: 327-47.
20.
ColtraneScott. 1997. Family Man. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
DavisFred. 1963. Passage through Crisis. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
22.
DouglasSusanMeredithMichaels. 2004. The Mommy Myth. New York: Free Press.
23.
EmersonRobert M.2008. Responding to Roommate Troubles: Reconsidering Informal Dyadic Control. Law & Society Review42: 483-512.
24.
EmersonRobert M.2009. Ethnography, Interaction and Ordinary Trouble. Ethnography10: 535-48.
25.
EmersonRobert M.2011. From Normal Conflict to Normative Deviance: The Micro-Politics of Trouble in Close Relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography40: 3-38.
26.
EmersonRobert M.MessingerSheldon L.1977. The Micro-Politics of Trouble. Social Problems25: 121-35.
27.
EricksonRebecca J.2003. The Familial Institution. In Handbook of Symbolic Interaction, edited by ReynoldsLarry T.Herman-KinneyNancy J., 511-38. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
28.
GauthierAnne H.SmeedengTimothy M.FurstenbergFrank F.2004. Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children? Trends in Selected Industrialized Countries. Population and Development Review30: 647-71.
29.
GiddensAnthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
GoffmanErving. 1971. The Insanity of Place. In Relations in Public: Micro Studies of the Public Order, 335-90. New York: Basic Books.
31.
GoodeErich. 2004. Is the Sociology of Deviance Still Relevant?American Sociologist35: 46-57.
32.
GrayDavid. 2002. “Everybody Just Freezes. Everybody Is Just Embarrassed”: Felt and Enacted Stigma among Parents of Children with High Functioning Autism. Sociology of Health and Illness24: 734-49.
33.
GrossHarriet Engel. 1980. Couples Who Live Apart: Time/Place Disjunctions and Their Consequences. Symbolic Interaction3: 69-82.
34.
HarryBeth. 1992. Making Sense of Disability: Low-Income, Puerto Rican Parents’ Theories of the Problem. Exceptional Children59: 27-40.
35.
HaysSharon. 1996. Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
HewittJohn P.ShulmanDavid. 2010. Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology, 11th edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
HorwitzAllan V.WakefieldJerome C.2007. The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
HughesEverett C.1945. Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status. American Journal of Sociology50: 353-59.
39.
JeffersonGail. 1980. On “Trouble-Premonitory” Response to Inquiry. Sociological Inquiry50: 153-85.
40.
KalmijnMatthijs. 2003. Shared Friendship Networks and the Life Course: An Analysis of Survey Data on Married and Cohabiting Couples. Social Networks25: 231-49.
41.
KalmijnMatthijsBernascoWim. 2001. Joint and Separated Lifestyles in Couple Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family63: 639-54.
42.
KarpDavid. 2001. The Burden of Sympathy: How Families Cope with Mental Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
LoflandJohnSnowDavidAndersonLeonLoflandLyn H.2006. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
LopataHelena Znaniecka. 1973. Widowhood in an American City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc.
46.
LopataHelena Znaniecka. 1996. Current Widowhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
McCallGeorge J.SimmonsJ. L.1966. Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.
48.
MeadGeorge Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
NewmanKatherine S.1988. Falling from Grace: Downward Mobility in the Age of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
PleckJoseph1987. American Fathering in Historical Perspective. In Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity, edited by KimmellMichael S.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
PowersElizabeth. 2001. New Estimates of the Impact of Child Disability on Maternal Employment. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings91: 135-39.
53.
RiessmanCatherine Kohler. 1990. Divorce Talk: Women and Men Make Sense of Personal Relationships. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
54.
RossCatherine E.1995. Reconceptualizing Marital Status as a Continuum of Social Attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family57: 129-40.
55.
RubinLillian B.1994. Families on the Fault Line. New York: Harper Collins.
56.
SayerLiana C.BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.2004. Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with Children. American Journal of Sociology110: 1-43.
57.
ShaffirWilliamKleinknechtSteven. 2005. Death at the Polls: Experiencing and Coping with Political Defeat. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography34: 707-38.
58.
SinghIlina. 2003. Boys Will Be Boys: Fathers’ Perspectives on ADHD Symptoms, Diagnosis and Drug Treatment. Harvard Review of Psychiatry11 (6): 308-16.
59.
StrykerSheldon. 2002. Traditional Symbolic Interactionism, Role Theory, and Structural Symbolic Interactionism: The Road to Identity Theory. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by TurnerJonathan H., 211-33. New York: Springer.
60.
StrykerSheldonBurkePeter J.2000. The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly63: 284-97.
61.
ThurerShari L.1994. The Myths of Motherhood: How Culture Reinvents the Good Mother. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
62.
UmbersonDebra. 2003. Death of a Parent: Transition to a New Adult Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63.
UmbersonDebraChenMeichu D.1994. Effects of a Parent's Death on Adult Children: Relationship Salience and Reaction to Loss. American Sociological Review59: 152-68.
64.
UmbersonDebraTerlingToni. 1997. The Symbolic Meaning of Relationships: Implications for Psychological Distress Following Relationship Loss. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships14: 723-44.
65.
VaughanDiane. 1986. Uncoupling. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
WallerWillard. 1930. The Old Love and the New. New York: Horace Liveright.
67.
WeigertAndrew J.HastingsRoss. 1977. Identity Loss, Family, and Social Change. American Journal of Sociology82: 1171-85.
68.
WeissmanMyrnaPaykelEugene S.1973. Moving and Depression in Women. In Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation, edited by WeissRobert S., 154-64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
WilsonSarah. 2007. “When you have children, you’re obliged to live”: motherhod, chronic illness, and biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness29: 610-26.
70.
ZerubavelEviatar. 1981. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
